Przejdź do treści
Central European Journal of Sport Sciences and Medicine
Vol. 50, No. 2/2025
OpenAlex

Dla całego czasopisma, według OpenAlex.

Cytowania
1 079
Publikacje
402
H-index
13
I10-index
23
Średnia cytowań (2 lata)
0,63
Cytowania w poszczególnych latach
Wykres cytowań czasopisma. Dokładne wartości są dostępne w tabeli poniżej. 2017: 27 2018: 41 2019: 47 2020: 103 2021: 96 2022: 143 2023: 152 2024: 167 2025: 173 2026: 98 2017 2026
Pokaż dane w tabeli
Cytowania w poszczególnych latach
RokPublikacjeCytowania
20174227
20183341
20193547
202038103
20213896
202231143
202330152
202429167
202530173
20261698

Dane pobrane:

Co oznaczają te liczby?

Publikacje i cytowania obejmują rekordy powiązane z tym czasopismem w OpenAlex. H-index to największa liczba h publikacji mających co najmniej h cytowań. I10-index to liczba publikacji cytowanych co najmniej 10 razy. Wykres przedstawia cytowania otrzymane w danym roku; bieżący rok jest niepełny. Zakres bazy może różnić się od WNUS i innych serwisów.

Średnia z 2 lat jest wskaźnikiem OpenAlex. Nie jest to Journal Impact Factor firmy Clarivate.

Zobacz w OpenAlex (nowa karta)
Google Scholar
Znajdź w Google Scholar (nowa karta)

The Conceptual or Theoretical Identity in Sports Sciences: A Scoping Review

DOI: 10.18276/cej.2025.2-08
Cytuj

Pełny tekst jest dostępny

ISSN:2300-9705
eISSN:2353-2807
Autorzy: Johan Edixon Sarmiento Rojas ORCID
Faculty of Health and Sport; Professional in Sports Training, Andean Area University Foundation in Bogotá, Colombia

Fabio Alberto Escobar Díaz ORCID
Faculty of Health and Sport, Andean Area University Foundation in Bogotá, Colombia
Słowa kluczowe: sports sciences science knowledge
Data wydania numeru / monografii:2025
Liczba stron:15 (103-117)
OAI-PMH:Metadane
CC BY-SA Open Access DOAJ Scopus Diamond Discovery Hub
Kod QR

Abstrakt

The consensus around the identity of sport sciences presents unresolved challenges due to the various theoretical or epistemological perspectives that influence it. A scoping review was conducted to map publications in scientific journals that address this topic in databases and bibliographic indexes. Information was sought in Scopus, ScienceDirect, Web of Science, and the Virtual Health Library using free and controlled key terms and Boolean connectors AND and OR. The process included 34 articles that explore the conceptual or theoretical identity in sport sciences. Overall, the literature reveals different perspectives on theoretical and conceptual identity, with multiple alternatives coexisting and no consensus. In the future, research to examine whether this confusion exists at the practical level from an inductive point of view is proposed.

