Перейти к содержимому
Acta Politica Polonica

Ранее: Zeszyty Naukowe Uniwersytetu Szczecińskiego. Acta Politica

1/2026 (61)
Статистика OpenAlex

Для всего журнала по данным OpenAlex.

Цитирования
273
Публикации
264
H-index
5
I10-index
1
Средняя цитируемость (2 года)
0,47
Полученные цитирования по годам
График цитирований журнала. Точные значения доступны в таблице ниже. 2017: 26 2018: 15 2019: 8 2020: 5 2021: 37 2022: 33 2023: 42 2024: 35 2025: 24 2026: 24 2017 2026
Показать таблицу данных
Полученные цитирования по годам
ГодПубликацииЦитирования
20173626
20182915
2019178
2020155
20211637
20222133
20231342
20242035
20251924
2026624

Данные загружены:

Что означают эти числа?

Публикации и цитирования охватывают записи, связанные с этим журналом в OpenAlex. H-индекс равен наибольшему числу h публикаций, каждая из которых цитируется не менее h раз. I10-индекс считает публикации с 10 и более цитированиями. График показывает цитирования, полученные в каждом году; текущий год неполный. Охват может отличаться от WNUS и других сервисов.

Средняя цитируемость за 2 года является показателем OpenAlex, а не Journal Impact Factor компании Clarivate.

Открыть в OpenAlex (новая вкладка)

A Review of Challenges in the Process of European Integration in Bosnia and Herzegovina

DOI: 10.18276/ap.2026.61-04
Цитировать

Полный текст доступен

ISSN:2451-0432
eISSN:2719-4388
Авторы: MARKO AĆIĆ ORCID
Independent University Banja Luka in Bosnia and Herzegovina

MILOŠ GRUJIĆ ORCID
Independent University Banja Luka in Bosnia and Herzegovina
Ключевые слова: European Union Western Balkans Bosnia and Herzegovina Republika Srpska Federation of Bosnia and Herzegovina European integration process
Дата издания выпуска / монографии:2026
Количество страниц:13 (57-69)
OAI-PMH:Метаданные
Cited-by (Crossref) ?: Включите JavaScript для получения данных о цитировании.
CC BY-SA Open Access DOAJ ERIH PLUS Diamond Discovery Hub
QR-код

Абстракт

This paper analyzes specific aspects of cooperation between Bosnia and Herzegovina (BiH) and the European Union (EU) following the signing of the Dayton Peace Agreement in 1995, with a particular focus on the length of this process and the obstacles encountered. The paper indicates that the constant generation of crises and the unconstitutional actions of the Office of the High Representative (OHR) in BiH have impeded the European integration process. Special attention is paid to the protracted nature of the process, which has negatively affected public opinion in both BiH entities—Republika Srpska and the Federation of BiH. A survey conducted for this paper confirms a high overall level of support for EU ac- cession. Nevertheless, a significant difference was observed between the entities: respondents from the Federation of BiH showed greater enthusiasm compared to those from Republika Srpska. Respondents place their greatest hopes in the fight against corruption and the strengthening of the rule of law. Support for NATO membership is lower, and the perception of Russia as a positive security factor is markedly low. The paper also covers a broader context, positioning BiH within the framework of the artificially coined term, the “Western Balkans.” It shows that, despite positive progress reports, the path to full EU membership remains uncertain. The final goal is for all the collected data to assist the authors in drawing conclusions about the fate of BiH’s European path.

