1. | References |
2. | Albert H. (1985), Treatise on Critical Reason, Princeton 1985. |
3. | Aristotle (2005), Metaphysics, trans. W.D. Ross, NuVisions Publications. |
4. | Apel K.O. (1996a), A Planetary Macroethics for Humanity, [in:] Selected Essays vol. 2, Humanity Press, New Jersey: 275-292. |
5. | Apel K.O. (1994), C.S. Peirce and Post-Tarskian Truth, [in:] Selected Essays vol. 1, Humanity Press, New Jersey: 175-206. |
6. | Apel K.O. (2006), Refleksja transcendentalno-pragmatyczna. Główna perspektywa aktualnej transformacji filozofii Kanta, trans. Z. Zwoliński, [in:] M. Potępa, Z. Zwoliński [ed.], Dwieście lat z filozofią Kanta, Wyd. Genessis, Warszawa: 509-530. |
7. | Apel K.O. (1991), Semiotyka transcendentalna a prawda. Znaczenie konsensualnej teorii prawdy Peirce'a we współczesnej dyskusji na temat prawdy, “Principia” IV: 5-22. |
8. | Apel K.O. (1996b), The Question of Grounding: Philosophy and Transcendental Pragmatics of Language, [in:] Selected Essays vol. 2, Humanity Press, New Jersey: 68-102. |
9. | Apel K.O. (1998), Towards a Transformation of Philosophy, trans. G. Adey, D. Frisby, Marquette University Press, Milwaukee. |
10. | Apel K.O. (1997), Zasada samofundowania swoich podstaw w hermeneutycznej rekonstrukcji historii, trans. P. Znaniecki, [in:] T. Buksiński (ed.), Rozumność i racjonalność, WN UAM. |
11. | Chwedeńczuk B. (1984), Spór o naturę prawdy, Państwowy Instytut Wydawniczy, Warszawa. |
12. | Dominiak Ł. (2017), Libertarianism and Original Appropriaton, “Historia i polityka” 29: 43-56. |
13. | Dominiak Ł. (2019), Must Right-Libertarians Embrace Easements by Necessity?, “Diametros” 60: 34-51. |
14. | Gordon D. (1988), Radical and Quasi-Kantian, “Liberty” 2: 46-47. |
15. | Friedman D. (1988), The Trouble with Hoppe, “Liberty” 2: 44. |
16. | Eabrasu M. (2009), A Reply to the Current Critiques Formulated Against Hoppe’s Argumentation Ethics, “Libertarian Papers” 1: 1-29. |
17. | Eabrasu M. (2012), Rothbard’s and Hoppe’s Justifications of Libertarianism. Politics, Philosophy & Economics, 12(3), 288–307. |
18. | Frederic D. (2013), Hoppe’s Derivation of Self-Ownership from Argumentation: Analysis and Critique, “Reason Papers” 35: 92-106. |
19. | Habermas J. (1979), What is Universal Pragmatics?, [in:] Communication and the Evolution of Society, trans. T. McCarthy, Beacon Press, Boston: 1-68. |
20. | Hare R.M. (1981), Moral Thinking. Its Levels, Method, and Point, Clarendon Press, New York. |
21. | Hohfeld, W. (1919), Some Fundamental Legal Conceptions as Applied in Judicial Reasoning, [in:] idem, Fundamental Legal Conceptions as Applied in Judicial Reasoning and Other Essays, New Haven-London. |
22. | Hoppe H-H. (2016a), A Theory of Socialism and Capitalism, Ludwig von Mises Institute, Auburn. |
23. | Hoppe H-H. (2007), Economic Science and the Austrian Method, Ludwig von Mises Institute, Auburn. |
24. | Hoppe H-H. (1987), Eigentum, Anarchie und Staat. Studien zur Theorie des Kapitalismus, Westdeutscher Verglag, Opladen. |
25. | Hoppe H-H. (2018), Getting Libertarianism Right, Ludwig von Mises Institute, Auburn. |
26. | Hoppe H-H. (1976), Handeln und Erkennen. Zur Kritik des Empirismus am Beispiel der Philosophie David Humes, Herbert Lang/Peter Land, Bern/Frankfurt am Main 1976. |
27. | Hoppe H-H. (1989), In Defense of Extreme Rationalism: Thoughts on Donald McCloskey's “The Rhetoric of Economics”, “The Review of Austrian Economics” 3:179-214. |
