Przejdź do treści
Ekonomiczne Problemy Usług

Wcześniej: Zeszyty Naukowe Uniwersytetu Szczecińskiego. Ekonomiczne Problemy Usług

nr 131 (2) 2018

Implications of ICT-based platforms on labor markets – the case of Uber


(WPŁYW PLATFORM OPARTYCH NA ICT NA RYNKI PRACY – PRZYKŁAD UBERA)
DOI: 10.18276/epu.2018.131/2-08
Cytuj

Pełny tekst jest dostępny

ISSN:1896-382X
eISSN:2353-2866
Autorzy: Anders Henten
Aalborg University, Center for Communication, Media and Information Technologies

Iwona Windekilde
Aalborg University, Center for Communication, Media and Information Technologies
Słowa kluczowe: platformy ICT Uber
Data publikacji całości:2018-05-12
Liczba stron:22 (75-96)
OAI-PMH:Metadane
Klasyfikacja JEL: L91 O31
Cited-by (Crossref) ?: Włącz JavaScript, aby pobrać dane cytowań.
CC BY-SA Open Access DOAJ
Kod QR

Abstrakt

Platformy ICT pośredniczące w obszarze zatrudnienia budują rynki pracy dla osób, które nie są zatrudnione na odpowiednich dla siebie stanowiskach i/lub pracują w niepełnym wymiarze godzin. Stopień, w jakim tego typu platformy obecnie przyczyniają się do ogólnych trendów w zakresie zatrudnienia w niepełnym wymiarze godzin lub samozatrudnienia, są trudne do oszacowania, ponieważ obecnie dostępna ilość danych jest stosunkowo niewielka. Nie można jednak mieć wątpliwości, że platformy ICT w dłuższej perspektywie wzmocnią tendencje w kierunku zatrudnienia w niepełnym wymiarze godzin, a w każdym razie na zwiększenie niestabilności warunków pracy

