Autobiografia Literatura Kultura Media

ISSN: 2353-8694     eISSN: 2719-4361    OAI    DOI: 10.18276/au.2024.1.22-06
CC BY-SA   Open Access   DOAJ  ERIH PLUS

Liste der Ausgaben / nr 1 (22) 2024
Doing Research in Times of Crisis. An Auto/biography
(Prowadzenie badań w czasach kryzysu. Auto/biografia)

Autoren: Aneta Ostaszewska ORCID
Uniwersytet Warszawski
Schlüsselbegriffe: auto/biografia badania akademia doświadczenie sweaty concept
Veröffentlichungsdatum der gesamten Ausgabe:2024
Seitenanzahl:14 (71-84)
Cited-by (Crossref) ?:

Abstract

Artykuł ma na celu „wejście w głąb” procesu zmagania się z myślami, emocjami i doświadczeniami, które pojawiły się w trakcie i w wyniku mojej pracy badawczej w czasie pandemii Covid-19. Odwołując się do terminu „auto/biografia” Liz Stanley, staram się zgłębić znaczenia i implikacje badań nad autobiografią badacza. Interesuje mnie epistemologiczna dyskusja na temat wzajemnych powiązań tego, co osobiste, z tym, co polityczne i instytucjonalne w kontekście badań feministycznych. Moim celem jest otwarcie przestrzeni na pytanie typu: W jaki sposób badania wpływają na trajektorię mojej auto/biografii?
herunterladen

