Haiku and Sumi-e Paintings Inspired by the Poetry of Magdalena Szpunar

ISBN: 978-83-7972-975-3    ISBN (online): 978-83-7972-976-0 OAI    DOI: 10.18276/978-83-7972-976-0
CC BY-SA   Open Access 

.

Rok wydania:2025
Dziedzina:Dziedzina nauk społecznych
Dyscyplina:pedagogika
Słowa kluczowe: Haiku sztuka sumi-e sztuczna inteligencja w sztuce minimalizm Magdalena Szpunar.
Autorzy: Elżbieta Perzycka-Borowska ORCID
Uniwersytet Szczeciński

Informacje

Wersja elektroniczna publikacji dostępna na licencji CC BY-SA 4.0 po 12 miesiącach od daty wprowadzenia do obrotu: wrzesień 2025

Wersję drukowaną publikacji można nabyć w sklepie Wydawnictwa Naukowego Uniwersytetu Szczecińskiego: wn.usz.edu.pl/sklep/

 

Ta książka otrzymała dofinansowanie z następujących dwóch programów:

GRANT OFFER: Research Grant, Other JeS Guarantee Calls

Research Grant

GRANT TITLE: Communiti es and Artistic Participation in Hybrid Environment (CAPHE).
Grant Ref: EP / X038572 / 1
HORIZON-MSCA-SE-01-01 grant agreement.
Communities and Artistic Participation in Hybrid Environment, No. 101086391.

UE

Abstrakt

Od poezji Magdaleny Szpunar do haiku i sumi-e generowanych przez sztuczną inteligencję

„Od poezji Magdaleny Szpunar do haiku i AI wygenerowanych obrazów sumi-e” to połączenie tradycyjnych japońskich form sztuki z nowoczesną technologią. Autorka zagłębia się w minimalistyczne sztuki haiku i malarstwa sumi-e, czerpiąc inspirację z głębokiej i społecznie zaangażowanej poezji Magdaleny Szpunar—wybitnej socjolożki i poetki, znanej z poruszania intymnych i społecznych aspektów życia, w tym ludzkiego cierpienia i niesprawiedliwości społecznych.

Książka składa się z dwóch głównych części. Pierwsza część, „Ścieżki harmonii. Codzienność objęta sztuką”, przedstawia poszukiwanie harmonii w życiu codziennym, historię i znaczenie sztuki sumi-e oraz haiku jako sztuki minimalizmu i refleksji. Autorka odnosi się do filozofii zen, podkreślając znaczenie prostoty i dążenia do wewnętrznej równowagi. Opisuje także własne doświadczenia twórcze i codzienne rytuały, które stanowią źródło inspiracji dla jej prac artystycznych.

Druga część, „Światło i cień. Synergia refleksji wyrażona w haiku i sumi-e”, to zbiór 62 wierszy haiku, którym towarzyszą obrazy wygenerowane przy użyciu programów sztucznej inteligencji, takich jak DALL·E i Midjourney. Obrazy te są inspirowane tradycyjną techniką sumi-e, a ich celem jest uchwycenie istoty emocji i zjawisk za pomocą minimalnych pociągnięć pędzla. Książka stawia pytania o relację między człowiekiem a światem, przemijalność oraz istotę egzystencji, co wpisuje się w refleksyjną naturę haiku i sumi-e.

Autorka przez całą książkę bada, jak integracja technologii sztucznej inteligencji z tradycyjnymi formami sztuki tworzy dialog między przeszłością a teraźniejszością, wzmacniając emocjonalny wpływ doświadczenia poetyckiego. Redukując słowa i obrazy do ich istoty, dzieło reflektuje nad tematami przemijalności, relacji człowieka ze światem oraz istoty istnienia.