28. | Hoppe H-H. (1983), Kritik der kausalwissenschaftlichen Sozialforschung. Untersuchungen zur Grundlegung von Soziologie und Ökonomie, Westdeutscher Verglag, Opladen. |
29. | Hoppe H-H. (2006), The Economics and Ethics of Private Property. Studies in Political Economy and Philosophy, Ludwig von Mises Institute, Auburn. |
30. | Hoppe H-H. (2016b) On the Ethics of Argumentation, URL = http://propertyandfreedom.org/2016/10/hans-hermann-hoppe-on-the-ethics-of-argumentation-pfs-2016/ [available 22.11.2019]. |
31. | Hoppe H-H. (2012), The Great Fiction. Property, Economy, Society, and the Politics of Decline. Laissez Faire Books, Baltimore. |
32. | Jones M. (1988), A Matter of Degree, “Liberty” 2: 49. |
33. | Kant I. (1929), Critique of Pure Reason, trans. N.K. Smith, Macmillan and CO., London. |
34. | Kinsella N.S. (2008), Against Intellectual Property, Ludwig von Mises Institute, Auburn. |
35. | Kinsella N.S. (2002), Defending Argumentation Ethics, URL = http://www.stephankinsella.com/publications/defending-argumentation-ethics/. |
36. | Kinsella N.S. (2006), How We Come to Own Ourselves, URL = https://mises.org/library/how-we-come-own-ourselves [available 22.11.2019]. |
37. | Kinsella N.S. (1994), The Undeniable Morality of Capitalism, “St. Mary’s Law Journal” 25: 1420-1447. |
38. | Kinsella N.S. (2009), What Libertarianism Is?, [in:] J.G. Hülsmann, S. Kinsella (ed.), Property, Freedom, Society: Essays in Honor of Hans-Hermann Hoppe, Auburn AL, p. 179-196. |
39. | Kramer M. (1998), Rights Without Trimmings, [in:] M. Kramer, N.E. Simmonds, H. Steiner, A Debate Over Rights. Philosophical Inquiries, Oxford University Press, New York:, p. 7-59 |
40. | Kuhlmann W. (1981), Reflexive Letzbegründung. Zur These von der Unhintergehbarkeit der Argumentationssituation, “Zeitschrift für Philosophische Forschung” 35: 3-26. |
41. | Lorenzen P. (1969), Normative Logic and Ethics, Hohschultaschenbücher Verlag, Mannheim/Zürich. |
42. | Murphy R.P, Callahan G. (2006), Hans-Hermann Hoppe’s Argumentation Ethics: A Critique, “Journal of Libertarian Studies” 20: 53-62. |
43. | Machan T. (1988), Ethics Without Philosophy, “Liberty” 2: 52-53. |
44. | Peirce Ch.S. (1878), How to Make Our Ideas Clear, „Popular Science Monthly 12: 286-302, URL = http://www.filosofia.unimi.it/zucchi/NuoviFile/Peirce1878.pdf. |
45. | Peirce Ch.S. (1934a), Some Consequences of Four Incapacities,[in:] The Collected Papers of Charles Sanders Peirce, Ch. Hartshorne, P. Weiss, A.W. Burks (ed), vol. 5: 264-317. |
46. | Peirce Ch.S. (1934b), Grounds of Validity of the Laws of Logic: Further Consequences of the Four Incapacitie, [in:] The Collected Papers of Charles Sanders Peirce, Ch. Hartshorne, P. Weiss, A.W. Burks (ed), vol. 5: 318:357. |
47. | Rasmussen D. (1988): Arguing and Y-ing, “Liberty” 2: 50-52. |
48. | Rothbard M.N. (1988), Beyond Is and Ought, “Liberty” 2: 44-45. |
49. | Rothbard M.N. (1998), The Ethics of Liberty, Ludwig von Mises Institute, Auburn. |
50. | Schmelzer I, (2013), Against Absolute Certainty, URL = ilja-schmelzer.de/papers/againstCertainty.pdf [available 22.11.2019] |
51. | Sierocka B. (2003), Krytyka i dyskurs. O transcendentalno-pragmatycznym uprawomocnieniu krytyki filozoficznej, Aureus, Kraków. |
52. | Steiner H. (1994), An Essay on Rights, Blackwell Publishers,Oxford UK-Cambridge USA. |
53. | Yeager L. (1988), Raw Assertions, “Liberty” 2: 45-46. |
54. | Van Dun F. (2009), Argumentation Ethics and the Philosophy of Freedom, “Libertarian Papers” 1 (Art. 19): 1-32. |