Авторы: |
Magdalena
Reuter
![]() University of the National Education Commission Weronika Kałwak ![]() Jagiellonian University, Krakow Michał Sznajder Jagiellonian University, Krakow Michał Wierzchoń ![]() Jagiellonian University, Krakow |
Ключевые слова: | sensory substitution qualitative methods interviews quantitative methods experience |
Data publikacji całości: | 2025 |
Количество страниц: | 40 (5-44) |
1. | Auvray, M., & Farina, M. (2014). Patrolling the boundaries of synaesthesia: A critical appraisal of transient and artificially-acquired forms of synesthetic experiences. In O. Deroy (Ed.), Sensory blendings: New essays on synaesthesia (pp. 19–40). Oxford University Press. https://doi.org/10.1093/ oso/9780199688289.003.0013 |
2. | Auvray, M., Hanneton, S., & O’Regan, J. K. (2007). Learning to perceive with a visuo-auditory substitution system: localisation and object recognition with ‘The Voice’. Perception, 36 (3), 416–430. https://doi.org/10.1068/p5631 |
3. | Auvray, M., & Myin, E. (2009). Perception with compensatory devices: from sensory substitution to sensorimotor extension. Cognitive Science, 33 (6), 1036–1058. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1551-6709.2009.01040.x |
4. | Bach-y-Rita, P., Collins, C. C., Saunders, F. A., White, B., & Scadden, L. (1969). Vision substitution by tactile image projection. Nature, 221 (5184), 963–964. |
5. | Bach-y-Rita, P. (1972). Brain mechanisms in sensory substitution. Academic Press. |
6. | Bach-y-Rita, P. (1984). The relationship between motor processes and cognition in tactile vision substitution. In W. Prinz & A. F. Sanders (Eds), Cognition and motor processes (pp. 149–160). Springer. |
7. | Bach-y-Rita, P. (1996). Substitution sensorielle et qualia. In J. Proust (Ed.), Perception et Intermodalité (pp. 81–100). Presses Universitaires de France. Reprinted in English translation in A. Noë & E. Thompson (2002, Eds.), Vision and mind: Selected readings in the Philosophy of perception. MIT Press. |
8. | Block, N. (2003). Tactile sensation via spatial perception. Trends in cognitive sciences, 7 (7), 285–286. https://doi.org/10.1016/S1364-6613(03)00132-3 Deroy, O., & Auvray, M. (2012). Reading the world through the skin and ears: a new perspective on sensory substitution. Frontiers in Psychology, 3, 457. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2012.00457 |
9. | Deroy, O., & Auvray, M. (2015). Beyond vision: The vertical integration of sensory substitution devices. In D. Stokes, M. Matthen, & S. Biggs (Eds.), Perception and its modalities. Oxford University Press. |
10. | Farina, M. (2013). Neither touch nor vision: sensory substitution as artificial synesthesia? Biology and Philosophy, 28 (4), 639–655. https://doi.org/10.1007/ s10539-013-9377-z |
11. | Froese, T., McGann, M., Bigge, W., Spiers, A., & Seth, A. K. (2012). The enactive torch: a new tool for the science of perception. IEEE Transactions on Haptics, 5 (4), 365–375. https://doi.org/10.1109/TOH.2011.57 |
12. | Grice, H. P. (2011). Some remarks about the senses. In F. Macpherson (Ed.), The senses: Classic and contemporary philosophical perspectives (pp. 83–100). Oxford University Press. |
13. | Hurley, S., & Noë, A. (2003). Neural plasticity and consciousness. Biology and Philosophy, 18 (1), 131–168. https://doi.org/10.1023/a:1023308401356 |
14. | Kałwak, W., Reuter, M., Łukowska, M., Majchrowicz, B., & Wierzchoń, M. (2018). Guidelines for quantitative and qualitative studies of sensory substitution experience. Adaptive Behavior, 26 (3), 111–127. https://doi.org/ 10.1177/1059712318771690 |
15. | Macpherson, F. (2011). Taxonomising the senses. Philosophical Studies, 153 (1), 123–142. |
16. | Nagel, T. (1974). What is it like to be a bat? The Philosophical Review, 83 (4), 435–450. https://doi.org/10.2307/2183914 |
17. | Nagel, S. K., Carl, C., Kringe, T., Märtin, R., & König, P. (2005). Beyond sensory substitution – learning the sixth sense. Journal of Neural Engineering, 2 (4), R13–R26. https://doi.org/10.1088/1741-2560/2/4/R02 |
18. | Nanay, B. (2017). Sensory substitution and multimodal mental imagery. Perception, 46 (9), 1014–1026. https://doi.org/10.1177/0301006617699225 |
19. | Petitmengin, C. (2006). Describing one’s subjective experience in the second person: An interview method for the science of consciousness. Phenomenology and the Cognitive Sciences, 5 (3), 229–269. |
20. | Petitmengin, C., & Bitbol, M. (2009). Listening from within. Journal of Consciousness Studies, 16 (10-1), 363–404. |
21. | Poirier, C., De Volder, A. G., & Scheiber, C. (2007). What neuroimaging tells us about sensory substitution. Neuroscience & Biobehavioral Reviews, 31 (7), 1064–1070. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.neubiorev.2007.05.010 |
22. | Prinz, J. (2006). Putting the brakes on enactive perception. Psyche, 12 (1), 1–19. |
23. | Shanon, B. (2010). Toward a phenomenological psychology of the conscious. In J. Stewart, O. Gapenne, & E. A. Di Paulo (Eds.), Enaction: Toward a new paradigm for cognitive science. The MIT Press. https://doi.org/10.7551/ mitpress/9780262014601.001.0001 |
24. | Ward, J., & Meijer, P. (2010). Visual experiences in the blind induced by an auditory sensory substitution device. Consciousness and Cognition, 19 (1), 492–500. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.concog.2009.10.006 |
25. | Wilbers, J., & Duit, R. (2006). Post-festum and heuristic analogies. In P. J. Aubusson, A. G. Harrison, & S. M. Ritchie (Eds.), Metaphor and analogy in science education, Vol. 30 (pp. 37–49). Springer Science & Business Media. |