Książka ta nie tylko oddaje hołd poezji Magdaleny Szpunar, ale również stanowi artystyczny eksperyment, który pokazuje, w jaki sposób prostota w poezji i obrazie może wzajemnie się uzupełniać. Zaprasza czytelników do medytacji nad światem, człowiekiem i sztuką w ich najbardziej zredukowanych i najczystszych formach, podkreślając transformującą moc poezji i sztuki w wywoływaniu głębokiej refleksji, emocjonalnego rezonansu i zaangażowania społecznego. Wykorzystanie nowoczesnych narzędzi, takich jak sztuczna inteligencja, pozwala na twórcze poszukiwania nowych form ekspresji, a także na otwieranie nowych ścieżek interpretacyjnych dla współczesnej sztuki.

Bibliografia

1.Addiss, S. (1989). The art of Zen: Paintings and calligraphy by Japanese monks 1600–1925. Harry N. Abrams.
2.Anantrasirichai, N., & Bull, D. (2021). Artificial intelligence in the creative industries: A review. Artificial Intelligence Review, 55(1), 589–656. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10462-021-10039-7
3.Ashby, S., Hanna, J., Rooij, A. d., Kasprzak, M., Hoekstra, J., & Bos, S. (2023). Articulating (uncertain) AI futures of artistic practice: A speculative design and manifesto sprint approach. In Proceedings of the 15th Conference on Creativity and Cognition (C&C ’23), Association for Computing Machinery, 312–318. https://doi.org/10.1145/3591196.3596819
4.Barcz, A. (2016). Realizm ekologiczny. Od ekokrytyki do zookrytyki w literaturze polskiej. Wydawnictwo Naukowe “Śląsk”.
5.Bate, J. (1991). Romantic ecology: Wordsworth and the environmental tradition. Routledge.
6.Batson, C. Daniel. Altruism in humans (2010; online edn, Oxford Academic, 1 May 2011). https://doi.org/10.1093/acprof:oso/9780195341065.001.0001
7.Beheitt, M., & Haj Hmida, M. (2022). Automatic Arabic poem generation with GPT-2. ICAART 2022 – 14th International Conference on Agents and Artificial Intelligence, 366–374. http://doi.org/10.5220/0010847100003116
8.Belfi, A. M., Vessel, E. A., & Starr, G. G. (2018). Individual ratings of vividness predict aesthetic appeal in poetry. Psychology of Aesthetics, Creativity, and the Arts, 12(3), 341–350. https://doi.org/10.1037/aca0000153
9.Bellaiche, L., Shahi, R., Turpin, M. H., Ragnhildstveit, A., Sprockett, S., Barr, N., … & Seli, P. (2023). Humans versus AI: Whether and why we prefer human-created compared to AI-created artwork. Cognitive Research: Principles and Implications, 8(1). https://doi.org/10.1186/s41235-023-00499-6
10.Berthier, F. (1995). Reading Zen in the rocks: The Japanese dry landscape garden. University of Chicago Press.
11.Blyth, R. H. (1982). Haiku. Hokuseido Press.
12.Brown, M. E. L., Kelly, M., & Finn, G. M. (2021). Thoughts that breathe, and words that burn: Poetic inquiry within health professions education. Perspectives on Medical Education, 10(5), 257–264. https://doi.org/10.1007/s40037-021-00682-9
13.Brown, T. B., Mann, B., Ryder, N., Subbiah, M., Kaplan, J., Dhariwal, P., … & Amodei, D. (2020). Language models are few-shot learners. https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.2005.14165
14.Chen, L., Xiao, S., Chen, Y., Sun, L., Childs, P. R. N., & Han, J. (2024). An artificial intelligence approach for interpreting creative combinational designs. Journal of Engineering Design, 36(5–6), 920–947. https://doi.org/10.1080/09544828.2024.2377068
15.Chi, J. (2024). The evolutionary impact of artificial intelligence on contemporary artistic practices. Communications in Humanities Research, 35(1), 52–57. https://doi.org/10.54254/2753-7064/35/20240006
