Analiza i Egzystencja


ISSN: 1734-9923     eISSN: 2300-7621    OAI    DOI: 10.18276/aie.2021.54-03
CC BY-SA   Open Access   DOAJ  ERIH PLUS  DOAJ

Lista wydań / 54 (2021)
Conception, Connotation, and Essential Predication: Peter Auriol’s Conceptualism to the Test in II Sententiarum, d. 9, q. 2, art. 1

Autorzy: Giacomo Fornasieri ORCID
Lumsa University - Rome
Słowa kluczowe: Peter Auriol Connotation Essential Predication Conceptualism
Data publikacji całości:2021-07
Liczba stron:46 (81-126)
Cited-by (Crossref) ?:

Abstrakt

This paper comprises two parts. The first part is an introduction to Auriol’s moderate conceptualism, as it is presented in his Commentary on Book II of the Sentences, distinction 9, question 2, article 1. The second part is an edition of the text. In the introduction, I focus on Auriol’s use of the noetic tool of connotation. My thesis, in particular, is that connotation is a necessary prerequisite to his moderate conceptualism. To this purpose, the first part of this introduction will be devoted to a brief presentation of Auriol’s conceptualism. In the second part, Auriol’s theory of essential predication will be presented. In the third part, I will present my claim that Auriol’s theory of essential predication can only be made sense of when read against the background of his theory of connotation as applied to intellectual cognition. Finally, I will offer a collation of Auriol’s Commentary on Book II of the Sentences, distinction 9, question 2, article 1, obtained by collating eight manuscripts, which hand down Auriol’s text, that is, Firenze, Biblioteca nazionale centrale, ms. Conv. Soppr. B.6.121, Firenze, ms. Conv. Soppr. A. 3.120, Napoli, Biblioteca nazionale, ms. VII.C.3, Padova, Biblioteca Antoniana, ms. 161, scaff. ix, Paris, Bibliothèque nationale de France, ms. latin 15867; Pelplin, Biblioteka Seminarium duchownego, ms. 46/85, Vaticano (Città del), Biblioteca Apostolica, ms. Borgiano 404, Vaticano (Città del), Biblioteca Apostolica, ms. Vat. lat. 942.
Pobierz plik

