Przejdź do treści
Acta Politica Polonica

Wcześniej: Zeszyty Naukowe Uniwersytetu Szczecińskiego. Acta Politica

2/2025 (60)
Statystyki OpenAlex

Dla całego czasopisma, według OpenAlex.

Cytowania
273
Publikacje
264
H-index
5
I10-index
1
Średnia cytowań (2 lata)
0,47
Cytowania w poszczególnych latach
Wykres cytowań czasopisma. Dokładne wartości są dostępne w tabeli poniżej. 2017: 26 2018: 15 2019: 8 2020: 5 2021: 37 2022: 33 2023: 42 2024: 35 2025: 24 2026: 24 2017 2026
Pokaż dane w tabeli
Cytowania w poszczególnych latach
RokPublikacjeCytowania
20173626
20182915
2019178
2020155
20211637
20222133
20231342
20242035
20251924
2026624

Dane pobrane:

Co oznaczają te liczby?

Publikacje i cytowania obejmują rekordy powiązane z tym czasopismem w OpenAlex. H-index to największa liczba h publikacji mających co najmniej h cytowań. I10-index to liczba publikacji cytowanych co najmniej 10 razy. Wykres przedstawia cytowania otrzymane w danym roku; bieżący rok jest niepełny. Zakres bazy może różnić się od WNUS i innych serwisów.

Średnia z 2 lat jest wskaźnikiem OpenAlex. Nie jest to Journal Impact Factor firmy Clarivate.

Zobacz w OpenAlex (nowa karta)

Gender Bias and Barriers to Women's Career Advancement in Civil Service of Kebbi State, Nigeria.

DOI: 10.18276/ap.2025.60-06
Cytuj

Pełny tekst jest dostępny

Abstrakt

This study investigates gender bias and the barriers to women’s career advancement within the civil service sector in Kebbi State. Specifically, it examines the areas where women face unfair treatment in their professional careers, the obstacles they encounter while progressing in their jobs, and the coping strategies that could enhance their career development. The research adopts a cross-sectional descriptive design, involving 198 female employees selected from the ministries through random sampling. A semi-structured questionnaire was used to gather data and was analyzed using SPSS version 28.0. Three research questions and corresponding hypotheses were formulated to test the study’s variables. The research questions were addressed using descriptive statistics, such as the frequency and percentage of cases. The Mann-Whitney U-test was used to test the hypotheses at a 0.05 significance level. The results of the first hypothesis indicated notable differences in experiences of gender bias between junior and senior staff, suggesting that job position influences how employees perceive and experience gender bias in their workplace. The second hypothesis revealed marked differences in cultural beliefs between junior and senior staff, indicating that job position affects how employees experience and perceive cultural beliefs regarding women’s careers. The third hypothesis demonstrated no statistically significant difference between junior and senior staff regarding their perceptions of the impact of coping strategies on women’s career progression, suggesting that both junior and senior staff generally share similar views on the role of coping strategies in career advancement. The study offers targeted recommendations to foster an equitable working environment for women in the civil service and to enhance their career prospects.
Podgląd PDF

