Zum Inhalt springen
Analiza i Egzystencja
60 (2022)
OpenAlex

Daten beziehen sich auf diesen Artikel oder dieses Kapitel.

Datensatz in der Datenbank gefunden

Zitate
1
Literaturangaben
37
Zitate nach Jahren
JahrZitate
20261

Daten abgerufen:

Quelle ansehen (neuer Tab)

Für die gesamte Zeitschrift, laut OpenAlex.

Zitate
215
Publikationen
300
H-index
6
I10-index
2
Mittlere Zitierhäufigkeit (2 Jahre)
0,14
Erhaltene Zitate nach Jahr
Diagramm der Zeitschriftenzitate. Die genauen Werte stehen in der Tabelle darunter. 2017: 1 2018: 12 2019: 6 2020: 14 2021: 25 2022: 23 2023: 19 2024: 39 2025: 40 2026: 34 2017 2026
Datentabelle anzeigen
Erhaltene Zitate nach Jahr
JahrPublikationenZitate
2017251
20182312
2019236
20202014
20212125
20222623
20232519
20242639
20252540
20262034

Daten abgerufen:

Was bedeuten diese Zahlen?

Publikationen und Zitate umfassen die dieser Zeitschrift zugeordneten OpenAlex-Datensätze. Der H-Index ist die größte Anzahl h von Publikationen mit jeweils mindestens h Zitaten. Der I10-Index zählt Publikationen mit mindestens 10 Zitaten. Das Diagramm zeigt die in einem Jahr erhaltenen Zitate; das laufende Jahr ist unvollständig. Die Abdeckung kann von WNUS und anderen Diensten abweichen.

Der Zweijahresdurchschnitt ist eine OpenAlex-Kennzahl und nicht der Journal Impact Factor von Clarivate.

In OpenAlex ansehen (neuer Tab)
OpenCitations

Daten beziehen sich auf diesen Artikel oder dieses Kapitel.

Zitate
0

Daten abgerufen:

Quelle ansehen (neuer Tab)
DOAJ

Daten beziehen sich auf diesen Artikel oder dieses Kapitel.

Datensatz in der Datenbank gefunden

Daten abgerufen:

Quelle ansehen (neuer Tab)
Google Scholar
In Google Scholar suchen (neuer Tab)

The interdisciplinary problem: an analysis


(Problem interdyscyplinarny. Analiza)
DOI: 10.18276/aie.2022.60-02
Zitieren

Der Volltext ist verfügbar

ISSN:1734-9923
eISSN:2300-7621
Autoren: Monika Walczak ORCID
Katolicki Uniwersytet Lubelski Jana Pawła II
Schlüsselbegriffe: interdyscyplinarność problem pytanie problem interdyscyplinarny pytanie interdyscyplinarne
Erscheinungsdatum der Ausgabe / Monografie:2022
Seitenanzahl:22 (21-42)
OAI-PMH:Metadaten
CC BY-SA Open Access DOAJ ERIH PLUS Scopus Diamond Discovery Hub
QR-Code

Abstract

The purpose of this paper is to analyze the concept of the interdisciplinary problem using the categories of the logic of questions. The problem is seen in a logical and epistemic sense: the problem is a meaning of the question, and the question is a formulation of the problem in a particular language. Demonstrating that the interdisciplinarity of an interdisciplinary problem is understood in terms of a particular kind of complexity, I indicate the places where it is realized in the structure of the problem-question, in the problem’s solution-answer to the question, and in the cognitive context of the problem solving - answering to the question. The paper also displays how an interdisciplinary problem is situated within the broader structure of an interdisciplinary research process. Thus, the paper provides not only a metatheoretical characterization of the interdisciplinary problem but also a general methodological tool for analyzing particular interdisciplinary problems.

