Przejdź do treści
Analiza i Egzystencja
61 (2023)
OpenAlex

Dla całego czasopisma, według OpenAlex.

Cytowania
196
Publikacje
300
H-index
6
I10-index
2
Średnia cytowań (2 lata)
0,14
Cytowania w poszczególnych latach
Wykres cytowań czasopisma. Dokładne wartości są dostępne w tabeli poniżej. 2017: 0 2018: 12 2019: 6 2020: 13 2021: 25 2022: 23 2023: 16 2024: 33 2025: 36 2026: 30 2017 2026
Pokaż dane w tabeli
Cytowania w poszczególnych latach
RokPublikacjeCytowania
2017250
20182312
2019236
20202013
20212125
20222623
20232516
20242633
20252536
20262030

Dane pobrane:

Co oznaczają te liczby?

Publikacje i cytowania obejmują rekordy powiązane z tym czasopismem w OpenAlex. H-index to największa liczba h publikacji mających co najmniej h cytowań. I10-index to liczba publikacji cytowanych co najmniej 10 razy. Wykres przedstawia cytowania otrzymane w danym roku; bieżący rok jest niepełny. Zakres bazy może różnić się od WNUS i innych serwisów.

Średnia z 2 lat jest wskaźnikiem OpenAlex. Nie jest to Journal Impact Factor firmy Clarivate.

Zobacz w OpenAlex (nowa karta)
Google Scholar

The Relationship between the Globalization of Human Rights and the Territorial Protection of Civil Rights

DOI: 10.18276/aie.2023.61-02
Cytuj

Pełny tekst jest dostępny

Abstrakt

The main aim of the article is to show that axiological and anthropological dimensions of human rights in the globalized world do not fit together. Such tension – between universally understood human rights and territorially perceived citizens’ rights – is unavoidable. By making the term “human” strictly biological people are being perceived not as members of a particular community but as members of the species. In the political paradigm these collectivities are distinguished by political rules, in the biological paradigm they are perceived as natural. In this situation, from political perspective the life of the others (non-citizens) in effect ceases to be treated as a human life or as a life associated with any ethical requirements, because the normative dimension that metaphysics, religion or politics give to the notion of being human has been excluded. Hence, human rights cannot be enforced with the same effectiveness as the laws enforced in the area of state jurisdiction. They constitute an ethical norm by which the international community judges a given procedure, rather than an enforceable legal norm. In order to justify my reasoning, I will refer to the two philosophically important categories - space and border – that play an important role in understanding the processes of globalization that affect the legitimation and enforcement of human rights.
Podgląd PDF

Otwórz PDF

Bibliografia (28)
  1. Agamben, G. (1998). Homo Sacer: Sovereign Power and Bare Life. Trans. D. Heller-Roazer. Stanford: Stanford University Press.
  2. Arendt, H. (1962). The Origins of Totalitarianism. Cleveland and New York: The World Publishing Company.
  3. Aristotle. (2013). Politics.Trans. C. Lord. Chicago and London: Chicago University Press.
  4. Baudrillard, J. (1996). The System of Objects. London: Verso.
  5. Castells, M. (1996). The Rise of the Network Society. The Information Age: Economy, Society and Culture. Vol. I. Oxford: Blackwell.
  6. Donelly, J. (2003). Universal Human Rights in Theory and Practice, 2nd edition. Ithaca NY: Cornell University Press.
  7. Fabre, C. (2016). Cosmopolitan Peace. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
  8. Finnis, J. (1983). The Fundamentals of Ethics. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
  9. Freeman, M. (2004). Human Rights: An Interdisciplinary Approach. Cambridge: Polity Press, Blackwell.
  10. Giddens, A. (2003). Runaway World. How Globalization is Reshaping Our Lives. Routledge.
  11. Habermas, J. (2001). The Post-National Constellation. Ed. Max Pensky. Cambridge MA: MIT Press.
  12. Held, D. (2000). Regulating Globalisation? Reinvention of Politics. International Sociology 15 (2), 394–408.
  13. Kant, I. (2006). Groudwork of the Metaphysics of Morals (11th ed.). Trans. M. J. Gregor. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
  14. Khosrokhavar, F. (2014). Radicalisation. Paris. Maison des Sciences de l'Homme.
  15. Lyotard, J.F. (1997). Kondycja ponowoczesna. Aletheia.
  16. Markiewicz B., Nogal, A., Gawin, M., Wonicki, R. (2016). Human and Citizens Rights in a Globalized World. Warsaw. Center for Philosophical Research.
  17. McAuliffe, M., Khadri, B. (ed.). World Migration Report 2020. Retrieved from: https://publications.iom.int/system/files/pdf/wmr_2020.pdf (12.05.2021).
  18. Montesquieu, Ch. (1899). The Spirit of Laws. New York: The Colonial Press.
  19. Osiatyński, W. (2009). Human Rights and Their Limits. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
  20. Pogge, Th. (1992). Cosmopolitanism and Sovereignty. Ethics103 (1), 48–73.
  21. Polanyi, K. (2001). The Great Transformation. The Political and Economic Origins of Our Times. Boston: Beacon Press.
  22. Robertson, R. (1992). Globalization: Social Theory and Global Culture. London: Sage.
  23. Scholte, J.A. (2005). Globalization: A Critical Introduction. 2nd Edition. New York: Palgrave Macmillan.
  24. The Declaration of Human and Civic Rights. Retrived from: http://www.conseil-constitutionnel.fr/conseil-constitutionnel/root/bank_mm/anglais/cst2.pdf (07.04.2021).
  25. Valentini, L. (2011). Justice in a Globalized World. A Normative Framework. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
  26. Wilson, E. (1975). Sociobiology. The New Synthesis. Harvard University Press.
  27. Wnuk-Lipiński, E. (2004). Świat międzyepoki. Globalizacja. Demokracja. Państwo narodowe. Kraków. Znak.
  28. Yongding ,Yu. (2018). A Trade War That Is Unwar¬ranted. China and World Economy 26 (5), 38–61.