PDF

Pobierz PDF
Podgląd PDF

Otwórz PDF

Bibliografia (54)
  1. Accenture (2016). Platform Economy: Technology-driven business model innovation from the outside in, Technology Vision. Accenture Technology R&D.
  2. Aloisi, A. (2016). Commoditized Workers: Case Study Research on Labor Law Issues Arising from a set of “On-Demand/Gig Economy” Platforms. Comparative Labor Law & Policy Journal, 37, 653.
  3. Bernhardt, A. (2014). Labor Standards and the Reorganization of Work: Gaps in Data and Research. UC Berkeley: Institute for Research on Labor and Employment.
  4. Budziewicz-Guźlecka, A. (2017). Role of the Sharing Economy in the Contemporary Economy. Ekonomiczne Problemy Usług, 1 (126), 27–36.
  5. CGA (2015). CGA, Connecticut General Assembly, OLR Bill Analysis, An Act Regulating Transportation Network Companies. Retrieved from: https://www.cga.ct.gov/2015/ba/2015HB-06683-R000362-BA.htm.
  6. Cherry, M.A., Aloisi, A. (2017). “Dependent Contractors” In the Gig Economy: A Comparative Approach. American University Law Review, 3 (66).
  7. Chirgwin, R. (2017). Switzerland says Uber's an employer, sends social security bill, 6.01.2017. Retrieved from: https://www.theregister.co.uk/2017/01/06/switzerland_says_ubers_an_ employer_sends_social_security_bill/.
  8. Coase, R. (1937). The nature of the firm. Economica, 4 (16), 386–405.
  9. CURIA, Advocate General’s Opinion in Case C-434/15, Press Release No 50/17, Luxembourg, 11 May 2017 (Court of Justice of the European Union 2017).
  10. Czaplewski, M. (2016). E-commerce in Poland and Denmark – comparative analysis and development trends. The Business & Management Review, 5 (7), 399–403.
  11. Dagnino, E. (2016). Labour and Labour Law in the time of the on-demand economy. Revista Derecho Social y Empresa, 6.
  12. EC (2016). Part-time work: A divided Europe, Employment, Social Affairs & Inclusion. Retrieved from: European Commission's DG for Employment, Social Affairs & Inclusion: http://ec.europa.eu/social/main.jsp?langId=en&catId=1196&newsId=2535&furtherNews=yes.
  13. EC (2016). European Commission. A European agenda for the collaborative economy {SWD (2016) 184 final}, Brussels, 2.6.2016 COM (2016) 356 final.
  14. EC (2016B). European Commission – Fact Sheet. A European agenda for the collaborative economy. Retrieved from: http://europa.eu/rapid/press-release_MEMO-16-2002_en.htm.
  15. Economides, N. (1996). The economics of networks. International Journal of Industrial Organization, 14, 673–699.
  16. Employment Tribunals (2016). Reasons for Reserved Judgment on Preliminary Hearing sent to the Parties on 28 October 2016, Case number 2202550/2015. Retrieved from: https://www.judiciary.gov.uk/wp-content/uploads/2016/10/aslam-and-farrar-v-uber-reasons-20161028.pdf.
  17. ESA (2016). U.S. Department of Commerce Economics and Statistics Administration Office of the Chief Economist, Digital Matching Firms: A New Definition in the “Sharing Economy” Space.
  18. Evans, D., Schmalensee, R. (2016). Matchmakers: The new economics of multisided platforms. Harvard Business Review.
  19. Evans, P.C., Gawer, A. (2016). The Rise of the Platform Enterprise. A Global Survey. The Center for Global Enterprise.
  20. Friedman, G. (2014). The rise of the American gig economy. Dollars & Sense, March–April, 28–29.
  21. Gawer, A., Cusumano, M.A. (2002). Platform leadership: How Intel, Microsoft and Cisco drive industry innovation. Harvard Business Scholl Press.
  22. Goodin, G.P., Moran, M. (2016). Transportation Network Companies. Texas A&M Transportation Institute. Retrieved from: https://static.tti.tamu.edu/tti.tamu.edu/documents/tti-prc-testimony-08302016.pdf.
  23. Groff, A., Callegari, P., Madden, P. (2015). Platforms Like Uber and the Blurred Line Between Independent Contractors and Employees. Computer Law Review International, 6 (December).
  24. Hagiu, A., Wright, J. (2015). Multi-sided platforms. Working Paper 15-037, Harvard Business School.
  25. Hall, J.V., Krueger, A.B. (2015). An Analysis of the Labor Market for Uber’s Driver-Partners in the United States. Working paper 22843. National Bureau of Economic Research.
  26. Henten, A., Windekilde, I. (2016). Transaction costs and the sharing economy. Journal Info (Bingley).
  27. Henten, A., Windekilde, I. (2017). Domesticating the monster – the case of Uber in a social contract perspective. Nordic and Baltic Journal of ICT, 1, 1–16.
