Przejdź do treści
Central European Journal of Sport Sciences and Medicine
Vol. 46, No. 2/2024
Statystyki OpenAlex

Dla całego czasopisma, według OpenAlex.

Cytowania
1 077
Publikacje
412
H-index
12
I10-index
22
Średnia cytowań (2 lata)
0,43
Cytowania w poszczególnych latach
Wykres cytowań czasopisma. Dokładne wartości są dostępne w tabeli poniżej. 2017: 37 2018: 45 2019: 56 2020: 112 2021: 106 2022: 146 2023: 150 2024: 161 2025: 132 2026: 67 2017 2026
Pokaż dane w tabeli
Cytowania w poszczególnych latach
RokPublikacjeCytowania
20174237
20183345
20193556
202038112
202138106
202231146
202330150
202429161
202530132
20261667

Dane pobrane:

Co oznaczają te liczby?

Publikacje i cytowania obejmują rekordy powiązane z tym czasopismem w OpenAlex. H-index to największa liczba h publikacji mających co najmniej h cytowań. I10-index to liczba publikacji cytowanych co najmniej 10 razy. Wykres przedstawia cytowania otrzymane w danym roku; bieżący rok jest niepełny. Zakres bazy może różnić się od WNUS i innych serwisów.

Średnia z 2 lat jest wskaźnikiem OpenAlex. Nie jest to Journal Impact Factor firmy Clarivate.

Zobacz w OpenAlex (nowa karta)

Physical Education Teachers as Adults Trainers and their Perceptions of their Evaluation on Vocational Education and Training

DOI: 10.18276/cej.2024.2-06
Cytuj

Pełny tekst jest dostępny

Abstrakt

Introduction: Educational systems and related evaluation policies tend to change and adapt to the demands of society all over the world. In Greece, the latest education policy includes the update and adaption of the educational curricula and the introduction of evaluation of teachers and adult trainers on vocational education and training (VET). The evaluation of teachers and trainers involved in the Public vocational training Institutes (VTI) and specifically in the Specialties of Sports’ Coach through an effective evaluation process could identify the strengths and weaknesses of the trainers and create professional development opportunities within their knowledge of content, pedagogy, and curriculum. Purpose: The purpose of this study was to investigate the perceptions of Physical Education Teachers who teach as Adult Trainers in public and private VTIs in the specialty of Sports Coach (e.g., Soccer Coach, Basketball Coach, Track and Field Coach, Tennis Coach, Strength and Conditioning Coach, AEROBICS Instructor), regarding their evaluation on VET. Methods: In this study, 102 participants (M = 44.9 ± 11.02 years old), 55 males (53.9%) and 47 females (46.1%) participated. A relevant questionnaire about Teachers’ Evaluation was adapted and used. Non-parametric statistical tests were applied and descriptive statistics were calculated for all variables. Results: The results showed different perceptions among some items of the questionnaire depending on the work institution - public / private VTIs (p ≤ 0.05), educational level (p ≤ 0.05) and teaching experience (p ≤ 0.05). Conclusions: These results underscore the complexity and variability in perceptions of educational evaluation. These findings suggest the importance of considering various factors, such as institutional type, teaching experience, and educational level, in the design and implementation of evaluation systems to ensure they are effective, equitable, and conducive to professional growth.
Podgląd PDF

