Skip to content
Acta Biologica

Previously: Zeszyty Naukowe Uniwersytetu Szczecińskiego. Acta Biologica

No. 26
OpenAlex

Data describes this article or chapter.

Record found in the database

Citations
1
References
12
Citations by year
YearCitations
20231

Data retrieved:

View source (new tab)
Crossref

Data describes this article or chapter.

Record found in the database

Citations
1

Data retrieved:

View source (new tab)
OpenCitations

Data describes this article or chapter.

Citations
1

Data retrieved:

Citing publications
  1. 10.3390/w15213751 (2023)
View source (new tab)
DOAJ

Data describes this article or chapter.

Record found in the database

Data retrieved:

View source (new tab)
Google Scholar
Find in Google Scholar (new tab)

A faunistic and ecological characterization of the water mites (Acari: Hydrachnidia) of the Branew River (central-eastern Poland)

DOI: 10.18276/ab.2019.26-09
Cite

The full text is available

ISSN:2450-8330
eISSN:2353-3013
Authors: Robert Stryjecki
Department of Zoology and Animal Ecology, University of Life Science in Lublin, Akademicka 13, 20-950 Lublin, Poland
Keywords: lotic zone lentic zone Lebertia rivulorum synecological groups species diversity anthropo-genic transformation
Issue / book publication date:2019
Page range:17 (99-115)
OAI-PMH:Metadata
Cited-by (Crossref) ?: Enable JavaScript to retrieve citation data.
CC BY-SA Open Access DOAJ
QR code

Abstract

A characteristic feature of the Hydrachnidia communities of the Branew River, distinguishing its fauna from that of other Polish rivers, was the very high abundance of species of the genus Lebertia. Species of this genus accounted for as much as 53.1% of the collected material. The most numerous was Lebertia rivulorum, which was caught in numbers not found in other Polish rivers. Lebertia inaequalis and L. oblonga were also abundant. The largest synecologi-cal groups were rheophiles and rheobionts (94.9% combined). More individuals (1494) and species (27) were caught in the lentic zone of the river than in the lotic zone (1291 ind., 25 sp.). The species most associated with the lotic zone was L. rivulorum. This species was caught mainly on a substrate of gravel and stones with a small amount of sandy sediments, sparsely covered with Elodea canadensis. The species most associated with the lentic zone was Forelia variegator. The most abundant species in the Branew River, Hygrobates setosus, was caught in much higher numbers in the littoral zone than in the central part of the river. The high similarity of fauna was observed between the lotic and lentic zones, and much lower similarity between sites. The results indicate intensive species migration in the transverse profile of the river and low migration in the longitudinal profile. Higher species diversity was recorded in the lentic zone than in the lotic zone of the river – both in the river as a whole and at the individual sites. In the anthropogenically transformed stretch of the river (straightened riverbed, concrete dam, and concrete bottom), species diversity was significantly lower (H’ = 1.83) than in the natural stretch (H’ = 2.37). The results confirm literature data describing the negative impact of such transformations on Hydrachnidia communities. Despite anthropogenic transformations in parts of the river, the structure of the fauna (a very large proportion of rheobionts and rheophiles), as well as the physicochemical parameters of the water, is indicative of the good ecological condition of the river.

