Koncepcje zysku w ekonomii i rachunkowości. Perspektywa MSR/MSSF

ISBN: 978-83-7972-735-3    ISBN (online): 978-83-7972-736-0    ISSN: 0860-2751    OAI    DOI: 10.18276/978-83-7972-736-0
CC BY-SA   Open Access 

Issue archive / T. (MCCCLXXXIX) 1315

Year:2024
Field:Field of Social Sciences
Discipline:economics and finance
Authors: Michał Hendryk ORCID
Uniwersytet Szczeciński

Information

Electronic version of the publication available under CC BY-SA 4.0 license after 12 months from the date of release: July 2024

Abstract

The concepts of profit in economics and accounting. IAS/IFRS accounting standards perspective

The nature of profit has been one of the central problems of economics and accounting for centuries. However, the academic attention paid to this area is still well justified. Indeed, to date, neither economic theory nor accounting theory has developed a single, universal definition of profit, although the concept is commonly used by most people. It can therefore be argued that profit is a perfect research problem (because of the multiplicity of possible interpretations) and at the same time paradoxical (because of its common understanding). As a result, it has been an extremely interesting research challenge to investigate whether the interpretation of profit from the perspective of similar and related fields of study – economics and accounting – actually differs significantly

With the progress of the broader economy and the development of the capital market, an evolution in accounting science and practice can be observed, reflected, among other things, in the implementation of the comprehensive income concept in US and, subsequently, International Accounting Standards. This measure, which is the de facto modern definition of profit, expresses the periodic change in an entity’s equity that has occurred as a result of transactions and other events, excluding changes resulting from transactions with owners in their capacity as owners. Therefore, the comprehensive income includes holistically the effects of transactions and changes in the value of assets and liabilities, irrespective of whether they are recognized in net income or are equity-settled. The aim of this development is to bring the traditionally understood net income closer to the economic income, which is inextricably linked to the growing importance of fair value measurement.

Despite the lapse of more than 25 years since its implementation in US accounting standards and 15 years since its implementation in international accounting standards, the comprehensive income concept is still controversial. This is because a conceptual framework that clearly identifies the economic meaning of the comprehensive income has still not been developed. This notion refers primarily to the issue of recognition of other comprehensive income. This category was intended to be an extension of information on the traditionally understood accounting profit (net income), but is now a set of items of a diverse nature that can and, as research shows, are not understood by stakeholders. Therefore, this work, in the context of the modern concept of profit, by which is meant the comprehensive income, deals in particular with aspects related to the problem of recognition and presentation of information on other comprehensive income.

The general objective of this monograph is to compare the nature of the profit and the principles of its measurement in economic theory and accounting theory and to identify the nature and current principles of qualifying the components of other comprehensive income to the comprehensive income, with particular reference to the criteria for the classification of components of other comprehensive income in the comprehensive income.

As the considerations outlined in this work demonstrate, the concept of economic profit had a strong influence on the development of the concept of net income in accounting, has been positively verified. The considerations outlined in the monograph, although representing only a modest part of the extremely rich heritage of economic thought and accounting theory, provide an insight into the close relationship between economic profit and accounting profit. The review of economic profit concepts has shown that some of their interpretations are timeless and, most importantly, closely related to the perception from the perspective of accounting. The concept presented by J.R. Hicks can currently be taken as a model view of economic profit. According to it, profit is nothing more than a periodic surplus over the maintenance of human wealth. A similar approach, albeit from the perspective of an economic entity, is also found in accounting theory. The key to identifying the relationship between economic profit and accounting profit is to understand the concept of wealth, defined by J.R. Hicks as the present value of a person’s future economic benefits. Translated to business entities, economic profit can be viewed as the difference between the present value of equity (i.e. the economic benefits generated by the business) at the end of the period and the present value of equity at the beginning of the period. In practice, therefore, economic profit can be equated with the increase in the value of the enterprise, which is a measure of its prosperity. This would only be achieved in accounting standards if all assets and liabilities were valued at current values, which, in view of the difficulties of valuation on the basis of the abovementioned standards and the widespread use of historical cost, can only be regarded as an abstraction or utopia. However, as economies and capital markets have developed, accountants have sought to bring accounting profit, as traditionally understood, closer to economic profit, as reflected in the growing importance of fair value measurement and the introduction of the comprehensive income concept into accounting standards.

