Skip to content
Analiza i Egzystencja
65 (2024)
OpenAlex

For the whole journal, according to OpenAlex.

Citations
237
Publications
481
H-index
6
I10-index
2
Mean citedness (2 years)
0.17
Citations received by year
Journal citation chart. Exact values are available in the table below. 2017: 4 2018: 13 2019: 12 2020: 17 2021: 27 2022: 31 2023: 31 2024: 33 2025: 36 2026: 19 2017 2026
Show data table
Citations received by year
YearPublicationsCitations
2017254
20182313
20192312
20202017
20212127
20222631
20232531
20242633
20252536
20262019

Data retrieved:

What do these numbers mean?

Publications and citations cover records linked to this journal in OpenAlex. H-index is the largest number h of publications with at least h citations each. I10-index counts publications cited at least 10 times. The chart shows citations received in each year; the current year is incomplete. Coverage may differ from WNUS and other services.

The 2-year mean is an OpenAlex metric. It is not the Clarivate Journal Impact Factor.

View in OpenAlex (new tab)
Google Scholar

Memory traces, phenomenology and the simulationist vs causal theory dispute

DOI: 10.18276/aie.2024.65-02
Cite

The full text is available

Abstract

Phlosophy of memory is a hot topic in the cognitive sciences and philosophy of mind. This work examines the dispute between simulations and causal theoris of memory by means of an examination of the feeling of familiarity and its relation to memory traces, more specifically in how they increase the fluency of reconstruction of past episodes. Understanding the relationship between familiarity and memory traces, and furthermore, the relation between a fully-fledged phenomenology of memory and a sense of subjective certainty of the episode has occurred in the past leads to a different interpretation of the rivalry between the CTM and the simulationist account
Preview PDF

Open PDF

Bibliography (17)
  1. Alba, J. W. , & L. Hasher. (1983). Is memory schematic? Psychological Bulletin, 93 (2): 203-231.
  2. De Brigard, F. (2014). The Nature of Memory Traces. Philosophy Compass, 9(6), 402.
  3. James, W. (1890). The Principles of Psychology. London: Macmillan .
  4. Klein, S. B. (2013). The complex act of projecting oneself into the future. Wiley Interdisciplinary Reviews: Cognitive Science, 4 (1): 63-79.
  5. Klein, S. B. (2015). What memory is. WIREs: Cognitive Science, 6(1), 1.
  6. Mahr, J. B., & Csibra, G. (2018). Why do we remember? The communicative function of episodic memory. BEHAVIORAL AND BRAIN SCIENCES, 41.
  7. Martin, C. B., & and M. Deutscher. (1966). Remembering. Philosophical Review, 75: 161-196.
  8. Michaelian, K. (2011). Generative memory. PHILOSOPHICAL PSYCHOLOGY, 24(3), 323–342.
  9. Michaelian, K. (2016). Mental time travel. episodic memory and our knowledge of the personal past. The MIT Press.
  10. Michaelian, K., & Bernecker, S. (2017). The Routledge handbook of philosophy of memory. Routledge, Taylor & Francis Group.
  11. Robins, S. (n.d.). Representing the past: memory traces and the causal theory of memory. PHILOSOPHICAL STUDIES, 173(11), 2993–3013.
  12. Russell, B. (1921). The Analysis of Mind. London: George Allen & Unwin .
  13. Teroni, F. (2017). The Phenomenology of Memory. In Sven Bernecker & Kourken Michaelian (eds.), Oxford Handbook of Philosophy of Memory (pp. 21-33). New York, USA: Oxford University Press.
  14. Tulving, E. (1972). Episodic and semantic memory. In E. Tulving & W. Donaldson (eds), Organization of Memory (pp. 381-402). New York: Academic Press.
  15. Tulving, E. (1985). Memory and consciousness. Canadian Psychology,26 ( 1 ): 1-12 .
  16. Tulving, E. (1993). What Is Episodic Memory? Current Directions in Psychological Science, 2(3), 67–70.
  17. Tulving, E. (2001). Origin of autonoesis in episodic memory. In H. L. Roediger, III, J. S. Nairne, I. Neath & A. M. Surprenant (eds), The Nature of Remembering: Essays in Honor of Robert G. Crowder (pp. 17-34). Washington, DC: American Psychological Association.