Analiza i Egzystencja

ISSN: 1734-9923     eISSN: 2300-7621    OAI    DOI: 10.18276/aie.2021.54-01
CC BY-SA   Open Access   DOAJ  ERIH PLUS  DOAJ

Lista wydań / 54 (2021)
A Pragmatic Theory of Everyday Imposition of Words in an Anonymous Thirteenth-Century Commentary on De anima (MS Prague, Metropolitan Chapter, M. 80, ff. 54vA–55rB)

Autorzy: Claudia Appolloni ORCID
Università di Bologna; Université de Genève; Fondazione San Carlo di Modena
Słowa kluczowe: Anonymous of Prague Commentaries on De anima Medieval Pragmatics Medieval Semantics Roger Bacon
Data publikacji całości:2021-07
Liczba stron:48 (9-56)
Cited-by (Crossref) ?:

Abstrakt

The aim of this paper is to offer an edition of three anonymous questions on De anima II.8, contained in MS Prague, Metropolitan Chapter, M. 80, ff. 54vA–55vB and dated 1250–1260. The text offers an original theory of the everyday imposition of words. To present it, I (i) analyze the contemporary question-commentaries on De anima II.8; (ii) I present the theory of everyday imposition by discussing the analogies with, and differences from, Bacon’s contemporary pragmatic theory; and (iii) I discuss the hypothesis of the attribution of the text to Roger Bacon.
Pobierz plik

Plik artykułu

Bibliografia

1.Primary Literature
2.Albertus Magnus (1890). Peri Hermeneias. In: Borgnet, A. (ed.), Albertus Magnus Opera omnia, II voll. Paris: Vivès.
3.Albertus Magnus (1916–1920). De animalibus, ed. H. Stadler. Münster: Aschendorff.
4.Albertus Magnus (1968). De anima. In: C. Stroick, (ed.), Alberti Magni Opera Omnia, vol. VII.1. Monasterii Westfalorum: Aschendorff.
5.Albertus Magnus (2008). De homine. In: Anzulewicz, H., Söder, J. R. (eds.), Alberti Magni Opera Omnia. Vol. XXVII.2. Monasterii Westfalorum: Aschendorff.
6.Anonymous Bodley (1998). Anonimi magistri artium (c.1246–1247) Sententia super II et III de anima, ed. Bazan, B.C. Philosophes médiévaux 37. Louvain-Paris.
7.Anonymous Rome (1985). Anonymi Magistri Artium (c.1245–1250), Lectura in librum de anima a quodam discipulo reportat, ed. Gauthier, R.A. Spicilegium Bonaventurianum 24.
8.Anonymous Siena (2009). Quaestiones super librum de anima. Anonymi magistri artium Quaestiones super librum De anima, ed. Bernardini, P. Firenze: SISMEL.
9.Anonymous Vaticani (2017). Quaestione super librum De Sensu et Sensato, In: Ebbesen, S., Does Language Acquisition Depend on Hearing a Language? A Text Corpus. Universite de Copenhague. Institut du Moyen-Age Grec et Latin. Cahiers 86, 164–174.
10.Anonymous Vennebusch (1963). Anonymi Magistri Artium, Quaestiones in tres libros de anima (c. 1260), ed. Vennebusch, J. Paderborn: Verlag Ferdinand Schöningh.
11.Aristotle (1831). De Interpretatione. In: Bekker, I., Brandis C.A., Bonitz, H. (eds.), Aristotelis opera. 4 vols (vol. I). Academia Regia Borussica. Berlin: Georg Reimer.
12.Aristotle (1831). Historia Animalium. In: Bekker, I., Brandis, C.A., Bonitz, H. (eds.), Aristotelis opera. 4 vols (vol. I). Academia Regia Borussica. Berlin: Georg Reimer.
13.Aristotle (1872). Aristotelis Politicorum libri octo cum vetusta translatione Guilelmi de Moerbeka, ed. Susemihl, F. Leipzig: Tebner.
14.Aristotle (2000). De historia animalium. Translatio Guillelmi de Morbeka. Pars prima: lib. I–V, eds. Beullens, P., Bossier, F. Leiden-Boston-Köln: E.J. Brill.
15.Aristotle (2020). De animalibus. Michael Scot’s Arabic-Latin Translation, Vol. 1a: books I–III: History of Animals, ed van Oppenraay, A.M.I. Leiden: Brill.
16.Augustin (1981). Confessionum libri XIII, ed. L. Verheijen. Turnhout: Brepols (CCL 27).