The analysis of the IAS/IFRS rules in the area of recognition and presentation of information on comprehensive income (including other comprehensive income in particular), which was presented in chapter two, showed that the indicated contemporary concept of income can still be controversial and misunderstood by various stakeholder groups. This is because it often requires highly specialized knowledge and acceptance of the principles developed by the IASB for the recognition and presentation of information on other comprehensive income, which, it should be emphasized, are not entirely clear and consistent. This conclusion is surprising given that the category of other comprehensive income has existed in accounting standards for many years. Thus, in the area of regulatory formulation in the area of the comprehensive income, the Board seems to have moved away from the principle-based approach, which is standard for IAS/IFRS setting, to an approach based on its internal judgements, which can be tentatively characterized as an “IASB-based approach”. This monograph therefore brings together and systematizes knowledge about the comprehensive income, addressing the difficulties of understanding it. In this context, it should be emphasized that accounting should be seen as a science that develops inductively. Its evolution is therefore conditioned by the progressive development of the wider market. Undoubtedly, the concept of the comprehensive income, understood in this thesis as the modern concept of income, will change, and the directions of change will be determined by practice.

Bibliography

1.Accounting Standards Board (1992). Financial Reporting Standard 3: Reporting Financial Performance.
2.Alexander, S.S. (1950). Income Measurement in a Dynamic Economy. American Institute of Accountants.
3.American Accounting Association (1936). A Tentative Statement of Accounting Principles Affecting Corporate Reports. American Accounting Association.
4.American Accounting Association (1966). A Statement of Basic Accounting Theory.
5.American Accounting Association (1969). Report of Committee on Managerial Decision Models. The Accounting Review, 44, 43–76.
6.Artienwicz, N., Bartoszewicz, A., Wójtowicz, P., & Cyganska, M. (2020). Kształtowanie wyniku finansowego w Polsce. Teoria – praktyka – stan badań. Instytut Prawa Gospodarczego Sp. z o.o.
7.Arystoteles (1953). Polityka, przeł. i oprac. L. Piotrowicz. Zakład Imienia Ossolińskich – Wydawnictwo.
8.Association of International Certified Professional Accountants (1973). Report of the Study Group on the Objectives of Financial Statements, Objectives of Financial Statements.
9.Association of International Certified Professional Accountants.
10.Association of Investment Management and Research (1993). Financial Reporting in the 1990s and Beyond.
11.Baker, C.R. (2017). The Influence of Accounting Theory on the FASB Conceptual Framework. The Accounting Historians Journal, 44(2), 109–124.
12.Bareja, K. (2014). Spór o priorytet w sprawozdawczości finansowej. Zeszyty Teoretyczne Rachunkowości, 77, 19–37.
13.Barr, A. (1938). Comments on “A Statement of Accounting Principles”. Journal of Accountancy, 318–323.
14.Barth, M.E., Beaver, W.H., Hand, J.R.M., & Landsman, W.R. (1999). Accruals, Cash Flows, and Equity Values. Review of Accounting Studies, 4(3/4), 205–229. https://doi. org/10.1023/A:1009630100586.
15.Barth, M.E., Li, K., & McClure, C. (2022). Evolution in Value Relevance of Accounting Information. The Accounting Review. https://doi.org/10.2308/TAR-2019-0521.
16.Bartkowiak, R. (2003). Historia myśli ekonomicznej. PWE.
17.Baxter, W.T. (1971). Depreciation. Sweet and Maxwell.
18.Bedford, N.M. (1951). A Critical Analysis of Accounting Concepts of Income. The Accounting Review, 26(4), 526–537.
19.Bedford, N.M. (1965). Income Determination Theory: An Accounting Framework. Addison- Wesley Publishing Company.
20.Bedford, N.M., & Ziegler, R.E. (1975). The Contributions of A.C. Littleton to Accounting Thought and Practice. The Accounting Review, 50(3), 435–443.