PDF

Download PDF
Preview PDF

Open PDF

Bibliography (96)
  1. Bańkowska, A., Kłosowska, M., Stryjecki, R., Zawal, A. (2015). New and rare water mite (Hydrachnidia) species in Polish fauna found in the
  2. Krąpiel River and valley water bodies in Ińskie Lake District. Acta Biologica, 22, 15–37.
  3. Bazan-Strzelecka, H. (1964). Water mites (Acari, Hydrachnellae) of certain Warta River environments. Ekologia Polska, 12 (seria A), 337–354.
  4. Bazan-Strzelecka, H. (1986). Wodopójki (Acari, Hydrachnellae) rzeki Grabi. Acta Universitatis Lodziensis Folia Zoologica, 4, 59–69.
  5. Biesiadka, E. (1970). Wodopójki (Hydracarina) dolnego biegu rzeki Wełny. Fragmenta Faunistica, 5, 43–55.
  6. Biesiadka, E. (1972). Wodopójki (Hydracarina) Wielkopolskiego Parku Narodowego. Prace Monograficz-ne Przyrody Wielkopolskiego Parku Narodowego, 5, 1–102.
  7. Biesiadka, E. (1974). Hydracarina of the river Raba and some of its tributaries. Acta Hydrobiologica, 16, 31–50.
  8. Biesiadka, E. (1979). Wodopójki (Hydracarina) Pienin. Fragmenta Faunistica, 24, 97–173.
  9. Biesiadka, E. (2008). Wodopójki (Hydrachnidia). In: W. Bogdanowicz, E. Chudzicka, J. Pilipiuk, E. Skibińska (eds.), Fauna Polski –
  10. charakterystyka i wykaz gatunków (pp. 149–219). Warszawa: Muzeum i Instytut Zoologii PAN.
  11. Biesiadka, E., Cichocka, M. (1993). Środowiskowe rozmieszczenie wodopójek (Hydracarina) w Karkono-szach. In: J. Tomaszewski, J.
  12. Sarosiek, S. Szymański (eds.) Geoekologiczne problemy Karkonoszy (2, pp. 263–273). Wrocław: Wydawnictwo Uniwersytetu Wrocławskiego.
  13. Biesiadka, E., Cichocka, M., Moroz, M.D. (2004). Water mites (Hydrachnidia) from the Neman River (Belarus), some of its tributaries and
  14. riverine reservoirs. Fragmenta Faunistica, 47, 143–164.
  15. Biesiadka, W., Kasprzak, K. (1977). An investigation on the macrofauna of the River Warta within the city of Poznań. Acta Hydrobiol., 19,
  16. 109–122.
  17. Biesiadka, W., Kowalik, W., Ścibior, R. (2015). Water mites (Acari, Hydrachnidia) in three forest and landscape reserves in Roztocze. Annales
  18. UMCS, C, 70, 29–41.
  19. Cichocka, M. (1996a). Wodopójki (Hydracarina) rzeki Pasłęki. Fragmenta Faunistica, 39, 179–205. Cichocka, M. (1996b). Wodopójki
  20. (Hydracarina) Bagien Biebrzańskich. Fragmenta Faunistica, 39, 207–221.
  21. Cichocka, M. (2006). Water mites (Hydrachnidia, Acari) in the running waters of the Masurian Landscape Park. Supplementa ad Acta
  22. Hydrobiologica, 8, 33–53.
  23. Davids, C., Di Sabatino, A., Gerecke, R., Gledhill, T., Smit, H., van der Hammen, H. (2007). Acari: Hydrachnidia I. In: R Gerecke (ed.),
  24. Freshwater Fauna of Central Europe, Vol. 7/2 – 1 (pp. 241–388). München: Spektrum Akademischer Verlag.
  25. Di Sabatino, A., Gerecke, R., Gledhill, T., Smit, H. (2010). Chelicerata: Acari II. In: R. Gerecke (ed.), Freshwater Fauna of Central Europe, Vol.
  26. 7/2 – 2 (pp. 1–234). München: Spektrum Akademischer Verlag.
  27. Di Sabatino, A., Gerecke, R., Martin, P. (2000). The biology and ecology of lotic water mites (Hydrachnidia). Freshwater Biology, 44, 47–62.
  28. Dittmar, H. (1955). Ein Sauerlandbach. Archiv fur Hydrobiologie, 50, 305–352.
  29. Geoportal, 2019. Mapy topograficzne. Retrieved from: http://mapy.geoportal.gov.pl (11.09.2019).
  30. Gerecke, R. (2002). The water mites (Acari, Hydrachnidia) of little disturbed forest stream in southwest Germany – a study on seasonality and
  31. habitat preference, with remarks on diversity patterns in different geographical areas. In: F. Bernini, R. Nannelli, G. Nuzzaci, E. de Lillo (eds.),
