Studia Językoznawcze

synchroniczne i diachroniczne aspekty badań polszczyzny


ISSN: 1730-4180     eISSN: 2353-3161    OAI    DOI: 10.18276/sj.2026.24-05
CC BY-SA   Open Access   ERIH PLUS

Issue archive / t. 24, 2025
Potencjał badawczy Krytycznej Analizy Dyskursu w humanistyce cyfrowej: analiza wybranych zagadnień teoretycznych

Authors: Ewa Glapka ORCID
Uniwersytet Szczeciński, Instytut Językoznawstwa
Keywords: Transdyscyplinarność humanistyka cyfrowa Krytyczna Analiza Dyskursu
Whole issue publication date:2026-02
Page range:13 (71-83)
Cited-by (Crossref) ?:

Abstract

Critical Discourse Analysis (CDA) is an interdisciplinary framework that allows the identification of complex relationships between language and social context. The aim of the article is to show the research potential of CDA in the context of contemporary communication and digital humanities, taking into account the theoretical assumptions of this program. Explaining how the theory of text underlying CDA resonates with the key mechanisms of digital communication, the article emphasizes the significance of intertextuality and interdiscursivity as essential analytical tools in the context of digital communication analysis, where text and image co-create meanings, and the boundaries between texts and genres become blurred. CDA’s transdisciplinary nature is discussed as well as its role of integrating linguistic, sociological and cultural perspectives in research on communication. The article draws attention to the challenges associated with CDA, especially regarding the allegations of a lack of coherence. It proposes, however, that CDA’s pragmatic and transdisciplinary approach is characterized by scientific rigor, which makes CDA an important part of the contemporary humanities.
Download file

