Badania mieszane w naukach ekonomicznych i zarządzaniu. Podejście równoległe


ISBN: 978-83-7972-874-9    ISBN (online): 978-83-7972-873-2    ISSN: 0860-2751    OAI    DOI: 10.18276/978-83-7972-873-2
CC BY-SA   Open Access 

Lista wydań / T. (MCDXX) 1346

Rok wydania:2024
Dziedzina:Dziedzina nauk społecznych
Dyscyplina:ekonomia i finanse
Autorzy: Krzysztof Błoński ORCID
Uniwersytet Szczeciński

Adam Sagan ORCID
Uniwersytet Ekonomiczny w Krakowie

Informacje

Wersja elektroniczna publikacji dostępna na licencji CC BY-SA 4.0 po 12 miesiącach od daty wprowadzenia do obrotu: luty 2025

Abstrakt

Koncepcja badań mieszanych (mixed methods research) zakłada pluralizm metod badawczych, dzięki czemu możliwe jest połączenie ilościowego i jakościowego podejścia do projektowania i realizacji procesu badawczego. Umożliwia to włączenie obu podejść do formułowania pytań i metod badawczych, metod zbierania danych, ich analizy oraz wnioskowania w obrębie jednego badanego przypadku. Cechą wyróżniającą i odróżniającą badanie metodami mieszanymi od badania metodami wielorakimi jest integracja występująca praktycznie w całym procesie badawczym. Efektem takiego podejścia powinna być większa możliwość eksploracji i eksplanacji badanych zjawisk niż w przypadku zastosowania tylko jednej z tych metod. Projekty badawcze metod mieszanych (np. podejście równoległe) należy postrzegać jako ramy wspomagające, ułatwiające organizowanie licznych decyzji metodycznych, które trzeba podejmować na poszczególnych etapach gromadzenia danych, ich analizy i oceny jakości badania. Autorzy, przygotowując monografię, postawili sobie za cel wskazanie odpowiedzi na pytanie − jaki powinien być zakres działań, decyzji w przypadku projektowania i realizacji badania metodami mieszanymi wykorzystującego podejście równoległe? Konsekwencją takiego kierunku przeglądu literatury przedmiotu jest przyjęty układ pracy, odpowiadający poszczególnym etapom procesu badawczego.

Bibliografia

1.Abeza, G., O’Reilly, N., Dottori, M., Séguin, B., Nzindukiyimana, O. (2015). Mixed methods research in sport marketing. International Journal of Multiple Research Approaches, 9(1), 40−56.
2.Adams, J., Khan, H.T., Raeside, R., White, D.I. (2007). Research methods for graduate business and social science students. SAGE Publications.
3.Alborz, A., McNally, R. (2004). Developing methods for systematic reviewing in health services delivery and organization: An example from a review of access to health care for people with learning disabilities. Part 2. Evaluation of the literature − A practical guide. Health Information and Libraries Journal, 21, 227−236.
4.Alise, M.A., Teddlie, C. (2010). A Continuation of the Paradigm Wars? Prevalence Rates of Methodological Approaches Across the Social/Behavioral Sciences. Journal of Mixed Methods Research, 4(2), 103−126. https://doi.org/10.1177/1558689809360805.
5.Anderson, M.H. (2006). How can we know what we think until we see what we said? A citation and citation context analysis of Karl Weick’s the social psychology of organizing. Organization Studies, 27(11), 1675–1692.
6.Andrew, S., Halcomb, E. (red.) (2009). Mixed methods research for nursing and the health sciences. Wiley-Blackwell Pub.
7.Andrew, S., Salamonson, Y., Everett, B., Halcomb, E.J., Davidson, P.M. (2011). Beyond the ceiling effect: using a mixed methods approach to measure patient satisfaction. International Journal of Multiple Research Approaches, 5(1), 52−63.
8.Appelbaum, M., Cooper, H., Kline, R.B., Mayo-Wilson, E., Nezu, A.M., Rao, S.M. (2018). Journal article reporting standards for quantitative research in psychology: The APA Publications and Communications Board task force report. American Psychologist, 73(1), 3−25.
9.Aranowska E. (2005), Pomiar ilościowy w psychologii. Od klasycznej teorii testów do podstaw teorii testów dla pojęć rozmytych. Warszawa: Wydawnictwo Naukowe Scholar.
10.Aultman, J., Baughman, K.R., Ludwick, R. (2018). A broader understanding of care managers’ attitudes of advance care planning: A concurrent nested design. Journal of Clinical Nursing, 27(19–20), 3572–3582. https://doi.org/10.1111/jocn.14531.
11.Babbie, E. (2021). Badania społeczne w praktyce. Warszawa: Wydawnictwo Naukowe PWN.
12.Bazeley, P. (2018). Integrating analyses in mixed methods research. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
13.Beach, D., Pedersen, R.B. (2016). Causal Case Study Methods: Foundations and Guidelines for Comparing, Matching, and Tracing. University of Michigan Press.
14.Bergman, M.M. (red.) (2008). Advances in mixed methods research: Theories and applications. Sage.
15.Braun, V., Clarke, V. (2006). Using thematic analysis in psychology. Qualitative Research in Psychology, 3(2), 77−101. DOI: 10.1191/1478088706qp063oa.
16.Browne, W., Lahi, M.G., Parker, R. (2009). A guide to sample size calculations for random effect models via simulation and the MLPowSim Software Package. https://www.semanticscholar. org/paper/A-guide-to-sample-size-calculations-for-random-via-Browne- -Lahi/9feff4e31550fdc784e8336e95f85a214ca82f72.
17.Brunswik, E. (1956). Perception and the representative design of psychological experiments. Berkeley: University of California Press.
18.Bryman, A. (2007). Barriers to integrating quantitative and qualitative research. Journal of mixed methods research, 1(1), 8−22. https://doi.org/10.1177/2345678906290531.
19.Bryman, A., Becker, S., Sempik, J. (2008). Quality criteria for quantitative, qualitative and mixed methods research: A view from social policy. International Journal of Social Research Methodology, 11(4), 261−276.
20.Brzeziński J.M. (2021). Metodologia badań psychologicznych. Wydanie nowe. Warszawa: Wydawnictwo Naukowe PWN.
21.Cabrera, L.Y., Reiner, P.B. (2016). A novel sequential mixed-method technique for contrastive analysis of unscripted qualitative data: Contrastive quantitized content analysis. Sociological Methods & Research, 47(3), 532−548.
22.Califf, C.B., Sarker, S., Sarker, S. (2020). The bright and dark sides of technostress: A mixed- -methods study involving healthcare IT. MIS Quarterly, 44(2).