Artikeldatei

Bibliographie

1.Acker, Sandra. “In/out/side: Positioning the researcher in feminist qualitative research.” Resources for Feminist Research, 28, no. 1-2 (2000). link.gale.com/apps/doc/A80881203/AONE?u=googlescholar&sid=bookmark-AONE&xid=e3a3b29b.
2.Ahmed, Sara. Living a Feminist Life. Duke University Press, 2017.
3.Ahmed, Sara. “Introduction: Sexism – A Problem with a Name.” new formations: a journal of culture/theory/politics 86 (2015): 5-13. http://muse.jhu.edu/article/604486.
4.Anzaldúa, Gloria. Borderlands La Frontiera: the New Mestiza. Aunt Lute Books, 1987.
5.Bell, Viki. Feminist Imagination. Genealogies in Feminist Theory. Sage, 2000.
6.Chadwick, Rachel. “On the politics of discomfort.” Feminist Theory, 22, no. 4 (2021): 556-574. https://doi.org/10.1177/1464700120987379.
7.Cotterill, Pamela & Gayle Letherby. “Weaving Stories: Personal Auto/Biographies in Feminist Research.” Sociology, 27, no. 1 (1983): 67-79. https://doi.org/10.1177/003803859302700107.
8.Denzin, Norman K. “The reflexive interview and a performative social science.” Qualitative Research, 1, no. 1 (2001): 23-46. https://doi.org/10.1177/146879410100100102.
9.Geertz, Clifford. “Blurred Genres: The Refiguration of Social Thought.” The American Scholar, 49, no. 2 (1980): 165–79. http://www.jstor.org/stable/41210607.
10.Griffin, Gabriele, Katarina Hamberg, and Britta Lundgren, eds. The Social Politics of Research Collaboration. Routledge, 2013.
11.Griffin, Gabriele Annelie Bränström-Öhman, Hildur Kalman, eds. The Emotional Politics of Research Collaboration. Routledge, 2013.
12.Hall, Richard. The Alienated Academic: The Struggle for Autonomy Inside the University. Palgrave Macmillan, 2018.
13.Hanisch, Carole. “The Personal Is Political.” In: Notes from the Second Year. Women’s Liberation. Major Writings of the Radical Feminists, edited by Shulamith Firestone and Anne Koedt. Radical Feminism, 1970.
14.Haraway, Donna. “Situated Knowledges: The science question in feminism and the privilege of partial perspective.” Feminist Studies, 14, no. 3 (1988): 575-599.
15.Hemmings, Clare. “Affective Solidarity: Feminist Reflexivity and Political Transformation.” Feminist Theory, 12, no. 2 (2012): 147–161.
16.Hochschild, Arlie Russell. “Emotion work, feeling rules, and social structure.” American Journal of Sociology, 85, no. 3 (1979): 551-575.
17.Howlett, Marnie. “Looking at the ‘field’ through a Zoom lens: Methodological reflections on conducting online research during a global pandemic.” Qualitative Research, 22, no. 3 (2022): 387-402. https://doi.org/10.1177/1468794120985691.
18.Kaplan, Ann E. “Is the Gaze Male?” In: Powers of Desire: The Politics of Sexuality, edited by Ann Snitow, Christine Stansell and Sharon Thompson. Methuen, 1983.
19.Letherby, Gayle. Feminist research in theory and practice. McGraw-Hill Education, 2003.
20.Maisuria, Alpesh and Svenja Helmes. Life for the Academic in the Neoliberal University. Routledge, 2019.
21.Nicotera, Anne Maydan. “The Woman Academic as Subject/Object/Self: Dismantling the Illusion of Duality.” Communication Theory, 9, no. 4 (1999): 430–464. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1468-2885.1999.tb00207.x.
22.Ortiz-Vilarelle, Lisa. “(Life) Writing to Belong: Teaching and Learning on Camera during a Pandemic.” a/b: Auto/Biography Studies, 37, no. 3 (2022): 495-502. https://doi.org/10.1080/08989575.2022.2154450.
23.Ostaszewska, Aneta. Becoming bel hooks. A story about the self-empowerment of a Black girl who became a feminist. Wydawnictwa Uniwersytetu Warszawskiego, 2023.
24.Ostaszewska, Aneta, Marta Pietrusińska. ”Wywiad online jako nowa rzeczywistość badawcza w kontekście badań nad feminizacją pandemii.” Studia Socjologiczne, 3, no. 250 (2023): 37–58. https://doi.org/10.24425/sts.2023.147160.
25.Pérez, Caroline Criado. Invisible Women: Data Bias in a World Designed for Men. Vintage Books, 2020.
26.Reinharz, Shulamit. On Becoming a Social Scientist: From Survey Research and Participant Observation to Experimental Analysis. Routledge, 1984.
27.Richardson, Laurel. Fields of Play. Rutgers University Press, 1997.
28.Rodak, Paweł. Między zapisem a literaturą. Dziennik polskiego pisarza w XX wieku. Wydawnictwa Uniwersytetu Warszawskiego, 2011.
29.Rose, Gillian. “Situating knowledges: positionality, reflexivities and other tactics.” Progress in Human Geography, 21, no. 3 (1997): 305-320. https://doi.org/10.1191/030913297673302122.
30.Smith, Sidonie and Julia Watson. Interfaces: Women/Autobiography/Image/ Performance. University of Michigan Press, 2009.
31.Stanley, Liz. The auto/biographical I: The theory and practice of feminist auto/biography. Manchester University Press, 1992.
32.Stanley, Liz and Sue Wise. Breaking Out: Feminist Consciousness and Feminist Research. Routledge and Kegan Paul, 1983.
33.Staude, John-Raphael. “Autobiography as a Spiritual Practice.” Journal of Gerontological Social Work, 45, no. 3 (2005): 249-269. https://doi.org/10.1300/J083v45n03_01.
34.Steier, Frederick. Research and Reflexivity. Sage, 1991.
35.Taylor, Yvette, Kinneret Lahad, eds., Feeling Academic in the Neoliberal University. Palgrave Studies in Gender and Education. Palgrave Macmillan Cham, 2018. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-64224-6_1.
36.Till, Karen E. “Returning home and to the field.” Geographical Review 91 (2001): 46–56. https://doi.org/10.2307/3250804.