21.Bek-Gaik, B. (2013a). Sprawozdanie z całkowitych dochodów jako nowy element sprawozdania finansowego – wybrane aspekty teoretyczne i praktyczne. Zeszyty Naukowe Uniwersytetu Szczecińskiego. Finanse, Rynki Finansowe, Ubezpieczenia, 59, 21–37.
22.Bek-Gaik, B. (2013b). Sprawozdawczy wymiar rachunku wyników w warunkach globalnego rynku. Wydawnictwo Uniwersytetu Łódzkiego. https://doi.org/10.18778/7525-891-2.
23.Biblia Tysiąclecia (2018). Biblia Tysiąclecia – Pismo Święte Starego i Nowego Testamentu. Wydawnictwo Pallottinum.
24.Bogui, F.B. (2008). Handbook of Governmental Accounting. CRC Press.
25.Brief, R.P., & Owen, J. (1973). A Reformulation of the Estimation Problem. Journal of Accounting Research, 11(1), 1–15. https://doi.org/10.2307/2490277.
26.Brooks, J.R. (2018). The Definitions of Income. Tax Law Review, 71(253), 253–309. https:// doi.org/10.2139/SSRN.2928972.
27.Bryer, R.A. (2021). Creating the “Big Mess”: A Marxist History of American Accounting Theory, c. 1900–1929 (T. 1). World Scientific Publishing Co Pte Ltd.
28.Canning, J.B. (1929). The Economics of Accountancy. Ronald Press.
29.Chambers, R.J. (1966). Accounting, Evaluation and Economic Behavior. Prentice-Hall.
30.Chambers, R.J. (1979). Review Article: Canning’s The Economics of Accountancy – After 50 Years. The Accounting Review, 54(4), 764–775.
31.Chatfield, M., & Vangermeersch, R. (red.). (1996). The History of Accounting, An International Encyclopedia. Garland Publishing.
32.Clark, J.B. (1908). The Distribution of Wealth. A Theory of Wages, Interest and Profits. The Macmillan Company.
33.Copeland, T., Koller, T., & Murrin, J. (1997). Wycena: mierzenie i kształtowanie wartości firm, tłum. A. Kaunauskas, T. Wiazowski. WIG-Press.
34.Cwynar, A., & Cwynar, W. (2002). Zarządzanie wartością spółki kapitałowej. Koncepcje – systemy – narzędzia. Fundacja Rozwoju Rachunkowości w Polsce.
35.Czajor, P. (2012). Zmiany w zakresie i formie prezentacji sprawozdania finansowego według międzynarodowych regulacji. Acta Universitatis Lodziensis. Folia Oeconomica, 263, 11–30.
36.Czajor, P., Druszcz, P., & Hendryk, M. (2020). Usefulness of Comprehensive Income Statement – Preliminary Study on the Example of Companies from the WIG30 Index. Financial Sciences, 24(4), 10–26. https://doi.org/10.15611/fins.2019.4.02.
37.Damodaran, A. (2006). Valuation Approaches and Metrics: A Survey of the Theory and Evidence. https://pages.stern.nyu.edu/~adamodar/pdfiles/papers/valuesurvey.pdf.
38.Davidson, H.J., & Trueblood, R.M. (1961). Accounting for Decision-Making. The Accounting Review, 36(4).
39.Dean, A.H. (1949). An Inquiry into the Nature of Business Income under Present Price Levels. American Institute of Accountants.
40.Deegan, C., & Unerman, J. (2006). Financial Accounting Theory. McGraw-Hill Education.
41.Deloitte Touche Tohmatsu Limited (b.d.-a). Financial statement presentation – Other comprehensive income. https://www.iasplus.com/en/projects/completed/fs/fsp-oci.
42.Deloitte Touche Tohmatsu Limited (b.d.-b). IAS 1 – Presentation of Financial Statements. https://www.iasplus.com/en/standards/ias/ias1.
43.Deloitte Touche Tohmatsu Limited (19.10.2010). Other Comprehensive Income – Comment Letter Analysis. https://www.iasplus.com/en/meeting-notes/iasb/2010/agenda_1010/ agenda1519.
44.Dichev, I.D., & Tang, V.W. (2008). Matching and the Changing Properties of Accounting Earnings over the Last 40 Years. The Accounting Review, 83(6), 1425–1460.
45.Duliniec, A. (2001). Struktura i koszt kapitału w przedsiębiorstwie. Wydawnictwo Naukowe PWN.
46.Edwards, E.O., & Bell, P.W. (1961). The Theory and Measurement of Business Income. University of California Press. https://doi.org/10.1525/9780520340626.
47.Ernst & Young LLP (2021). International GAAP 2021: Generally Accepted Accounting Practice Under International Financial Reporting Standards: Global Edition. Wiley.
48.European Financial Reporting Advisory Group (2020.03.17). Summary of US GAAP requirements for insurance (including changes to the Accounting for Long-Duration Insurance Contracts) and comparison with IFRS 17 – Issues Paper. https://www.efrag.org/ Assets/Download?assetUrl=%2Fsites%2Fwebpublishing%2FMeeting%20Documents% 2F1907081359223505%2F07-06%20IFRS%2017%20DEA%20US%20GAAP%20com parison%20EFRAG%20Board%2020-03-17.pdf.