16.Chukwuka, A. V. (2023). First report of fishkill incidence in Bonny-Andoni coastal area, Nigeria. Croatian Journal of Fisheries, 81(2), 83–91. https://doi.org/10.2478/cjf-2023-0010
17.Cooms, S., & Saunders, V. (2023). Poetic inquiry: A tool for decolonising qualitative research. Qualitative Research Journal, 24(1), 3–22. https://doi.org/10.1108/qrj-05-2023-0071
18.Cormier, K. (2023). Dedication to the craft: Developing pre-service teachers into social justice advocates through PDS and poetry. School-University Partnerships, 16(2), 110–124. https://doi.org/10.1108/sup-02-2023-0011
19.Creely, E., & Blannin, J. (2023). The implications of generative ai for creative composition in higher education and initial teacher education. ASCILITE Publications, 357–361. https://doi.org/10.14742/apubs.2023.618
20.Cronin, C., & Hawthorne, C. (2019). ‘Poetry in motion’ a place in the classroom: Using poetry to develop writing confidence and reflective skills. Nurse Education Today, 76, 73–77. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.nedt.2019.01.026
21.Croom, A. (2014). The practice of poetry and the psychology of well-being. Journal of Poetry Therapy, 28(1), 21–41. https://doi.org/10.1080/08893675.2015.980133
22.Curwood, J. S., & Jones, K. (2022). A bridge across our fears: Understanding spoken word poetry in troubled times. Literacy, 56(1), 50–58. https://doi.org/10.1111/lit.12270
23.Cutts, Q., & Sankofa Waters, M. B. (2019). Poetic approaches to qualitative data analysis. Oxford Research Encyclopedia of Education.
24.Daboui, P., Janbabai, G., Akbari, M. E., & Nouri, M. (2022). Effect of Masnavi-based poetry therapy on anxiety, depression and stress of women with breast cancer. Iranian Journal of Psychiatry and Behavioral Sciences, 16(4). https://doi.org/10.5812/ijpbs-116651
25.Davies, E. (2018). Why we need more poetry in palliative care. BMJ Supportive & Palliative Care, 8(3), 266–270. https://doi.org/10.1136/bmjspcare-2017-001477
26.Doshi, A. R., & Hauser, O. P. (2024). Generative AI enhances individual creativity but reduces the collective diversity of novel content. Science Advances, 10(28). https://doi.org/10.1126/sciadv.adn5290
27.Duh, M., & Nemanič, M. K. (2020). Efficiency of an innovative didactic approach in graphic design teaching. Croatian Journal of Education – Hrvatski Časopis za Odgoj i Obrazovanje, 22. https://doi.org/10.15516/cje.v22i0.3840
28.Eisenberg, N. (2002). Empathy-related emotional responses, altruism, and their socialization. In R. J. Davidson & A. Harrington (Eds.), Visions of compassion: Western scientists and Tibetan Buddhists examine human nature. Oxford University Press. https://doi.org/10.1093/acprof:oso/9780195130430.003.0007
29.Ellis, C., Adams, T. E., & Bochner, A. P. (2010). Autoethnography: An overview. Forum Qualitative Sozialforschung Forum: Qualitative Social Research, 12(1). https://doi.org/10.17169/fqs-12.1.1589
30.Foster, L. J. J., Deafenbaugh, L., & Miller, E. (2016). Group metaphor map making: Application to integrated arts-based focus groups. Qualitative Social Work, 17(2), 305–322. https://doi.org/10.1177/1473325016667475
31.Gangadharbatla, H. (2021). The role of AI attribution knowledge in the evaluation of artwork. Empirical Studies of the Arts, 40(2), 125–142. https://doi.org/10.1177/0276237421994697
32.Grassini, S., & Koivisto, M. (2024). Understanding how personality traits, experiences, and attitudes shape negative bias toward AI‑generated artworks. Scientific Reports, 14, 4113. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-024-54294-4