23.Cameron, R., Molina‐Azorin, J.F. (2011). The acceptance of mixed methods in business and management research. International Journal of Organizational Analysis, 19(3), 256−271.
24.Castro, F.G., Kellison, J.G., Boyd, S.J., Kopak, A. (2010). A methodology for conducting integrative mixed methods research and data analyses. Journal of Mixed Methods Research, 4(4), 342−360.
25.Chan, D. (1998). Functional relations among constructs in the same content domain at different levels of analysis: A typology of composition models. Journal of Applied Psychology, 83(2), 234–246. https://doi.org/10.1037/0021-9010.83.2.234.
26.Chang, Y., Voils, C.I., Sandelowski, M., Hasselblad, V., Crandell, J.L. (2009). Transforming verbal counts in reports of qualitative descriptive studies into numbers. Western Journal of Nursing Research, 31(7), 837– 852.
27.Chigbu, U. (2019). Visually Hypothesising in Scientific Paper Writing: Confirming and Refuting Qualitative Research Hypotheses Using Diagrams. Publications, 7(1), 22. https://doi.org/10.3390/publications7010022.
28.Chlipała, P. (2018). Integracja podejść metodologicznych w badaniach marketingu. Wydawnictwo Uniwersytetu Ekonomicznego w Krakowie.
29.Collingridge, D.S. (2013). A primer on quantitized data analysis and permutation testing. Journal of Mixed Methods Research, 7(1), 81–97.
30.Collins, K.M. (2015). Validity in multimethod and mixed research. W: S.N. Hesse-Biber, B. Johnson (red.), The Oxford handbook of multimethod and mixed methods research inquiry (s. 240−256). New York: Oxford University Press.
31.Collins, K.M., Onwuegbuzie, A.J., Jiao, Q.G. (2006). Prevalence of Mixed-methods Sampling Designs in Social Science Research. Evaluation & Research in Education, 19(2), 83–101. https://doi.org/10.2167/eri421.0.
32.Collins, K.M.T., Onwuegbuzie, A.J., Johnson, B. (2012). Securing a place at the table: A review and extension of legitimation criteria for the conduct of mixed research. American Behavioral Scientist, 56, 849−865.
33.Collins, K.M.T., Onwuegbuzie, A.J., Sutton, I.L. (2006). A model incorporating the rationale and purpose for conducting mixed methods research in special education and beyond. Learning Disabilities: A Contemporary Journal, 4, 67–100.
34.Cooke, A., Smith, D.M., Booth, A. (2012). The benefits of a systematic search strategy when conducting qualitative evidence synthesis; the SPIDER tool. Qualitative Health Research, 22(10), 1435−1443.
35.Cooper, H. (2020). Reporting Quantitative Research in Psychology: How to Meet APA Style Journal Article Reporting Standards. Revised. APA Style Series. APA Books.
36.Cox, J.W., Hassard, J. (2005). Triangulation in organizational research: A re-presentation. Organization, 12(1), 109−133.
37.Creswell, J.W. (2003). Research Design. Qualitative, Quantitative, and Mixed Methods Approaches. (2nd ed.). London: Sage Publications.
38.Creswell, J.W. (2013). Projektowanie badań naukowych. Metody jakościowe, ilościowe i mieszane. Kraków: Wydawnictwo Uniwersytetu Jagiellońskiego.
39.Cresswell, J.W. (2009). Research Design: Qualitative, Quantitative, and Mixed Methods Approaches. Sage.
40.Creswell, J.W. (2014). Research Design: Qualitative, Quantitative and Mixed Methods Approaches (4th ed.). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
41.Creswell, J.W., Clark, V.L.P. (2010). Designing and conducting mixed methods research (2nd ed.). Sage Publications.
42.Creswell, J.W., Clark, V.L P. (2007). Designing and conducting mixed methods research. Sage Publications.
43.Creswell, J.W., Clark, V.L.P. (2017). Designing and conducting mixed methods research. Sage Publications.
44.Creswell, J.W., Clark, V.L.P. (2018). Designing and conducting mixed methods research. Sage Publications.
45.Creswell, J.W., Clark V.L.P (2011). Designing and conducting mixed methods research. Thousand Oaks: Sage.
46.Creswell, J.W., Clark, V.L.P. (2006). Design and conducting mixed methods research. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
47.Creswell, J.W., Clark, V.L.P., Gutmann, M.L., Hanson, W.E. (2003). Advanced mixed methods research designs. W: A. Tashakkori, C. Teddlie (red.), Handbook of mixed methods in social and behavioral research (s. 209–240). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
48.Curtis, S., Gesler, W., Smith, G., Washburn, S. (2000). Approaches to sampling and case selection in qualitative research: Examples in the geography of health. Social Science and Medicine, 50, 1001–1014.
49.Czakon W. (2020). Rygor metodologiczny. W: W. Czakon (red.), Podstawy metodologii badań w naukach o zarządzaniu. Wydanie trzecie rozszerzone. Warszawa: Wydawnictwo Nieoczywiste.
50.Czakon, W. (2014). Kryteria oceny rygoru metodologicznego badań w naukach o zarządzaniu. Organizacja i Kierowanie, 1(161), 51−62.
51.D’Alessio, M., Laghi, F., Baiocco, R. (2009), Attitudes toward TV advertising: a measure for children. Journal of Applied Developmental Psychology, 30(4), 409−418.
52.Datta, L. (2001). The wheelbarrow, the mosaic, and the double helix: Challenges and strategies for successfully carrying out mixed methods evaluation. Evaluation Journal of Australasia, 1(2), 33–40.
53.De Loo, I., Lowe, A. (2011). Mixed methods research: don’t “just do it”. Qualitative Research in Accounting & Management, 8(1), 22−38.
54.Decuir-Gunby, J.T., Schutz, P.A. (2017). Developing a mixed methods proposal: A practical guide for beginning researchers (first edition). Sage.
55.Dellinger, A.B., Leech, N.L. (2007). Toward a unified validation framework in mixed methods research. Journal of Mixed Methods Research, 1(4), 309−332.
56.Denzin, N. (1978) The research act: a theoretical introduction to sociological methods. (2nd ed.) New York: Mc Graw-Hill.
57.Denzin, N.K. (1970). The research act in sociology. London: Butterworth.
58.Derbaix, C., Pecheux, C. (2003). „A new scale to assess children’s attitude toward TV advertising”. Journal of Advertising Research, 43(4), 390−399.
59.Donthu, N., Kumar, S., Mukherjee, D., Pandey, N., Lim, W.M. (2021). How to conduct a bibliometric analysis: An overview and guidelines. Journal of Business Research, 133, 285−296.
60.Driscoll, D.L., Appiah-Yeboah, A., Salib. P., Rupert, D.J. (2007). Merging qualitative and quantitative data in mixed methods research: How to and why not. Ecological and Environmental Anthropology, 3(1), 19–28.
