Skip to content
Analiza i Egzystencja
55 (2021)
OpenAlex

Data describes this article or chapter.

Record found in the database

Citations
0
References
22

Data retrieved:

View source (new tab)

For the whole journal, according to OpenAlex.

Citations
221
Publications
305
H-index
6
I10-index
2
Mean citedness (2 years)
0.13
Citations received by year
Journal citation chart. Exact values are available in the table below. 2017: 1 2018: 12 2019: 6 2020: 15 2021: 25 2022: 23 2023: 20 2024: 38 2025: 41 2026: 38 2017 2026
Show data table
Citations received by year
YearPublicationsCitations
2017251
20182312
2019236
20202015
20212125
20222623
20232520
20242638
20252541
20262538

Data retrieved:

What do these numbers mean?

Publications and citations cover records linked to this journal in OpenAlex. H-index is the largest number h of publications with at least h citations each. I10-index counts publications cited at least 10 times. The chart shows citations received in each year; the current year is incomplete. Coverage may differ from WNUS and other services.

The 2-year mean is an OpenAlex metric. It is not the Clarivate Journal Impact Factor.

View in OpenAlex (new tab)
OpenCitations

Data describes this article or chapter.

Citations
0

Data retrieved:

View source (new tab)
DOAJ

Data describes this article or chapter.

Record found in the database

Data retrieved:

View source (new tab)
Google Scholar

How Could Boltzmann Have Inspired the Early Wittgenstein?

DOI: 10.18276/aie.2021.55-04
Cite

The full text is available

Abstract

In 1931, when writing about those who had inspired him, Wittgenstein singled out Boltzmann; nobody seems to know why, however. Most commentators have ignored this remark, while a few have tried to guess what the inspiration might have been by searching the popular and philosophical writings of Boltzmann. In this article, I hypothesize that Wittgenstein may have been inspired by Boltzmann’s scientific research program from his famous 1877 article. This hypothesis is not confirmed—or rejected—by any surviving documents. But to some extent (considering the role of Fleck’s creative misunderstandings) there are two explanations for the origins of the two strange theorems underlying the Tractatus’s ontology: (1) each situation can be the case or not the case while everything else remains the same; (2) the facts are not subject to the laws of nature. My hypothesis also makes it understandable why Wittgenstein developed his logical theory of probability. So, let’s keep it in mind.
Preview PDF

Open PDF

Bibliography (25)
  1. Blackmore, J. (1999). Boltzmann and Epistemology. Synthese, 119 (1-2), 157-189.
  2. Blackmore J. T. (1983). Boltzmann and Wittgenstein. In: P. Weingartner & J. Czermak (eds.), Epistemology and Philosophy of Science, 534-537. Vienna: Hölder-Pichler-Tempsky.
  3. Boltzmann, L. (1866). Über die Mechanische Bedeutung des Zweiten Hauptsatzes der Wärmetheorie, Wiener Berichte, 53, 195–220.
  4. Boltzmann, L. (1872). Weitere Studien über das Wärmegleichgewicht unter Gasmolekülen, Wiener Berichte, 66, 275–370.
  5. Boltzmann, Ludwig (1877/2015). On the Relationship between the Second Fundamental Theorem of the Mechanical Theory of Heat and Probability Calculations regarding the Conditions for Thermal Equilibrium, transl. by K. Sharp and F. Matschinsky, Entropy, 17, 1971-2009.
  6. Boltzmann, L. (1904/1974). On Statistical Mechanics. In: Theoretical Physics and Philosophical Problems. B. McGuinness (ed.), Dordrecht: Reidel.
  7. Boltzmann, L. (1905). Populäre Schriften. Leipzig: Barth.
  8. Crary, A., Read, R. (eds.) (2000). The New Wittgenstein. London & New York: Routledge.
  9. Fleck, L. (1935/1979). Genesis and Development of a Scientific Fact. F. Bradley, T. J. Trenn (trans.), T. J. Trenn, R. K. Merton (eds.). Chicago: Chicago University Press.
  10. Harré, R. (2001). Wittgenstein: Science and Religion, Philosophy, 76 (296), 211-237.
  11. Loschmidt, J., (1876-7). Über die Zustand des Wärmegleichgewichtes eines Systems von Körpern mit Rücksicht auf die Schwerkraft. Wiener Berichte, 73, 128, 366; 75, 287; 76, 209.
  12. Maxwell, J. C. (1860) Illustrations of the Dynamical Theory of Gases. Philosophical Magazine, 19, 19–32; 20: 21–37.
  13. Montibeller, M. (2016). The Duty of Clarity: A Persuasion Effort. Continuity and Physics from Boltzmann to Wittgenstein. Philosophical Investigations, 39 (2), 138-153.
  14. Morris, Michael (2008). Wittgenstein and the Tractatus. London & New York: Routledge.
  15. Preston, J. M. (2016). "Boltzmann, Hertz, and Wittgenstein". In: H.-J. Glock, J. Hyman (eds.), A Companion to Wittgenstein, 110-123. John Wiley.
  16. Proops, I. (2017). Wittgenstein’s Logical Atomism. In: E. Zalta (ed.), The Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy, URL = <https://plato.stanford.edu/archives/win2017/entries/wittgenstein-atomism/>.
  17. Sluga, H., Stern, D. G. (eds.) (2018). The Cambridge Companion to Wittgenstein. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
  18. Stern, D. G. (2002). Sociology of Science, Rule Following and Forms of Life. In: M. Heidelberger, F. Stadler (eds.), History of Philosophy of Science: New Trends and Perspectives. Vienna Circle Institute Yearbook (9), 347-367. Dordrecht: Kluwer.
  19. Sterrett, Susan G. (2005/2006) Wittgenstein Flies A Kite: A Story of Models of Wings and Models of the World. New York: Pi Press.
  20. Uffink, J. (2017). Boltzmann's Work in Statistical Physics. In: E. Zalta (ed.), The Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy, URL = <https://plato.stanford.edu/archives/spr2017/entries/statphys-Boltzmann/>.
  21. Visser, H. (1999). Boltzmann and Wittgenstein or How Pictures Became Linguistic. Synthese, 119 (1-2), 135-156.
  22. Wilson, A. D. (1989). Hertz, Boltzmann and Wittgenstein Reconsidered. Studies in History and Philosophy of Science, 20, 245-263.
  23. Wittgenstein, L. (1922/1961) Tractatus Logico-Philosophicus. D. F. Pears and B. F. McGuinness (trans.). New York: Humanities Press.
  24. Wittgenstein, L. (1961). Notebooks 1914–1916. G. H. von Wright and G. E. M. Anscombe (eds.). Oxford: Blackwell.
  25. Wittgenstein, L. (1980). Culture and Value. G. H. von Wright (ed.), P. Winch (trans.). Oxford: Blackwell.