33.Gutiérrez Escalante, A. (2019). Metáfora y construcción social. Athenea Digital, 19(1), e2049. https://doi.org/10.5565/rev/athenea.2049
34.Hamerski, W. (2021). Romantyczne „kuźnie natury” w perspektywie ekokrytyki. Porównania, 2(29), 47–67. https://doi.org/10.14746/por.2021.2.3
35.Henderson, H. (1958). An introduction to haiku: An anthology of poems and poets from Basho to Shiki. Doubleday.
36.Higginson, W. J. (1985). The haiku handbook: How to write, share, and teach haiku. Kodansha International.
37.Hitsuwari, J., & Nomura, M. (2023). Effects of emotional and cognitive changes on aesthetic evaluation of poetry based on subjective and physiological continuous responses with pupil diameter measurement. Preprint (Version 3) available at Research Square. https://doi.org/10.21203/rs.3.rs-2713826/v3
38.Horst, R., James, K., Morales, E., & Takeda, Y. (2022). The intermingled meanings of PhoneMe: Exploring trans-modal, place-based poetry in an online social network. Journal of Adolescent & Adult Literacy, 66(4), 249–256. https://doi.org/10.1002/jaal.1274
39.Hubert, K. F., Awa, K. N., & Zabelina, D. L. (2024). The current state of artificial intelligence generative language models is more creative than humans on divergent thinking tasks. Scientific Reports, 14(1), 3440. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-024-53303-w
40.Hutchinson, J. (2014). I can haz likes: Cultural intermediation to facilitate “petworking”. M/C Journal, 17(2). https://doi.org/10.5204/mcj.792
41.Jusslin, S., & Höglund, H. (2021). Arts-based responses to teaching poetry: A literature review of dance and visual arts in poetry education. Literacy, 55(1), 39–51. https://doi.org/10.1111/lit.12236
42.Kalina, N. D. (2022). Constructive realism in the construction of artistic images of fine art in the context of the creation of symbolic meanings. Человек И Культура (Chelovek i Kul’tura), 5, 77–105. https://doi.org/10.25136/2409-8744.2022.5.38275
43.Kambua, C. (2023). Exploring the impacts of artistic expression on minority communities in East Africa. American Journal of Arts, Social and Humanity Studies, 3(1), 1–10. https://doi.org/10.47672/ajashs.1499
44.Keene, D. (1999). Seeds in the heart: Japanese literature from earliest times to the late sixteenth century. Columbia University Press.
45.Khan, A. A., Faraz, Q., & Afrin, Z. (2021). Tracing poetry of protest in India: Dalit, Muslim and feminist perspectives. International Journal of Research Publications, 72(1), 47–58. https://doi.org/10.47119/ijrp100721320201796
46.Khraban, T. (2021). The psycholinguistic study of post-traumatic stress disorder through military personnel’s creative writing. Scientific Journal of Polonia University, 42(5), 41–47. https://doi.org/10.23856/4205
47.Kolbuszewska, E. (2007). Romantyczne przeżywanie przyrody: znaczenia, wartości, style zachowań. a linea.
48.Kristiantari, M. G. R., Widiana, I. W., & Artawan, G. (2023). Enhancing the ability to write poetry and creative thinking skills with rural nature-inspired contextual approach. International Journal of Evaluation and Research in Education (IJERE), 12(2), 761. https://doi.org/10.11591/ijere.v12i2.23194
49.Laneve, C., & Margiotta, R. (2022). Metaphor: The power of signification in teaching. Ensino Em Re-Vista, 29(Contínua), e048. https://doi.org/10.14393/ER-v29a2022-48
50.Leavy, P. (2015). Method meets art: Arts-based research practice (2nd ed.). Guilford Press.
51.Lewicka, M. (2011). Place attachment: How far have we come in the last 40 years? Journal of Environmental Psychology, 31(3), 207–230.