PDF

Pobierz PDF
Podgląd PDF

Otwórz PDF

Bibliografia (66)
  1. Almeida, F. Q., Bracht, V., & Vaz, A. (2012). Epistemological classifications in physical education: Redescreptions. Movimento, 18(4), 241–263. https://doi.org/10.22456/1982-8918.27727
  2. Balagué, N., Torrents, C., Hristovski, R., & Kelso, J. A. S. (2017). Sport science integration: An evolutionary synthesis. European Journal of Sport Science, 17(1), Article 1. https://doi.org/10.1080/17461391.2016.1198422
  3. Bento, J. O. (1998). Sobre el objeto y sobre la metodología de investigación de las Ciencias del Deporte. Universidade da Coruña. https://ruc.udc.es/dspace/handle/2183/9767
  4. Bento, J. O., Carreiro da Costa, F., Vicente Pedraz, M., Araujo Gaya, A. C., Lagardera Otero, F., Parlebas, P., Pieron, M., Sobral, F., & Touriñán, J. M. (1998). Conclusiones y consenso. Universidade da Coruña. https://ruc.udc.es/dspace/handle/2183/9757
  5. Bungenstab, G. C. (2020). Epistemology of Brazilian physical education: (Re)descriptions of epistemological activity in the 21st century. Movimento, 26(1), 1–14. https://doi.org/10.22456/1982-8918.100551
  6. Camy, J., Fargier, P., Perrin, C., & Belli, A. (2017). Forms of interdisciplinarity in four sport science research centres in Europe. European Journal of Sport Science, 17(1), Article 1. https://doi.org/10.1080/17461391.2016.1218551
  7. Cardinale, M. (2017). Commentary on “Towards a Grand Unified Theory of sports performance”. Towards a Grand Unified Theory of sports performance, 56, 160–162. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.humov.2017.04.015
  8. Champely, S., Fargier, P., & Camy, J. (2017). Disciplinarity and sport science in Europe: A statistical and sociological study of ECSS conference abstracts. European Journal of Sport Science, 17(1), Article 1. https://doi.org/10.1080/17461391.2016.1197318
  9. Coimbra, D. R., Dominski, F. H., Correia, C. K., & Andrade, A. (2019). Scientific production in sports science journals: bibliometric analysis. Revista Brasileira de Medicina Do Esporte, 25, 88–93. https://doi.org/10.1590/1517-869220192501208554
  10. Crum, B. (2012). La crisis de identidad de la Educación Física: Diagnóstico y explicación. Memoria Academica, 14, 61-72.Davids, K., Smith, L., & Martin, R. (1991). Controlling system uncertainty in sport and work. Applied Ergonomics, 22(5), 312–315. https://doi.org/10.1016/0003-6870(91)90387-W
  11. Davids, K. (2010). The athlete-environment relation as a complex system: Implications for sport pedagogy. International Journal of Sport Psychology, 10, 13–14.
  12. Davids, K., & Araújo, D. (2010). The concept of “organismic asymmetry” in sport science. Journal of Science and Medicine in Sport, 13(6), 633–640. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jsams.2010.05.002
  13. Davids, K., Araújo, D., Seifert, L., & Orth, D. (2015). Expert performance in sport: An ecological dynamics perspective. In: Routledge handbook of sport expertise. Routledge.
  14. Dowling, M., Leopkey, B., Inoue, Y., Berg, B. K., & Smith, L. (2020). Scoping reviews and structured research synthesis in sport: Methods, protocol and lessons learnt. International Journal of Sport Policy and Politics, 12(4), Article 4. https://doi.org/10.1080/19406940.2020.1817126
  15. Eusse, K. L. G., Bracht, V., & Almeida, F. (2021). Crisis epistemológica de la Educación Física en Colombia: El debate sobre la identidad y el objeto de estudio. Educación Física y Deporte, 40(2), Article 2. https://doi.org/10.17533/udea.efyd.v40n2a02
  16. Fensterseifer, P. (2020). Knowledge production in physical education/sport science - Quality x quantity: Where are we going? Revista Tempos e Espaços Educação, 13(32). https://doi.org/10.20952/revtee.v13i32.14099
  17. García Jiménez, L. (2008). Aproximación epistemológica al concepto de ciencia: Una propuesta básica a partir de Kuhn, Popper, Lakatos y Feyerabend. Andamios, 4(8), 185-–202.
  18. Glazier, P. S. (2015). Towards a grand unified theory of sports performance. Human Movement Science, 56(Pt A), 139–156. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.humov.2015.08.001
  19. Glazier, P. S. (2017). Towards a grand unified theory of sports performance: A response to the commentaries. Human Movement Science, 56, 184--89. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.humov.2017.04.016
