European Journal of Service Management

Wcześniej: Zeszyty Naukowe Uniwersytetu Szczecińskiego. Service Management

ISSN: 2450-8535     eISSN: 2451-2729    OAI    DOI: 10.18276/ejsm.2018.27/2-65
CC BY-SA   Open Access 

Lista wydań / Vol. 27/2, 3/2018
Absorption of the EU funds in the context of institutional efficiency of local governments in Poland

Autorzy: Magdalena Wojarska
University of Warmia and Mazury in Olsztyn, Department of Economic and Regional Policy

Renata Marks-Bielska
University of Warmia and Mazury in Olsztyn, Department of Economic and Regional Policy
Słowa kluczowe: institutional efficiency of local governments level of absorption of the EU funds by municipalities regression analysis
Data publikacji całości:2018-12-31
Liczba stron:7 (531-537)
Klasyfikacja JEL: H79 R19 R59
Cited-by (Crossref) ?:

Abstrakt

This article reports an empirical study whose aim was to verify a hypothesis assuming the presence of a relationship between institutional efficiency of local governments and the value of financial means acquired from the EU budget and from other foreign programmes (including the contribution from the state budget as a cofinancing of projects executed with the support of structural funds and the EU Cohesion Fund). The analysis was based on mixed data, i.e. primary (obtained via a survey from 1,220 municipalities) and secondary ones (from the Local Data Bank). The institutional efficiency of local governments was measured with an EFF aggregate metric, which was the sum of weighted synthetic partial metrics determined for the basic areas of activity pursued by local governments, while the identification of relationships was based on one-factor analysis of regression. The results substantiated positive verification of the hypothesis and demonstrated that efficiency (as defined for the purpose of this study) cannot be treated as an exclusive determinant of the absorption of EU funds by municipalities. More important in this respect are the size of a population and budgetary revenues in a given municipality.
Pobierz plik

Plik artykułu

Bibliografia

1.Acemoglu, D. (2008). Introduction to modern economic growth. Princeton: Princeton University Press.
2.Acemoglu, D., Johnson, S., Robinson, J.A. (2001). The colonial origins of comparative development: an empirical investigation. American Economic Review, 91, 1369–1401.
3.Álvarez-Díaz, M., Miguez, G.C. (2008). The quality of institutions: A genetic programming approach. Economic Modelling, 25, 161–169.
4.Chousa, J.P., Khan, H.A., Melikyan, D., Tamazian, A. (2005). Assessing institutional efficiency, growth and integration. Emergings Markets Review, 6, 69–84.
5.Churski, P., Perdał, R., Herodowicz, T. (2016). Rola środków polityki spójności pozyskiwanych przez samorząd terytorialny w rozwoju społeczno-gospodarczym ośrodków regionalnych w Polsce. Samorząd Terytorialny, 7–8, 96–115.
6.Communication from the Commission to the European Parliament, the Council, the European Economic and Social Committee and the Committee of the Regions. A Quality Framework for Services of General Interest in Europe (COM (2011) 900 final).
7.Hall, R., Jones, C.I. (1999). Why do some countries produce so much more output per worker than others? Quaterly Journal of Economics, 114, 83–116.
8.https://danepubliczne.gov.pl/dataset/bank-danych-lokalnych (July 19, 2017).
9.Jastrzębska, M. (2011). Znaczenie bezzwrotnych środków zagranicznych jako źródeł finansowania działalności jednostek samorządu terytorialnego w latach 2004–2010. Finanse Komunalne, 10, 18–31.
10.Kaufmann, D., Kraay, A. (2002). Growth Without Governance.
11.Kaufmann, D., Kraay, A., Mastruzzi, M. (2003). Governance Matters III. Governance Indicators for 1996–2002. Washington: The World Bank.
12.Kaufmann, D., Kraay, A., Zoldo-Lobaton, P. (1999). Governance Matters. Policy Research. Working Paper, 2196; 1–64.
13.Knack S., Keefer P. (1995). Institutions and Economic Performance: Cross-Country Tests Using Alternative Institutional Measures. Economics and Politics, 7 (3), 207–227.
14.Knack, S., Keefer, P. (1997). Does social capital have an economic pay-off? A cross-country investigation. Quaterly Journal of Economics, 112 (4), 1251–1288.
15.Landes, D.S. (2000). Bogactwo i nędza narodów: dlaczego jedni są tak bogaci a inni tak ubodzy? Warszawa: Muza.
16.Mauro, P. (1995). Corruption and growth. Quaterly Journal of Economics, 110 (3), 681–712.
17.North, D.C. (1984). Transformation Costs, Institutions and Economics History. Journal of Institutional and Theoretical Economics, 140, 7–17.
18.Pastuszka, S. (2012). Czynniki wpływające na realizację projektów unijnych przez jednostki samorządu terytorialnego województwa świętokrzyskiego. Samorząd Terytorialny, 9, 26–47.
19.Putnam, R.D. (1995). Demokracja w działaniu. Tradycje obywatelskie we współczesnych Włoszech. Warszawa: Społeczny Instytut Wydawniczy Znak.
20.Rodric, D. (ed.) (2003). In Search of Prosperity. Analytic Narratives on Economic Growth. Priceton and Oxford: Princeton University Press.
21.Rodric, D., Subramanian, A., Trebbi, F. (2004). Institutions rule: The primacy of intitution over geograph and integration in economic development. Journal of Economic Growth, 9 (2), 131–165.
22.Rodrik, D. (1999). Where did all the growth go. External Shocks, Social Conflict, and Growth Collapses. Journal of Economic Growth, 4 (4), 385–412.
23.Woolcock, M., Narayan, D. (2000). Social Capital: Implication for Development Theory, Research and Policy. The World Bank Research Observer. 15 (2), 225–249.