52.Liu, B., Fu, J., Kato, M. P., & Yoshikawa, M. (2018). Beyond narrative description: Generating poetry from images by multi-adversarial training. MM ’18: Proceedings of the 26th ACM international conference on Multimedia, 738–791. https://doi.org/10.1145/3240508.3240587
53.Lloyd-Davies, V. (2019). Mindful artist: Sumi-e painting: Master the meditative art of Japanese brush painting. Walter Foster Publishing.
54.Magni, F., Park, J., & Chao, M. M. (2023). Humans as creativity gatekeepers: Are we biased against AI creativity? Journal of Business and Psychology, 39(3), 643–656. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10869-023-09910-x
55.Manathunga, C., Davidow, S., Williams, P., Willis, A., Raciti, M., Gilbey, K., … & Chan, A. (2022). Decolonising the school experience through poetry to foreground truth-telling and cognitive justice. London Review of Education, 20(1), 6. https://doi.org/10.14324/lre.20.1.06
56.Masuda, K. (1973). Zen and Japanese culture. Princeton University Press.
57.Matsumoto, N. (1985). Sumi-e: The art of Japanese ink painting. Tuttle Publishing.
58.Mazzone, M., & Elgammal, A. (2019). Art, creativity, and the potential of artificial intelligence. Arts, 8(1), 26. https://doi.org/10.3390/arts8010026
59.McClintock, H. (2005). Haiku in English: The first hundred years. Norton.
60.McLuhan, M. (1964). Understanding media: The extensions of man. McGraw-Hill.
61.McLuhan, M. (1967). The medium is the massage: An inventory of effects. Random House.
62.McMillan, D. W., & Chavis, D. M. (1986). Sense of community: A definition and theory. Journal of Community Psychology, 14(1), 6–23. McNiff, S. (1998). Art-based research. Jessica Kingsley Publishers.
63.Miller, A. (2021). Ideas, language, action: the protest poetry of #MeToo and Black Lives Matter. Text, 25(Special 64), 1–18. https://doi.org/10.52086/001c.30990
64.Millet, K., Buehler, F., Du, G., & Kokkoris, M. D. (2023). Defending humankind: Anthropocentric bias in the appreciation of AI art. Computers in Human Behavior, 143, 107707. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chb.2023.107707
65.Mohr, S. (2023). Mystical poetry and the ontology of the self in liberation psychology. Journal of Theoretical and Philosophical Psychology, 43(2), 76–89. https://doi.org/10.1037/teo0000203
66.Moreno, R., Guthrie, K. H., & Strickland, K. (2023). Incorporating arts-based pedagogy: Moving beyond traditional approaches to teaching qualitative research. Teaching and Learning Inquiry, 11. https://doi.org/10.20343/teachlearninqu.11.15
67.Neef, N. E., Zabel, S., Papoli, M. & Otto, S. (2024). Drawing the full picture on diverging findings: Adjusting the view on the perception of art created by artificial intelligence. AI & Society, 40, 2859–2879. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00146-024-02020-z
68.Newfield, D., & D’Abdon, R. (2015). Reconceptualising poetry as a multimodal genre. TESOL Quarterly, 49(3), 510–532. http://www.jstor.org/stable/43893770
69.Ng, Z., Griffin, T. C., & Braun, L. (2021). The new status quo: Enhancing access to human–animal interactions to alleviate social isolation & loneliness in the time of COVID-19. Animals, 11(10), 2769. https://doi.org/10.3390/ani11102769
70.Niikuni, K., Wang, M., Makuuchi, M., Koizumi, M., & Kiyama, S. (2022). Pupil dilation reflects emotional arousal via poetic language. Perceptual and Motor Skills, 129(6), 1691–1708. https://doi.org/10.1177/00315125221126778
