Analiza i Egzystencja

ISSN: 1734-9923     eISSN: 2300-7621    OAI    DOI: 10.18276/aie.2023.61-04
CC BY-SA   Open Access   DOAJ  ERIH PLUS  DOAJ

Issue archive / 61 (2023)
Amerykańska metafizyka rasy
(American metaphysics of race)

Authors: Mieczysław Jagłowski ORCID
Uniwersytet Warmińsko-Mazurski, Instytut Filozofii
Keywords: race racism contemporary American philosophy realism anti-realism eliminativism conservatism critique of the metaphysics of race
Whole issue publication date:2023
Page range:22 (67-88)
Cited-by (Crossref) ?:

Abstract

American metaphysics of race In the 1990s, a debate about the race began in the United States, in which many philosophers are involved. In philosophy, this debate has become known as the metaphysics of race. The aim of this article is to outline positions that have formed in the area of the metaphysics of race as a separate, mainly American, current of philosophical thought - realism (naturalistic and constructivist) and anti-realism - and to indicate the most important arguments invoked by their most outstanding proponents to justify their metaphysical positions, as well as the counter-arguments of their opponents. The article also discusses the normative aspect of this dispute, very important from the moral and social point of view, listing two main positions on this level: eliminativism and conservatism regarding the presence of racial terms and concepts in public discourses. In the final parts of the article, the relations between metaphysical positions and normative directives formulated by the participants of the debate are considered, and critical arguments concerning the philosophical value and social importance of this trend of thinking are presented.
Download file