Otwórz PDF

Bibliografia (69)
  1. Altrichter, H., & Kemethofer, D. (2018). Does accountability pressure through school inspections promote school improvement?. In Educational Effectiveness Theory (pp. 29–53). Routledge. http://doi.org/10.4324/9781315231037-3
  2. Athanailidis, I., Laios, A., Arvanitidoy, V., Mourtzios, C., & Zaggelidis, G. (2016). Self-assessment of tennis coaches relating to athletes, parents and their educational level. The case of Greece. Journal of Physical Education and Sport, 16(3), 901–904. http://doi.org/10.7752/jpes.2016.03141
  3. Athanailidis, I., Zangelidis, G., & Laios, A. (2015). The educational system of coaching schools in tennis. Journal of Physical Education and Sport, 15(IKEEART-2020-1931), 208–211. http://doi.org/10.7752/jpes.2015.02032
  4. Bakker, M. E., Roelofs, E. C., Beijaard, D., Sanders, P. F., Tigelaar, D. E., & Verloop, N. (2011). Video portfolios: The development and usefulness of a teacher assessment procedure. Studies in Educational Evaluation, 37(2-3), 123–133. http://doi.org/10.1016/j.stueduc.2011.04.007
  5. Bazylchuk, O., Putrov, S., Bazylchuk, V., Sushchenko, L., & Galina, I. (2018). Problems of implementing innovational educational technologies in the process of vocational training of future specialists in physical therapy in higher educational establishments in Ukraine. Journal of Physical Education and Sport, 18(2), 606–613. http://doi.org/10.7752/jpes.2018.02088
  6. Bezkopylnyi, O., O. Bazylchuk, V. Bazylchuk, Y. Dutchak, L. Sushchenko, & Н. Ostapenko. "Peculiarities of application of interactive educational technologies in training of future teachers of physical culture to work with health protection in secondary school." Journal of Physical Education and Sport 20, no. Suppl. 1 (2019): 291–297. http://doi.org/10.7752/jpes.2020.s1040
  7. Brinia, V., Fotakeli, M., & Vasileiou, C. (2019). Adult tutors' views on their educational needs: the case of a Public Institute of Vocational Training in Greece. International Journal of Higher Education and Sustainability, 2(4), 327–340.
  8. Bryman, A. (2003). Quantity and quality in social research. Routledge.
  9. Bryman, A. (2016). Social research methods. Oxford university press.
  10. Cohen, D. K., & Hill, H. C. (1998). Instructional policy and classroom performance: The mathematics reform in California. http://doi.org/10.1111/0161-4681.00057
  11. Cohen, L., Manion, L., Morrison, K., & Morrison, R. B. (2007). Research methods in education” Routledge. https://doi.org/10.4324/9780203029053
  12. Collins, J. (2004). Education techniques for lifelong learning: principles of adult learning. Radiographics, 24(5), 1483–1489. http://doi.org/10.1148/rg.245045020
  13. De Angelis, M., Marzano, A., & Iannotta, I. S. (2015). Teacher evaluation in Italy: problematic nodes and critical features, In EDULEARN 15 Proceedings (pp. 1782–1790). IATED.
  14. Deligiannidou, T., Athanailidis, I., Laios, A., & Stafyla, A. (2019). Variation of perceptions of Physical Education teachers on the principal's level of effectiveness according to their age, gender, years of service in the same school and stage of service. Journal of Physical Education and Sport, 19, 134–142. http://doi.org/10.7752/jpes.2019.s1020
  15. Deligiannidou, T., Athanailidis, I., Laios, A., & Stafyla, A. (2020). Determining effective leadership qualities of a school principal from the perception of PE teachers in Greece. Journal of Physical Education and Sport, 20, 2126-2135. http://doi.org/10.7752/jpes.2020.s3286
  16. Edy, D. L. (2020). Revisiting the impact of project-based learning on online learning in vocational education: analysis of learning in pandemic Covid-19. In 2020 4th International Conference on Vocational Education and Training (ICOVET) (pp. 378–381). IEEE. http://doi.org/10.1109/ICOVET50258.2020.9230137
  17. Finnish National Board of Education. (2012). Teachers in Finland – trusted professionals. Helsinki: Finnish National Board of Education.
  18. Freitas, S., Dias, C., & Fonseca, A. (2013). How do elite soccer coaches prepare their players and teams psychologically?. Journal of Physical Education and Sport, 13(3), 321. http://doi.org/10.7752/jpes.2013.03053
  19. Gargalianos, D., & Matsaridis, A. (2017). Evaluation of the total quality management maturity of the hellenic national sport federations using the EQFM model. Journal of Physical Education and Sport, 17(2), 675. http://doi.org/10.7752/jpes.2017.02101
  20. Gurvitch, R., Lund, J., & Metzler, M. (2008). Chapter 1: Researching the adoption of model-based instruction— context and chapter summaries. Journal of Teaching in Physical Education, 27(4), 449-456. http://doi.org/10.1123/jtpe.27.4.449