Plik artykułu

Bibliografia

1.Manuscripts
2.Firenze, Biblioteca nazionale centrale, ms. conv. soppr. A.3.120
3.Firenze, Biblioteca nazionale centrale, ms. conv. soppr. B.6.121
4.Napoli, Biblioteca nazionale, ms. VII.C.3
5.Padova, Biblioteca Antoniana, ms. 161 scaff. ix
6.Paris, Bibliothèque nationale de France, ms. latin 15867
7.Pelplin, Biblioteka Seminarium duchownego, ms. 46/85
8.Vaticano (Città del), Biblioteca Apostolica, ms. Borgiano 404
9.Vaticano (Città del), Biblioteca Apostolica, ms. Vat. lat. 942
10.Primary Sources
11.Aristoteles (1949). Analytica Posteriora. Ed. W.D. Ross. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
12.Aristoteles (1956). De Anima. Ed. W.D. Ross. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
13.Aristoteles (1982). De Generatione et Corruptione. Ed. C.J.F. Williams. Oxford:Oxford University Press
14.Aristoteles (1928). Metaphysica. Ed. W.D. Ross. Oxford: Clarendon Press.
15.Aristoteles (1936). Physica. Ed. W.D. Ross. Oxford: Clarendon Press.
16.Aristoteles (1963). Praedicamenta. Ed. J.L. Ackrill. Oxford: Clarendon Press.
17.Aristoteles Latinus (1968). Analytica posteriora. Translationes Iacobi, Anonymi sive ‘Ioannis’, Gerardi et Recensio Guillelmi de Moerbeka. Ed. L. Minio-Paluello, B.G. Dod. Bruges–Paris: Desclée De Brouwer.
18.Aristoteles Latinus (1984). De anima. Recensio Guillelmi de Morbeka. Ed. R.-A. Gauthier. In: Thomas de Aquino (1984), Sentencia libri De anima. Ed.R.-A. Gauthier. Roma–Paris: Editio Leonina.
19.Aristoteles Latinus (1986). De generatione et corruptione. Translatio Vetus. Ed. J. Judycka. Leiden: Brill.
20.Aristoteles Latinus (2003). De generatione et corruptione. Recensio Guillelmi de Morbeka. Ed. J. Judycka. Aristoteles Latinus Database. Turnhout: Brepols.
21.Aristoteles Latinus (1961). Categoriae vel Praedicamenta. Translatio Boethii, Editio Composite, Translatio Guillelmi de Moerbeka, Lemmata e Simplicii commentario decerpta, Pseudo-Augustini Paraphrasis Themistiana. Ed. L. MinioPaluello. Bruges–Paris: Desclée De Brouwer.
22.Aristoteles Latinus (1995). Metaphysica, lib. I–XIV. Recensio et Translatio Guillelmi de Moerbeka. 2 vols. Ed. G. Vuillemin-Diem, Leiden: Brill.
23.Aristoteles Latinus (1990). Physica. Translatio Vetus. Ed. F. Bossier, J. Brams. Leiden: Brill.
24.Averroes (1953). Commentarium magnum in Aristotelis De anima libros. Ed. F.S. Crawford. In: H.A. Wolfson, D. Baneth, F.H. Fobes (ed.), Corpus Commentariorum Averrois in Aristotelem. Vol. 6. Cambridge: The Medieval Academy of America.
25.John Duns Scotus (1982). Lectura in Librum Secundum Sententiarum, dd. 1–6. Ed. L. Modrić, S. Bušelić, B. Hechich, I. Jurić, I. Percan, R. Rosini, S. Ruiz de Loizaga, C. Saco Alarcón. Vol. XVIII. Città del Vaticano: Typis Polyglottis Vaticanis.
26.John Duns Scotus (1973). Ordinatio Liber Secundus, dd. 1–3. Ed. C. Balić, C. Barbarić, S. Bušelić, B. Hechich, L. Modrić, S. Nanni, R. Rosini, S. Ruiz
27.de Loizaga, C. Saco Alarcón. Vol. VII. Città del Vaticano: Typis Polyglottis Vaticanis.
28.John Duns Scotus (1997). Quaestiones super libros Metaphysicorum Aristotelis. Ed. R. Andrews, G. Etzkorn, G. Gál, R. Green, F. Kelley, G. Marcil,
29.T. Noone, R. Wood. Opera Philosophica. Vol. IV. New York: St. Bonaventure.
30.John Wycliff (2017). De Scientia Dei. Ed. Campi. Oxford: Oxford University Press. Les Auctoritates Aristotelis (1974). Ed. J. Hamesse. Louvain: Béatrice-Nauwelaerts.
31.Petrus Aureoli (1952–1956). Peter Aureoli Scriptum Super Primum Sententiarum. Ed. E. Buytaert. Vol. I–II. New York: St. Bonaventure.
32.Petrus Aureoli (1596). Commentariorum in Primum Librum Sententiarum. Pars prima. Auctore Petro Aureolo Verberio Ordinis Minorum Archiespiscopi