  20. Gillet, B. (1991). La imposible «definición» del deporte. In J.-J. Morne (Ed.), Epistemología y antropología del deporte (pp. 92-94). Alianza.
  21. Grupe, O. (1976). Estudios sobre una teoría pedagógica de la educación física. Instituto Nacional de Educación Física.
  22. Haag, H. (1979). Development and structure of a theoretical framework for sport science («Sportwissenschaft»). Quest, 31(1), 25–35.
  23. Hackfort, D. (2017). Commentary on “Towards a Grand Unified Theory of sports performance”. Human Movement Science, 56, 166–168. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.humov.2017.05.003
  24. Haddaway, N. R., Page, M. J., Pritchard, C. C., & McGuinness, L. A. (2022). PRISMA2020: An R package and Shiny app for producing PRISMA 2020-compliant flow diagrams, with interactivity for optimised digital transparency and Open Synthesis. Campbell Systematic Reviews, 18(2), e1230. https://doi.org/10.1002/cl2.1230
  25. Hristovski, R., Aceski, A., Balague, N., Seifert, L., Tufekcievski, A., & Cecilia, A. (2017). Structure and dynamics of European sports science textual contents: Analysis of ECSS abstracts (1996–2014). European Journal of Sport Science, 17(1), Article 1. https://doi.org/10.1080/17461391.2016.1207709
  26. Jess, M., Howells, K., & McMillan, P. (2023). Becoming physical education: The ontological shift to complexity. Sport Education and Society. https://doi.org/10.1080/13573322.2023.2177984
  27. Jirásek, I. (2004). From philosophy of sport to philosophical kinanthropology. International Journal of Physical Education, 41(4), 163–171.
  28. Joyner, M. J. (2003). Before automated database searches: Let’s not forget the classics!! Exercise and Sport Sciences Reviews, 31(2), 59–60. https://doi.org/10.1097/00003677-200304000-00001
  29. Kuhn, T. (2004). La estructura de las revoluciones científicas. Fondo de Cultura Económica.
  30. Lakatos, I. (1989). La metodología de los programas de investigación científica. Alianza Editorial.
  31. Lambert, K., Gray, S., O’Connor, J., & Young, L. (2022). How is embodiment in physical education theoretically conceptualised? A concept analysis. Physical Education and Sport Pedagogy. https://doi.org/10.1080/17408989.2022.2153819
  32. Magallanes, C. (2015). Crisis de identidad en la educación física. Revista Universitaria de la Educación Física y el Deporte. http://revista.iuacj.edu.uy/index.php/rev1/article/view/18
  33. Maguire, J. (1991). Human sciences, sport sciences, and the need to study people “in the round”. Quest, 43(2), 190–206. https://doi.org/10.1080/00336297.1991.10484021
  34. Martínez, J. (2009). El movimiento humano. Ciencia, competencia y estándares. Kinesis.
  35. Martínez-Santos, R. (2014). Thoughts and conditions for the unification of sports science. Apunts. Educación Física y Deportes, 118, 95–100. https://doi.org/10.5672/apunts.2014-0983.es.(2014/4).118.10
  36. Martines, I. C., de Carvalho Fugi, N., & de Souza, J. (2020). The José María Cagigal research program for the field of physical education. Movimento, 26(1). https://doi.org/10.22456/1982-8918.92691
  37. McFee, G. (2007). Paradigms and possibilities: Or, some concerns for the study of sport from the philosophy of science. Sport, Ethics and Philosophy, 1(1), 58–77. https://doi.org/10.1080/17511320601143009
  38. McNamee, M. (1998). Philosophy and physical education: Analysis, epistemology and axiology. European Physical Education Review, 4(1), 75–91. https://doi.org/10.1177/1356336X9800400108
  39. Meinel, K. (1977). Didáctica del movimiento. Orbe.
  40. Mendes, M. I. B. D. S., & Da Nóbrega, T. P. (2008). Brazil-Medico and the contributions of medical-hygienist thought to the scientific bases of Brazilian physical education. Historia, Ciencias, Saude - Manguinhos, 15(1), 209–219. https://doi.org/10.1590/S0104-59702008000100013
  41. Nagel, E. (1991). La estructura de la ciencia. Paidós.
  42. Newell, K. M. (1986). Constraints on the development of coordination. In M. G. Wade & H. T. A. Whiting (Eds.), Motor development in children: Aspects of coordination and control (pp. 341-360). Martinus Nijhoff. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-009-4460-2_19
  43. Padrón, J. (2007). Tendencias epistemológicas de la investigación científica en el siglo XXI. Cinta de Moebio, 28, Article 28.
  44. Parlebas, P. (2001). Juegos, deporte y sociedad: Léxico de praxiología motriz. Paidotribo.