Otwórz PDF

Bibliografia (26)
  1. Bermudez-Figueroa, E., Roca, B. (2022). Gender labour inequalities in the public sector: the interplay between policy and micro-politics. Employee Relations: The International Journal, 44 (7), 96–112.
  2. Broccolini, C., Fruttero, A., Jain, S., (2024). Revisiting trends in gender equality. Retrieved from: https://www.elibrary. imf.org/display/book/9798400246968/CH001.xml (12.10.2023).
  3. Crenshaw, K. (1991). Mapping the margins: Intersectionality, identity politics, and violence against women of colour. Stanford Law Review, 43 (6), 1241–1299.
  4. Eagly, A.H. (1987). Sex differences in social behaviour: A social-role interpretation. Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
  5. Eagly, A.H., Steffen, V. J. (1984). Gender Stereotypes stem from the distribution of women and men into social roles. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 46 (4), 735–754.
  6. Eagly, A.H., Wood, W. (2016). Social role theory of sex differences. In: N. Naples, R.C. Hoogland, M. Wickramasinghe, W.C.A. Wong (eds.), The Wiley Blackwell Encyclopedia of Gender and Sexuality Studies.
  7. Ekiye, B., Wechi, I. (2023). Investigating the underrepresentation of women in managerial positions in the bayelsa state public service. Federal University Otuoke Journal of Management Sciences, 7 (2), 184–201.
  8. Federal Republic of Nigeria. (2004). Labour Act (Cap L1, LFN). Abuja: Government Printer. Freedman, J. (2002). Feminism. Buckingham: Open University Press.
  9. Internation Labour Organisation. (2022). Gender gap in employment: What’s holding women back? Retrieved from: https://webapps.ilo.org/infostories/en-GB/Stories/Employment/barriers-women#intro (10.04.2024).
  10. Jaggar, A. (1983). Feminist Politics and Human Nature. Rowman & Littlefield.
  11. Kebbi State Development Plan. (2022). Retrieved from: extension://efaidnbmnnnibpcajpcglclefindmkaj/https://ppl-aifile- upload.s3.ct-files/30314188/4d9a0036.
  12. Kpanja, I. and Umar, U.S. (2018). Impact of gender imbalance on civil service productivity: implications for counselling. Journal of Innovative Social Sciences and Counselling Research, 6 (2), 45–51.
  13. Krainc, A.E., Dance-Schissel, D. (2023). Social role theory | Definition, importance & criticisms. Retrieved from: https://study.com/academy/lesson/eaglys-social-role-theory-of-gender-differences-definition-lesson-quiz.html (12.10.2023).
  14. Lorber, J. (2010). Gender inequality: Feminist theories and politics. Oxford University Press.
  15. Muhammed, S.U., Usman A.K. (2007). Non-work factors and labour turnover among female employees in Kebbi State Civil Service. Bangladesh e-journal of Sociology, 4 (2), 38–44.
  16. Nartey, P., Bahar, O.S., Nabunya, P. (2023). A review of the cultural gender norms contributing to gender inequality in Ghana: An ecological systems perspective. International Journal of Women’s Studies, 25 (7), 1–16.
  17. Oyoru, R.A. (2023). Women’s participation in Nigerian politics: Challenges and prospects to Nigerian democracy. International Journal of Humanity Studies, 6 (2), 301–314.
  18. Ridgeway, C.L. (2011). Framed by gender: How gender inequality persists in the modern world. Oxford University Press.
  19. Sahumani, N., Majola, B.K., Ngirande, H. (2023). Organisational cultural factors and barriers affecting women’s career success at a selected institution of higher learning in South Africa. International Journal of Social Science and Research Review, 6 (11), 165–178.
  20. Schein, V.E. (1990). Would women lead differently? In: E.A. Fagenson (ed.), Women in management: Trends, issues, and challenges in managerial diversity (pp. 167–176).
  21. Sage Publications. Thelma, C.C., Ngubule, L. (2024). Women in leadership: Examining barriers to women’s advancement in leadership positions. Asian Journal of Advanced Research and Report, 18 (6), 273–290.
  22. Tong, R. (2009). Feminist thought: A more comprehensive introduction. Boulder: Westview Press.
  23. UN Women. (2023). Forecasting time spent in unpaid care and domestic work: Technical brief, 2023. Retrieved from: https://www.unwomen.org/sites/default/files/2023-10/technical-brief-forecasting-time-spent-in-unpaid-care-anddomestic- work-en.pdf (12.10.2023).
  24. United Nations. (2015). Transforming our world: The 2030 Agenda for Sustainable Development. The resolution adopted by the General Assembly on 25 September 2015. Retrieved from: https://www.refworld.org/legal/resolution/ unga/2015/en/111816 (25.08.2015).
  25. Vital Voices Global Partnership. (2012). Retrieved from: https://www.vitalvoices.org/a-step-forward-for-female-politicalleaders- secretary-clinton-launches-women-in-public-service-project/ (02.10.2024).
  26. Women’s Voice and Leadership. (2024). Retrieved from: https://www.feministhub.org/women-voice-and-leadershipproject- in-kebbi/ (02.10.2024).