33.Aquensi S. R. E. Cardinali, Ad Clementem VIII Pont. Opt. Max. Roma:Typographia Vaticana.
34.Petrus Aureoli (1605). Commentarii in Secundum Librum Sententiarum, ed. Petri Aureoli Verberii Ordinis Minorum Archiepiscopi Aquensis S.R.E. Cardinalis Commentariorum in Secundum Librum Sententiarum. Vol. 2. Roma: Typographia Alojsii Zannetti.
35.Petrus Aureoli. II Sententiarum, d. 3, q. 2, art. 4. Firenze, Biblioteca nazionale centrale, ms. conv. soppr. A.3.120, ff. 25va–27vb.
36.Petrus Aureoli (2005). Scriptum Super Primum Sententiarum, d. 23, art. 2. Ed. L.M. De Rijk. In: L.M. De Rijk, Giraldus Odonis O.F.M. Opera Philosophica. Vol. II: De Intentionibus. Critical Edition with a Study of the Medieval Intentionality Debate up to Ca. 1350. (pp. 695–748). Leiden: Brill.
37.Petrus Aureoli (2020). Petri Auriol Scriptum auper primum Sententiarum. The Electronic Scriptum. Ed. R.L. Friedman, L.O. Nielsen, C. Schabel. Retrieved from: http://www.peterauriol.net/editions/electronicscriptum/contents.
38.Roger Bacon (1930). Quaestiones supra libros primae philosophiae Aristotelis. Metaphysica (I,II, V–X). Ed. R. Steele. Oxford: E Typographeo Clarendoniano.
39.Simplicius (1907). Simplicii In Aristotelis Categorias commentarium. Ed. K. Kalbfleisch. Berlin: Typis et Impensis Georgii Reimeri.
40.Simplicius (1971–1975). Simplicius in Categorias. Ed. A. Pattin. CLC 5. Turnhout: Brepols.
41.Thomas Wylton (2003). Quodlibet, q. 5. Ed. L.O. Nielsen, T. Noone, C. Trifogli. In: Thomas Wylton’s Question on the Formal Distinction as Applied to the
42.Divine. Documenti e studi sulla tradizione filosofica medievale, 14, 327–388.
43.Thomas Wylton (2010). On the Intellectual Soul. Ed. L.O. Nielsen, C. Trifogli. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
44.Walter Burley. Expositio libri De anima, lib. I, q. 3. Città del Vaticano, Biblioteca Apostolica Vaticana, ms. Vat. lat. 2151, ff. 1ra–88rb.
45.Secondary Sources
46.Adriaenssen, H.Th. (2014). Peter John Olivi and Peter Auriol on Conceptual Thought. Oxford Studies in Medieval Philosophy, 2, 67–97. https://doi.org/10.1093/acprof:oso/9780198718468.003.0004
47.Cenci, C. (1978). Manoscritti francescani della Biblioteca nazionale di Napoli. Vol. 1. Florence: Quaracchi.
48.Conti, A.D. (2000). Divine Ideas and Exemplar Causality in Auriol. Vivarium, 38, 99–116. https://doi.org/10.1163/156853400510057
49.Conti, A.D. (2016). Walter Burley. In: E.N. Zalta (ed.), The Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy. Retrieved from: https://plato.stanford.edu/archives/sum2016/entries/burley.
50.Doucet, V. (1936). L’oeuvre scolastique de Richard de Conington. Archivum Franciscanum Historicum, 29, 396–442.
51.Davenport, A. (2006). Esse Egressus and Esse Apparens in Peter Auriol’s Theory of Intentional Being. Mediaevalia Philosophica Polonorum, XXXV, 60–84.
52.Duba, W., Schabel, C. (2017). Remigio, Auriol, Scotus, and the Myth of the TwoYear-Sentences Lecture at Paris. Recherches de Théologie et Philosophie Médiévales, 84 (1), 143–179.
53.Fornasieri, G. (2018). Peter Auriol on Connotative Distinction and His Criticism of Scotus’s Formal Distinction. Documenti e studi sulla tradizione filosofica medievale, 29, 231–273.
54.Fornasieri, G. (2019). Teoria degli universali e conoscenza della realtà in Pietro Aureoli. PhD Dissertation. Università degli Studi di Salerno-KU Leuven. Unpublished.
55.Fornasieri, G. (2021). Intelligere formaliter solum connotat aliquid ut apparens. Peter Auriol on the Nature of the Cognitive Act. Rivista di Storia della Filosofia, 1, 24–49.