17.Avicenna Latinus (1968). Liber de anima seu Sextus de Naturalibus. IV–V. ed. Van Riet, S. Louvain-Leiden: Éditions Orientalistes-Brill.
18.Boethius (1880). Commentarii in librum Aristotelis Peri Ermeneias [In Peri Hermeneias 1; In Peri Hermeneias 2], ed. Meiser, K. Lipsiae: Teubner.
19.Geoffrey of Aspall (2005). Quaestiones super De anima, ed. Vlatka Čizmić. München: Unpublished.
20.Peter of Spain (2015). Questiones super libro “De animalibus” Aristotelis: Critical Edition with Introduction, ed. Navarro Sánchez, F. Farnham, Surrey and Burlington, VT: Ashgate Press.
21.Ps.-Kilwardby (1975). Commentum super Priscianum maiorum. In: Fredborg, K.M., Green-Pedersen, N.J., Nielsen, L., Pinborg, J. (eds.), The Commentary on “Priscianus Maior” ascribed to Robert Kilwardby. Universitè de Copenhague. Institut du Moyen-Age Grec et Latin. Cahiers 15, 1–146.
22.Richard Rufus of Cornwall (2018). Sententia cum questionibus in libros De anima Aristotelis, ed. Ottman, J. R., Wood, R., Lewis, N., Martin, C. J. New York: Oxford University Press.
23.Roger Bacon (1859). Opus Tertium, Opus Minus, Compendium Philosophiae, ed. J.S. Brewer, Opera quaedam hactenus inedita, vol. I. London.
24.Roger Bacon (1902). The Greek Grammar of Roger Bacon, and a Fragment of his Hebrew Grammar. Edited from the MSS. with introduction and notes by the Rev. Edmond Nolan, B.A., and Hirsch, S.A. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
25.Roger Bacon (1935). Questiones super libros octo Physicorum, ed. Delorme, F., Steele, R. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
26.Roger Bacon (1937). Liber De Sensu et Sensato. Summa de Sophismatibus et Distinctionibus, ed. Steele, R. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
27.Roger Bacon (1965). Opera quaedam hactenus inedita (=Opus tertium, Opus minus, Compendium studii philosophiae, Epistola de secretis operibus Artis et Naturae, et de nullitate Magiae), ed. Brewer, J.S. London, 1859; reprint 1965, Nendeln, Lichtenstein: Kraus.
28.Roger Bacon (1978). De Signis. In: Fredborg, K.M., Nielsen, L., Pinborg, J. (eds.), An Unetited Part of Roger Bacon’s “Opus Maius”: “De Signis”. Traditio 34, 75–136.
29.Roger Bacon (1986). Summulae dialectices I–II. In: De Libera, A. (ed.), Les Summulae dialectices de Roger Bacon. I. De Termino. II. De Enuntiatione. Archives d’histoire doctrinale et litteraire du moyen age 53, 139–289.
30.Thomas Aquinas (1971). Sententia libri politicorum. In: Opera omnia, ed. Leonina, t. XLVIII (pp. 67–295). Roma: Editori di San Tommaso.
31.Secondary Literature
32.Anheim, É., Grévin, B., Morard, M. (2001). Exégèse judéo-chrétienne, magie et linguistique: un recueil de “notes” inédites attribuées à Roger Bacon, Archives d’histoire doctrinale et littérair du Moyen Age 68, 95–154.
33.Anzulewicz, H., Söder, J.R. (2008). Prolegomena. In: Anzulewicz H., Söder J. R. (eds.), Alberti Magni De homine (pp. V–xvii). Monasterii Westfalorum: Aschendorff.
34.Appolloni, C. (2020). Approccio pragmatico e libertà semantica: un confronto tra Ruggero Bacone e Pietro di Giovanni Olivi sulla teoria del significato. Documenti e Studi per la Tradizione Filosofica Medievale 31, 311–332.
35.Ashworth, J. (2012). Aquinas, Scotus and Others on Naming, Knowing, and the Origin of Language. In: Fink J.L. et al. (eds.), Logic and Language in the Middle Ages: A volume in honour of Sten Ebbesen (pp. 257–272). Leiden: Brill. https://doi.org/10.1163/9789004242135_017
36.Bazan, B.C. (2002). 13th century commentaries on De anima: from Peter of Spain to Thomas Aquinas. In: Fioravanti G., Leonardi C., Perfetti, S. (eds.), Il Commento filosofico nell’Occidente latino (secoli XIII–XV) (pp. 119–184). Turnhout: Brepols. https://doi.org/10.1484/M.RPM-EB.3.1075
37.Bernardini, P. (2009). Introduzione. In: Anonymous of Siena, Quaestiones super librum de anima. Anonymi magistri artium Quaestiones super librum De anima, ed. Bernardini, P. (pp. I–CI). Firenze: SISMEL.
