Zum Inhalt springen
Central European Journal of Sport Sciences and Medicine
Vol. 36, No. 4/2021
OpenAlex

Daten beziehen sich auf diesen Artikel oder dieses Kapitel.

Datensatz in der Datenbank gefunden

Zitate
18
Literaturangaben
17
Zitate nach Jahren
JahrZitate
20211
20223
20235
20243
20253
20263

Daten abgerufen:

Quelle ansehen (neuer Tab)

Für die gesamte Zeitschrift, laut OpenAlex.

Zitate
1 180
Publikationen
402
H-index
14
I10-index
29
Mittlere Zitierhäufigkeit (2 Jahre)
0,72
Erhaltene Zitate nach Jahr
Diagramm der Zeitschriftenzitate. Die genauen Werte stehen in der Tabelle darunter. 2017: 27 2018: 44 2019: 49 2020: 108 2021: 100 2022: 150 2023: 159 2024: 193 2025: 200 2026: 118 2017 2026
Datentabelle anzeigen
Erhaltene Zitate nach Jahr
JahrPublikationenZitate
20174227
20183344
20193549
202038108
202138100
202231150
202330159
202429193
202530200
202616118

Daten abgerufen:

Was bedeuten diese Zahlen?

Publikationen und Zitate umfassen die dieser Zeitschrift zugeordneten OpenAlex-Datensätze. Der H-Index ist die größte Anzahl h von Publikationen mit jeweils mindestens h Zitaten. Der I10-Index zählt Publikationen mit mindestens 10 Zitaten. Das Diagramm zeigt die in einem Jahr erhaltenen Zitate; das laufende Jahr ist unvollständig. Die Abdeckung kann von WNUS und anderen Diensten abweichen.

Der Zweijahresdurchschnitt ist eine OpenAlex-Kennzahl und nicht der Journal Impact Factor von Clarivate.

In OpenAlex ansehen (neuer Tab)
Crossref

Daten beziehen sich auf diesen Artikel oder dieses Kapitel.

Datensatz in der Datenbank gefunden

Zitate
10

Daten abgerufen:

Quelle ansehen (neuer Tab)
OpenCitations

Daten beziehen sich auf diesen Artikel oder dieses Kapitel.

Zitate
17

Daten abgerufen:

Zitierende Veröffentlichungen
  1. 10.3389/fspor.2026.1768525 (2026)
  2. 10.3389/fspor.2023.1272478 (2023)
  3. 10.3389/fspor.2026.1732293 (2026)
  4. 10.3389/fpsyg.2025.1667429 (2025)
  5. 10.53863/mor.v3i2.672 (2023)
  6. 10.5114/jhk/203104 (2025)
  7. 10.3390/app13052911 (2023)
  8. 10.3390/sports10100139 (2022)
  9. 10.3390/biomechanics2030028 (2022)
  10. 10.3390/jfmk7040078 (2022)

Die Liste kann unvollständig sein. Den vollständigen Umfang finden Sie in der Quelle.

Quelle ansehen (neuer Tab)
DOAJ

Daten beziehen sich auf diesen Artikel oder dieses Kapitel.

Datensatz in der Datenbank gefunden

Daten abgerufen:

Quelle ansehen (neuer Tab)
Google Scholar

Key Kinematic Components for Optimal Basketball Free Throw Shooting Performance

DOI: 10.18276/cej.2021.4-01
Zitieren

Der Volltext ist verfügbar

Abstract

The purpose of this study was to determine the difference in five kinematic variables (internal knee and elbow angles, elbow height, forearm angle from vertical, and shoulder flexion angle at ball release) between proficient and non-proficient free throw shooters and which variables had the greatest contributions to a successful free throw shooting outcome. Seventeen male basketball players shoot three sets of 10 free throws with a two-minute break between each set. A three-dimensional motion tracking system composed of 17 sensors sampling at 60 Hz was used for data collection. Proficient free throw shooters had greater knee and elbow flexion, lower elbow height, and a smaller forearm angle compared to non-proficient shooters. These results explained 89.5% of the total variance. While maintaining the optimal range of these kinematic variables allows each subject to reach an appropriate level of free throw shooting performance, the key variable capable of distinguishing between made and missed shots within the proficient group of shooters was the forearm angle. Positioning the forearm parallel, or close to parallel, with an imaginary vertical line during the preparatory phase of the shooting motion accounted for 23.9% of the total variance and was associated with a greater number of made shots.