Article file

Bibliography

1.Bachtin Michaił. „Discourse in the novel”, W: The dialogic imagination, red. Michael Holquist. Austin: University of Texas Press, [1935] 1981, 259–422.
2.Bachtin Michaił. „The problem of speech genres”, W: Speech genres and other late essays, red. Caryl Emerson i Michael Holquist. Austin: University of Texas Press, [1953] 1986, 60–102.
3.Barthes Roland. The rustle of language. Oxford: Blackwell, 1986.
4.Baxter Judith. „Discourse-analytic approaches to text and talk”, W: Research methods in linguistics, red. Lia Litosseliti. Londyn: Continuum, 2010, 117–37.
5.Benwell Bethan i Elizabeth Stokoe. Discourse and identity. Edynburg: Edinburgh University Press, 2006.
6.Berry David M. (red.) Understanding digital humanities. Londyn: Palgrave Macmillan, 2012.
7.Bhaskar Roy. Scientific realism and human emancipation. Londyn: Verso, 1986.
8.Blommaert Jan. Discourse: A critical introduction. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2005.
9.Burke, Shani, Parisa Diba i Georgios Antonopoulos. ‘You sick, twisted messes’: The use of argument and reasoning in Islamophobic and anti-Semitic discussions on Facebook, Discourse & Society, 31, 4 (2020), 374–389.
10.Chouliaraki Lilie i Norman Fairclough. Discourse in late modernity. Rethinking critical discourse analysis. Edynburg: Edinburgh University Press, 1999.
11.Cicourel, Aaron V. Method and measurement in sociology. New York: The Free Press, 1969.
12.Esposito, Eleonora i Majid KhosraviNik (red.) Discourse in the digital age: social media, power, and society. Londyn: Routledge, 2022.
13.Fairclough Norman. „The discourse of New Labour: Critical discourse analysis”, W: Discourse as data. A guide for analysis, red. Margaret Wetherell, Stephanie Taylor i Simeon J. Yates, Londyn: The Open University, [2001] 2009, 229–66.
14.Fairclough Norman. Critical discourse analysis: The critical study of language. Londyn: Longman, 1995.
15.Giddens Anthony. The constitution of society: Outline of the theory of structuration. Cambridge: Polity Press, 1984.
16.Glapka Ewa. Reading bridal magazines from a critical discursive perspective. Basingstoke: Palgrave, 2014.
17.Hammersley Martyn. „On the foundations of critical discourse analysis”, Language and Communication, 17, 3 (1997), 237–48.
18.Hodge Robert i Gunther R. Kress. Language as ideology. Londyn: Routledge, 1996.
19.Jäger Siegfried. „Discourse and knowledge: Theoretical and methodological aspects of a critical discourse and dispositive analysis”, W: Methods of Critical Discourse Analysis, red. Ruth Wodak i Michael Meyer, Londyn: Sage, 2001, 32–62.
20.Jeffries Lesley. Textual construction of the female body. A critical discourse approach. Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan, 2007.
21.KhosraviNik Majid. Digital meaning-making across content and practice in social media critical discourse studies, Critical Discourse Studies 19, 2 (2022), 119–123.
22.KhosraviNik Majid. Social Media Critical Discourse Studies. Routledge, 2023.
23.Krzyżanowska Natalia. The commodification of motherhood: Normalisation of consumerism in mediated discourse on mothering, Social Semiotics, 30, 4 (2020), 563–590.
24.Laclau, Ernesto i Chantal Mouffe. Hegemony and socialist strategy. Londyn: Verso, 1985.
25.Lazar Michele. „Feminist Critical Discourse Analysis: Relevance for current gender and language research”, W: The Handbook of Language, Gender, and Sexuality, red. Susan Ehrlich, Miriam Meyerhoff i Janet Holmes, Nowy Jork: John Wiley & Sons, 2014, 198–199.
26.Litosseliti Lia (red.). Research methods in linguistics. Londyn: Continuum, 2010.
27.Litosseliti Lia i Jane Sunderland (red). Gender identity and discourse analysis. Amsterdam: John Benjamins, 2002.
28.Maryl Maciej. Kim są polscy humaniści cyfrowi?, Teksty Drugie, 1 (2017), 286–300.
29.Maybin Janet. „Language, struggle and voice: The Bakhtin/Volosinov writings”, W: Discourse theory and practice, red. Margaret Wetherell, Stephanie Taylor i Simeon J. Yates, Londyn: The Open University, [2001] 2009, 64–71.
30.Mouzelis Nicos. Sociological theory: What went wrong? Diagnosis and remedies. Londyn: Routledge, 1995.
31.Schegloff, Emanuel. A. „Text and context paper”, Discourse and Society, 3 (1998), 4–37.
32.Sparkes Andrew C. „The paradigms debate: An extended review and a celebration of difference”, W: Research in physical education and sport: Exploring alternative vision. red. Andrew C. Sparkes, Londyn: Falmer, 1992, 9–60.
33.Taylor Stephanie. „Evaluating and applying discourse analytic research”, W: Discourse as data. A guide for analysis, red. Margaret Wetherell, Stephanie Taylor i Simeon J. Yates, Londyn: Sage, [2001] 2009, 311–30.
34.Teo Peter. „Racism in the news: a Critical Discourse Analysis of news reporting in two Australian newspapers”, Discourse & Society 11, 1 (2000): 7–49.
35.van Leeuwen Theo. Discourse and practice. New tools for Critical Discourse Analysis. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2008.
36.van Leeuwen, Theo. „The representation of social actors”, W: Texts and practices: Readings in critical discourse analysis, red. Carmen Rosa Caldas-Coulthard and Malcolm Coulthard, Londyn: Routledge, 1996, 32–70.
37.Walczak, Bartłomiej. „Zwrot lingwistyczny a samorefleksyjność antropologii”. Przegląd Socjologii Jakościowej, 9, 3 (2013), 110–12.
38.Widdowson Henry. Text, context, pretext: Critical issues in discourse analysis. Malden: Blackwell, 2004.
39.Wodak Ruth i Brigitta Busch. „Approaches to media texts”, W: The Sage handbook of media studies, red. John H. Downing, Thousand Oaks, Sage, 2004, 105–22.
40.Wodak Ruth. 2001. „The discourse-historical approach”, W: Methods of Critical Discourse Analysis, red. Ruth Wodak i Michael Meyer, Londyn, Sage, 63–94.