71.Obermeier, C., Kotz, S. A., Jessen, S., Raettig, T., Koppenfels, M. v., & Menninghaus, W. (2015). Aesthetic appreciation of poetry correlates with ease of processing in event-related potentials. Cognitive, Affective, & Behavioral Neuroscience, 16(2), 362–373. https://doi.org/10.3758/s13415-015-0396-x
72.Ogeye, O. O. (2019). Towards an architectural identity: Learning from the communication method of contemporary Nigerian art. International Journal of Architecture, Arts and Applications, 5(2), 37. https://doi.org/10.11648/j.ijaaa.20190502.11
73.Orwig, W., Bellaiche, L., Spooner, S., Vo, A., Baig, Z., Ragnhildstveit, A., … Seli, P. (2024). Using AI to generate visual art: Do individual differences in creativity predict AI-assisted art quality? Creativity Research Journal, 1–12. https://doi.org/10.1080/10400419.2024.2440691
74.Panhofer, H., & Payne, H. (2011). Languaging the embodied experience. Body, Movement and Dance in Psychotherapy, 6(3), 215–232. https://doi.org/10.1080/17432979.2011.572625
75.Peng, X. (2023). Research on the aesthetic value and artistic characteristics in Chinese painting. Art and Performance Letters, 4(4), 51–55. https://doi.org/10.23977/artpl.2023.040410
76.Peradantha, I. B. G. S., Widyastutieningrum, S. R., Soewarlan, S., & Triguna, I. B. G. Y. (2023). Interactions of artistic expressions with spatial contexts in the Isolo performance of Sentani Tribe, Putali Village, Indonesia. International Society for the Study of Vernacular Settlements, 10(8), 314–330. https://doi.org/10.61275/ISVSej-2023-10-08-21
77.Pramling, N. (2010). The sound and the sense: Exploring the collaborative construction of free-form poetry in the six-year-old group. Contemporary Issues in Early Childhood, 11(2), 156–174. https://doi.org/10.2304/ciec.2010.11.2.156
78.Puspitasari, E. (2020). Project-based learning implementation to cultivate preservice English teachers’ 21st century skills. IJELTAL (Indonesian Journal of English Language Teaching and Applied Linguistics), 5(1), 191. https://doi.org/10.21093/ijeltal.v5i1.638
79.Rotari, N. (2022). Metafora – Monadă în terminologie. Filolog Mod, 16, 440–448. https://doi.org/10.52505/filomod.2022.16.47
80.Sadaf, & Rahman, S. (2023). Representing dissent through poetry: A study of select poems of Maya Angelou. The Creative Launcher, 8(3), 84–90. https://doi.org/10.53032/tcl.2023.8.3.10
81.Samo, A., & Highhouse, S. (2023). Artificial intelligence and art: Identifying the aesthetic judgment factors that distinguish human- and machine-generated artwork. Psychology of Aesthetics, Creativity, and the Arts. Advance online publication. https://doi.org/10.1037/aca0000570
82.Schafer, R. M. (1977). The soundscape: Our sonic environment and the tuning of the world. Destiny Books.
83.Shapiro, K. J. (1988). Metaphor making through the body. Phenomenology + Pedagogy, 6(1), 5–14. https://doi.org/10.29173/pandp15042
84.Shirane, H. (1998). Traces of dreams: Landscape, cultural memory, and the poetry of Basho. Stanford University Press.
85.Siallagan, E. A., & Alfina, I. (2023). Poetry generation for Indonesian pantun: Comparison between SeqGAN and GPT-2. Computer Science and Information, 16(1), 59–67. https://doi.org/10.21609/jiki.v16i1.1113
86.Sound, J. K., Peters, A., Bellamy-Carter, J., Rad-Menéndez, C., MacKechnie, K., Green, D.H., & Leney, A. C. (2021). Rapid cyanobacteria species identification with high sensitivity using native mass spectrometry. Analytical Chemistry, 93(42), 14293–14299. https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.analchem.1c03412