Zusatzmaterialien

01_cabarkapa.d-fry.a-carlson.k_errata.pdf
This is the correct version of the article
Pobierz
PDF-Vorschau

PDF öffnen

Bibliographie (20)
  1. Ammar, A., Chtourou, H., Abdelkarim, O., Parish, A., Hoekelmann, A. (2016). Free throw shot in basketball: kinematic analysis of scored and missed shots during the learning process. Sport Sciences for Health, 12 (1), 27–33.
  2. Branch, J. (2009, March 04). For free throws, 50 years of practice is no help. Retrieved from: https://www.nytimes.com/2009/03/04/sports/basketball/04freethrow.html (2.07.2020).
  3. Brancazio, P.J. (1981). Physics of basketball. American Journal of Physics, 49 (4), 356–365.
  4. Cabarkapa, D., Fry, A.C., Poggio, J.P, Deane, M.A. (in press). Kinematic differences between proficient and non-proficient free throw shooters – a video analysis. Journal of Applied Sport Sciences.
  5. Csataljay, G., O’Donoghue, P., Hughes, M., Dancs, H. (2009). Performance indicators that distinguish winning and losing teams in basketball. International Journal of Performance Analysis in Sport, 9 (1), 60–66.
  6. Goosey-Tolfrey, V., Butterworth, D., Morriss, C. (2002). Free throw shooting technique of male wheelchair basketball players. Adapted Physical Activity Quarterly, 19 (2), 238–250.
  7. Hays, D., Krause, J. V. (1987). Score on the Throw. The Basketball Bulletin, Winter, 4–9.
  8. Huston, R.L., Grau, C.A. (2003). Basketball shooting strategies – the free throw, direct shot and layup.Sports Engineering, 6 (1), 49–64.
  9. Hamilton, G.R., Reinschmidt, C. (1997). Optimal trajectory for the basketball free throw. Journal of Sports Sciences, 15 (5), 491–504.
  10. Hudson, J.L. (1985). Prediction of basketball skill using biomechanical variables. Research Quarterly for Exercise and Sport , 56 (2), 115–121.
  11. Kozar, B., Vaughn, R.E., Whitfield, K.E., Lord, R.H., Dye, B. (1994). Importance of free-throws at various stages of basketball games. Perceptual and Motor Skills, 78 (1), 243–248.
  12. Mullineaux, D.R., Uhl, T.L. (2010). Coordination-variability and kinematics of misses versus swishes of basketball free throws. Journal of Sports Sciences, 28 (9), 1017–1024.
  13. Miller, S., Bartlett, R. (1996). The relationship between basketball shooting kinematics, distance and playing position. Journal of Sports Sciences, 14 (3), 243–253.
  14. Okubo, H., Hubbard, M. (2006). Dynamics of the basketball shot with application to the free throw. Journal of Sports Sciences, 24 (12), 1303–1314.
  15. Robinson, N. (2016, July 25). Why are NBA big men so useless at free throws? Retrieved from: http://theniche-cache.com/american-sports/why-are-nba-big-men-so-useless-at-free-throws (2.07.2020).
  16. Sampaio, J., Janeira, M. (2003). Importance of free-throw performance in game outcome during the final series of basketball play-offs. International Journal of Applied Sports Sciences, 15 (2), 9–16.
  17. Trninic, S., Dizdar, D., Luksic, E. (2002). Differences between winning and defeated top quality basketball teams in final tournaments of European club championship. Collegium Antropologicum, 26 (2), 521–531.
  18. Tran, C.M., Silverberg, L.M. (2008). Optimal release conditions for the free throw in men’s basketball. Journal of Sports Sciences, 26 (11), 1147–1155.
  19. Tan, A., Miller, G. (1981). Kinematics of the free throw in basketball. American Journal of Physics, 49 (6), 542–544.
  20. Uygur, M., Goktepe, A., Ak, E., Karabork, H., Korkusuz, F. (2010). The effect of fatigue on the kinematics of free throw shooting in basketball. Journal of Human Kinetics, 24 (2010), 51–56.