  32. Acarid phylogeny and evolution. Adaptations in mites and ticks (pp. 69–89). Dordrecht: Kluwer Academic Publishers.
  33. Gerecke, R. 2009. Revisional studies on the European species of the water mite genus Lebertia Neumann, 1880 (Acari: Hydrachnidia,
  34. Lebertiidae). Abhandlungen der Senckenberg Gesellschaft für Natur-forschung, 566, 1–144.
  35. Gerecke, R., Gledhill, T., Pešić, V., Smit, H. (2016). Chelicerata: Acari III. In: R. Gerecke (ed.), Freshwater Fauna of Central Europe, Vol. 7/2 –
  36. 3 (pp. 1–429). München: Spektrum Akademischer Verlag.
  37. Gledhill, T. (1973). The water-mites (Hydrachnellae, Acari) of a Stony Stream. In: M. Daniel, B. Rosický (eds.), Proceedings of the 3rd
  38. International Congress of Acarology (pp. 159–167). Dordrecht: Springer.
  39. Hammer, Ø., Harper, D.A.T., Ryan, P.D. (2001). PAST: Paleontological statistics software package for education and data analysis.
  40. Palaeontologia Electronica, 4, (1). Retrieved from: http://palaeo-electronica. org/2001_1/past/issue1_01.htm.
  41. Kondracki, J. (2014). Geografia regionalna Polski. Warszawa: Wydawnictwo Naukowe PWN.
  42. Kowalik, W. (1981). Wodopójki (Hydracarina) rzek dorzecza Wieprza. Annales UMCS, C (35), 327–351. Kowalik, W. (1984). Studia
  43. faunistyczno-ekologiczne nad wodopójkami (Hydracarina) południowo-wschodniej Polski. Rozprawy Naukowe AR w Lublinie, 83, 1–67.
  44. Kowalik, W., Biesiadka, E. (1981). Occurrence of water mites in the River Wieprz polluted with domestic-industry sewage. Acta
  45. Hydrobiologica, 23, 331–348.
  46. Kowalik, W., Zawal, A., Buczyńska, E. (2014). Water mites (Acari, Hydrachnidia) of the River Szum and Stream Krupiec in the Roztocze
  47. region. Acta Biologica, 21, 75–89.
  48. Kupiszewska, J. (1965). Water-mites (Hydrachnellae) in the River Dunajec. Benthic Fauna of the Dunajec River. Kom. Zagosp. Ziem Górskich
  49. PAN, 11, 177–181.
  50. Martin, P. (1996). Faunistisch-ökologische Benthosstudien an den Wassermilben (Hydrachnidia, Acari) zweier Bäche des Norddeutschen
  51. Tieflandes (Ostholsteinisches Hügelland, Schleswig-Holstein). Fau-nistisch-Ökologische Mitteilungen, 7, 153–167.
  52. Martin, P. (1997). Zur Faunistik und Substratpraferenz del’ Wassermilben (Hydrachnidia, Acari) zweier-durch feine mineralische Substrate
  53. gepragten Bache in Schleswig-Holstein. Faunistisch-Okologiscbe Mitteilungen, 7, 221–237.
  54. Martin, P., Dabert, M., Dabert, J. (2010). Molecular evidence for species separation in the water mite Hy-grobates nigromaculatus Lebert,
  55. 1879 (Acari, Hydrachnidia): evolutionary consequences of the loss of larval parasitism. Aquatic Science 72, 347–360.
  56. Martin, P., Speth, S. (1996). Die substratspezifische Verteilung der Hydrachnidia (Acari) zweier Bache in jungglazialen Sandergebieten
  57. Schleswig-Holsteins (Osterau und Rodenbek). Limnologica, 26, 93–103.
  58. McAleece, N., Gage, J.D.G., Lambshead, P.J.D., Paterson, G.L.J. (1997). BioDiversity Professional statistics analysis software. Jointly
  59. developed by the Scottish Association for Marine Science and the Natural History Museum London.
  60. Michalczyk, Z., Wilgat, T. (1998). Stosunki wodne Lubelszczyzny. Lublin: Wydawnictwo UMCS.
  61. Odum, E.P. (1982). Podstawy ekologii. Wyd. III. Warszawa: PWRiL.
  62. Pieczyński, E. (1960). Kształtowanie się zgrupowań wodopójek (Hydracarina) w różnych środowiskach jeziora Wilkus. Ekologia Polska, Seria
  63. A, 8, 169–198.
  64. Rąkowski, G., Smogorzewska, M., Janczewska, A., Wójcik, J., Walczak, M., Pisarski, Z. (2004). Park Krajobrazowy Lasy Janowskie. In: G.