PDF

PDF herunterladen
PDF-Vorschau

PDF öffnen

Bibliographie (41)
  1. Ajdukiewicz, Kazimierz. (1965) Logika pragmatyczna. Warszawa: Państwowe Wydawnictwo Naukowe.
  2. Ajdukiewicz, Kazimierz. (1974) Pragmatic Logic. Translated by Wojtasiewicz, Olgierd. Dordrecht: Reidel.
  3. Ajdukiewicz, Kazimierz. (1985) ‘Zdania pytajne’. In Ajdukiewicz, Kazimierz. Język i poznanie, vol. 1 (Warszawa: PWN), 278-286.
  4. An Introduction to Interdisciplinary Research. Theory and Practice, Edited by Menken, Steph, and Keestra, Machiel. (2016). Amsterdam: Amsterdam University Press.
  5. Brożek, Anna. (2007) Pytania i odpowiedzi. Warszawa: Wydawnictwo Semper.
  6. Chettiparamb, Angelique. (2007) Interdisciplinarity: A Literature Review. https://www.llas.ac.uk/resources/3219 (accessed January 2, 2015).
  7. Cross, Charles, and Roelofsen, Floris. (2020) ‘Questions’. In Zalta, Edward N. (ed.), The Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy. (https://plato.stanford.edu/archives/fall2020/entries/questions (accessed February 21, 2021).
  8. Doroszewski, Jan. (2001) ‘Pojęcie problemu w nauce i działalności praktycznej’. Studia Semiotyczne, 23, 39-152.
  9. Harrah, David. (1998) ‘Questions’. In Craig, Edward (ed.), The Routledge Encyclopedia of Philosophy, vol. 8 (London: Routledge), 2-3.
  10. Hanks, Peter W. (2005) ‘Questions’. In Borchert, Donald M. (ed.), The Encyclopedia of Philosophy, Appendix, vol. 10, Second Edition (Detroit: Thomson Gale), 32-37.
  11. Hirsch-Hardon, Gertrude, Pohl, Christian, and Bammer, Gabriele. (2010) ‘Solving Problems through Transdisciplinary Research’. In Frodeman, Robert, Klein, Julie Thompson, and Mitcham, Carl (eds.), The Oxford Handbook of Interdisciplinarity, First Edition (Oxford: Oxford University Press), 431-452.
  12. Hursh, Barbara, Haas, Paul, and Moore, Michael. (1983) ‘An interdisciplinary model to implement general education’. Journal of Higher Education, 54(1), 42-59.
  13. Klein, Julie Thompson. (1990) Interdisciplinarity: History, Theory and Practice. Detroit: Wayne State University Press.
  14. Klein, Julie Thompson. (2010) ‘A Taxonomy of Interdisciplinarity’. In Frodeman, Robert, Klein, Julie Thompson, and Mitcham, Carl (eds.), The Oxford Handbook of Interdisciplinarity, First Edition (Oxford: Oxford University Press), 15-30.
  15. Kubiński, Tadeusz. (1970) Wstęp do logicznej teorii pytań. Warszawa: Państwowe Wydawnictwo Naukowe.
  16. Kuhn, Thomas S. (1962) The Structure of Scientific Revolutions. Chicago: The Chicago University Press.
  17. Kuhn, Thomas S. (1970) ‘Postscript-1969’. In Thomas S. Kuhn, The Structure of Scientific Revolutions, Second Edition (Chicago: The Chicago University Press), 174-210.
  18. Kuhn, Thomas S. (2001) ‘Postscriptum (1969)’. Translated by Nowotniak, Justyna. In Kuhn, Thomas S., Struktura rewolucji naukowych (Warszawa: Fundacja Aletheia), 301-360.
  19. Lakatos, Imre. (1968) ‘Criticism and the Methodology of Scientific Research Programmes’. Proceedings of the Aristotelian Society, 69, 149-186.
  20. Lakatos, Imre. (1970) ‘Falsification and the Methodology of Scientific Research Programmes’ In Lakatos, Imre, and Musgrave, Alan (eds.), Criticism and the Growth of Knowledge (Cambridge: The Cambridge University Press), 91-196.
