Skip to content
Acta Biologica

Previously: Zeszyty Naukowe Uniwersytetu Szczecińskiego. Acta Biologica

No. 27
OpenAlex

Data describes this article or chapter.

Record found in the database

Citations
0
References
1

Data retrieved:

View source (new tab)
OpenCitations

Data describes this article or chapter.

Citations
0

Data retrieved:

View source (new tab)
DOAJ

Data describes this article or chapter.

Record found in the database

Data retrieved:

View source (new tab)
Google Scholar

A note on centrifugation for improving freshwater invertebrate sample conservation

DOI: 10.18276/ab.2020.27-03
Cite

The full text is available

Abstract

Sorting of freshwater invertebrate samples is best done while the animals are still alive. However, sorting in the field generally means less overall sampling can be done in the allotted time. Placing samples under cold conditions has been the traditional way to extend the life of the organisms contained within them. In this work, we evaluated whether the addition of a centrifugation step extends the survival time of organisms post-sampling, thus providing more time for sorting. Three salad spinners were tested for their capacity to extract water from samples. Additional observations were made on the compaction of samples due to excessive centrifugation. We conclude that adding a short centrifugation step of 30 seconds prolongs the life of several freshwater invertebrate taxa, including Hydrachnidia, Nematoda and Ostracoda. Furthermore, when fixation of samples in the field is necessary, centrifugation reduces the amount of fixative to be added to the samples to reach a certain concentration. Fixed samples can also be centrifuged, which may be particularly relevant when sampling abroad as inflam-mable liquids are often prohibited on planes. In our experience, centrifuging fixed samples does not compromise the fixed organisms, or their genetic material.
Preview PDF

Open PDF

Bibliography (21)
  1. Anderson, J.T., Zilli, F.L., Montalto, L., Marchese, M.R., McKinney, M., Park, Y.L. (2013). Sampling and
  2. Processing Aquatic and Terrestrial Invertebrates in Wetlands. In: J. Anderson, C. Davis (eds.), Wetland
  3. Techniques. Dordrecht, The Netherlands: Springer.
  4. Andreu, E., Camacho, A. (2002). Recommendations for sampling water, biota and bottom sediments in Ramsar
  5. wetlands (bilingual Spanish-English). Madrid: Ministerio de Medio Ambiente.
  6. García-Jiménez, R., Horreo, J.L., Valdecasas, A.G. (2017). Minimal barcode distance between two water mite
  7. species from Madeira Island: a cautionary tale. Experimental and Applied Acarology, 72, 133–143. DOI:
  8. 10.1007/s10493-017-0147-5.
  9. Hauer, F.R., Resh, V.H. (2006). Macroinvertebrates. In: F.R. Hauer, G. Lamberti (eds.), Methods in Stream
  10. Ecology (chapter 20). Academic Press.
  11. Kalloniatis, M., Luu, C. (2007). Visual Acuity by Michael Kalloniatis and Charles Luu. Webvision. The
  12. Organization of the Retina and Visual System, 5. Retrieved from: https://webvision.med.utah.edu/ book/part-viii-
  13. psychophysics-of-vision/visual-acuity.
  14. Schwoerbel, J. (1970). Methods in Hydrobiology. Pergamon Press.
  15. Stryjecki, R., Bankowska, A., Szenejko, M. (2018). A faunistic and ecological characterization of the water
  16. mites (Acari: Hydrachnidia) of the Bukowa River (central-eastern Poland). Acta Biologica, 25,77–94.
  17. Tachet, H. (2000). Invertébrés d’eau douce. Sytematique, biologie, ecologie. Paris: CNRS editions.
  18. Valdecasas, A.G., Aboal, M., Cirujano, S., Iepure, S., Jaume, D., Proctor, H., Velasco, J. L. (2010). Sampling
  19. continental freshwater. In: J. Eymann, J. Degreef, C. Häuser, J.C. Monje, Y. Samyn, D. Vandenspiegel (eds.),
  20. Manual on Field Recording Techniques and Protocols for All Taxa Biodiversity Inventories (pp. 213–272). Abc
  21. Taxa cap. 10.