38.Briguglia, G. (2015). L’animale politico. Agostino, Aristotele e altri mostri medievali. Roma: Salerno Editrice.
39.Briguglia, G., Gentili, S., Rosier-Catach, I. (2020). Introduction. L'homme comme animal politique et parlant. Philosophical Readings XII (1), 1–12.
40.Cesalli, L., Rosier-Catach, I. (2018). «Signum est in praedicamento relationis». Roger Bacon's Semantics Revisited in the Light of His Relational Theory of the Sign. Oxford Studies in Medieval Philosophy 6, 62–99. https://doi.org/10.1093/oso/9780198827030.003.0003
41.Cesalli, L., Goubier, F., Rosier-Catach, I. (forthcoming). Roger Bacon. De signis. Traduction et commentaire.
42.Dahan, G. (1990). Les intellectuels chrétiens et les juifs au Moyen Âge. Paris: Cerf.
43.Dahan, G. (1995). Nommer les êtres: Exégèse et théorie du langage dans les commentaires médiévaux de Genèse 2, 19–20. In: Ebbesen, S. (ed), Sprachtheorien in Spätantike und Mittelalter (pp. 55–74). Tübingen: Narr.
44.De Libera, A. (1981). Roger Bacon Et Le Problème De L'appellatio Univoca. In: Braakhuis, H., Kneepkens C.H., Rijk, L. (eds.), English Logic and Semantics: From the End of the Twelfth Century to the Time of Ockham and Burleigh (pp. 193–234). Nijmegen: Ingenium Publishers.
45.De Libera, A. (1986). Les Summulae Dialectices de Roger Bacon. In: De Libera, A. (ed.), Les Summulae dialectices de Roger Bacon. I. De Termino. II. De Enuntiatione. Archives d’histoire doctrinale et litteraire du moyen age 53, 139–170.
46.De Raedemaeker, J. (1968–1970). Informations concernant quelques commentaires du "De anima". Bulletin de Philosophie Médiévale (10), 194–(12), 211.
47.Delorme, F., Steele, R. (1935), Introduction. In: Roger Bacon, Questiones super libros octo Physicorum, ed. Delorme, F., Steele, Oxford: Oxford University Press.
48.Durand, B. (2017a). Sauvages expérimentaux. Une histoire des fictions d’isolement enfantin. Paris: Hermann.
49.Durand, B. (2017b). Fictions d'isolement enfantin: Anthologie d'une expérience de pensée. Paris: Hermann.
50.Ebbesen, S. (2017a). Does Language Acquisition Depend on Hearing a Language? A Text Corpus. Universite de Copenhague. Institut du Moyen-Age Grec et Latin. Cahiers 86, 138–215.
51.Ebbesen, S. (2017b). Psammetichus’s Experiment and the Scholastics: Is Language Innate? In: Pelletier, J., Moques, R. (eds.), The Language of Thought in Late Medieval Philosophy: Essays in honour of Claude Panaccio (pp. 287–302). Swaziland: Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-66634-1_18
52.Ebbesen, S. (2020). An Anthology of Questions on De anima in ms Praha, MK M.80. An Analysis with an Edition of Selected Questions. Universitè de Copenhague. Institut du Moyen-Age Grec et Latin. Cahiers 89, 1–44.
53.Eco, U., Lambertini, R., Marmo, C., Tabarroni, A. (1984). On Animal Language in the Medieval Classification of Signs. Versus. Quaderni di Studi Semiotici 38/39, 3–38. https://doi.org/10.1075/fos.21.03eco
54.Edmond Nolan, B.A., Hirsch, S.A. (1902). Introduction. In: Edmond Nolan, B.A., Hirsch S.A. (eds.), The Greek Grammar of Roger Bacon, and a Fragment of his Hebrew Grammar. Edited from the MSS. with introduction and notes by the Rev. Edmond Nolan, B.A., and Hirsch, S.A. (pp. I–LXXV). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
55.Engels, J. (1963). Origine, sens et survie du terme boécien “secundum placitum”. Vivarium 1, 87–114. https://doi.org/10.1163/156853463X00045
56.Gauthier, R.A. (1984). La «Sentencia super librum de anima» d’Adam de Bocfeld. In: Gauthier, R.A. (ed.), Sanctus Thomas de Aquino Opera omnia iussu Leonis XIII P.M. edita. Cura et studio Fratrum Praedicatorum XLV 1 Sententia libri de anima. Roma-Paris.