  21. Hammond, J., & Perry, J. (2005). A multi-dimensional assessment of soccer coaching course effectiveness. Ergonomics, 48(11–14), 1698–1710. http://doi.org/10.1080/00140130500101213
  22. Ibm, C. R. (2017). IBM SPSS Statistics for Windows, Version Q3 25.0. Armonk, NY: IBM Corporation.
  23. Ingersoll, R. M., & Collins, G. J. (2019). Accountability and control in American schools. In Teachers Matter–But How? (pp. 75–95). Routledge. http://doi.org/10.1080/00220272.2016.1205142
  24. Isoré, M. (2009). Teacher evaluation: Current practices in OECD countries and a literature review.
  25. Jose, P., & Lopez, C. (2023). Formative assessment of physical education teachers and self-concept level of primary school children. Central European Journal of Sport Sciences and Medicine, 41(01). http://doi.org/10.18276/cej.2023.1-04
  26. Kafritsa, V., Anagnou, E., & Fragoulis, I. (2021). Educational needs of adult refugees’ educators: A Greek case study. Education Quarterly Reviews, 4(1). http://doi.org/10.31235/osf.io/wjtf7
  27. Kapachtsi, V. (2007). The evaluation of the teacher: attitudes and perceptions of teachers of secondary education in the region of V. Thessaloniki (Master's thesis).
  28. Kapachtsi, V. (2008). The evaluation of the teacher's work. Attitudes of Greek secondary school teachers towards evaluation. Thessaloniki: Kyriakidis Publications.
  29. Kapachtsi, (2013). Teachers’ evaluation. Research data. C.V.P. PAIDAGOGIKIS & EKPAIDEFSIS (In Greek: Ο θεσμός της αξιολόγησης του εκπαιδευτικού. Ερευνητικά δεδομένα. C.V.P. ΠΑΙΔΑΓΩΓΙΚΗΣ & ΕΚΠΑΙΔΕΥΣΗΣ).
  30. Kipreos, G., Papailiou, D., Perrea, A., Travlos, A., & Strigas, E. (2016). Evaluation of coaches and differences of perspective due to demographic characteristics. Journal of Physical Education and Sport, 16(3), 831. http://doi.org/10.7752/jpes.2016.03131
  31. Knowles, M. S., Holton III, E. F., & Swanson, R. A. (2014). The adult learner: The definitive classic in adult education and human resource development. Routledge. http://doi.org/10.4324/9780429299612
  32. Kokkos, A. (2008). Adult Education in Greece. Convergence, 41, 59-73.
  33. Kozubal, A., Kozubal, K., Warchoł, K., Bartosiewicz, A., Łuszczki, E., Król, P., ... & Stępień-Słodkowska, M. (2022). The influence of lockdown on the physical activity and subjective health in the teachers of physical education in Poland. Central European Journal of Sport Sciences and Medicine, 38, 27–37. http://doi.org/10.18276/cej.2022.2-03
  34. Kyriazi, N. (2011). Sociological Research Critical Review of Methods and Techniques. Πεδίο, Athens.
  35. Laios, A. (2005). The educational system for training coaches in Greece. International Journal of Educational Management, 19(6), 500–504. http://doi.org/10.1108/09513540510617445
  36. Law 4763/2020, National System of Vocational Education, Training and Lifelong Learning, incorporation into Greek legislation of Directive (EU) 2018/958 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 28 June 2018 on the proportionality check prior to the adoption of new legislation on professions (OJ L 173), ratification of the Agreement between the Government of the Hellenic Republic and the Government of the Federal Republic of Germany on the Hellenic-German Youth Foundation and other provisions, FEDERAL LAW GAZETTE 31A/21-12- 2020. Greece.
  37. Law 5029/2023, "We Live Together in Harmony - Breaking the Silence": regulations for the prevention and treatment of violence and bullying in schools and other provisions, Government Gazette 55A/10-3-2023. Greece.
  38. Lyle, J. (2005). Sports coaching concepts: A framework for coaches' behaviour. Routledge. https://doi.org/10.4324/9780203994986
  39. Lyle, J., & Cushion, C. (2016). Sport coaching concepts: A framework for coaching practice. Taylor & Francis. http://doi.org/10.4324/9780203126424
  40. Matsagouras, E. (2007). Teaching strategies. Athens: Gutenberg.
  41. Mathison, S. (2010). The Purpose of Educational Evaluation, in Peterson, P., Baker, E. and McGaw, B. (Eds): International Encyclopedia of Education, 792–797. http://doi.org/10.1016/B978-0-08-044894-7.01592-X
  42. Matthew, B. T. (2015). Systematic analysis of physical education standards, benchmarks and related teacher decisions. Journal of Physical Education and Sport, 15(2), 277. http://doi.org/10.7752/jpes.2015.02042;
  43. Mertens, D. (2009). Research and evaluation in education and psychology. Athens: Metahmio.
  44. Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development. (2009). Teacher evaluation. A conceptual framework and examples of country practices. Organisation for Economic Co-Operation and Development.
  45. Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development. (2016). PISA 2015: Results in focus. PISA.
