Zum Inhalt springen
Analiza i Egzystencja
76 (2026)
OpenAlex

Für die gesamte Zeitschrift, laut OpenAlex.

Zitate
215
Publikationen
300
H-index
6
I10-index
2
Mittlere Zitierhäufigkeit (2 Jahre)
0,14
Erhaltene Zitate nach Jahr
Diagramm der Zeitschriftenzitate. Die genauen Werte stehen in der Tabelle darunter. 2017: 1 2018: 12 2019: 6 2020: 14 2021: 25 2022: 23 2023: 19 2024: 39 2025: 40 2026: 34 2017 2026
Datentabelle anzeigen
Erhaltene Zitate nach Jahr
JahrPublikationenZitate
2017251
20182312
2019236
20202014
20212125
20222623
20232519
20242639
20252540
20262034

Daten abgerufen:

Was bedeuten diese Zahlen?

Publikationen und Zitate umfassen die dieser Zeitschrift zugeordneten OpenAlex-Datensätze. Der H-Index ist die größte Anzahl h von Publikationen mit jeweils mindestens h Zitaten. Der I10-Index zählt Publikationen mit mindestens 10 Zitaten. Das Diagramm zeigt die in einem Jahr erhaltenen Zitate; das laufende Jahr ist unvollständig. Die Abdeckung kann von WNUS und anderen Diensten abweichen.

Der Zweijahresdurchschnitt ist eine OpenAlex-Kennzahl und nicht der Journal Impact Factor von Clarivate.

In OpenAlex ansehen (neuer Tab)
Google Scholar
In Google Scholar suchen (neuer Tab)

Wonder to Imagine Better – Thinking Politics in the Anthropocene


(Dziwić się, by wyobrażać sobie lepiej - refleksje o polityce w antropocenie)
DOI: 10.18276/aie.2026.76-01
Zitieren

Der Volltext ist verfügbar

ISSN:1734-9923
eISSN:2300-7621
Autoren: Urszula Lisowska ORCID
Uniwersytet Wrocławski
Schlüsselbegriffe: antropocen polityka zadziwienie wyobraźnia sąd refleksyjny
Erscheinungsdatum der Ausgabe / Monografie:2026
Seitenanzahl:20 (5-24)
OAI-PMH:Metadaten
CC BY-SA Open Access DOAJ ERIH PLUS Scopus Diamond Discovery Hub
QR-Code

Abstract

Artykuł rozważa znaczenie zadziwienia (wonder) i wyobraźni dla myślenia o polityce w antropocenie. W pierwszym kroku antropocen zostaje przedstawiony jako wyzwanie ale fundamentów polityki. Następnie omówiono zdolności wyobraźni i zdumienia, każdą z nich odnosząc do wyzwań antropocenu W ostatniej części artykułu zadziwienie i wyobraźnia zostają ze sobą powiązane za sprawą ujęcia sądu refleksyjnego. Zakończenie powraca do antropocenu i wskazuje dalszych kwestie wymagające rozważenia. W artykule nawiązano do prac takich autorek i autorów jak Hannah Arendt, Martha C. Nussbaum i Jeremy Bendik-Keymer.