  21. Laudan, Larry. (1977) Progress and Its Problems. Towards a Theory of Scientific Growth. London, Berkeley: University of California Press.
  22. Mayers, Christopher, and Haynes, Carolyn. (2002) ‘Transforming undegraduate science through interdisciplinary inquiry’. In Haynes, Carolyn (ed.), Innovations in interdisciplinary teaching (Phoenix, AZ: American Council on Education/ The Oryx Press), 179-197.
  23. Newell, William H. (2001) ‘A Theory of Interdisciplinary Studies’. Issues in Integrative Studies, 19, 1-25.
  24. Pelc, Jerzy. (1991) ‘O poznawczej roli pytań’. In Pelc, Jerzy (ed.), Prace z pragmatyki, semantyki i metodologii semiotyki (Wrocław: Ossolineum), 287-302.
  25. Poczobut, Robert. (2012) ‘Interdyscyplinarność i pojęcia pokrewne’. In Chmielewski, Adam, Dudzikowa, Maria, and Grobler, Adam (eds), Interdyscyplinarnie o interdyscyplinarności. Między ideą a praktyką (Kraków: Impuls), 39-61.
  26. Repko, Allen F. (2006) ‘Disciplining Intedisciplinarity: The Case for Textbooks’. Issues in Integrative Studies, 24, 112-142.
  27. Repko, Allen F. (2008) Interdisciplinary Research: Process and Theory, First Edition, Los Angeles: Sage Publications Inc.
  28. Repko Allen F. and Szostak, Rick. (2020) Interdisciplinary Research: Process and Theory, Fourth Edition, Los Angeles: Sage Publications Inc.
  29. Searle, John. (1969) Speech Acts, Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
  30. Searle, John. (1979) Expression and Meaning. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
  31. Skarga, Barbara. (1989) Granice historyczności. Warszawa: IFiS PAN.
  32. Szostak, Rick. (2002) ‘How to Do Interdisciplinarity: Integrating the Debate’. Issues in Integrative Studies, 20, 103-122.
  33. Terpstra, Jennifer L., Best, Allan, Abrams, David B., and Moor, Gress. (2010) ‘Health Sciences and Health Services’. In Frodeman, Robert, Klein, Julie Thompson, and Mitcham, Carl (eds.), The Oxford Handbook of Interdisciplinarity, First Edition (Oxford: Oxford University Press), 508-521.
  34. Thagard, Paul. (2010) ‘Cognitive Science’. In Frodeman, Robert, Klein, Julie Thompson, and Mitcham, Carl (eds.), The Oxford Handbook of Interdisciplinarity, First Edition (Oxford: Oxford University Press), 234-245.
  35. The Encyclopedia of Philosophy. Edited by Edwards, Paul. (1967). First Edition, New York: The Macmillan Corporation and The Free Press; London: Collier -Macmillan Ltd.
  36. The Encyclopedia of Philosophy. Edited by Borchert, Donald M. (2005). Second Edition, Detroit: Thomson Gale.
  37. The Routledge Encyclopedia of Philosophy, Edited by Craig, Edward. (1998). London: Routledge.
  38. The Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy. Edited by Zalta, Edward N. (2020). https://stanford.library.sydney.edu.au/archives/fall2020/ (accessed February 21, 2021).
  39. Walczak, Monika. (2015) ‘Interdyscyplinarny charakter kulturoznawczego pojęcia kultury’. Człowiek i Społeczeństwo, 39, 135-152.
  40. Ziembiński, Zygmunt. (1976) Practical Logic, Translated by Ter-Oganian, Leon. Dordrecht: Springer.
  41. Ziembiński, Zygmunt. (1994) Logika praktyczna. Warszawa: Państwowe Wydawnictwo Naukowe.