49.Evans, L. (2005). Editorial: Accounting History in the German Language Arena. Accounting, Business & Financial History, 15(3), 229–233. https://doi.org/10.1080/09585200500284146.
50.Financial Accounting Standards Board (b.d.). ASC 220-10-45-10A. https://asc.fasb.org/ 1943274/2147482790.
51.Financial Accounting Standards Board (1978). Statement of Financial Accounting Concepts (SFAC) No. 1: Objectives of Financial Reporting by Business Enterprises.
52.Financial Accounting Standards Board (1980). Statement of Financial Accounting Concepts (SFAC) No. 3: Elements of Financial Statements of Business Enterprises.
53.Financial Accounting Standards Board (1981). Statement of Financial Accounting Standards (SFAS) No. 52: Foreign Currency Translation.
54.Financial Accounting Standards Board (1984). Statement of Financial Accounting Standards (SFAS) No. 80: Accounting for Futures Contracts.
55.Financial Accounting Standards Board (1985a). Statement of Financial Accounting Concepts (SFAC) No. 6: Elements of Financial Statements. A Replacement of FASB Concepts Statement No. 3.
56.Financial Accounting Standards Board (1985b). Statement of Financial Accounting Standards (SFAS) No. 87: Employers’ Accounting for Pensions.
57.Financial Accounting Standards Board (1993). Statement of Financial Accounting Standards (SFAS) No. 115: Accounting for Certain Investments in Debt and Equity Securities. Financial Accounting Standards Board (1996). Exposure Draft: Reporting Comprehensive Income.
58.Financial Accounting Standards Board (1997). Statement of Financial Accounting Standards (SFAS) No. 130: Reporting Comprehensive Income.
59.Financial Reporting Standards Board (1994). Financial Reporting Standard No 2: Presentation of Financial Reports.
60.Fisher, I. (1906). The Nature of Capital and Income. The Macmillan Company.
61.Fisher, I. (1907). The Rate of Interest. The Macmillan Company.
62.Flood, J.M. (2019). Wiley GAAP 2019: Interpretation and Application of Generally Accepted Accounting Principles (1st edition). Wiley.
63.Giedroyć, M. (2015). Relewantność informacji sprawozdawczych. Prace Naukowe Uniwersytetu Ekonomicznego we Wrocławiu, 390, 114–122.
64.Gierusz, M., Błażyńska, J., Hońko, S., & Rówińska-Král’, M. (2021). Wybrane aspekty sprawozdawczości finansowej w czasach pandemii i kryzysu ekonomicznego. Jakość i użyteczność ujawnień. Instytut Prawa Gospodarczego Sp. z o.o.
65.Glapiński, A. (2012). Schumpeterowska teoria przedsiębiorcy, czyli skąd się bierze pies. Konsumpcja i Rozwój, 1(2), 3–12.
66.Godfrey, J., Hodgson, A., Tarca, A., Hamilton, J., & Holmes, S. (2010). Accounting Theory (wyd. 7). John Wiley & Sons.
67.Gorzewska, P. (2021). MSSF 9: Klasyfikacja, wycena i utrata wartości składników aktywów finansowych. https://www.ey.com/pl_pl/mssf/mssf9-klasyfikacja-wycena-i-utrata-wartosci- skladnikow-aktywow-f.
68.Gos, W. (2001). Dynamiczne teorie bilansowe jako baza przepływów pieniężnych. Zeszyty Teoretyczne Rady Naukowej Stowarzyszenia Księgowych w Polsce, 2(58), 33–52.
69.Gos, W. (2015). Definiowanie i interpretacja zysku i kapitału. Zeszyty Naukowe Uniwersytetu Szczecińskiego. Finanse, Rynki Finansowe, Ubezpieczenia, 873(77), 71–78. https://doi. org/10.18276/FRFU.2015.77-07.
70.Grant Thornton LLP (2019). Comparison between U.S. GAAP and IFRS® Standards. https:// www.grantthornton.com/content/dam/grantthornton/website/assets/content-page-files/ audit/pdfs/IFRS-news-2018/Comparison-between-US-GAAP-and-IFRS-Standards- December-31-2018.pdf.
71.Günther, R. (2015). Value-Relevance of Other Comprehensive Income under IFRS [Rozprawa doktorska]. University of St. Gallen.
72.Hatfield, H.R. (1909). Modern Accounting: Its Principles and Some of Its Problems. D. Appleton and Company.
73.Hendriksen, E.A., & van Breda, M.F. (2002). Teoria rachunkowości, tłum. G. Idzikowska i in. Wydawnictwo Naukowe PWN.
74.Hendryk, M. (2023). Koncepcja ujmowania i prezentacji informacji o innych całkowitych dochodach w rachunku wyniku całkowitego. Werset.
75.Hicks, J.R. (1946). Value and Capital: An Inquiry into Some Fundamental Principles of Economic Theory. Clarendon Press.