61.Dubey, U., Kothari, D.P., Awari, G.K. (2016). Quantitative techniques in business, management and finance: A case-study approach. CRC Press.
62.Decuir-Gunby, J.T., Schutz, P.A. (2017). Developing a mixed methods proposal: A practical guide for beginning researchers (first ed.). Sage.
63.Duşa, A. (2019). QCA with R. Springer International Publishing. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-75668-4
64.Eastwood, J.G., Jalaludin, B.B., Kemp, L.A. (2014). Realist explanatory theory building method for social epidemiology: A protocol for a mixed method multilevel study of neighbourhood context and postnatal depression. SpringerPlus, 3(1), 12. https://doi. org/10.1186/2193-1801-3-12.
65.Egghe, L. (2006). Theory and practise of the g-index. Scientometrics, 69(1), 131–152. https:// doi.org/10.1007/s11192-006-0144-7.
66.Eisner, E.W. (1991). The enlightened eye: qualitative inquiry and the enhancement of educational practice. New York: Macmillan Publishing Company.
67.Ejdys, J. (2016). Problematyka społecznej odpowiedzialności biznesu jako obiekt naukowych zainteresowań − wyniki analizy bibliometrycznej. Przegląd Organizacji, 4, 36−44.
68.Fàbregues, S., Molina-Azorín, J.F. (2017). Addressing quality in mixed methods research: A review and recommendations for a future agenda. Quality & Quantity, 51(6), 2847−2863.
69.Fàbregues, S., Paré, M.-H., Meneses, J. (2019). Operationalizing and Conceptualizing Quality in Mixed Methods Research: A Multiple Case Study of the Disciplines of Education, Nursing, Psychology, and Sociology. Journal of Mixed Methods Research, 13(4), 424–445.
70.Fehrenbacher, A.E., Patel, D. (2020). Translating the theory of intersectionality into quantitative and mixed methods for empirical gender transformative research on health. Culture, Health & Sexuality, 22(sup1), 145–160. https://doi.org/10.1080/13691058.2019.1671494.
71.Feilzer, M. (2010). Doing Mixed Methods Research Pragmatically: Implications for the Rediscovery of Pragmatism as a Research Paradigm. Journal of Mixed Methods Research, 4(1), 6−16. https://doi.org/10.1177/1558689809349691
72.Fetters, M.D. (2019). The mixed methods research workbook: Activities for designing, implementing, and publishing projects. Sage Publications.
73.Fetters, M.D. (2020). The mixed methods research workbook: Activities for designing, implementing, and publishing projects. Sage.
74.Fetters, M.D., Curry, L. A., Creswell, J.W. (2013). Achieving integration in mixed methods designs− principles and practices. Health Services Research, 48(6 pt 2), 2134−2156. https://doi.org/10.1111/1475-6773.12117.
75.Fetters, M.D., Freshwater, D. (2015). The 1 + 1 = 3 Integration Challenge. Journal of Mixed Methods Research, 9(2), 115−117. https://doi.org/10.1177/1558689815581222.
76.Fetters, M.D., Molina-Azorin, J.F. (2017). The Journal of Mixed Method Research starts a new decade: The mixed methods research integration trilogy and its dimensions. Journal of Mixed Methods Research, 11(3), 291−307.
77.Fielding, N., Cisneros-Puebla, C. (2009). CAQDAS-GIS convergence: Toward a new integrated mixed method research practice? Journal of Mixed Methods Research, 3(4), 349–370.
78.Flick, U. (2007). Managing Quality in Qualitative Research. London: Sage.
79.Flick, U. (2010). Projektowanie badania jakościowego. Warszawa: Wydawnictwo Naukowe PWN.
80.Flick, U. (2011). Jakość w badaniach jakościowych. Warszawa: Wydawnictwo Naukowe PWN.
81.Flick, U. (1992). Triangulation revisited: strategy of validation or alternative? Journal for the Theory of Social Behavior, 22(2), 175−197.
82.Fornell, C., Larcker, D.F. (1981). Evaluating structural equation models with unobservable variables and measurement error. Journal of Marketing Research, 18(1), 39−50.
83.Frambach, J.M., van der Vleuten, C.P., Durning, S. (2013). AM last page: Quality criteria in qualitative and quantitative research. Academic Medicine, 88(4). DOI:10.1097/ ACM.0b013e31828abf7f.
84.Fugard, A.J.B., Potts, H.W.W. (2015). Supporting thinking on sample sizes for thematic analyses: A quantitative tool. International Journal of Social Research Methodology, 18(6), 669–684. https://doi.org/10.1080/13645579.2015.1005453.
85.Furlong, J., Oancea, A. (2005). Assessing quality in applied and practice-based educational research: A framework for discussion. Review of Australian research in education: counterpoints on the quality and impact of educational research − a special issue of the Australian Educational Researcher, 6, 89−104.
86.George, A.L., Bennett, A. (2005). Case studies and theory development in the social sciences. Cambridge: MIT Press.
87.Gibbert, M., Ruigrok, W., Wicki, B. (2008). What passes as a rigorous case study? Strategic Management Journal, 29(13), 1465−1474.
88.Gibbs, G. (2011). Analizowanie danych jakościowych. Warszawa: Wydawnictwo Naukowe PWN.
89.Gigerenzer, G. (2004). Mindless statistics. The Journal of Socio-Economics, 33(5), 587–606. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.socec.2004.09.033.
90.Gliner, J.A., Morgan, G.A., Leech, N.L. (2009). Research methods in applied settings: An integrated approach to design and analysis (2nd ed.). New York: Taylor & Francis.
91.Glinka, B., Czakon, W. (2021). Podstawy badań jakościowych. Warszawa: PWE.
92.Golicic, S.L., Davis, D.F. (2012). Implementing mixed methods research in supply chain management. International Journal of Physical Distribution & Logistics Management, 42(8/9), 726−741. https://doi.org/10.1108/09600031211269721.
93.Gorbaniuk, O. (2016). Wykorzystywanie procedury sędziów kompetentnych w naukach społecznych i możliwości jej oceny psychometrycznej za pomocą narzędzi dostępnych w Statistica. Kraków: Statsoft Polska.
94.Grafton, J., Lillis, A.M., Mahama, H. (2011). Mixed methods research in accounting. Qualitative Research in Accounting & Management, 8(1), 5−21.
95.Gravetter, F.J., Wallnau, L.B. (2007). Essentials of statistics for the behavioral sciences (6th ed.). Belmont, CA: Wadsworth.
96.Greene, J.C. (2007). Mixed methods in social inquiry (Vol. 9). John Wiley & Sons.