57.Goubier, F. (forthcoming). Signification et usage dans la philosophie médiévale du langage. In Godart-Wendling, B. (ed.), Usages de l’usage, Londres: ISTE.
58.Hackett, J. (1997). Roger Bacon: His Life, Career and Works. In: Id. (ed), Roger Bacon and the Sciences: Commemorative Essays (pp. 9–24), Leiden-New York-Kohl: Brill.
59.Hackett, J. (2020). Roger Bacon. In: The Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy, Retrieved from: https://plato.stanford.edu/archives/sum2020/entries/roger-bacon/ (16.01.2021).
60.Huang, Y. (2017). Introduction: What is Pragmatics? In: Huang, Y. (ed.), The Oxford Handbook of Pragmatics (pp. 1–18). Oxford: Oxford University Press.
61.Köhler, T. W. (2014). Homo animal nobilissimus. Konturen des spezifisch Menschlichen in der naturphilosophischen Aristoteleskommentierung des dreizehnten Jahrhunderts. Teilband 2. Leiden-Boston: Brill. https://doi.org/10.1163/9789004278554
62.Maloney, T.S. (1984). Roger Bacon on Equivocation. Vivarium 22, 85–112. https://doi.org/10.1163/156853484X00051
63.Maloney, T.S. (2013). Roger Bacon. On Signs. (Opus maius, Part 3, Chapter 2). Translated with an introduction and notes by Thomas S. Maloney. Toronto: Pontifical Institute of Medieval Studies.
64.Marmo, C. (1994). Semiotica e linguaggio nella scolastica: Parigi, Bologna, Erfurt 1270–1330. La semiotica dei Modisti. Roma: Istituto Storico Italiano per il Medio Evo.
65.Marmo, C. (1995). A Pragmatic Approach to Language in Modism. In: Ebbesen, S. (ed.) Sprachtheorien in Spätantike und Mittelalter, Tübingen: Gunter Narr Verlag, 169–183.
66.Marmo, C. (1997). Bacon, Aristotle (and all the others) on Natural Inferential Signs. Vivarium 72, 136–154. https://doi.org/10.1163/1568534972662574
67.Marmo, C. (2010). La semiotica del XIII secolo: tra arti liberali e teologia. Milano: Bompiani.
68.Marmo, C. (2020). Per uno studio sull’intelligenza animale nella Scolastica medievale: facoltà estimativa, inferenze e segni tra XIII e XIV secolo. In: Gensini, S. (ed.), La voce e il logos. Filosofie dell’animalità nella storia delle idee (pp. 79–110), Pisa: Edizioni ETS.
69.Mora-Márquez, A.M. (2011). Pragmatics in Peter John Olivi’s Account of Signification of Common Names. Vivarium 49, 150–164. https://doi.org/10.1163/156853411X590471
70.Mora-Márquez, A.M. (2015). The thirteenth-Century Notion of Signification: The Discussion and Their Origin and Development. Leiden-Boston: Brill. https://doi.org/10.1163/9789004300132
71.Noriega-Olmos, S. (2012). 5. Κατὰ Συνθήκην. In: Id. (ed.), Aristotle’s Psychology of Signification (pp. 141–170). Berlin-Boston: De Gruyter.
72.Oelze, A. (2018). Animal Rationality: Later Medieval Theories 1250–1350. Leiden: Brill. https://doi.org/10.1163/9789004363779
73.Ottman, J. R., Wood, R., Lewis, N., Martin, C. J. (2018). Introduction. In: Richard Rufus of Cornwall (2018). Sententia cum questionibus in libros De anima Aristotelis, ed. Ottman, J. R., Wood, R., Lewis, N., Martin, C. J. (pp. 1–194). New York: Oxford University Press. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-024-1151-5_443-2
74.Panaccio, C. (1999). Grammar and Mental Language in the Pseudo-Kilwardby. Historisk-filosofiske meddelelser. Det Kongelige Danske Videnskabernes Selskab 77, 397–413.
75.Perfetti, S. (2012). Animali pensati nella filosofia tra medioevo e prima età moderna. Pisa: Edizioni ETS.