  65. Rąkowski (ed.), Parki krajobrazowe w Polsce (pp. 605–610). Warszawa: Instytut Ochrony Środowiska.
  66. Smit, H., Boonstra, H., Hop, H., van Maanen, B., Achterkamp, B., Wiggers, R. (2015). Eight water mite species new to the Dutch fauna (Acari:
  67. Hydrachnidia). Nederlandse Faunistische Mededelingen, 45, 77–89.
  68. Smit, H., Hop, H., Munts, R. (2008). Two watermite species new to the Dutch fauna and new records of rare species (Acari: Hydrachnidia).
  69. Nederlandse Faunistische Mededelingen, 28, 41–47.
  70. Smit, H., van der Hammen, H. (2000). Atlas of the Dutch water mites (Acari: Hydrachnidia). Nederlandse Faunistische Mededelingen, 13,
  71. 1–266.
  72. Sokolov, I.I. (1940). Paukoobraznyje, Vodjanye klešši. Fauna SSSR. Moskva–Leningrad.
  73. Stryjecki, R. (2002). The impact of human activity on the water mite fauna (Acari, Hydrachnidia) of the „Lasy Janowskie” Landscape Park
  74. (South-Eastern Poland). In: F. Bernini, R. Nannelli, G. Nuzzaci, E. de Lillo (eds.), Acarid phylogeny and evolution. Adaptations in mites and
  75. ticks (pp. 113–119). Dor-drecht: Kluwer Academic Publishers.
  76. Stryjecki, R. (2009). Water mites (Acari, Hydrachnidia) of the Bug River Valley between Włodawa and Kodeń. Teka Komisji Ochrony i
  77. Kształtowania Środowiska Przyrodniczego O.L. PAN, 6, 335–344.
  78. Stryjecki, R. (2010). Water mites (Acari: Hydrachnidia) of the northern part of Nadwieprzański Landscape Park. Teka Komisji Ochrony i
  79. Kształtowania Środowiska Przyrodniczego O.L. PAN, 7, 388–399.
  80. Stryjecki, R., Bańkowska, A., Szenejko, M. (2018). A faunistic and ecological characterization of the water mites (Acari: Hydrachnidia) of the
  81. Bukowa River (central-eastern Poland). Acta Biologica, 25, 77–94.
  82. Stryjecki, R., Kowalczyk-Pecka, D. (2013a). A faunistic and ecological characterization of the water mites (Acari: Hydrachnidia) of the highly
  83. anthropologically transformed Mietiulka river in Polesie National Park. Environmental Protection and Natural Resources, 24 (1), 11–15.
  84. Stryjecki, R., Kowalczyk-Pecka, D. (2013b). A synecological characterization of the water mite communities (Acari: Hydrachnidia) of the
  85. Tanew River in the Nad Tanwią reserve. Teka Komisji Ochrony i Kształtowania Środowiska Przyrodniczego O.L. PAN, 10, 407–416.
  86. Stryjecki, R., Pawlęga, K., Ścibior, R. (2012). Habitat distribution of water mites (Acari: Hydrachnidia) in Kozłowiecki Landscape Park. Teka
  87. Komisji Ochrony i Kształtowania Środowiska Przyrodniczego O.L. PAN, 9, 224–233.
  88. van der Hammen, H., Smit, H. (1996). The water mites (Acari: Hydrachnidia) of streams in the Netherlands: distribution and ecological
  89. aspects on a regional scale. Netherlands Journal of Aquatic Ecology, 30 (203), 175–185.
  90. Viets, K. (1936). Spinnentiere oder Arachnoidea. VII: Wassermilben oder Hydracarina. Tierwelt Deutsch-land, Jena, 31–32, 1–574.
  91. Zawal, A., Kowalik, W. (2013). Water mites of the Biała Łada and Czarna Łada rivers in the Lublin region. Annales UMCS, C, 93, 117–125.
  92. Zawal, A., Sadanowicz, P. (2012). Fauna wodopójek (Hydrachnidia) rezerwatu przyrody „Źródlisko Skrzy-powe”. Parki Narodowe i Rezerwaty
  93. Przyrody, 31 (4), 3–10.
  94. Zawal, A., Stryjecki, R., Stępień, E., Buczyńska, E., Buczyński, P., Czachorowski, S., Pakulnicka, J., Śmietana, P. (2017). The influence of
  95. environmental factors on water mite assemblages (Acari, Hy-drachnidia) in a small lowland river – an analysis at different levels of
  96. organization of the environment. Limnology, 18, 333–343.