97.Greene, J.C., Caracelli, V.J., Graham, W.F. (1989). Toward a Conceptual Framework for Mixed-Method Evaluation Designs. Educational Evaluation and Policy Analysis, 11(3), 255−274. https://doi.org/10.3102/01623737011003255.
98.Guba, E.G., Lincoln, Y.S. (1989). Fourth Generation Evaluation. Sage.
99.Guetterman T.C., Fetters M.D., Creswell. J.W. (2015). Integrating quantitative and qualitative results in health science mixed methods research through joint displays. Annals of Family Medicine, 13(6), 554–561.
100.Guetterman, T.C., Fàbregues, S., Sakakibara, R. (2021). Visuals in joint displays to represent integration in mixed methods research: A methodological review. Methods in Psychology, 5. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.metip.2021.100080.
101.Guetterman, T., Creswell, J.W., Kuckartz, U. (2015). Using joint displays and MAXQDA software to represent the results of mixed methods research. W: M. McCrudden, G. Schraw, C. Buckendahl (red.), Use of visual displays in research and testing: Coding, interpreting and reporting data (s. 145−176). Charlotte, NC: Information Age Publishing.
102.Guillet, B.D. (2020). Online upselling: Moving beyond offline upselling in the hotel industry. International Journal of Hospitality Management, 84, 102322.
103.Gwet, K.L. (2014). Handbook of Inter-Rater Reliability: The Definitive Guide to Measuring the Extent of Agreement Among Raters (4th ed). Advanced Analytics, LLC.
104.Hales, D., Peersman, G., Rugg, D., Kiwango, E. (2010). An Introduction to Triangulation. UNAIDS.
105.Hall, B., Howard, K. (2008). A Synergistic Approach. Journal of Mixed Methods Research, 2, 248–269. https://doi.org/10.1177/1558689808314622.
106.Hanson, W.E., Creswell, J.W., Clark, V.L.P., Petska, K.S., Creswell, J.D. (2005). Mixed methods research designs in counseling psychology. Journal of Counseling Psychology, 52(2), 224–235. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-0167.52.2.224.
107.Harrison III, R.L. (2013). Using mixed methods designs in the Journal of Business Research, 1990–2010. Journal of Business Research, 66(11), 2153−2162.
108.Harrison, R.L., Reilly, T.M. (2011). Mixed methods design in marketing research. Qualitative Market Research: an International Journal, 14(1), 7−26. https://doi. org/10.1108/13522751111099300.
109.Harrison, R.L., Reilly, T.M., Creswell, J.W. (2020). Methodological rigor in mixed methods: An application in management studies. Journal of Mixed Methods Research, 14(4), 473−495.
110.Hayter, C.S. (2016). Constraining entrepreneurial development: A knowledge-based view of social networks among academic entrepreneurs. Research Policy, 45(2), 475−490.
111.Hesse-Biber, S.N. (2010). Mixed methods research: Merging theory with practice. Guilford Press.
112.Heyvaert, M., Hannes, K., Maes, B., Onghena, P. (2013). Critical appraisal of mixed methods studies. Journal of Mixed Methods Research, 7(4), 302−327. DOI:10.1177/1558689813479449.
113.Hirsch, J.E. (2005). An index to quantify an individual’s scientific research output. Proceedings of the National academy of Sciences, 102(46), 16569−16572.
114.Hirsch, J.E., Buela-Casal, G. (2014). The meaning of the h-index. International Journal of Clinical and Health Psychology, 14(2), 161–164.
115.Hornowska, E., Brzezińska, A.I., Kaliszewska-Czeremska, K., Appelt, K., Rawecka, J., Bujacz, A. (2012). Paradoksalny efekt triangulacji? Edukacja, 120(4), 72−83.
116.Howitt, D., Cramer, D. (2020). Research methods in psychology. Pearson.
117.Humphrey, S.E., LeBreton, J.M. (2019). Introduction. W: S.E. Humphrey, J.M. LeBreton (red.), The handbook of multilevel theory, measurement, and analysis (s. 3–8). American Psychological Association. https://doi.org/10.1037/0000115-001.
118.Jaccard, J., Wood, G. (1986). An Idiothetic Analysis of Behavioral Decision Making. W: D. Brinberg, R.J. Lutz (red.), Perspectives on Methodology in Consumer Research (s. 67–106). Springer New York. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4613-8609-4_3.
119.Jaccard, J., Becker, M.A. (2002). Statistics for the behavioral sciences. Belmont, CA: Wadsworth.
120.Jameson, F. (2001). Postmodernism and Consumer Society. W: S. Malpas (red.), Postmodern Debates (s. 22–36). Macmillan Education UK. https://doi.org/10.1057/978-1-137-04505-8_3.
121.Jha, R., Jbara, A.-A., Qazvinian, V., Radev, D.R. (2017). NLP-driven citation analysis for scientometrics. Natural Language Engineering, 23(1), 93–130.
122.Johnson B., Christensen L. (2014). Data analysis in qualitative and mixed research. W: B. Johnson, L. Christensen (red), Educational Research, Quantitative, Qualitative, and Mixed Approaches (s. 613–614). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
123.Johnson, B., Turner, L.A. (2003). Data collection strategies in mixed methods research. W: A. Tashakkori, C. Teddlie (red.), Handbook of mixed methods in social and behavioral research (s. 297−319).Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
124.Johnson, R.B., Christensen, L. (2017). Educational research: Quantitative, qualitative, and mixed approaches (6th ed.). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
125.Johnson, R.B., Onwuegbuzie, A.J. (2004). Mixed methods research: A research paradigm whose time has come. Educational Researcher, 33, 14–26.
126.Johnson, R.B., Onwuegbuzie, A., Turner, L.A. (2007). Toward a Definition of Mixed Methods Research. Journal of Mixed Methods Research, 1(2), 112−133. https://doi. org/10.1177/1558689806298224.
127.Johnson, R.B., Turner, L.A. (2003). Data Collection Strategies in Mixed Methods Research. W: A. Tashakkori, C. Teddlie (red.), Handbook of mixed methods in social and behavioral research.Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage. Joint displays as a visual integration strategy. https://ebrary.net/173008/business_finance/joint_ displays_visual_integration_strategy#569617.
128.Jonsen, K., Jehn, K.A. (2009). Using triangulation to validate themes in qualitative studies. Qualitative Research in Oganizations and Management: an International Journal, 4(2), 123−150.
129.Journal Article Reporting Standards for All Qualitative Research Designs (JARS-Qual). https:// apastyle.apa.org/jars/qual-table-1.pdf.
130.Journal Article Reporting Standards for Quantitative Research (JARS-Quant). https://apastyle. apa.org/jars/quant-table-1.pdf.
