Analiza i Egzystencja


ISSN: 1734-9923    eISSN: 2300-7621    OAI    DOI: 10.18276/aie.2026.75-03
CC BY-SA   Open Access   DOAJ  ERIH PLUS  DOAJ  DOAJ

Issue archive / 75 (2026)
John Rodington: The Primacy of the Will over the Intellect in Relation to the Ultimate End

Authors: Andrea Nannini ORCID
Istituto di Storia della Teologia, Lugano (CH)
Whole issue publication date:2026
Page range:20 (43-62)
Cited-by (Crossref) ?:

Abstract

In this paper I present John Rodington’s opinion on the contingent fruition of the supreme good. Upholding Duns Scotus’s opinion against William Ockham’s criticism, Rodington states that the beatific enjoyment is contingent and depends only on the will. In debating this issue, Rodington delves into the nature of the human will, which he conceives as entirely independent from the intellect’s knowledge. In relation to this specific aspect, Rodington distances himself from Richard FitzRalph, despite the fact that the two authors display certain conceptual affinities, which the present article seeks to highlight. Furthermore, Rodington manifests a notable affinity with the theses advanced by Francis of Marchia, an Italian Franciscan who occupies a comparatively marginal position within the English intellectual milieu. The study concludes with a concise examination of what Rodington designates as dubia, a series of subordinate questions that engage with the most distinctive and original dimensions of his thought.
Download file

Article file

Bibliography

1.Manuscripts
2.V—John Rodington. Lectura super primum Sententiarum. Biblioteca Apostolica Vaticana, Vat. lat. 5306, Vatican City.
3.P—John Rodington. Lectura super primum Sententiarum. Biblioteca Provincial, 93, Tarragona.
4.Primary Sources
5.Anselm of Canterbury. (1946). Opera omnia (Vol. 1: De libertate arbitrii) (F. S. Schmitt, Ed.). Thomas Nelson and Sons.
6.Francis of Marchia. (2006). Commentarius in IV libros Sententiarum Petri Lombardi (N. Mariani, Ed.). Editiones Collegii S. Bonaventurae ad Claras Aquas.
7.John Duns Scotus. (1950). Opera omnia (Vol. 2: Ordinatio. Liber primus) (C. Balić & M. Bodewig, Eds.). Typis Polyglottis Vaticanis.
8.S. Bušelić, P. Čapkun-Delić, J. Jurić, I. Montalverne, S. Nanni, B. Pergamo, F. Prezioso, I. Reinhold, & O. Schäfer, Eds.). Typis Polyglottis Vaticanis.
9.John Duns Scotus. (1960). Opera omnia (Vol. 17: Lectura. Liber primus) (C. Balić & M. Bodewig, Eds.). Typis Polyglottis Vaticanis.
10.S. Bušelić, P. Čapkun-Delić, B. Hechich, J. Jurić, B. Korošak, L. Modrić, S. Nanni, I. Reinhold, & O. Schäfer, Eds. Typis Polyglottis Vaticanis.
11.Richard FitzRalph. (2025). Richard FitzRalph on the will and instantaneous volition: A critical edition of Book I, Question 10 from Richard FitzRalph’s Lectura in Sententias (M. Michałowska & M. W. Dunne, Eds.). Brill.
12.Robert Greystones. (2017). Robert Greystones on the freedom of the will: Selections from his commentary on the Sentences ( M. Henninger, R. Andrews, & J. Ottman, Eds.). Oxford University Press.
13.William Ockham. (1967). Opera philosophica (Vol. 1: Scriptum in Librum Primum Sententiarum. Ordinatio. Prologus et distinctio prima) (S. Brown & G. Gál, Eds.). The Franciscan Institute.
14.Secondary Sources
15.Courtenay, W. J. (2004). Rodington, John. In Oxford Dictionary of National Biography. Oxford University Press. https://doi.org/10.1093/odnb/9780192683120.013. 23935
16.Dunne, M. W. (2023). Mind as a trinity of intellect, memory, and will. In M. W. Dunne & S. Nolan (Eds.), A companion to Richard FitzRalph: Fourteenth-century scholar, archbishop, and polemicist (pp. 62–100). Brill.
17.Lechner, J. (1935). Die Quästionen des Sentenzenkommentars des Johannes von Rodington O.F.M. Franziskanische Studien, 22, 232–248.
18.Lukács, E. A., & Michałowska, M. (Eds.). (2024). Calculating ethics in the fourteenth century. Brill.
19.Nannini, A. (2023). La versione di Ordinatio, I, d. 39: L’altra faccia della contingenza [The version of Ordinatio, I, d. 39: The other side of contingency]. In E. Dezza, A. Nannini, & D. Riserbato (Eds.), Intorno al futuro. Volontà e contingenza secondo Duns Scoto. Introduzione, testo e traduzione di Lectura, I, d. 39 (pp. 129–187). Edizioni Antonianum.
20.Nannini, A. (2026). Power, transcendence and the trinity: The formal distinction of the will and the intellect in John Ripa. In M. Michałowska & M. W. Dunne (Eds.), The will discourse in late medieval philosophy and theology (pp. 266–292). Routledge.
21.Nardi, B. (1952). Soggetto e oggetto del conoscere nella filosofia antica e medievale. Edizioni dell’Ateneo.
22.Schabel, C. D., & Friedman, R. L. (2003). Trinitarian theology and philosophical issues III: Oxford 1312–1329: Walsingham, Graystanes, FitzRalph, and Rodington. Cahiers de l’Institut du Moyen Âge grec et latin, 74, 39–88.
23.Szlachta, M. (2026). The effort of the will in Richard Middleton’s Sentences commentary. In M. Michałowska & M. W. Dunne (Eds.), The will discourse in late medieval philosophy and theology (pp. 63–87). Routledge.
24.Tweedale, M. M. (1965). John of Rodynton on knowledge, science, and theology (Unpublished doctoral dissertation). University of California, Los Angeles.