PDF

PDF herunterladen
PDF-Vorschau

PDF öffnen

Bibliographie (36)
  1. Arendt, H. (1972). Crises of the Republic. A Harvest Book.
  2. Arendt, H. (1978a). The Life of the Mind. San Diego: A Harvest Book.
  3. Arendt, H. (1978b). The Jew as Pariah. Jewish Identity and Politics in the Modern Age. New York: Grove Press.
  4. Arendt, H. (1990). Philosophy and Politics. Social Research, 57(1), 96–103.
  5. Arendt, H. (1992). Lectures on Kant’s Political Philosophy. University of Chicago Press.
  6. Arendt, H. (1994). Essays in Understanding, 1930-1953. Formation, Exile and Totalitarianism. Schocken Books.
  7. Arendt, H. (1998). The Human Condition. University of Chicago Press.
  8. Arendt, H. (2006). Between Past and Future. Eight Exercises in Political Thought. Penguin Books.
  9. Aristotle (n.d.). Metaphysics (W.D. Ross, Trans.). The Internet Classics Archive. https://classics.mit.edu/Aristotle/metaphysics.1.i.html
  10. Barker, K. (2019). A Political Theory of Wonder: Feelings of Order in Modern Political Thought [Doctoral dissertation, University of California Los Angeles]. e-Scholarship. https://escholarship.org/uc/item/4hv1z257.
  11. Bendik-Keymer, J. (2022). Beneficial Relations Between Species and the Moral Responsibility of Wondering. Environmental Politics, 31(2), 320–337. https:// doi.org/10.1080/09644016.2020.1868818.
  12. Bendik-Keymer, J. (2023). Nussbaum’s Politics of Wonder: How the Mind’s Original Joy is Revolutionary (M. Morrison, Illus.). Bloomsbury Academic.
  13. Chakrabarty, D. (2021). The Climate of History in a Planetary Age. The University of Chicago Press.
  14. Descartes, R. (2017). The Passions of the Soul. Early Modern Texts. https://www.early- moderntexts.com/assets/pdfs/descartes1649part2.pdf.
  15. Dryzek, J.S., & Pickering, J. (2019). The Politics of the Anthropocene. Oxford University Press.
  16. Ferdinand, M. (2022). Decolonial Ecology. Thinking from the Caribbean World (A. P. Smith, Trans.). Polity Press.
  17. Ferguson, M. (2022). “Wonder at What Is as It Is”: Arendtian Wonder as the Occasion for Political Responsibility. The Journal of the British Society for Phenomenology, 53(2), 261–275. https://doi.org/10.1080/00071773.2022.2085520.
  18. Haraway, D. (2016). Staying with the Trouble. Making Kin in the Anthropocene. Duke University Press.
  19. Hyvönen, A.E. (2020). Labor as Action: The Human Condition in the Anthropocene. Research in Phenomenology, 50(2), 240–260. https://doi.org/10.1163/ 15691640-12341449.
  20. International Union of Geological Sciences. (2024). The Anthropocene. https:// www.iugs.org/_files/ugd/f1fc07_40d1a7ed58de458c9f8f24de5e739663.pdf? index=true
  21. Irigaray, L. (1993). An Ethics of Sexual Difference (C. Burke & G. C. Gill, Trans.). Ithaca, New York: Cornell University Press.
  22. Kant, I. (1987). The Critique of Judgment (W. S. Pluhar, Trans.). Hackett Publishing Company.
  23. La Caze, M. (2013). Wonder & Generosity: Their Role in Ethics and Politics. State University of New York Press.
  24. Latour, B. (2015). Telling Friends from Foes in the Time of the Anthropocene. In C. Hamilton, Ch. Bonneuil & F. Gemenne (Eds.), The Anthropocene and the Global Environment Crisis – Rethinking Modernity in a New Epoch (pp. 145–155). Routledge.
  25. Lisowska, U. (2024a). Towards Non-Appropriative Relating: Environment-Building as World-Making. Environmental Ethics, 46(4), 437–452. https://doi.org/10.5840/ enviroethics2024123189.
  26. Lisowska, U. (2024b). Zadziwienie jako kategoria filozofii polityki – przyswojenie swoistości versus zawłaszczenie. Ruch Filozoficzny, 80(4), 97–114. https://doi. org/10.12775/RF.2024.031
  27. Lisowska, U. (2025). Towards Ecological World-Making: Bringing Hannah Arendt and Malcom Ferdinand Together. Ethics and the Environment, 30(2), 71–87. https://doi.org/10.2979/een.00019.
  28. Mouffe, Ch. (2005). On the Political. Routledge.
  29. Nussbaum, M.C. (2007). Frontiers of Justice: Disability, Nationality, Species Membership. The Belknap Press of Harvard University Press.
  30. Nussbaum, M.C. (2008). Upheavals of Thought. The Intelligence of Emotions. Cambridge University Press.
  31. Nussbaum, M.C. (2023). Justice for Animals: Our Collective Responsibility. Simon & Schuster.
  32. Rockström, J. (2025). Diagnosing Earth’s Tipping Points: Where We Stand in the Anthropocene. Frontiers in Public Health, 13. https://doi.org/10.3389/ fpubh.2025.1653860.
  33. Schinkel, A. (2021). Wonder and Education. On the Educational Importance of Contemplative Wonder. Bloomsbury Academic.
  34. Steffen, W., Crutzen, P.J., & McNeill, J.R. (2007). The Anthropocene: Are Humans Now Overwhelming the Great Forces of Nature? AMBIO: A Journal of the Human Environment, 36(8), 614–621. http://dx.doi.org/10.1579/0044-7447 (2007)36[614:TAAHNO]2.0.CO;2.
  35. Whyte, K. (2021). Against Crisis Epistemology. In B. Hokowhitu, A. Moreton- Robinson, L. Tuhiwai-Smith, S. Larkin, & C. Andersen (Eds.), Handbook of Critical Indigenous Studies (pp. 52–64). Routledge.
  36. Young, I.M. (2001). Asymmetrical Reciprocity: on Moral Respect, Wonder, and Enlarged Thought. In R. Beiner & J. Nedelsky (Eds.), Judgment, Imagination and Politics. Themes from Kant and Arendt (pp. 205–228). Rowman & Littlefield Publishers.