131.Kaczmarczyk, S. (2003). Badania marketingowe. Metody i techniki. Warszawa: PWE.
132.Kawalec, P. (2017). Wykorzystanie planu badań metodami mieszanymi do tworzenia nowej wiedzy. Studium przypadku z zakresu zdrowia publicznego. Zagadnienia Naukoznawstwa, 4, 429−451.
133.Kennett, D.J., O’Hagan, F., Cezer, D. (2008). Learned resourcefulness and the long-term benefits of a chronic pain management program. Journal of Mixed Methods Research, 2(4), 317−339.
134.Kerlinger, F.N. (1986). Foundations of behavioral research (3rd ed.). Fort Worth, TX: Holt, Rinehart, and Winston.
135.Kerrigan, M.R. (2014). A framework for understanding community colleges’ organizational capacity for data use: A convergent parallel mixed methods study. Journal of Mixed Methods Research, 8(4), 341−362.
136.Khoo-Lattimore, C., Mura, P., Yung, R. (2019). The time has come: A systematic literature review of mixed methods research in tourism. Current Issues in Tourism, 22(13), 1531−1550.
137.Kirk, J., Miller, M.L. (1986). Reliability and validity in qualitative research. Beverly Hills: Sage Publications.
138.Klincewicz, K., Mijal, M., Żemigała, M. (2012). Bibliometria w zarządzaniu technologiami i badaniami naukowymi. Ministerstwo Nauki i Szkolnictwa Wyższego.
139.Kolasińska-Morawska, K. (2021). Operacjonalizacja zmiennych. W: Ł. Sułkowski, R. Lenart- Gansiniec, K. Kolasińska-Morawska (red.), Metody badań ilościowych w zarządzaniu. Łódź: Wydawnictwo Społecznej Akademii Nauk.
140.Kubinowski, D. (2011). Jakościowe badania pedagogiczne. Filozofia – metodyka – ewaluacja. Lublin: Wydawnictwo Uniwersytetu Marii Curie-Skłodowskiej.
141.Kuckartz, U. (2010). Realizing Mixed-Methods Approaches with MAXQDA. Marburg: Philipps- Universität. https://www.maxqda.com/download/MixMethMAXQDA-Nov01-2010. pdf.
142.Leal, I., Engebretson, J., Cohen, L., Fernandez-Esquer, M.E., Lopez, G., Wangyal, T., Chaoul, A. (2016). An exploration of the effects of Tibetan yoga on patients’ psychological well- -being and experience of lymphoma: An experimental embedded mixed methods study. Journal of Mixed Methods Research 12(1), 31–54.
143.Leavy, P. (2017). Research design: Quantitative, qualitative, mixed methods, arts-based, and community-based participatory research approaches. Guilford Press.
144.Leech, N.L. (2012). Writing Mixed Research Reports. American Behavioral Scientist, 56(6), 866–881. https://doi.org/10.1177/0002764211433800.
145.Leech, N.L., Onwuegbuzie, A.J. (2009). A typology of mixed methods research designs. Quality and Quantity: International Journal of Methodology, 43, 265–275.
146.Leech, N.L., Onwuegbuzie, A.J. (2010). Guidelines for conducting and reporting mixed research in the field of araleling and beyond. Journal of Counseling & Development, 88(1), 61−69.
147.Levitt, H.M. (2020). Reporting qualitative research in psychology: How to meet APA style journal article reporting standards. American Psychological Association.
148.Levitt, H.M., Bamberg, M., Creswell, J.W., Frost, D.M., Josselson, R., Suárez-Orozco, C. (2018). Journal article reporting standards for qualitative primary, qualitative meta-analytic, and mixed methods research in psychology: The APA Publications and Communications Board task force report. American Psychologist, 73(1), 26–46. https://doi.org/10.1037/amp0000151.
149.Lieberman, E.S. (2005). Nested Analysis as a Mixed-Method Strategy for Comparative Research. American Political Science Review, 99(3), 435–452. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0003055405051762.
150.Lincoln, Y.S., Guba, E.G. (1985). Naturalistic inquiry. Beverly Hills: Sage.
151.Lioutas, E.D., Tzimitra-Kalogianni, I. (2014). „I saw Santa drinking soda!” Advertising and children’s food preferences. Child: Care, Health and Development, 41(3), 424−433.
152.Maison, D. (2022). Jakościowe metody badań społecznych. Podejście aplikacyjne. Warszawa: Wydawnictwo Naukowe PWN.
153.Maxwell, J.A. (1992). Understanding and validity in qualitative research. Harvard Educational Review, 62(3), 279−300.
154.Mazurek-Łopacińska, K., Sobocińska, M. (2018). Triangulacja w badaniach jakościowych. Prace Naukowe Uniwersytetu Ekonomicznego we Wrocławiu, 525,11−20.
155.McCain, K.W. (1990). Mapping authors in intellectual space: A technical overview. Journal of the American Society for Information Science, 41(6), 433−434.
156.Mertens, D.M. (2020). Research and evaluation in education and psychology: Integrating diversity with quantitative, qualitative, and mixed methods (5th ed.). Sage.
157.Miles, M.B., Huberman, A.M. (2000). Analiza danych jakościowych. Białystok: Trans Humana. Miles, M.B., Huberman, A.M., Saldana, J. (2014). Qualitative Data Analysis. Sage.
158.Miles, M., Huberman, A.M. (1994). Qualitative data analysis: An expanded sourcebook. Wydanie drugie. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
159.Mixed Methods Article Raporting Standards (MMARS). https://apastyle.apa.org/jars/mixed- -table-1.pdf.
160.Modell, S. (2009). In defence of triangulation: A critical realist approach to mixed methods research in management accounting. Management Accounting Research, 20(3), 208−221. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.mar.2009.04.001.
161.Modell, S. (2010). Bridging the paradigm divide in management accounting research: The role of mixed methods approaches. Management Accounting Research, 21(2), 124−129.
162.Moghaddam, F.M., Walker, B.R., Harre, R. (2003). Cultural distance, levels of abstraction, and the advantages of mixed methods. W: A. Tashakkori, C. Teddlie (red.), Handbook of mixed methods in social & behavioral research (s. 111−134). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
163.Molina-Azorin, J.F. (2012). Mixed methods research in strategic management: Impact and applications. Organizational Research Methods, 15(1), 33−56.
164.Molina-Azorín, J.F., Tarí, J.J., Pereira-Moliner, J., Lopez-Gamero, M. D., Pertusa-Ortega, E.M. (2015). The effects of quality and environmental management on competitive advantage: A mixed methods study in the hotel industry. Tourism Management, 50, 41−54. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tourman.2015.01.008.
