Analiza i Egzystencja


ISSN: 1734-9923     eISSN: 2300-7621    OAI    DOI: 10.18276/aie.2021.54-04
CC BY-SA   Open Access   DOAJ  ERIH PLUS  DOAJ

Lista wydań / 54 (2021)
The Middle Color: A History of a Problem in Thirteenth Century Oxford Commentaries on De sensu et sensato

Autorzy: Monika Mansfeld ORCID
Uniwersytet Łódzki
Słowa kluczowe: teoria koloru Arystoteles średniowieczna filozofia przyrody Adam z Buckfield Geoffrey z Aspall De sensu et sensato
Data publikacji całości:2021-07
Liczba stron:28 (127-154)
Cited-by (Crossref) ?:

Abstrakt

The intersections between philology and philosophy are visible in the interpretations of passages of Aristotle’s De sensu et sensato devoted to the so-called middle color (color medius) by several philosophers active in Oxford in the middle of the thirteenth century, such as Adam of Buckfield, Adam of Whitby and Geoffrey of Aspall. In their work, they had to struggle not only with problems originating from De sensu et sensato itself, but also with others caused by the poor quality of its only translation available at that time. They also discussed a new philosophical problem emerging from Aristotle’s text: if there is a sequence of colors stretched between white and black, where middle colors are evenly distributed throughout it according to the ratio of whiteness and blackness in each of them, there must be a color in which the ratio is perfectly even and, therefore, it has to occupy the position in the very middle of the sequence. My paper presents their search for the middle color par excellence and intense discussions on the nature of the middle color.
Pobierz plik