PDF

Скачать PDF
Просмотр PDF

Открыть PDF

Библиография (29)
  1. Aćić, M., Grujić, M. (2022). The role of selected financial organizations in the reconstruction of Bosnia and Herzegovina after the Dayton Peace Agreement. Acta Politica Polonica, 1 (53), 15–28.
  2. Aćić, M. (2022). Uloga međunarodnih organizacija u stvaranju i funkcionisanju Dejtonske BiH. Nezavisni univerzitet Banja Luka; Grafid d.o.o Banja Luka.
  3. Aćić, M., Grujić, M. (2023). The role of pre-accession assistance in the process of joining the European Union. Acta Politica Polonica, 2 (56), 25–37.
  4. Agencija za razvoj preduzeća Eda, Fakultet političkih nauka Univerziteta u Banjoj Luci. (2020, December). Stavovi građana Republike Srpske prema ulasku Bosne i Hercegovine u NATO i EU (3. krug istraživanja). Eda. https:// edabl.org/stavovi-gradjana-republike-srpske-prema-ulasku-bih-u-nato-i-eu-3-krug-istrazivanja/
  5. Council of the EU. (2008). Stabilisation and Association Agreement between the European Communities and their Member States, of the one part, and Bosnia and Herzegovina, of the other part. Luxembourg.
  6. Council of the EU. (2016). Conclusions on the Application of Bosnia and Herzegovina for Membership of the EU (para. 1–3). Brussels.
  7. Council of the European Union. (2003). EU-Western Balkans Summit, Declaration, Thessaloniki, 2003. Document 10229/03 (Press 163). Brussels/Thessaloniki.
  8. Direkcija za evropske integracije. (2024). Članstvo BiH u EU podržava 71,2 posto građana. Direkcija za evropske integracije. https://www.dei.gov.ba/bs/clanstvo-bih-u-eu-podrzava-712-posto-gradana
  9. Direkcija za evropske integracije. (2025). Članstvo BiH u EU podržava 69,9 % građana BiH. Direkcija za evropske integracije. https://www.dei.gov.ba/bs/clanstvo-bih-u-eu-podrzava-699-gradana-bih Direkcija za evropske integracije. (n. d.). Infografike.
  10. Direkcija za evropske integracije. https://www.dei.gov.ba/bs/ infografike
  11. Draganić, A. (2022). Stavovi građana Republike Srpske prema ulasku BiH u NATO i EU (maj 2022). Eda. https://edabl. org/stavovi-gradjana-republike-srpske-prema-ulasku-bih-u-nato-i-eu-maj-2022-2/
  12. Dudley, D., Saez, F. (2022). The European Union’s Political Membership Criteria and Their Effects on Divided Societies: The Case of Bosnia and Herzegovina. Journal of Balkan Studies, 2 (2), 73–91.
  13. Europe Direct Čakovec. (2025). Strategija za zapadni Balkan. Europe Direct Čakovec. https://europedirect-cakovec.eu/ strategija-za-zapadni-balkan/
  14. European Commission. (1997). CARDS Programme Overview. Brussels.
  15. European Commission. (2000). Regular Report on Bosnia and Herzegovina. Brussels.
  16. European Commission. (2001). Enlargement Strategy Paper. Brussels.
  17. European Commission. (2018). Vjerodostojna perspektiva proširenja i pojačana suradnja EU-a sa zapadnim Balkanom (IP/18/561). [Press release]. https://ec.europa.eu/commission/presscorner/detail/hr/ip_18_561
  18. European Commission. (2019). Opinion on Bosnia and Herzegovina’s Application for Membership of the European Union. Brussels.
  19. European Commission. (2022). 2022 Enlargement Package – Bosnia and Herzegovina Report. Brussels.
  20. European Commission. (2025). Komisija izvješćuje o napretku zemalja koje nastoje postati članice EU-a. European Commission. https://commission.europa.eu/news-and-media/news/commission-reports-progress-aspiring-eu- members-2025-11-04_hr
  21. European Council. (2003). Thessaloniki Summit Declaration (EU–Western Balkans Summit). Thessaloniki.
  22. European Council. (2022). Conclusions on Enlargement and Stabilisation and Association Process. Brussels.
  23. European Council. (2024). Conclusions on Bosnia and Herzegovina. Brussels.
  24. European Union. (1996). EU Support to Bosnia and Herzegovina. Brussels.
  25. Politika. (2025). Balkan na Zapadu. https://www.politika.rs/scc/clanak/475604/balkan-na-zapadu
  26. Polović, J., Dujić Frlan, J. (2019). Zapadni Balkan: „Divide et impera” ili zašto suprostavljeni interesi generiraju trajnu nestabilnost regije. Acta Economica et Turistica, 5 (2), 163‒183.
  27. Ratti, L. (2023). The enduring relationship between NATO and European integration. In: M. Segers and S. Van Hecke (Eds.), The Cambridge History of the European Union – Volume 1: European Integration Outside In. Cambridge University Press.
  28. Savić, D. (2021). Stavovi građana Republike Srpske prema ulasku Bosne i Hercegovine u NATO i EU (septembar 2021). Eda, Fakultet političkih nauka Univerziteta u Banjoj Luci. https://edabl.org/stavovi-gradjana-republike-srpske- prema-ulasku-bosne-i-hercegovine-u-nato-i-eu-septembar-2021/
  29. Schimmelfennig, F. (2003). The EU, NATO and the Integration of Europe: Rules and Rhetoric. Cambridge University Press.