165.Moran-Ellis, J., Alexander, V.D., Cronin, A., Dickinson, M., Fielding, J., Sleney, J., Thomas, H. (2006). Triangulation and integration: Processes, claims and implications. Qualitative Research, 6(1), 45–59.
166.Morgeson, F.P., Hofmann, D.A. (1999). The Structure and Function of Collective Constructs: Implications for Multilevel Research and Theory Development. The Academy of Management Review, 24(2), 249–265. https://doi.org/10.2307/259081.
167.Morse, J.M. (1991). Approaches to qualitative-quantitative methodological triangulation. Nursing Research, 40, 120–123.
168.Morse, J.M., Niehaus, L. (2009). Mixed method design: Principles and procedures. Left Coast Press.
169.Moseholm, E., Fetters, M.D. (2017). Conceptual models to guide integration during analysis in convergent mixed methods studies. Methodological Innovations, 10(2). https://doi.org/10.1177/2059799117703118.
170.Moseholm, E., Rydahl-Hansen, S., Lindhardt, B.Ø., Fetters, M.D. (2017). Health-related quality of life in patients with serious non-specific symptoms undergoing evaluation for possible cancer and their experience during the process: a mixed methods study. Quality of Life Research, 26, 993−1006.
171.Moutinho Abdalla, M., Gois Lima Oliveira, L., Azevedo, C.E., Kuramoto Gonzalez, R. (2018). Quality in Qualitative Organizational Research: types of triangulations as a methodological alternative. Administração: Ensino e Pesquisa, 19(1). DOI 10.13058/raep.2018.v19n1.578.
172.Muszyński, M. (2018). Etapy ewaluacji badań jakościowych – perspektywa konstruktywistyczna. Rocznik Andragogiczny, 25, 187–209.
173.Myers, J.J., Koester, K.A., Chakravarty, D., Pearson, C., Maiorana, A., Shade, S.B., Steward, W.T. (2012). Perceptions regarding the ease of use and usefulness of health information exchange systems among medical providers, case managers and non-clinical staff members working in HIV care and community settings. International Journal of Medical Informatics, 81(10), e21−e29.
174.Mynarski, S. (2020). Praktyczne metody analizy danych rynkowych i marketingowych. Kraków: Zakamycze.
175.Netanda, R.S. (2012). Mixed Methods-Triangulation War: Hidden Challenges to Their Conceptual Survival: Journal of Applied Global Research. Journal of Applied Global Research, 5(14), 45–55. https://search.ebscohost.com/login.aspx?direct=true&db=asn& AN=94267088&lang=pl&site=ehost-live.
176.Newman, I., Ridenour, C.S., Newman, C., DeMarco, G.M.P. (2003). A typology of research purposes and its relationship to mixed methods. W: A. Tashakkori, C. Teddlie (red.), Handbook of mixed methods in social and behavioral research (s. 167−188).Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
177.Newman, L., Benz, C.R., (1998). Qualitative-quantitative research methodology: Exploring the interactive continuum. SIU Press.
178.Newton P.E., Shaw S.D. (2013). Standards for Talking and Thinking about Validity. Psychological Methods, 18(3), 301–319.
179.Nicolini, V., Cassia, F., Bellotto, M. (2017). Children perceptions of emotional and rational appeals in social advertisements. Young Consumers, 18(3), 261−277.
180.Nzabonimpa, J.P. (2018). Quantitizing and qualitizing (im-) possibilities in mixed methods research. Methodological Innovations, 11(2). https://doi.org/10.1177/2059799118789021.
181.O’Cathain, A, Murphy, E., Nicholl, J. (2010). Three techniques for integrating data in mixed methods studies. BMJ, 341. https://doi.org/10.1136/bmj.c4587.
182.O’Cathain, A. (2010). Assessing the quality of mixed methods research toward a comprehensive framework. W: A. Tashakkori, C. Teddlie (red.), SAGE handbook of mixed methods in social & behavioral research. Wydanie drugie (s. 531−558). Thousand Oaks. CA: Sage.
183.O’Cathain, A. (2020). The Mixed Methods Research Workbook: Activities for Designing, Implementing, and Publishing Projects. Journal of Mixed Methods Research, 14(4), 548–549. https://doi.org/10.1177/1558689820943700.
184.O’Cathain, A., Murphy E., Nicholl J. (2008). The quality of mixed methods studies in health services research. Journal of Health Service Research and Policy, 13(2), 92–98.
185.Onwuegbuzie, A., Collins, K. (2015). A Typology of Mixed Methods Sampling Designs in Social Science Research. The Qualitative Report, 12(2), 281−316. https://doi.org/10.46743/2160-3715/2007.1638.
186.Onwuegbuxie, A.J., Collins, K.M.T., Leech, N.L., Dellinger, A. B., Jiao, Q.C. (2007). Mixed methods+ literature reviews= mixed research syntheses: A framework for conducting and writing rigorous, comptehensive, and insightful literature reviews. W: The World of Educational Quality. Annual Meeting of the American Educational Research Association. Chicago.
187.Onwuegbuzie, A.J., Combs, J.P. (2010). Emergent data analysis techniques in mixed methods research: A synthesis. W: A. Tashakkori, C. Teddlie (red.), Handbook of mixed methods in social and behavioral research (s. 397−430). Wydanie drugie. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
188.Onwuegbuzie, A., Combs, J.P. (2011). Data analysis in mixed research: A primer. International Journal of Education, 3(1). DOI:10.5296/ije.v3i1.618.
189.Onwuegbuzie, A.J., Corrigan, J.A. (2014). Improving the quality of mixed research reports in the field of human resource development and beyond: A call for rigor as an ethical practice. Human Resource Development Quarterly, 25(3), 273−299.
190.Onwuegbuzie, A.J., Gerber, H., Abrams, S.S. (2017). Mixed methods research. W: The International Encyclopedia of Communication Research Methods (s. 1–33). https://doi.org/10.1002/9781118901731.iecrm0156.
191.Onwuegbuzie, A.J., Hitchcock J.H. (2016). Advanced Mixed Analysis Approaches. W: S. Nagy Hesse-Biber, R. Burke Johnson (red.), The Oxford Handbook of Multimethod and Mixed Methods Research Inquiry (s. 665−676). Oxford University Press.
192.Onwuegbuzie, A.J., Johnson, R.B. (2006). The validity issue in mixed research. Research in the Schools, 13(1), 48−63.
193.Onwuegbuzie, A.J., Johnson, R.B. (2021). Mapping the emerging landscape of mixed analysis. W: The Routledge reviewer’s guide to mixed methods analysis (s. 1−22). Routledge.
194.Onwuegbuzie, A.J., Leech, N.L. (2006). Linking research questions to mixed methods data analysis procedures. The Qualitative Report, 11(3), 474−498.