76.Perfetti, S. (2017). La disseminazione del sapere sugli animali (dalla tarda antichità al XIII secolo) e l'iperaristotelismo di Alberto Magno. In: Sassi, M.M. (ed.), La zoologia di Aristotele e la sua ricezione, dall'età ellenistica e romana alle culture medioevali (pp. 269–297). Pisa: Pisa University Press. https://doi.org/10.2307/j.ctvb1hscw.13
77.Raizman-Kedar, Y. (2007). Questioning Aristotle: Roger Bacon on the True Essence of Colour. The Journal of Medieval Latin 17, 373–383. https://doi.org/10.1484/J.JML.2.305704
78.Rosier, I. (1994). La parole comme acte: sur la grammaire et la sémantique au XIIIe siècle. Paris: Vrin.
79.Rosier-Catach, I (2000). Aristotle and Augustine, Two models of Occidental Medieval Semantics, in: In: Singh, Gill H., Manetti, G. (eds.). Signs and Signification, vol. 2 (pp. 41–62) New Delhi: Bahri.
80.Rosier-Catach, I. (2003). Variations médiévales sur l’opposition entre signification “ad placitum’ et signification naturelle. In: Braakhuis, H., Kneepkens, C.H. (eds.), Aristotle’s Peri hermeneias in the Latin Middle Ages. Essays on the Commentary Tradition (pp. 165–205). Turnhout: Brepols.
81.Rosier-Catach, I. (2004). La parole efficace. Signe, rituel, sacré. Paris: Editions du Seuil.
82.Rosier-Catach, I. (2006). “Solo all’uomo fu dato di parlare.” Dante, gli angeli, gli animali. Rivista di filosofia Neo-scolastica 98, 435–466.
83.Rosier-Catach, I. (2011). Glossario. In: Grondeux A., Imbach R., Rosier-Catach I., Dante Alighieri. De l’éloquence en vulgaire. Traduction et commentaire sous la direction d’Irène Rosier-Catach. Paris: Fayard. 259–326.
84.Rosier-Catach, I. (2015). Communauté politique et communauté linguistique. In: Genet, J.P. (ed.), La légitimité implicite (pp. 225–243). Paris-Rome: Publications de la Sorbonne/Ecole française de Rome. https://doi.org/10.4000/books.psorbonne.6590
85.Rosier-Catach, I. (2020). «Multa vocabula ceciderunt ab usu». Les mots, le cercle de vin, et le beneplacitum du locuteur. In: Borsa, P., Falzone, P., Fiorentini, L., Gentili, S., Marcozzi, L., Stroppa, S., Tonelli, N., (eds.), Per Enrico Fenzi. Saggi di allievi e amici per i suoi ottant’anni (pp. 25–41). Firenze: Le Lettere.
86.Rosier-Catach I., Cassin B., Caussat P., Grondeux A (2004). Langue / Langage / Parole. In B. Cassin (ed). Vocabulaire européen des Philosophies. Dictionnaire des intraduisibles, Éditions du Seuil / Dictionnaires Le Robert, Paris. 675–684.
87.Rossi, P.B. (2017). L’entrata dei libri De animalibus nel Medioevo latino. In: Sassi, M.M. (ed.), La zoologia di Aristotele e la sua ricezione, dall'età ellenistica e romana alle culture medioevali (pp. 237–268). Pisa: Pisa University Press. https://doi.org/10.2307/j.ctvb1hscw.12
88.Sekizawa I. (2010). Le naturalisme linguistique de Boèce de Dacie. Thèse de doctorat. Université Paris Diderot, Paris 7.
89.van Oppenraay, A.M.I. (2020). Introduction. In: Aristotle, De animalibus. Michael Scot’s Arabic-Latin Translation, Vol. 1a: books I–III: History of Animals, ed. A. M. I. van Oppenraay. Leiden: Brill.
90.Von Moos P. (2011) Sermo. Das Begriffsgeschischtliche auf und ab der Primärbedeutung « Gespräch ». In I. Atucha, D. Calma, C. K.nig-Pralong, I. Zavattero (eds.). Mots médiévaux offerts à Ruedi Imbach, Fédération Internationale des Instituts d’Études Médiévales, Porto. 669–679.
91.Weijers, O. (2002). La structure des commentaires philosophiques à la Faculté des arts: quelques observations. In: Fioravanti, G., Leonardi, C., Perfetti, S. (eds.), Il Commento filosofico nell’Occidente latino (secoli XIII–XV) (pp. 17–42). Turnhout: Brepols. https://doi.org/10.1484/M.RPM-EB.3.1071
92.Wood, R. (2010). Ms Description M80. Record prepared by Rega Wood, URL: http://rrp.stanford.edu/pragM80-xml.html (16.01.2020).