87.Stanley, N., Stanley, L., & Fletcher, S. (2022). Maximizing use of poetry and art in public spaces for promoting language development. Babylonia Journal of Language Education, 3, 78–84. https://doi.org/10.55393/babylonia.v3i.207
88.Stapleton, S. R. (2018). Data analysis in participatory action research: Using poetic inquiry to describe urban teacher marginalization. Action Research, 19(2), 449–471. https://doi.org/10.1177/1476750318811920
89.Steffens, D. C., Fahed, M., Manning, K. J., & Wang, L. (2022). The neurobiology of apathy in depression and neurocognitive impairment in older adults: A review of epidemiological, clinical, neuropsychological and biological research. Translational Psychiatry, 12(1). https://doi.org/10.1038/s41398-022-02292-3
90.Suzuki, D. T. (2004). Zen and Japanese culture. Princeton University Press.
91.Tabaszewska, J. (2018). Ekokrytyczna (samo)świadomość. Ekokrytyka, Teksty Drugie, 2, 7–16. https://rcin.org.pl/Content/66957/PDF/WA248_86913_P-I-2524_tabaszewska-eko_o.pdf
92.Takahashi, H. (2021). Haiku and the aesthetics of silence. Journal of Japanese Aesthetics, 17, 12–15.
93.Talat, A., & Chaudhry, H. F. (2014). The effect of PBL and 21st century skills on students’ creativity and competitiveness in private schools. Lahore Journal of Business, 2(2), 89–114. https://doi.org/10.35536/ljb.2014.v2.i2.a5
94.Tarbi, E. & Morgan, B. (2022). Opportunities for poetic analysis in qualitative nursing research. Nursing Research, 71(4), 322–327. https://doi.org/10.1097/nnr.0000000000000580
95.Tsai, C. (2023). The structure and function of mind-wandering in Chinese regulated verse. Humanities, 12(4), 87. https://doi.org/10.3390/h12040087
96.Ueda, M. (1992). Bashō and his interpreters: Selected hokku with commentary. Stanford University Press.
97.Vilchynska, T., Bachynska, H., Verbovetska, O., Babii, I., Svystun, N., & Sokol, M. (2021). Conceptual metaphor as a linguomental tool of reality knowledge: Identification problem. Revista EntreLínguas, 7(esp. 3), e021064. https://doi.org/10.29051/el.v7iesp.3.15735
98.Wang, Q., Sun, B., Yan, Z., Zhu, X., Liu, H., & Xin, Y. (2016). Retraction notice: Stability research on the effect of oil spill dispersant II – Impact of wave intensity. Open Petroleum Engineering Journal, 9(1), 327–327. https://doi.org/10.2174/1874834101609010327
99.Wassiliwizky, E., Koelsch, S., Wagner, V., Jacobsen, T., & Menninghaus, W. (2017). The emotional power of poetry: neural circuitry, psychophysiology and compositional principles. Social Cognitive and Affective Neuroscience, 12(8), 1229–1240. https://doi.org/10.1093/scan/nsx069
100.Yakovenko, I. (2020). Women’s voices of protest: Sonia Sanchez and Nikki Giovanni’s poetry. Vìsnik Marìupol’s’kogo Deržavnogo Unìversitetu. Serìâ: Fìlologìâ, 13(23), 130–139. https://doi.org/10.34079/2226-3055-2020-13-23-130-139
101.Yasuda, K. (1957). The Japanese haiku: Its essential nature, history, and possibilities in English, with selected examples. Tuttle Publishing.
102.Yuniarti, I., Glenk, K., McVittie, A., Nomosatryo, S., Triwisesa, E., Suryono, T., … & Ridwansyah, I. (2021). An application of Bayesian Belief Networks to assess management scenarios for aquaculture in a complex tropical lake system in Indonesia. Plos One, 16(4), e0250365. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0250365
103.Zambo, R., & Zambo, D. (2015). Using I poems to hear the voices and understand the actions of EDD students conducting action research. The Qualitative Report, 18(42), 1–17. https://doi.org/10.46743/2160-3715/2013.1453