56.Friedman, R.L. (1997). Conceiving and Modifying Reality: Some Modist Roots of Peter Auriol’s Theory of Concept Formation. In: C. Marmo (ed.), Vestigia, Imagines, Verba: Semiotics and Logic in Medieval Theological Texts (XII–XIV Century) (pp. 305–321). Turnhout: Brepols.
57.Friedman, R.L. (1999). Peter Auriol on Intentions and Essential Predication. In: S. Ebbesen, R.L. Friedman (eds.), Medieval Analyses in Language and Cognition (pp. 415–430). Copenhagen: The Royal Danish Academy of Sciences and Letters.
58.Friedman, R.L. (2000). Peter Auriol on Intellectual Cognition of Singulars. Vivarium, 38, 177–193. https://doi.org/10.1163/156853400510084
59.Friedman, R.L. (2013). Intellectual Traditions at the Medieval University: The Use of Philosophical Psychology in Trinitarian Theology among the Franciscans and Dominicans, 1250–1350. 2 vols. Leiden: Brill.
60.Friedman, R.L. (2015). Act, Species, and Appearance: Peter Auriol on Intellectual Cognition and Consciousness. In: G. Klima (ed.), Intentionality, Cognition, and Mental Representation in Medieval Philosophy (pp. 141–165). New York: Fordham University Press. https://doi.org/10.5422/fordham/9780823262748.003.0007
61.Goris, W. (2002). Implicit Knowledge—Being as First Known in Peter of Oriel. Recherches de Théologie et Philosophie Médiévales, 69 (1), 33–65.
62.Halverson, J.L. (1998). Peter Aureol on Predestination: A Challenge to Late Medieval Thought. Leiden: Brill.
63.Marangon, P. (1997). Le origini e le fonti dello scotismo padovano. In: P. Marangon, Ad cognitionem scientiae festinare: gli studi nell’Università e nei conventi di Padova nei secoli XIII e XIV (pp. 178–230). Trieste: Edizioni Lint.
64.Mazurek, A., Ott, J. (2011). Die mittelalterlichen Handschriften der Signaturengruppe B in der Universitäts- und Landesbibliothek Düsseldorf. Teil 2. Ms. B 101a bis B 214 (pp. 213–215). Wiesbaden: Harrassowitz.
65.Paladini, C. (2018a). Essere ed essenza secondo Pietro Aureoli. Documenti e studi sulla tradizione filosofica medievale, 29, 275–330.
66.Paladini, C. (2018b). “Omnis res, eo quod est, singularis est.” Pietro Aureoli sulla composizione metafisica dell’ente singolare. Rivista di Storia della Filosofia, 4, 569–593.
67.Pickavé, M. (2017). Peter Auriol and William of Ockham on a Medieval Version of the Argument from Illusion. In: J. Pelletier, M. Roques (eds.), The Language of Thought in Late Medieval Philosophy. Essays in Honor of Claude Panaccio (pp. 183–198). Berlin: Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-66634-1_12
68.Rode, C. (2017). Peter Auriol on Universals and the Notion of Passive Conception. In: F. Amerini, L. Cesalli (eds.), Universals in the Fourteenth Century (pp. 138–154). Pisa: Edizioni della Normale.
69.Schabel, C. (2000). Place, Space, and the Physics of Grace in Auriol’s Sentences Commentary. Vivarium, 38, 117–161. https://doi.org/10.1163/156853400510066
70.Suarez-Nani, T. (2009). Singularité et individualité selon Pierre Auriol. In: S.F. Brown, T. Dewender, T. Kobusch (eds.), Philosophical Debates at Paris in the Early Fourteenth Century (pp. 339–357). Leiden: Brill. https://doi.org/10.1163/ej.9789004175662.i-526.83
71.Taieb, H. (2018). What is Cognition? Peter Auriol Account. Recherches de Théologie et Philosophie Médiévales, 85 (1), 109–134.
72.Teetaert, A. (1935). Pierre Auriol. In: É. Amann, E. Mangenot, A. Vacant (eds.), Dictionnaire de théologie catholique (pp. 1810–1881). Paris: Letouzey et Ané.
73.Wöller, F. (2015). Theologie und Wissenschaft bei Petrus Aureoli. Ein scholastischer Entwurf aus dem frühen 14. Jahrhundert. Leiden: Brill. https://doi.org/10.1163/9789004298422