76.Hirst, D.E., & Hopkins, P.E. (1998). Comprehensive Income Reporting and Analysts’ Valuation Judgments. Journal of Accounting Research, 36, 47–75. https://doi.org/10.2307/2491306.
77.Hochreutener, Y. (2018). A Concept of Presenting Items in Profit or Loss or Other Comprehensive Income: A Theoretical and Empirical Study [Rozprawa doktorska]. University of St. Gallen.
78.Hommel, M., & Schmitz, S. (2013). Insights on German accounting theory. W: Y. Biondi & S. Zambon (red.), Accounting and Business Economics (s. 331–361). Routledge. https:// doi.org/10.4324/9780203094723.
79.Hońko, S. (2007). Podstawowe założenia i aktualne znaczenie wybranych teorii bilansowych. Zeszyty Teoretyczne Rachunkowości, 38(94), 77–88.
80.Horngren, C.T. (1965). How Should We Interpret the Realization Concept? The Accounting Review, 40(2), 323–333.
81.Hoshino, T., & Hines, W. (2019). IFRS 17 vs. US GAAP LDTI: Different animals? https:// www.milliman.com/-/media/milliman/pdfs/articles/ifrs17_vs_usgaap_ldti.ashx.
82.Husband, G.R. (1952). Review of Changing Concepts of Business Income; An Inquiry into the Nature of Business Income under Present Price Levels; Business Income and Price Levels, an Accounting Study; Five Monographs on Business Income, by Report of Study Group on Business Income, A.H. Dean, G.O. May, S.S. Alexander, M. Bronfenbrenner, S. Fabricant, & C. Warburton. The Accounting Review, 27(3), 399–404.
83.Husband, G.R., Lorig, A.N., & Sweeney, C.T. (1937). Accounting Postulates: An Analysis of the Tentative Statement of Accounting Principles. The Accounting Review, 12(4), 386–406.
84.IFRS Foundation (b.d.). Joint Financial Statement Presentation (Replacement of IAS 1). https://www.ifrs.org/projects/completed-projects/2011/joint-financial-statement-presen tation-replacement-of-ias-1/#final-stage.
85.Ijiri, Y. (1966). Income Determination Theory: An Accounting Framework by Norton M. Bedford. The Accounting Review, 41(4), 812–814.
86.International Accounting Standards Board (2005). MSR 1: Prezentacja sprawozdań finansowych.
87.International Accounting Standards Board (2006). Information for observers: Financial Statement Presentation (Phase B), Agenda Paper 15A. https://www.ifrs.org/content/ dam/ifrs/meetings/2006/december/iasb/financial-statement-presentation-phase-b/ ap15a-other-comprehensive-income.pdf.
88.International Accounting Standards Board (2007a). Information for observers: Financial Statement Presentation, Agenda Paper 7B. https://www.ifrs.org/content/dam/ifrs/meetings/ 2007/november/iasb/financial-statement-presentation/ap7b-totals-and-subtotals. pdf.
89.International Accounting Standards Board (2007b). Information for observers: Financial Statement Presentation (Phase B), Agenda Paper 15B. https://www.ifrs.org/content/ dam/ifrs/meetings/2007/january/iasb/financial-statement-presentation/ap13b-disaggregation. pdf
90.International Accounting Standards Board (2008). Discussion Paper: Preliminary Views on Financial Statement Presentation. https://www.ifrs.org/content/dam/ifrs/project/revised- ias-1-phase-b-replacement/dpprelviewsfinstmtpresentation.pdf.
91.International Accounting Standards Board (2009a). Information for Observers: Annual Improvements IAS 1 Presentation of Financial Statements: Agenda Paper 4C. https:// www.ifrs.org/content/dam/ifrs/meetings/2009/february/iasb/annual-improvements/ ap4c-presentation-of-the-statement-of-changes-in-equity.pdf.
92.International Accounting Standards Board (2009b). Information for Observers: Pensions, Agenda Paper 16C. https://www.ifrs.org/content/dam/ifrs/meetings/2009/january/iasb/ post-employment-benefits/ap16c-preliminary-views-on-amendments-to-ias-19.pdf. International Accounting Standards Board (2010). Exposure Draft ED/2010/5 Presentation of Items of Other Comprehensive Income. https://www.ifrs.org/content/dam/ifrs/project/ revised-ias-1-phase-b-oci/ed-ocimay10.pdf.
93.International Accounting Standards Board (2011). MSR 1: Prezentacja sprawozdań finansowych.
94.International Accounting Standards Board (2012). MSR 1: Prezentacja sprawozdań finansowych.
