Analiza i Egzystencja

ISSN: 1734-9923     eISSN: 2300-7621    OAI    DOI: 10.18276/aie.2024.65-02
CC BY-SA   Open Access   DOAJ  ERIH PLUS  DOAJ

Issue archive / 65 (2024)
Memory traces, phenomenology and the simulationist vs causal theory dispute

Authors: Luiz do Valle Miranda ORCID
Charles University in Prague
Keywords: memory traces familiarity causal connection
Whole issue publication date:2024
Page range:14 (21-34)
Cited-by (Crossref) ?:

Abstract

Phlosophy of memory is a hot topic in the cognitive sciences and philosophy of mind. This work examines the dispute between simulations and causal theoris of memory by means of an examination of the feeling of familiarity and its relation to memory traces, more specifically in how they increase the fluency of reconstruction of past episodes. Understanding the relationship between familiarity and memory traces, and furthermore, the relation between a fully-fledged phenomenology of memory and a sense of subjective certainty of the episode has occurred in the past leads to a different interpretation of the rivalry between the CTM and the simulationist account
Download file

Article file

Bibliography

1.Alba, J. W. , & L. Hasher. (1983). Is memory schematic? Psychological Bulletin, 93 (2): 203-231.
2.De Brigard, F. (2014). The Nature of Memory Traces. Philosophy Compass, 9(6), 402.
3.James, W. (1890). The Principles of Psychology. London: Macmillan .
4.Klein, S. B. (2013). The complex act of projecting oneself into the future. Wiley Interdisciplinary Reviews: Cognitive Science, 4 (1): 63-79.
5.Klein, S. B. (2015). What memory is. WIREs: Cognitive Science, 6(1), 1.
6.Mahr, J. B., & Csibra, G. (2018). Why do we remember? The communicative function of episodic memory. BEHAVIORAL AND BRAIN SCIENCES, 41.
7.Martin, C. B., & and M. Deutscher. (1966). Remembering. Philosophical Review, 75: 161-196.
8.Michaelian, K. (2011). Generative memory. PHILOSOPHICAL PSYCHOLOGY, 24(3), 323–342.
9.Michaelian, K. (2016). Mental time travel. episodic memory and our knowledge of the personal past. The MIT Press.
10.Michaelian, K., & Bernecker, S. (2017). The Routledge handbook of philosophy of memory. Routledge, Taylor & Francis Group.
11.Robins, S. (n.d.). Representing the past: memory traces and the causal theory of memory. PHILOSOPHICAL STUDIES, 173(11), 2993–3013.
12.Russell, B. (1921). The Analysis of Mind. London: George Allen & Unwin .
13.Teroni, F. (2017). The Phenomenology of Memory. In Sven Bernecker & Kourken Michaelian (eds.), Oxford Handbook of Philosophy of Memory (pp. 21-33). New York, USA: Oxford University Press.
14.Tulving, E. (1972). Episodic and semantic memory. In E. Tulving & W. Donaldson (eds), Organization of Memory (pp. 381-402). New York: Academic Press.
15.Tulving, E. (1985). Memory and consciousness. Canadian Psychology,26 ( 1 ): 1-12 .
16.Tulving, E. (1993). What Is Episodic Memory? Current Directions in Psychological Science, 2(3), 67–70.
17.Tulving, E. (2001). Origin of autonoesis in episodic memory. In H. L. Roediger, III, J. S. Nairne, I. Neath & A. M. Surprenant (eds), The Nature of Remembering: Essays in Honor of Robert G. Crowder (pp. 17-34). Washington, DC: American Psychological Association.