  45. Parviainen, J., & Aromaa, J. (2017). Bodily knowledge beyond motor skills and physical fitness: A phenomenological description of knowledge formation in physical training. Sport, Education and Society, 22(4), 477–492. https://doi.org/10.1080/13573322.2015.1054273
  46. Petrovic, A., Koprivica, V., & Bokan, B. (2017). Quantitative, qualitative and mixed research in sport science: A methodological report. South African Journal for Research in Sport, Physical Education and Recreation, 39(2), 181–197.
  47. Piggott, B., Müller, S., Chivers, P., Papaluca, C., & Hoyne, G. (2019). Is sports science answering the call for interdisciplinary research? A systematic review. European Journal of Sport Science, 19(3), Article 3. https://doi.org/10.1080/17461391.2018.1508506
  48. Pisk, J. (2014). Sport science: Ontological and methodological considerations. Physical Culture & Sport. Studies & Research, 61(1), 5–14.
  49. Popper, K. (1980). La lógica de la investigación científica. Tecnos.
  50. Reina, R. (2010). Estado Del Arte En Las Ciencias De La Actividad Física Y Del Deporte a Través Del Vi Congreso Internacional De La Aecd: Perspectivas Científicas Y Organizativas. Motricidad. European Journal of Human Movement, 25, 1–30.
  51. Renson, R. (1989). From physical education to kinanthropology: A quest for academic and professional identity. Quest, 41(3), 235–256. https://doi.org/10.1080/00336297.1989.10483973
  52. Ryall, E. (2019). Introduction to philosophical issues in sport science. Philosophies, 4(4). https://doi.org/10.3390/philosophies4040057
  53. Sabiston, C. M., Vani, M., de Jonge, M., & Nesbitt, A. (2022). Scoping reviews and rapid reviews. International Review of Sport and Exercise Psychology, 15(1), 91–119. https://doi.org/10.1080/1750984X.2021.1964095
  54. Sage, G. H. (1989). A commentary on qualitative research as a form of scientific inquiry in sport and physical education. Research Quarterly for Exercise and Sport, 60(1), 25–29.
  55. Sarmiento, J. (2018). Reconstrucción de las principales propuestas teóricas respecto al problema de la cientificidad en las ciencias del deporte. Lúdica Pedagógica, 1(28), Article 28. https://revistas.pedagogica.edu.co/index.php/LP/article/view/9429
  56. Souza, J. de. (2023). Movement: A praise for physical education and sport. Movimento, 29. https://doi.org/10.22456/1982-8918.121546
  57. Struna, N. L. (2007). Investigación historia en la actividad física. En Métodos de investigación en actividad física (pp. 221-236). [Datos de editor no proporcionados].
  58. Thomas, D. L. (1976). Sport: The conceptual enigma. Journal of the Philosophy of Sport, 3(1), 35–41.
  59. Toit, R. E. du, & Klerk, W. de. (2022). Guidelines for conducting rapid reviews in psychology research. Journal of Psychology in Africa, 32(6), 640–647. https://doi.org/10.1080/14330237.2022.2121468
  60. Vargas Olarte, C. E. (2012). Ciencias del deporte: Evolución de aspectos teórico científicos. Entramado, 8(1), Article 1.
  61. Vicente Pedraz, M. (1998). Reflexiones sobre el estado de la cuestión epistemológica de los saberes y prácticas del ámbito de la cultura física. Universidade da Coruña. https://ruc.udc.es/dspace/handle/2183/9764
  62. Weingart, P. (2010). A short history of knowledge formations. In R. Frodeman, J. T. Klein, & C. Mitcham (Eds.), The Oxford handbook of interdisciplinarity (pp. 3–14). Oxford University Press.
  63. Williams, A. M., & Ward, P. (2017). Searching for the Holy Grail: Can there ever be such a thing as a ‘Grand Unified Theory of sports performance’? Human Movement Science, 56, 181–183. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.humov.2017.04.012
  64. Woods, C., & Davids, K. (2023). Thinking through making and doing: Sport science as an art of inquiry. Sport Education and Society, 28(5), 579–593. https://doi.org/10.1080/13573322.2022.2054792
  65. Woods, C., Rudd, J., Araujo, D., Vaughan, J., & Davids, K. (2021). Weaving lines of inquiry: Promoting transdisciplinarity as a distinctive way of undertaking sport science research. Sports Medicine-Open, 7(1). https://doi.org/10.1186/s40798-021-00347-1
  66. Zeigler, E. F. (1974). Analysis of the claim that «physical education» has become a «family resemblance» term. En Concepts of physical education and sports sciences (Chap. 4, pp. 43-55). Wingate Institute for Physical Education and Sport.