95.International Accounting Standards Board (2014). MSR 1: Prezentacja sprawozdań finansowych.
96.International Accounting Standards Board (2018a). Conceptual Framework for Financial Reporting. https://www.ifrs.org/content/dam/ifrs/publications/pdf-standards/english/2021/ issued/part-a/conceptual-framework-for-financial-reporting.pdf.
97.International Accounting Standards Board (2018b). MSR 1: Prezentacja sprawozdań finansowych.
98.International Accounting Standards Board (2020). MSR 1: Prezentacja sprawozdań finansowych.
99.International Accounting Standards Board (2021a). MSR 1: Prezentacja sprawozdań finansowych.
100.International Accounting Standards Board (2021b). MSR 16: Rzeczowe aktywa trwałe.
101.International Accounting Standards Board (2021c). MSR 19: Świadczenia pracownicze.
102.International Accounting Standards Board (2021d). MSR 21: Skutki zmian kursów wymiany walut obcych.
103.International Accounting Standards Board (2021e). MSR 36: Utrata wartości aktywów.
104.International Accounting Standards Board (2021f). MSR 38: Wartości niematerialne.
105.International Accounting Standards Board (2021g). MSR 40: Nieruchomości inwestycyjne.
106.International Accounting Standards Board (2021h). MSSF 6: Poszukiwanie i ocena zasobów mineralnych.
107.International Accounting Standards Board (2021i). MSSF 7: Instrumenty finansowe: ujawnianie informacji.
108.International Accounting Standards Board (2021j). MSSF 9: Instrumenty finansowe.
109.International Accounting Standards Board, & Financial Accounting Standards Board (2006). Information for Observers: Financial Statement Presentation, Agenda Paper 6C / FASB Memorandum 44C. https://www.ifrs.org/content/dam/ifrs/meetings/2006/october/jointiasbfasb/ financial-statement-presentation/ap6c-measurement.pdf.
110.International Accounting Standards Board, & Financial Accounting Standards Board (2009). Information for Observers: Financial Statement Presentation, Agenda Paper 17A / FASB Memorandum 63A. https://www.ifrs.org/content/dam/ifrs/meetings/2009/july/ joint-iasb-fasb-with-efrag/fsp0907b17aobs.pdf.
111.Jaki, A. (2008). Wycena i kształtowanie wartości przedsiębiorstwa. Wolters Kluwer.
112.Jarrett, J.E. (1974). Bias in Adjusting Asset Values for Changes in the Price Level: An Application of Estimation Theory. Journal of Accounting Research, 12(1), 63–66. https://doi. org/10.2307/2490527.
113.Kaplan Publishing (2020). ACCA Strategic Business Reporting (SBR): Study Text. Kaplan Publishing.
114.Karpac, D., & Bartosova, V. (2020). The Importance of Opportunity Costs in Financial Management in Connection to the Economic Profit. Proceedings of the Fifth International Conference on Economic and Business Management (FEBM 2020). https://doi. org/10.2991/aebmr.k.201211.058.
115.Kaya, D., & Pillhofer, J. (2013). Potential Adoption of IFRS by the United States: A Critical View. Accounting Horizons, 27, 271–299. https://doi.org/10.2308/acch-50423.
116.Keynes, J.M. (2018). The Definition of Income, Saving and Investment. W: The General Theory of Employment, Interest, and Money (s. 47–66). Springer International Publishing. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-70344-2_6.
117.Khan Academy (2022). Explicit and implicit costs and accounting and economic profit. https://www.khanacademy.org/economics-finance-domain/microeconomics/firmeconomic- profit/economic-profit-tutorial/a/explicit-and-implicit-costs-and-accounting- and-economic-profit-cnx.
118.Knies, C. (1876). Der Credit (wyd. 1). Weidmannsche Buchhandlung.
119.Komisja Europejska (2021a). Rozporządzenie Komisji (UE) 2021/2036 z dnia 19 listopada 2021 r. zmieniające rozporządzenie (WE) nr 1126/2008 przyjmujące określone międzynarodowe standardy rachunkowości zgodnie z rozporządzeniem (WE) nr 1606/2002 Parlamentu Europejskiego i Rady w odniesieniu do Międzynarodowego Standardu Sprawozdawczości Finansowej 17. https://eur-lex.europa.eu/legal-content/PL/TXT/PDF /?uri=CELEX:32021R2036&from=EN.
120.Komisja Europejska (2021b). Rozporządzenie Komisji (WE) nr 1126/2008 z dnia 3 listopada 2008 r. przyjmujące określone międzynarodowe standardy rachunkowości zgodnie z rozporządzeniem (WE) nr 1606/2002 Parlamentu Europejskiego i Rady [tekst jednolity według stanu na 01.01.2021 r.]. https://eur-lex.europa.eu/legal-content/PL/TXT/ PDF/?uri=CELEX:02008R1126-20210101&from=EN.
