Zum Inhalt springen
Acta Politica Polonica

Vorher: Zeszyty Naukowe Uniwersytetu Szczecińskiego. Acta Politica

1/2026 (61)
OpenAlex

Für die gesamte Zeitschrift, laut OpenAlex.

Zitate
245
Publikationen
252
H-index
5
I10-index
1
Mittlere Zitierhäufigkeit (2 Jahre)
0,44
Erhaltene Zitate nach Jahr
Diagramm der Zeitschriftenzitate. Die genauen Werte stehen in der Tabelle darunter. 2017: 9 2018: 8 2019: 7 2020: 8 2021: 31 2022: 21 2023: 38 2024: 39 2025: 39 2026: 42 2017 2026
Datentabelle anzeigen
Erhaltene Zitate nach Jahr
JahrPublikationenZitate
2017339
2018298
2019177
2020158
20211631
20222121
20231338
20242039
20251939
2026642

Daten abgerufen:

Was bedeuten diese Zahlen?

Publikationen und Zitate umfassen die dieser Zeitschrift zugeordneten OpenAlex-Datensätze. Der H-Index ist die größte Anzahl h von Publikationen mit jeweils mindestens h Zitaten. Der I10-Index zählt Publikationen mit mindestens 10 Zitaten. Das Diagramm zeigt die in einem Jahr erhaltenen Zitate; das laufende Jahr ist unvollständig. Die Abdeckung kann von WNUS und anderen Diensten abweichen.

Der Zweijahresdurchschnitt ist eine OpenAlex-Kennzahl und nicht der Journal Impact Factor von Clarivate.

In OpenAlex ansehen (neuer Tab)
Google Scholar
In Google Scholar suchen (neuer Tab)

A Review of Challenges in the Process of European Integration in Bosnia and Herzegovina

DOI: 10.18276/ap.2026.61-04
Zitieren

Der Volltext ist verfügbar

ISSN:2451-0432
eISSN:2719-4388
Autoren: MARKO AĆIĆ ORCID
Independent University Banja Luka in Bosnia and Herzegovina

MILOŠ GRUJIĆ ORCID
Independent University Banja Luka in Bosnia and Herzegovina
Schlüsselbegriffe: European Union Western Balkans Bosnia and Herzegovina Republika Srpska Federation of Bosnia and Herzegovina European integration process
Erscheinungsdatum der Ausgabe / Monografie:2026
Seitenanzahl:13 (57-69)
OAI-PMH:Metadaten
CC BY-SA Open Access DOAJ ERIH PLUS Diamond Discovery Hub
QR-Code

Abstract

This paper analyzes specific aspects of cooperation between Bosnia and Herzegovina (BiH) and the European Union (EU) following the signing of the Dayton Peace Agreement in 1995, with a particular focus on the length of this process and the obstacles encountered. The paper indicates that the constant generation of crises and the unconstitutional actions of the Office of the High Representative (OHR) in BiH have impeded the European integration process. Special attention is paid to the protracted nature of the process, which has negatively affected public opinion in both BiH entities—Republika Srpska and the Federation of BiH. A survey conducted for this paper confirms a high overall level of support for EU ac- cession. Nevertheless, a significant difference was observed between the entities: respondents from the Federation of BiH showed greater enthusiasm compared to those from Republika Srpska. Respondents place their greatest hopes in the fight against corruption and the strengthening of the rule of law. Support for NATO membership is lower, and the perception of Russia as a positive security factor is markedly low. The paper also covers a broader context, positioning BiH within the framework of the artificially coined term, the “Western Balkans.” It shows that, despite positive progress reports, the path to full EU membership remains uncertain. The final goal is for all the collected data to assist the authors in drawing conclusions about the fate of BiH’s European path.