Plik artykułu

Bibliografia

1.Manuscripts
2.Adam de Buckfield. Expositio in De sensu et sensato Aristotelis, Red. I. In: Madrid, Biblioteca Nacional de España 3314, ff. 100r–110v (Ma); Milano, Biblioteca Ambrosiana H.105 inf., ff. 1r–18r (Mi); Oxford, Balliol Coll. 313, ff. 132r–144v (O); Philadelphia, Free Library, Lewis European 53, ff. 52ra–57vb (Phi).
3.Ps.-Adam de Buckfield. Expositio in De sensu et sensato Aristotelis, Red. II. In: Erfurt, Universitätsbibliothek, Dep. Ampl. F. 318, ff. 150r–161r (E); London, Wellcome Hist. Med. Libr. 3, ff. 53v–60r (W); Vaticano, Biblioteca Apostolica Vaticana, Vat. lat. 5988, ff. 34ra–41va (V).
4.Ps.-Adam de Buckfield. Expositio in De sensu et sensato Aristotelis, Red. III. In: Lisboa, Biblioteca Nacional, Alcobaça 382, ff. 126va–141rb (Li).
5.Adam de Whitby, Commentum in De sensu et sensato Aristotelis. In: Firenze, Biblioteca Nazionale Centrale, Conv. Soppr. G 3 464, ff. 73vb–78ra (Fi); München, Staatsbibliothek, Clm 14522, ff. 149rb–154vb (M); Paris, BN, lat. 16149, ff. 62ra–67ra (P).
6.Anonymus. Abbreviationes expositionis in De sensu et sensato Aristotelis Adae de Buckfield. In: Cambridge, Gonville and Caius College 506 (384), ff. 282r–293r (C); Erfurt, Universitätsbibliothek, Q. 312, ff. 69va–73vb (E2).
7.Galfridus de Aspall. Quaestiones in De sensu et sensato Aristotelis. In: Cambridge, Gonville and Caius College 509/386, ff. 287ra–302rb; Oxford, Merton College Library 272, ff. 257ra–276ra; Oxford, New College 285, ff. 164–189; Todi, Biblioteca Comunale Lorenzo Leoni 15, ff. 99vb–123ra.
8.Primary Sources
9.Anonymus (1935). Tractatus qualiter quilibet artificialis color fieri possit. In: D.V. Thompson, Medieval Color-Making: Tractatus Qualiter Quilibet Artificialis Color Fieri Possit from Paris, B. N., MS. latin 6749b. Isis, 22 (2), 456–468.
10.Anonymus (1973). Problemata, Corpus Christi College, Oxford, 233, ff. 21–31v. In: B. Lawn (ed.), The Salernitan Questions. An Anonymous Collection Dealing with Science and Medicine Written by an Englishman c. 1200, with an Appendix of Ten Related Collections (pp. 326–339). London: The Oxford University Press.
11.Aristoteles (2016). De sensu et sensato. Ed. L. Peeters, TAGL.13.1, ALDatabase.
12.Aristoteles (1985). De sensu et sensato. In: Commisio Leonina (ed.), Sentencia libri De sensu et sensato cuius secundus tractatus est De memoria et reminiscencia. Roma–Paris: Commissio Leonina–Libraie Philosophique J. Vrin.
13.Averroes (1949). In De sensu et sensato. In: A.L. Shields, H. Blumberg (ed.), Averrois Cordubensis Compendia librorum Aristotelis qui Parva Naturalia vocantur (pp. 1–46). Cambridge, MA: The Medieval Academy of America.
14.Eraclius (1849). De Coloribus et Artibus Romanorum. In: M.P. Merrifield (ed.), Original Treatises Dating from the XIIth to XVIIIth Centuries on the Arts of Painting, vol. 1 (pp. 183–257). London: John Murray, Albemarle Street.
15.Geoffrey of Aspall (2017). Questions on Aristotle’s “Physics”. Ed. S. Donati, C. Trifogli. Trans. J. Ashworth, C. Trifogli. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
16.Jehan le Begue (1849). Tabula de Vocabulis Sinonimis et Equivocis Colorum. In: M.P. Merrifield (ed.), Original Treatises Dating from the XIIth to XVIIIth Centuries on the Arts of Painting, vol. 1 (pp. 18–38). London: Albemarle Street.
17.Robertus Grosseteste (2013). De colore. In: G. Dinkova-Bruun, G.E.M. Gasper, M. Huxtable, T.C.B. McLeish, C. Panti, H. Smithson (ed.), The Dimensions of Colour. Robert Grosseteste’s De colore. Durham–Toronto: Pontifical Institute of Medieval Studies.
18.Robertus Grosseteste (1974). De operatione solis. In: J. McEvoy, The Sun as res and signum: Grosseteste’s Commentary on »Ecclesiasticus« ch. 43, vv. 1–5. Recherches de théologie ancienne et médiévale, 41, 38–91.
19.Roger Bacon (1902). Grammatica Graeca. In: E. Nolan, S.A. Hirsch (ed.), The Greek Grammar of Roger Bacon and a Fragment of His Hebrew Grammar, Cambridge: Leopold Classic Library.
20.Roger Bacon (1937). Liber De sensu et sensato. In: R. Steele (ed.), Opera hactenus inedita Rogeri Baconi, fasc. 14. Oxonii: E Typographeo Claredoniano.