195.Onwuegbuzie, A., Teddlie, C. (2003). A framework for analyzing data in mixed methods research. W: A. Tashakkori, C. Teddlie (red.), Handbook of mixed methods in social and behavioral research (s. 351−383). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
196.Onwuegbuzie, A., Collins, K. (2015). A Typology of Mixed Methods Sampling Designs in Social Science Research. The Qualitative Report, 12(2). https://doi.org/10.46743/2160-3715/2007.1638.
197.Onwuegbuzie, A., Leech, N. (2015). Sampling Designs in Qualitative Research: Making the Sampling Process More Public. The Qualitative Report, 12(2). https://doi.org/10.46743/2160-3715/2007.1636.
198.Onwuegbuzie, A.J., Johnson, R.B., Collins, K.M.T. (2011). Assessing legitimation in mixed research: a new framework. Qual. Quant, 45(6), 1253–1271.
199.Osareh, F. (1996). Bibliometrics, citation analysis and co-citation analysis: A review of literature. Libri, 46, 227−225.
200.Pace, R., Pluye, P., Bartlett, G., Macaulay, A. C., Salsberg, J., Jagosh, J., Seller, R. (2012). Testing the reliability and efficiency of the pilot Mixed Methods Appraisal Tool (MMAT) for systematic mixed studies review. International Journal of Nursing Sudies, 49(1), 47−53.
201.Papadimitriou, A. (2010). Looking for Clues about Quality: A Multilevel Mixed Design on Quality Management in Greek Universities. Electronic Journal of Business Research Methods, 8(2), Article 2. https://academic-publishing.org/index.php/ejbrm/article/ view/1256.
202.Parsons, T.D. (2016). Ecological Validity. W: T.D. Parsons (red.), Clinical neuropsychology and technology. What’s new and how we can use it. Springer.
203.Patton, M.Q. (2002). Qualitative evaluation and research methods (3rd ed.). Inc. Thousand Oaks: Sage Publications.
204.Pearl, J. (1995). Causal Diagrams for Empirical Research. Biometrika, 82(4), 669–688. https:// doi.org/10.2307/2337329.
205.Perezgonzalez, J.D. (2015). Fisher, Neyman-Pearson or NHST? A tutorial for teaching data testing. Frontiers in Psychology, 6. https://www.frontiersin.org/articles/10.3389/fpsyg.2015.00223.
206.Pluye, P., Gagnon, M.P., Griffiths, F., Johnson-Lafleur, J. (2009). A scoring system for appraising mixed methods research, and concomitantly appraising qualitative, quantitative and mixed methods primary studies in mixed studies reviews. International Journal of Nursing Sudies, 46(4), 529−546.
207.Pluye, P., Hong, Q.N. (2014). Combining the power of stories and the power of numbers: mixed methods research and mixed studies reviews. Annual Review of Public Health, 35, 29−45.
208.Podsakoff, P.M., MacKenzie, S.B., Lee, J.Y., Podsakoff, N.P. (2003). Common method biases in behavioral research: a critical review of the literature and recommended remedies. Journal of Applied Psychology, 88(5), 879–903. https://doi.org/10.1037/0021-9010.88.5.879.
209.Polit, D.F., Beck, C.T. (2010). Generalization in quantitative and qualitative research: Myths and strategies. International Journal of Nursing Studies, 47(11), 1451−1458.
210.Roe, B.E., Just, D.R. (2009). Internal and external validity in economics research: Tradeoffs between experiments, field experiments, natural experiments, and field data. American Journal of Agricultural Economics, 91(5), 1266−1271.
211.Rószkiewicz, M., Mazurek-Łopacińska, K., Sagan, A. (red.) (2021). Dobór próby we współczesnych badaniach marketingowych. Szczecin: Wydawnictwo Naukowe Uniwersytetu Szczecińskiego.
212.Sagan, A. (1998). Badania marketingowe. Podstawowe kierunki. Kraków: Wydawnictwo Akademii Ekonomicznej w Krakowie.
213.Sagan, A. (2018). Próby referencyjne w badaniach marketingowych. Marketing i Rynek, 4, 477–485.
214.Sandelowski, M, Voils, C., Knafl, G. (2009). On quantitizing. Journal of Mixed Methods Research, 3(3), s. 208–222.
215.Sandelowski, M. (2000). Combining qualitative and quantitative sampling, data collection, and analysis techniques in mixed-method studies. Research in Nursing & Health, 23, 246–255.
216.Schifferdecker, K., Reed, V., (2009). Using mixed methods research in medical education: Basic guidelines for researchers. Medical Education, 43(7), 637–644.
217.Silverman, D. (2012). Interpretacja danych jakościowych. Metody analizy rozmowy, tekstu i interakcji. Warszawa: Wydawnictwo Naukowe PWN.
218.Silverman, D. (2012). Prowadzenie badań jakościowych. Warszawa: Wydawnictwo Naukowe PWN.
219.Small, H. (1973). Co‐citation in the scientific literature: A new measure of the relationship between two documents. Journal of the American Society for Information Science, 24(4), 265−269.
220.Smith, H.W. (1975). Strategies of Social Research: The Methodological Imagination. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice Hall.
221.Soroko, E. (2009). Raportowanie badań jakościowych i ilościowych. Ukryte podobieństwa i wyraźne różnice. W: A. Oleszkowicz, P. Zdybek (red.), Psychologia ilości. Psychologia jakości. Uzupełniające się spojrzenia. Wrocław: Oficyna Wydawnicza ATUT.
222.Stake, R.E., Trumbull, D.J. (1982). Naturalistic generalizations. Review Journal of Philosophy and Social Science, 7, 3–12.
223.Stańczyk, S. (2020). Triangulacja – łączenie metod badawczych i urzetelnienie badań. W: W. Czakon (red.), Podstawy metodologii badań w naukach o zarządzaniu (s. 243−265). Warszawa: Wolters Kluwer.
224.Sułkowski, Ł., Lenart-Gansiniec, R. (red.) (2023). Metody badań mieszanych w naukach o zarządzaniu. Dąbrowa Górnicza: Wydawnictwo Naukowe Akademii WSB.
225.Su, M.M., Wall, G., Wang, Y., Jin, M. (2019). Livelihood sustainability in a rural tourism destination-Hetu Town, Anhui Province, China. Tourism Management, 71, 272−281.
226.Szmatka, J. (2008). Małe struktury społeczne. Wstęp do mikrosocjologii. Warszawa: Wydawnictwo Naukowe PWN.
227.Tashakkori, A., Teddlie, C. (1998). Mixed Methodology: Combining Qualitative and Quantitative Approaches. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
228.Tashakkori, A., Creswell, J. (2007). Editorial: The New Era of Mixed Methods. Journal of Mixed Methods Research, 1, 3–7. https://doi.org/10.1177/2345678906293042.