121.Kondratowicz-Pozorska, J. (2014). Przedsiębiorstwo jako podmiot ekonomiczny. W: G. Wolska & A. Bretyn (red.), Mikroekonomia. Pojęcia, przedmiot, ewolucja. Ćwiczenia i zadania. PWE.
122.le Manh, A. (2018). An Overview of the Legal Bases of Dividend Distribution in the European Union. https://www.anc.gouv.fr/files/live/sites/anc/files/contributed/ANC/3_Recherche/ B_Appels%20%C3%A0%20projets/2018/AnneLe-Manh_Rapport_Pan-euro_2018.pdf.
123.le Manh-Béna, A. (2009). Is Comprehensive Income Required by IAS 1 Relevant for Users? A Review of the Literature. https://shs.hal.science/halshs-00494511/document.
124.Lev, B., & Gu, F. (2016). The End of Accounting and the Path Forward for Investors and Managers. John Wiley & Sons, Inc. https://doi.org/10.1002/9781119270041.
125.Lev, B., & Zarowin, P. (1999). The Boundaries of Financial Reporting and How to Extend Them. Journal of Accounting Research, 37(2), 353–385. https://doi.org/10.2307/2491413.
126.Liberto, D. (2020.12.29). Economic Depreciation: Definition, Vs. Accounting Depreciation. https://www.investopedia.com/terms/e/economicdepreciation.asp.
127.Mankiw, N.G. (2008). Principles of Microeconomics (wyd. 5). South-Western Cengage Learning.
128.Marchewka, K. (2000). Główne nurty w teorii kapitału. Ruch Prawniczy, Ekonomiczny i Socjologiczny, nr 3, 105–120.
129.Marcinkowska, M. (2007). Ocena działalności instytucji finansowych. Difin.
130.Mathews, R. (1960). Inflation and Company Finance. The Accounting Review, 35(1), 8–18.
131.Mattessich, R. (2011). Two Hundred Years of Accounting Research: An International Survey of Personalities, Ideas and Publications (from the Beginning of the Nineteenth Century to the Beginning of the Twenty-first Century). Routledge.
132.Mattessich, R., & Küpper, H. (2003). Accounting Research in the German Language Area – First Half of the 20th Century. Review of Accounting and Finance, 2(3), 106–137. https:// doi.org/10.1108/eb027015.
133.Matuszak, Ł. (2012). Wycena a wiarygodność i porównywalność sprawozdania finansowego [Rozprawa doktorska, Uniwersytet Ekonomiczny w Poznaniu]. http://www.wbc.poznan. pl/Content/221563.
134.May, G.O. (1949). Business Income and Price Levels, an Accounting Study. American Institute of Accountants.
135.Mizikovsky, I.E., Druzhilovskaya, T.Y., Druzhilovskaya, E.S., Garina, E.P., & Romanovskaya, E.V. (2018). Accounting for Costs and Expenses: Problems of Theory and Practice. W: E. Popkova (red.), The Impact of Information on Modern Humans (s. 152– 162). Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-75383-6_20.
136.Mouck, T. (1995). Irving Fisher and the Mechanistic Character of Twentieth Century Accounting Thought. The Accounting Historians Journal, 22(2), 43–83.
137.Mućko, P. (2008). Koncepcja zmian w sprawozdawczości finansowej spółek publicznych. Wydawnictwo Naukowe Uniwersytetu Szczecińskiego.
138.Napier, C. (2013). Accounting and the Absence of a Business Economics Tradition in the United Kingdom. W: Y. Biondi & S. Zambon (red.), Accounting and Business Economics: Insights from National Traditions. Routledge.
139.Newberry, S. (2003). Reporting Performance: Comprehensive Income and its Components. Abacus, 39(3), 325–339. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-6281.2003.00136.x.
140.Nowak, E. (2009). Zaawansowana rachunkowość zarządcza. PWE.
141.Nowicki, D. (2016). Ekonomiczna wartość dodana w największych spółkach notowanych na Giełdzie Papierów Wartościowych w Warszawie. Studia Ekonomiczne. Zeszyty Naukowe Uniwersytetu Ekonomicznego w Katowicach, 282, 137–146.
142.Ohlson, J.A. (1995). Earnings, Book Values, and Dividends in Equity Valuation. Contemporary Accounting Research, 11(2), 661–687. https://doi.org/10.1111/J.1911-3846.1995.TB00461.X
143.Pacter, P.A. (1983). The Conceptual Framework: Make no Mystique about It. Journal of Accountancy, 156(1), 76–88.
144.Panfil, M., & Szablewski, A. (2016). Wycena przedsiębiorstwa. Od teorii do praktyki. Poltext.