PDF

PDF herunterladen
PDF-Vorschau

PDF öffnen

Bibliographie (29)
  1. Aćić, M., Grujić, M. (2022). The role of selected financial organizations in the reconstruction of Bosnia and Herzegovina after the Dayton Peace Agreement. Acta Politica Polonica, 1 (53), 15–28.
  2. Aćić, M. (2022). Uloga međunarodnih organizacija u stvaranju i funkcionisanju Dejtonske BiH. Nezavisni univerzitet Banja Luka; Grafid d.o.o Banja Luka.
  3. Aćić, M., Grujić, M. (2023). The role of pre-accession assistance in the process of joining the European Union. Acta Politica Polonica, 2 (56), 25–37.
  4. Agencija za razvoj preduzeća Eda, Fakultet političkih nauka Univerziteta u Banjoj Luci. (2020, December). Stavovi građana Republike Srpske prema ulasku Bosne i Hercegovine u NATO i EU (3. krug istraživanja). Eda. https:// edabl.org/stavovi-gradjana-republike-srpske-prema-ulasku-bih-u-nato-i-eu-3-krug-istrazivanja/
  5. Council of the EU. (2008). Stabilisation and Association Agreement between the European Communities and their Member States, of the one part, and Bosnia and Herzegovina, of the other part. Luxembourg.
  6. Council of the EU. (2016). Conclusions on the Application of Bosnia and Herzegovina for Membership of the EU (para. 1–3). Brussels.
  7. Council of the European Union. (2003). EU-Western Balkans Summit, Declaration, Thessaloniki, 2003. Document 10229/03 (Press 163). Brussels/Thessaloniki.
  8. Direkcija za evropske integracije. (2024). Članstvo BiH u EU podržava 71,2 posto građana. Direkcija za evropske integracije. https://www.dei.gov.ba/bs/clanstvo-bih-u-eu-podrzava-712-posto-gradana
  9. Direkcija za evropske integracije. (2025). Članstvo BiH u EU podržava 69,9 % građana BiH. Direkcija za evropske integracije. https://www.dei.gov.ba/bs/clanstvo-bih-u-eu-podrzava-699-gradana-bih Direkcija za evropske integracije. (n. d.). Infografike.
  10. Direkcija za evropske integracije. https://www.dei.gov.ba/bs/ infografike
  11. Draganić, A. (2022). Stavovi građana Republike Srpske prema ulasku BiH u NATO i EU (maj 2022). Eda. https://edabl. org/stavovi-gradjana-republike-srpske-prema-ulasku-bih-u-nato-i-eu-maj-2022-2/
  12. Dudley, D., Saez, F. (2022). The European Union’s Political Membership Criteria and Their Effects on Divided Societies: The Case of Bosnia and Herzegovina. Journal of Balkan Studies, 2 (2), 73–91.
  13. Europe Direct Čakovec. (2025). Strategija za zapadni Balkan. Europe Direct Čakovec. https://europedirect-cakovec.eu/ strategija-za-zapadni-balkan/
  14. European Commission. (1997). CARDS Programme Overview. Brussels.
  15. European Commission. (2000). Regular Report on Bosnia and Herzegovina. Brussels.
  16. European Commission. (2001). Enlargement Strategy Paper. Brussels.
  17. European Commission. (2018). Vjerodostojna perspektiva proširenja i pojačana suradnja EU-a sa zapadnim Balkanom (IP/18/561). [Press release]. https://ec.europa.eu/commission/presscorner/detail/hr/ip_18_561
  18. European Commission. (2019). Opinion on Bosnia and Herzegovina’s Application for Membership of the European Union. Brussels.
  19. European Commission. (2022). 2022 Enlargement Package – Bosnia and Herzegovina Report. Brussels.
  20. European Commission. (2025). Komisija izvješćuje o napretku zemalja koje nastoje postati članice EU-a. European Commission. https://commission.europa.eu/news-and-media/news/commission-reports-progress-aspiring-eu- members-2025-11-04_hr
  21. European Council. (2003). Thessaloniki Summit Declaration (EU–Western Balkans Summit). Thessaloniki.
  22. European Council. (2022). Conclusions on Enlargement and Stabilisation and Association Process. Brussels.
  23. European Council. (2024). Conclusions on Bosnia and Herzegovina. Brussels.
  24. European Union. (1996). EU Support to Bosnia and Herzegovina. Brussels.
  25. Politika. (2025). Balkan na Zapadu. https://www.politika.rs/scc/clanak/475604/balkan-na-zapadu
  26. Polović, J., Dujić Frlan, J. (2019). Zapadni Balkan: „Divide et impera” ili zašto suprostavljeni interesi generiraju trajnu nestabilnost regije. Acta Economica et Turistica, 5 (2), 163‒183.
  27. Ratti, L. (2023). The enduring relationship between NATO and European integration. In: M. Segers and S. Van Hecke (Eds.), The Cambridge History of the European Union – Volume 1: European Integration Outside In. Cambridge University Press.
  28. Savić, D. (2021). Stavovi građana Republike Srpske prema ulasku Bosne i Hercegovine u NATO i EU (septembar 2021). Eda, Fakultet političkih nauka Univerziteta u Banjoj Luci. https://edabl.org/stavovi-gradjana-republike-srpske- prema-ulasku-bosne-i-hercegovine-u-nato-i-eu-septembar-2021/
  29. Schimmelfennig, F. (2003). The EU, NATO and the Integration of Europe: Rules and Rhetoric. Cambridge University Press.