Article file

Bibliography

1.Andreasen, R.O. (2000). Race: Biological Reality or Social Construct? Philosophy of Science, 67, Supplement, 653–666.
2.Andreasen, R.O. (2004). The Cladistic Race Concept: A Defense. Biology and Philosophy, 19 (3), 425–442. DOI: 10.1023/B:BIPH.0000036110.07449.8d.
3.Andreasen, R.O. (2007). Biological Conceptions of Race. W: M. Matthen, Ch. Stephens (red.), Philosophy of Biology (s. 455–481). Amsterdam: Elsevier.
4.Appiah, K.A. (1990). Race. W: T. McLaughlin, F. Lentricchia (red.), Critical Terms for Literary Studies (s. 274–287). Chicago, London: University of Chicago Press.
5.Appiah, K.A. (1992). My Father’s House: Africa in the Philosophy of Culture.
6.Oxford, New York: Oxford University Press.
7.Appiah, K.A. (1996). Race, Culture, Identity: Misunderstood Connections. W: K.A. Appiah, A. Gutmann (red.), Color Conscious: The Political Morality of Race (s. 51–136). Princeton: Princeton University Press.
8.Appiah, K.A. (2005). The Ethics of Identity. Princeton: Princeton University Press.
9.Carter, B. (2000). Realism and Racism: Concepts of Race in Sociological Research. New York: Routledge.
10.Corlett, A.J. (2003). Race, Racism, and Reparations. Ithaca: Cornell University Press.
11.Domingues, P. (2007). Movimento Negro Brasileiro: alguns apontamentos históricos. Tempo, 12 (23), 100–122.
12.Gannett, L. (2004). The Biological Reification of Race. The British Journal for the Philosophy of Science, 55 (2), 323–345. DOI: 10.1093/bjps/55.2.323.
13.Glasgow, J. (2003). On the New Biology of Race. The Journal of Philosophy, 100 (9), 456–474. DOI: 10.5840/jphil2003100930.
14.Glasgow, J. (2009). A Theory of Race. New York: Routledge.
15.Hardimon, M.O. (2017). Rethinking Race: The Case for Deflationary Realism. Cambridge: Harvard University Press.
16.Hardimon, M.O. (2003). The Ordinary Concept of Race. The Journal of Philosophy, 100 (9), 437–455. DOI: 10.5840/jphil2003100932.
17.Haslanger, S. (2005). What Are We Talking About? The Semantics and Politics of Social Kinds. Hypatia, 20 (4), 10–26. DOI: 10.1111/j.1527-2001.2005.tb00533.x.
18.Haslanger, S. (2012). Resisting Reality: Social Construction and Social Critique. New York: Oxford University Press.
19.Hochman, A. (2016). Race: Deflate or Pop? Studies in History and Philosophy of Biological and Biomedical Sciences, 57, 60–68. DOI: 10.1016/j.shpsc.2016.03.003.
20.Hochman, A. (2017a). Replacing Race: Interactive Constructionism about Racialized Groups. Ergo, 4 (3), 61–92. DOI: 10.3998/ergo.12405314.0004.003.
21.Hochman, A. (2017b). In Defense of the Metaphysics of Race. Philosophical Studies: An International Journal for Philosophy in the Analytic Tradition, 174 (11), 2709–2729. DOI: 10.1007/s11098-016-0806-0.
22.Hochman, A. (2019). Racialization: A Defense of the Concept. Ethnic and Racial Studies, 42 (8), 1245–1262. DOI: 10.1080/01419870.2018.1527937.
23.Hochman, A. (2021a). Against the Reification of Race in Bioethics: Anti-Racism without Racial Realism. The American Journal of Bioethics, 21 (2), 88–90. DOI: 10.1080/15265161.2020.1861371.
24.Hochman, A. (2021b). Janus-Faced Race: Is Race Biological, Social, or Mythical? American Journal of Physical Anthropology, 175 (2), 453–464. DOI: 10.1002/ ajpa.24169.
25.Ikuenobe, P. (2018). The Practical and Experiential Reality of Racism: Carter’s and Corlett’s Realism About Race and Racism. Journal of African American Studies, 22 (4), 373–392. DOI: 10.1007/s12111-018-9417-5.
26.Lee, C.S.J. (1994). Navigating the Topology of Race. Stanford Law Review, 46 (3), 747–780. DOI: 10.2307/1229107.
27.Kim, C.J. (2004). Unyielding Positions: ACritique of the „Race” Debate. Ethnicities, 4 (3), 337–355. DOI: 10.1177/1468796804045238.
28.Kitcher, P. (1999). Race, Ethnicity, Biology, Culture. W: L. Harris (red.), Racism (s. 87–117). Amherst: Prometheus Books.
29.Kitcher, P. (2007). Does „Race” Have a Future? Philosophy and Public Affairs, 35 (4), 293–317.
30.Lappin, R. (2016). Should CERD Repudiate the Notion of Race? Peace Review, 28 (4), 393–398. DOI: 10.1080/10402659.2016.1237077.
31.Lemeire, O. (2016). Beyond the Realism Debate: The Metaphysics of „Racial” Distinctions. Studies in History and Philosophy of Biological and Biomedical Sciences, 59, 47–56. DOI: 10.1016/j.shpsc.2016.08.001.
32.Lewontin, R.Ch. (1972). The Apportionment of Human Diversity. W: T. Dobzhansky, M.K. Hecht, W.C. Steere (red.), Evolutionary Biology, t. 6 (s. 381–398). New York: Appleton-Century-Crofts.
33.Livingstone, F.B., Dobzhansky, T. (1962). On the Non-Existence of Human Races. Current Anthropology, 3 (3), 279–281.
34.Ludwig, D. (2014). Hysteria, Race, and Phlogiston. A Model of Ontological Elimination in the Human Sciences. Studies in History and Philosophy of Biological and Biomedical Sciences, 45, 68–77. DOI: 10.1016/j.shpsc.2013.10.007.
35.Ludwig, D. (2015). Against the New Metaphysics of Race. Philosophy of Science, 82 (2), 244–265. DOI: 10.1086/680487.
36.Ludwig, D. (2020). Understanding Race: The Case for Political Constructionism in Public Discourse. Canadian Journal of Philosophy, 50 (4), 492–504. DOI: 10.1017/can.2019.52.
37.Mallon, R. (2006). „Race”: Normative, Not Metaphysical or Semantic. Ethics, 116 (3), 525–551. DOI: 10.1086/500495.
38.Mallon, R. (2018). Constructing Race: Racialization, Causal Effects, or Both? Philosophical Studies, 175 (5), 1039–1056. DOI: 10.1007/s11098-018-1069-8.
39.Mosley, A. (1997). Are Racial Categories Racist? Research in African Literatures, 28 (4), 101–111.
40.Omi, M., Winant, H. (1994). Racial Formation in the United States: From the 1960s to the 1990s. London, New York: Routledge.
41.Osborne, P., West, C. (1995). American Radicalism. Radical Philosophy, 71, 27–38. Pierce, A.J. (2012). Reconstructing Race: A Discourse‐Theoretical Approach to a Normative Politics of Identity. Philosophical Forum, 43 (1), 1–22. DOI: 10.1111/phil.2012.43.issue-1.
42.Piza Duarte, E., Lima Bertúlio, D.L., Queiroz, M. (2020). Direito à liberdade e à igualdade nas políticas de reconhecimento: fundamentos jurídicos da identificação dos beneficiários nas cotas raciais. A&C: Revista de Direito Administrativo & Constitucional, 20 (80), 173–210, DOI: 10.21056/aec.v20i80.1230.
43.Quine, W.V. (1995). Rzeczy i ich miejsce w teoriach. W: T. Szubka (red.), Metafizyka w filozofii analitycznej (s. 31–52). Lublin: Wydawnictwo TN KUL.
44.Shulman, J.L., Glasgow, J. (2010), Is Race-Thinking Biological or Social, and Does it Matter for Racism? An Exploratory Study. Journal of Social Philosophy, 41 (3), 244–259. DOI: 10.1111/j.1467-9833.2010.01497.x.
45.Song, M. (2018). Why We Still Need to Talk about Race. Ethnic and Racial Studies, 41 (6), 1131–1145. DOI: 10.1080/01419870.2018.1410200.
46.Spencer, Q. (2012). What „Biological Racial Realism” Should Mean. Philosophical Studies: An International Journal for Philosophy in the Analytic Tradition, 159 (2), 181–204. DOI: 10.1007/s11098-011-9697-2.
47.Spencer, Q. (2014). ARadical Solution to the Race Problem. Philosophy of Science, 81 (5), 1025–1038. DOI: 10.1086/677694.
48.Spencer, Q. (2016). In Defense of the Actual Metaphysics of Race. Pobrano z: http:// philsci-archive.pitt.edu/12527/1/PHOS%20submission%20.pdf (4.03.2023). Spencer, Q. (2018). Racial Realism I: Are Biological Races Real? Philosophy Compass, 13 (1), 1–13. DOI: 10.1111/phc3.12468.
49.Spencer, Q. (2019). AMore Radical Solution to the Race Problem. Proceedings of theAristotelian Society Supplementary Volume, 93 (1), 25–48. DOI: 10.1093/arisup/akz011.
50.Uyan, D. (2021). Re-Thinking Racialization: The Analytical Limits of Racialization. Du Bois Review, 1–15. DOI: 10.1017/S1742058X21000023.
51.West, C. (2001). Race Matters. Boston: Beacon.
52.Zack, N. (2003). Reparations and the Rectification of Race. The Journal of Ethics, 7 (1), 139–151. DOI: 10.1023/A:1022883014371.
53.Zack, N. (2018). Philosophy of Race. An Introduction. Cham: Palgrave Macmillan.