Analiza i Egzystencja
How to Probe Sensory Substitution Experience? The Enactive Torch Studies
DOI: 10.18276/aie.2025.70-01
Zitieren
Der Volltext ist verfügbar
| ISSN: | 1734-9923 |
| eISSN: | 2300-7621 |
| Autoren: |
Magdalena
Reuter
University of the National Education Commission Weronika Kałwak
Jagiellonian University, Krakow Michał Sznajder Jagiellonian University, Krakow Michał Wierzchoń
Jagiellonian University, Krakow |
| Schlüsselbegriffe: | sensory substitution qualitative methods interviews quantitative methods experience |
| Erscheinungsdatum der Ausgabe / Monografie: | 2025-06-02 |
| Seitenanzahl: | 40 (5-44) |
| OAI-PMH: | Metadaten |
 
 
 
| |
Abstract
Sensory Substitution (SS) is a situation when information from one sensory modality is translated into another, such as, e.g., from vision to touch or hearing. This is possible thanks to sensory substitution devices, which include Colorophone, EyeMusic or Enactive Torch. Sensory Substitution Experience (SSE) has not yet been described successfully. There is an ongoing debate about what kind of expe- rience is associated with SS—is it similar to a substituted sense such as vision, or a substituting sense such as hearing or touch, or perhaps different senses or a completely new sense? Here we present three studies using visual-to-tactile Sen- sory Substitution Devices (SSDs) that aim to answer these questions. In the studies, we used the Enactive Torch device, which translates information about the dis- tance from the object into vibrations. The results from qualitative and quantitative methods show that SSE is based on, but not reduced to, visual and tactile qualities. Our participants reported experiences not only related to the substituting and substituted modalities, but also to other modalities such as echolocation, hearing, sense of space, sense of orientation or cross-modal experiences. The task required a method that was standardized enough to allow data generalization but also open- ended to capture the variability of SSE qualities and their dynamics. The studies allowed us to construct a standardized method combining a standardized environ- ment and qualitative and quantitative methods to study the SSE. We also provided guidelines for SSE interviews.
PDF-Vorschau
Bibliographie (25)
- Auvray, M., & Farina, M. (2014). Patrolling the boundaries of synaesthesia: A critical appraisal of transient and artificially-acquired forms of synesthetic experiences. In O. Deroy (Ed.), Sensory blendings: New essays on synaesthesia (pp. 19–40). Oxford University Press. https://doi.org/10.1093/ oso/9780199688289.003.0013
- Auvray, M., Hanneton, S., & O’Regan, J. K. (2007). Learning to perceive with a visuo-auditory substitution system: localisation and object recognition with ‘The Voice’. Perception, 36 (3), 416–430. https://doi.org/10.1068/p5631
- Auvray, M., & Myin, E. (2009). Perception with compensatory devices: from sensory substitution to sensorimotor extension. Cognitive Science, 33 (6), 1036–1058. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1551-6709.2009.01040.x
- Bach-y-Rita, P., Collins, C. C., Saunders, F. A., White, B., & Scadden, L. (1969). Vision substitution by tactile image projection. Nature, 221 (5184), 963–964.
- Bach-y-Rita, P. (1972). Brain mechanisms in sensory substitution. Academic Press.
- Bach-y-Rita, P. (1984). The relationship between motor processes and cognition in tactile vision substitution. In W. Prinz & A. F. Sanders (Eds), Cognition and motor processes (pp. 149–160). Springer.
- Bach-y-Rita, P. (1996). Substitution sensorielle et qualia. In J. Proust (Ed.), Perception et Intermodalité (pp. 81–100). Presses Universitaires de France. Reprinted in English translation in A. Noë & E. Thompson (2002, Eds.), Vision and mind: Selected readings in the Philosophy of perception. MIT Press.
- Block, N. (2003). Tactile sensation via spatial perception. Trends in cognitive sciences, 7 (7), 285–286. https://doi.org/10.1016/S1364-6613(03)00132-3 Deroy, O., & Auvray, M. (2012). Reading the world through the skin and ears: a new perspective on sensory substitution. Frontiers in Psychology, 3, 457. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2012.00457
- Deroy, O., & Auvray, M. (2015). Beyond vision: The vertical integration of sensory substitution devices. In D. Stokes, M. Matthen, & S. Biggs (Eds.), Perception and its modalities. Oxford University Press.
- Farina, M. (2013). Neither touch nor vision: sensory substitution as artificial synesthesia? Biology and Philosophy, 28 (4), 639–655. https://doi.org/10.1007/ s10539-013-9377-z
- Froese, T., McGann, M., Bigge, W., Spiers, A., & Seth, A. K. (2012). The enactive torch: a new tool for the science of perception. IEEE Transactions on Haptics, 5 (4), 365–375. https://doi.org/10.1109/TOH.2011.57
- Grice, H. P. (2011). Some remarks about the senses. In F. Macpherson (Ed.), The senses: Classic and contemporary philosophical perspectives (pp. 83–100). Oxford University Press.
- Hurley, S., & Noë, A. (2003). Neural plasticity and consciousness. Biology and Philosophy, 18 (1), 131–168. https://doi.org/10.1023/a:1023308401356
- Kałwak, W., Reuter, M., Łukowska, M., Majchrowicz, B., & Wierzchoń, M. (2018). Guidelines for quantitative and qualitative studies of sensory substitution experience. Adaptive Behavior, 26 (3), 111–127. https://doi.org/ 10.1177/1059712318771690
- Macpherson, F. (2011). Taxonomising the senses. Philosophical Studies, 153 (1), 123–142.
- Nagel, T. (1974). What is it like to be a bat? The Philosophical Review, 83 (4), 435–450. https://doi.org/10.2307/2183914
- Nagel, S. K., Carl, C., Kringe, T., Märtin, R., & König, P. (2005). Beyond sensory substitution – learning the sixth sense. Journal of Neural Engineering, 2 (4), R13–R26. https://doi.org/10.1088/1741-2560/2/4/R02
- Nanay, B. (2017). Sensory substitution and multimodal mental imagery. Perception, 46 (9), 1014–1026. https://doi.org/10.1177/0301006617699225
- Petitmengin, C. (2006). Describing one’s subjective experience in the second person: An interview method for the science of consciousness. Phenomenology and the Cognitive Sciences, 5 (3), 229–269.
- Petitmengin, C., & Bitbol, M. (2009). Listening from within. Journal of Consciousness Studies, 16 (10-1), 363–404.
- Poirier, C., De Volder, A. G., & Scheiber, C. (2007). What neuroimaging tells us about sensory substitution. Neuroscience & Biobehavioral Reviews, 31 (7), 1064–1070. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.neubiorev.2007.05.010
- Prinz, J. (2006). Putting the brakes on enactive perception. Psyche, 12 (1), 1–19.
- Shanon, B. (2010). Toward a phenomenological psychology of the conscious. In J. Stewart, O. Gapenne, & E. A. Di Paulo (Eds.), Enaction: Toward a new paradigm for cognitive science. The MIT Press. https://doi.org/10.7551/ mitpress/9780262014601.001.0001
- Ward, J., & Meijer, P. (2010). Visual experiences in the blind induced by an auditory sensory substitution device. Consciousness and Cognition, 19 (1), 492–500. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.concog.2009.10.006
- Wilbers, J., & Duit, R. (2006). Post-festum and heuristic analogies. In P. J. Aubusson, A. G. Harrison, & S. M. Ritchie (Eds.), Metaphor and analogy in science education, Vol. 30 (pp. 37–49). Springer Science & Business Media.