  28. Hullinger, J. (2016). Things you might not know about uber and its drivers. Retrieved from: http://mentalfloss.com/article/67010/16-things-you-might-not-know-about-uber-and-its-drivers.
  29. Kennedy, J.V. (2016). Three Paths to Update Labor Law for the Gig Economy. Information Technology & Innovation Foundation.
  30. Kollewe, J. (11.05.2017). New Uber blow as European legal adviser says service should be licensed like taxis,. Retrieved from: https://www.theguardian.com/technology/2017/ may/11/uber-cabs-taxis-us-app-ecj.
  31. Krueger, A.B., Harris, S.D. (2015). A proposal for modernizing Labor Laws for twenty-first-century work: the “independent worker”. Retrieved from The Hamilton Project: http://www.hamiltonproject.org/assets/files/modernizing_labor_laws_for_twenty_first_century_work_krueger_harris.pdf.
  32. La Monica, P.R. (2015). Is Uber really worth more than Ford and GM? Retrieved from CNN Money: http://money.cnn.com/2015/10/27/investing/uber-ford-gm-70-billion-valuation/index.html.
  33. Leighton, P., Brown, D. (2013). Future working: The rise of Europe’s independent professionals (iPros). EFIP.
  34. Liyan, C. (2015). At $68 Billion Valuation, Uber Will Be Bigger Than GM, Ford, and Honda. Retrieved from Forbes: https://www.forbes.com/sites/liyanchen/2015/12/04/at-68-billion-valuation-uber-will-be-bigger-than-gm-ford-and-honda/#537b718832e3.
  35. Lobel, O. (2016). The Law of the Platform. Minnesota Law Review, San Diego Legal Studies Paper, 16, 212.
  36. Means, B., Seiner, J.A. (2016). Essay, Navigating the Uber Economy. UC Davis Law Review, 49, 1511.
  37. Newcomer, E. (2017). Uber, Lifting Financial Veil. Retrieved from Bloomberg: https://www.bloomberg.com/news/articles/2017-04-14/embattled-uber-reports-strong-sales-growth-as-losses-continue.
  38. OECD (2016). New forms of work in the digital economy. Retrieved from Directorate for Science, Technology and Innovation Committee on Digital Economy Policy: http://www.oecd.org/officialdocuments/publicdisplaydocumentpdf/?cote=DSTI/ICCP/IIS(2015)13/FINAL&docLanguage=En.
  39. Order Denying Plaintiffs' Motion for Preliminary Approval, Case 3:13-cv-03826-EMC Document 748 (United State District Court 2016). Retrieved from: https://www.documentcloud.org/documents/3031645-Uber-Settlement-Denied.html#document/p2.
  40. Rosoff, M. (2015). Uber is now more valuable than Ford, GM, and a bunch of huge public companies. Retrieved from: http://www.businessinsider.com/uber-valuation-vs-market-cap-of-publicly-traded-stocks-2015-12?r=US&IR=T&IR=T.
  41. Shapiro, C., Varian, H.R. (1999). Information rules: A strategic guide to the network economy. Harvard Business Press.
  42. Sharpe, S. (2015). Intuit Forecast: 7.6 Million People in On-Demand Economy by 2020. Retrieved from Business Wire: http://www.businesswire.com/news/home/20150813005317/ en/Intuit-Forecast-7.6-Million-People-On-Demand-Economy#.VedGWE3bJon.
  43. Standing, G. (2011). The precariat – the new dangerous class. Bloomsbury Academic.
  44. Sundararajan, A. (2016). The sharing economy – the end of employment and the rise of crowd-based capitalism. The MIT Press.
  45. The Modern Financial Data (2017). Retrieved from: https://ycharts.com/.
  46. The Wall Street Journal (2017). Digital Matching Firms. Retrieved from http://graphics.wsj.com/table/DigMatching_0621.
  47. Uber (2017). Airports. Retrieved from https://www.uber.com/en-DK/airports/#airport-list.
  48. Uber (2017). Cities. Retrieved from https://www.uber.com/en-DK/cities/.
  49. Uber (2017). Country list. Retrieved from https://www.uber.com/en-DK/country-list/.
  50. Uber (2017). Driver jobs. Retrieved from https://www.uber.com/driver-jobs./
  51. Uber (2017). Feedback is a 2 way street,. Retrieved from https://newsroom.uber.com/feedback-is-a-2-way-street/.
  52. Uber B.V. (2017). Retrieved from terms and conditions: https://www.uber.com/en-IN/legal/terms/in/ (16.03.2017).
  53. Weber, L. (2015). What if There Were a New Type of Worker? Dependent Contractor. Retrieved from The Wall Street Journal: https://www.wsj.com/articles/what-if-there-were-a-new-type-of-worker-dependent-contractor-1422405831.
  54. Williamson, O.E. (1989). Transaction cost economics. In: R. Schmalensee, R. Willing (eds.), Handbook of industrial organization (pp. 135–182), vol. 1. Elsevier.