  46. Papageorgiou, G. (2014). Quantitative research. Retrieved from: http://sociology. soc. uoc. gr/pegasoc/wp-content/uploads/2014/10/Microsoft-Word-Papageorgiou_DEIGMATOLHPTIKH1. pdf (2014).
  47. Papakonstantinou, P., & Kolympari, T. (2019). A bone of contention: teacher evaluation system in Greece. International Journal of Management in Education, 13(1), 40–58. http://doi.org/10.1504/IJMIE.2019.10016610
  48. Peterson, P. L., Baker, E., & McGaw, B. (2010). International encyclopedia of education. Elsevier Ltd.
  49. Petty, J. (2013). Interactive, technology-enhanced self-regulated learning tools in healthcare education: A literature review. Nurse education today, 33(1), 53–59. http://doi.org/10.1016/j.nedt.2012.06.008
  50. Protsenko, U., Pantiuk, T., Romanchuk, O., & Danylevych, M. (2016). Improvement features of the Ukrainian physical education system. Journal of Physical Education and Sport, 16(1), 113–117. http://doi.org/10.7752/jpes.2016.01019
  51. Richards, K. A. R., Gaudreault, K. L., Starck, J. R., & Mays Woods, A. (2018). Physical education teachers’ perceptions of perceived mattering and marginalization. Physical Education and Sport Pedagogy, 23(4), 445–459. http:doi.org/10.1080/17408989.2018.1455820
  52. Robinson, W., & Campbell, J. (2010). Effective teaching in gifted education: Using a whole school approach. Routledge. http://doi.org/10.4324/9780203855065
  53. Sahlberg, P. (2010). The secret to Finland’s success: Educating teachers. Stanford Center for Opportunity Policy in Education, 2, 1–8.
  54. Sahlberg, P. (2021). Finnish lessons 3.0: What can the world learn from educational change in Finland?. Teachers College Press. https://doi.org/10.25656/01:11098
  55. Snider, J. (2011). Keys to Finnish educational success: Intensive teacher-training, union collaboration. The Huffington Post.
  56. Soltyk, O., Pavlyuk, Y., Vynogradskyi, B., Pavlyuk, O., Chopyk, T., & Antoniuk, O. (2017). Improvement of professional competence of future specialists in physical education and sports during the process of vocational training. Journal of Physical Education and Sport, 17, 964–969. http://doi.org/10.7752/jpes.2017.s3148
  57. Stefanik, R. (2013). Sociopolitical aspects of the work of physical education teachers in the West Pomerania in the years 1945–1950. Central European Journal of Sport Sciences and Medicine, 4(4), 11–17.
  58. Syauqi, K., Munadi, S., & Triyono, M. B. (2020). Students' Perceptions toward Vocational Education on Online Learning during the COVID-19 Pandemic. International Journal of Evaluation and Research in Education, 9(4), 881–886. http://doi.org/10.11591/ijere.v9i4.20766
  59. Tarhan, H., Karaman, A., Lauri, K., & Aerila, J. A. (2019). Understanding teacher evaluation in Finland: A professional development framework. Australian Journal of Teacher Education (Online), 44(4), 33–50. http://doi.org/10.14221/ajte.2018v44n4.3
  60. Thompson, J. L. (Ed.). (2018). Adult education for a change. Routledge.
  61. Tight, M. (2012). Key concepts in adult education and training. Routledge. http://doi.org/10.4324/9780203434086
  62. Todd, E. L., Begoña, C. R., & Carol, C. I. (2016). An evaluation of teachers' knowledge and use of physical education instructional models. Journal of Physical Education and Sport, 16(4), 1310. http://doi.org/10.7752/jpes.2016.04208
  63. Tsiolis, G. (2011). The relationship between qualitative and quantitative research in the social sciences: From the polemic of "paradigms" to synthetic approaches. Dafermos, M. Samatas, M. Koukuritakis, S. Hiotakis (eds.) Social sciences in the 21st century: Contentious issues and challenges. Issues and challenges. http://doi.org/10.4236/oalib.1107855
  64. Valcke, M., Rots, I., Verbeke, M., & Van Braak, J. (2007). ICT teacher training: Evaluation of the curriculum and training approach in Flanders. Teaching and teacher Education, 23(6), 795–808. http://doi.org/10.1016/j.tate.2007.02.004
  65. Villegas-Reimers, E. (2003). Teacher professional development: an international review of the literature. Paris: International Institute for Educational Planning
  66. Webb, R., Vulliamy, G., Hämäläinen, S., Sarja, A., Kimonen, E., & Nevalainen, R. (2004). A comparative analysis of primary teacher professionalism in England and Finland. Comparative education, 40(1), 83–107. http://doi.org/10.1080/0305006042000184890
  67. Williams, J. H., & Engel, L. C. (2012). How do other countries evaluate teachers?. Phi Delta Kappan, 94(4), 53–57. https://doi.org/10.1177/003172171209400414
  68. World Medical Association. (2010). WMA declaration of Helsinki – Ethical principles for medical research involving human subjects.
  69. Zafeiropoulos, K. (2005). How a scientific work is done. 2nd Edition. Athens: Kritiki Publications.