229.Tashakkori, A., Teddlie, C. (red.) (2003). Handbook of mixed methods in social and behavioral research. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
230.Teddlie, Ch., Tashakkori, A. (2009), Foundations of Mixed Methods Research: Integrating Quantitative and Qualitative Approaches in the Social and Behavioral Sciences. Los Angeles: Sage.
231.Teddlie, C., Yu, F. (2007). Mixed Methods Sampling: A Typology With Examples. Journal of Mixed Methods Research, 1(1), 77–100. https://doi.org/10.1177/1558689806292430.
232.Teddlie, C., Tashakkori, A. (2006). A general typology of research designs featuring mixed methods. Research in the Schools, 13, 12–28.
233.Teddlie, C., Tashakkori, A. (2009). Foundations of mixed methods research: Integrating quantitative and qualitative approaches in the social and behavioral sciences. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
234.Teddlie, C., Yu, F. (2007). Mixed Methods Sampling: A Typology with Examples. Journal of Mixed Methods Research, 1(1), 77−100. https://doi.org/10.1177/1558689806292430.
235.Teddlie, C., Yu, F. (2007). WITHDRAWN – Mixed Methods Sampling: A Typology With Examples. Journal of Mixed Methods Research, 1(1), NP1-NP1. https://doi.org/10.1177/2345678906292430.
236.Teo, A.R., Andrea, S.B., Sakakibara, R., Motohara, S., Matthieu, M.M., Fetters, M.D. (2016).
237.Brief gatekeeper training for suicide prevention in an ethnic minority population: a controlled intervention. BMC Psychiatry, 16(1), 1−9.
238.Tu, M. (2018). An exploratory study of Internet of Things (IoT) adoption intention in logistics and supply chain management: A mixed research approach. The International Journal of Logistics Management, 29(1), 131−151.
239.Turner, S.F., Cardinal, L.B., Burton, R.M. (2017). Research design for mixed methods: A triangulation-based framework and roadmap. Organizational Research Methods, 20(2), 243−267.
240.Uprichard, E., Dawney, L. (2019). Data Diffraction: Challenging Data Integration in Mixed Methods Research. Journal of Mixed Methods Research, 13(1), 19–32. https://doi.org/10.1177/1558689816674650.
241.Urbaniak-Zając, D. (2006). W poszukiwaniu kryteriów oceny badań jakościowych. W: D. Kubinowski, M. Nowak (red.), Metodologia pedagogiki zorientowanej humanistycznie (s. 209−222). Kraków: Oficyna Wydawnicza „Impuls”.
242.Usdiken, B., Pasadeos, Y. (1995). Organizational analysis in North America and Europe – a comparison of cocitation networks. Organization Studies, 16(3), 503–526.
243.Van Rijnsoever, F. (2016). (I Can’t Get No) Saturation: A Simulation and Guidelines for Sample Sizes in Qualitative Research. Academy of Management Proceedings. 12040. https://doi.org/10.5465/AMBPP.2016.12040abstract.
244.Vasileiou, K., Barnett, J., Thorpe, S., Young, T. (2018). Characterising and justifying sample size sufficiency in interview-based studies: Systematic analysis of qualitative health research over a 15-year period. BMC Medical Research Methodology, 18(1). Article number: 148. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12874-018-0594-7.
245.Velzen, J.H. (2016). Students’ general knowledge of the learning process: A mixed methods study illustrating integrated data collection and data consolidation. Journal of Mixed Methods Research, 12(2), 182–203.
246.Venkatesh, V., Brown, S.A., Bala, H. (2013). Bridging the qualitative-quantitative divide: Guidelines for conducting mixed methods research in information systems. MIS Quarterly, 37(1), 21−54.
247.Venkatesh, V., Brown, S.A., Sullivan, Y. (2016). Guidelines for conducting mixed-methods research: An extension and illustration. Journal of the AIS, 17(7), 435−495.
248.Viruel-Fuentes, E.A. (2007). Beyond acculturation: Immigration, discrimination, and health research among Mexicans in the United States. Social Science & Medicine, 65, 1524−1535.
249.Völcker, M. (2019). The quality of ‘good’mixed methods research: Development and discussion of an orientation framework. W: J. Lüdemann, A. Otto, Triangulation und Mixed- -Methods: Reflexionen theoretischer und forschungspraktischer Herausforderungen (s. 63−99). Martin-Luther-Universität Halle-Wittenberg.
250.Webb, E., Campbell, D., Schwartz, R., Sechrest, L. (2012) Unobtrusive Measures. Revised Edition. Sage Publications.
251.Whitehead, D., Schneider, Z. (2013). Mixed-methods research. W: Nursing & Midwifery Research: Methods and Appraisal for Evidence-Based Practice (s. 263–284). Elsevier Mosby.
252.Worek, B. (2009). Rzetelność i trafność w badaniach jakościowych: ocena jakości danych. Prace Naukowe Uniwersytetu Ekonomicznego we Wrocławiu, 51, 136−147.
253.Yauch, C.A., Steudel, H.J. (2003). Complementary use of qualitative and quantitative cultural assessment methods. Organizational Research Methods, 6(4), 465−481.
254.Yin, R.K. (2009). Case study research: Design and methods. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
255.Younas, A., Pedersen, M., Durante, A. (2020). Characteristics of joint displays illustrating data integration in mixed‐methods nursing studies. Journal of Advanced Nursing, 76(2), 676−686.
256.Youngs, H., Piggot-Irvine, E. (2012). The Application of a Multiphase Triangulation Approach to Mixed Methods: The Research of an Aspiring School Principal Development Program. Journal of Mixed Methods Research, 6(3), 184–198. https://doi. org/10.1177/1558689811420696.
257.Zachariadis, M., Scott, S., Barrett, M. (2013). Methodological implications of critical realism for mixed-methods research. MIS Quarterly, 37(3), 855−879.
258.Zhang, G., Ding, Y., Milojević, S. (2013). Citation content analysis (CCA): A framework for syntactic and semantic analysis of citation content. Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology, 64(7), 1490–1503.
259.Zhou, Y. (2019). A Mixed Methods Model of Scale Development and Validation Analysis. Measurement: Interdisciplinary Research and Perspectives, 17(1), 38−47. https://doi.org/10.1080/15366367.2018.1479088.
260.Zhu, X., Turney, P., Lemire, D., Vellino, A. (2015). Measuring academic influence: Not all citations are equal. Journal of the Association for Information Science and Technology, 66(2), 408–427.
261.Zupic, I., Cater, T. (2015). Bibliometric methods in management and organization. Organizational Research Methods, 18(3), 429−472.