21.Roger Bacon (1897). Opus Maius. In: J.H. Bridges (ed.), The “Opus Majus” of Roger Bacon, vol. 1, London: Cambridge University Press.
22.Secondary Sources
23.Bloch, D. (2008). Nicolaus Graecus and the Translatio Vetus of Aristotle’s “De Sensu.” Bulletin de Philosophie Médiévale, 50, 83–103. https://doi.org/10.1484/J.BPM.3.592
24.Bradley, M. (2009). Colour and Meaning in Ancient Rome. Cambridge: Cambridge
25.Brewer, J.S. (1858). Monumenta Franciscana. Vol. 1. London: Longman.
26.Callus, D.A. (1943). Introduction of Aristotelian Learning to Oxford. In: The British Academy (ed.), Proceedings of the British Academy, vol. 29 (pp. 1–55). London: Geoffrey Cumberlege.
27.Callus, D.A. (1952). The Powers of the Soul. An Early Unpublished Text. Recherches de Théologie ancienne et médiévale, 19, 131–170.
28.Dod, B.G. (2008). Aristoteles Latinus. In: N. Kretzmann, A. Kenny, J. Pinborg (eds.), The Cambridge History of Later Medieval Philosophy (pp. 45–79).Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
29.Ebbesen, S., Thomsen Thörnqvist, Ch., Decaix, V. (2016). Questions on “De sensu et sensato,” “De memoria” and “De somno et vigilia”: A Catalogue. Bulletin de Philosophie Médiévale, 57, 59–115. https://doi.org/10.1484/J.BPM.5.110805
30.Eco, U. (1985). How Culture Conditions the Colours We See. In: M. Blonsky (ed.), On Signs: A Semiotic Reader (pp. 157–175). Oxford: Blackwell.
31.Emden, A.B. (1957). A Biographical Register of the University of Oxford to A.D.1500. Vol. 1. Oxford: Oxford Clarendon Press.
32.Galle, G. (2008a). Edition and Discussion of the Oxford Gloss on “De sensu 1.”Archives d’histoire doctrinale et littéraire du Moyen Âge, 75, 197–281.
33.Galle, G. (2008b). The Anonymous Translator of the “Translatio Vetus” of “De Sensu.” Bulletin de Philosophie Médiévale, 50, 105–150. https://doi.org/10.1484/J.BPM.3.593
34.Köhler, T.W. (2017). Homo animal nobilissimum: Konturen des Spezifisch Menschlichen in der Naturphilosophischen Aristoteleskommentierung des Dreizehnten Jahrhunderts. Vol. 1. Leuven: Brill.
35.Lewis, Ch.T., Short, Ch. (1879). A Latin Dictionary. Founded on Andrews’ Edition of Freund’s Latin Dictionary. Oxford: Clarendon Press.
36.Lohr, C.H. (1967). Medieval Latin Aristotle Commentaries: Authors A–F. Traditio, 23, 313–413. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0362152900008795
37.Lohr, C.H. (2013). Latin Aristotle Commentaries I.1 Medieval Authors A–L. Firenze: Sismel Edizioni del Galluzzo.
38.Noone, T.B. (1992). Evidence for the Use of Adam of Buckfield’s Writings at Paris: A Note on New Haven, Yale University, Historical-Medical Library 12. Mediaeval Studies, 54, 308–316.
39.Parkhurst, C. (1990). Roger Bacon on Color: Sources, Theories and Influence. In: K.-L. Selig, E. Sears (eds.), The Verbal and the Visual, Essays in Honor of William Sebastian Heckscher (pp. 151–202). New York: Italica Press. https://doi.org/10.2307/j.ctt1tqx9sd.12
40.Pastoureau, M. (2017). Red: The History of a Colour. Princeton–Oxford: Princeton
41.Pastoureau, M. (2018). Blue: The History of a Colour. Princeton–Oxford: Princeton
42.Raizman-Kedar, Y. (2007). Questioning Aristotle: Roger Bacon on the True Essence of Colour. Journal of Medieval Latin, 17, 372–383. https://doi.org/10.1484/J.JML.2.305704
43.Russell, J.C. (1936). Dictionary of Writers of Thirteenth Century England. London: Longmans, Green.
44.Steele, R. (1937). Introduction. In: R. Steele (ed.), Opera hactenus inedita Rogeri Baconi, fasc. 14 (pp. v–xvi). Oxonii: E Typographeo Claredoniano.
45.Thomson, S.H. (1944). A Note on the Works of Magister Adam de Bocfeld (Bochermefort). Medievalia et Humanistica, 2, 55–87.
46.Thomson, S.H. (1958). A Further Note on Master Adam of Bocfeld. Medievalia et Humanistica, 12, 23–32.
47.Thorndike, L. (1960). Other Texts on Colours. Ambix, 8 (2), 53–70.
48.Weijers, O. (1994). Le travail intellectuel à la Faculté des arts de Paris: textes et maîtres (ca. 1200–1500), I. Répertoire des noms commençant par A–B.Turnhout: Brepols.