145.Paton, W.A. (1922). Accounting theory, with special reference to the corporate enterprise (wyd. 1). Ronald Press.
146.Paton, W.A. (1938). Comments on ‘A Statement of Accounting Principles’. Journal of Accountancy, 196–207.
147.Paton, W.A., & Broad, S.J. (1936). Valuation of the Business Enterprise. The Accounting Review, 11(1), 26–35.
148.Paton, W.A., & Littleton, A.C. (1940). An Introduction to Corporate Accounting Standards. Monograph No. 3. American Accounting Association.
149.Poniatowska, L. (2013). Wpływ wyceny bilansowej na definiowanie i pomiar wyniku finansowego. Studia i Prace Kolegium Zarządzania i Finansów, 130, 113–130.
150.Previts, G.J., & Flesher, D.L. (2015). Financial Accounting and Reporting in the United States of America – 1820 to 2010: Toward Sunshine from Shadows. W: S. Jones (red.), The Routledge Companion to Financial Accounting Theory (wyd. 1). Routledge.
151.Previts, G.J., & Merino, B.D. (1998). History of Accountancy in the United States: The Cultural Significance of Accounting. Ohio State University Press.
152.Procházka, D. (2009). The Hicks’ Concept of Income and Its Relevancy for Accounting Purposes. European Financial and Accounting Journal, 4(1), 37–60. https://doi. org/10.18267/j.efaj.62.
153.Riahi-Belkaoui, A. (2004). Accounting Theory (wyd. 5). Thomson Learning.
154.Richard, J. (2005). The Concept of Fair Value in French and German Accounting Regulations from 1673 to 1914 and Its Consequences for the Interpretation of the Stages of Development of Capitalist Accounting. Critical Perspectives on Accounting, 16(6), 825–850. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cpa.2003.06.008.
155.Rybicka, K. (2013). Teorie bilansowe – aspekty teoretyczne. Studia i Prace Kolegium Zarządzania i Finansów/Szkoła Główna Handlowa, 130, 131–142.
156.Sajnóg, A. (2020). Wynik całkowity – jakość i użyteczność w procesie podejmowania decyzji inwestycyjnych. Wydawnictwo Uniwersytetu Łódzkiego.
157.Samelak, J. (2004a). Determinanty sprawozdawczości finansowej przedsiębiorstw oraz kierunki jej dalszego rozwoju. Wydawnictwo Akademii Ekonomicznej w Poznaniu.
158.Samelak, J. (2004b). Kierunki rozwoju modelu sprawozdania finansowego. Monitor Rachunkowości i Finansów, 9, 4–7.
159.Sanders, T.H., Hatfield, H.R., & Moore, U. (1938). Statement of Accounting Principles. American Institute of Accountants.
160.Schmalenbach, E. (1919). Grundlagen dynamischer Bilanzlehre. Zeitschrift für handelswissenschaftliche Forschung, 13.
161.Schmidt, F. (1921). Die organische Bilanz im Rahmen der Wirtschaft. C.A. Gloeckner Verlagsbuchhandlung.
162.Schroeder, R.G., Clark, M.W., & Cathey, J.M. (2013). Financial Accounting Theory and Analysis: Text and Cases (wyd. 11). Wiley.
163.Schumpeter, J.A. (1960). Teoria rozwoju gospodarczego, tłum. J. Grzywicka. PWN.
164.Scott, D. (1941). The Basis for Accounting Principles. The Accounting Review, 16(4), 341–349.
165.Sganzini, C. (1908). Die realistische Theorie der Doppelten Buchhaltung (The Realistic Theory of Double-Entry). Städtische Handelsakademie St. Gallen.
166.Skoczylas, W. (red.) (2009). Analiza sprawozdawczości finansowej przedsiębiorstwa. Stowarzyszenie Księgowych w Polsce.
167.Skoczylas, W. (2013). Wskaźniki i systemy wskaźników ekonomicznych w pomiarze dokonań przedsiębiorstw. Wydawnictwo Naukowe Uniwersytetu Szczecińskiego
168.Sloan, R.G. (1996). Do Stock Prices Fully Reflect Information in Accruals and Cash Flows about Future Earnings? The Accounting Review, 71(3), 289–315.
169.Smith, A. (2013). Badania nad naturą i przyczynami bogactwa narodów, tłum. S. Wolff, O. Einfeld, Z. Sadowski (wyd. 2). Wydawnictwo Naukowe PWN.
170.Solomons, D. (1961). Economic and Accounting Concepts of Income. The Accounting Review, 36(3), 374–383.
171.Solomons, D. (1995). Criteria for Choosing an Accounting Model. Accounting Horizons, 9(1), 42–51.
172.Song, X., & Trimble, M. (2022). The Historical and Current Status of Global IFRS Adoption: Obstacles and Opportunities for Researchers. The International Journal of Accounting (TIJA), 57(02), 1–37. https://doi.org/10.1142/S1094406022500019.
173.Sprague, C.E. (1880). The Algebra of Accounts. Book-Keeper.
174.Sprouse, R.T., & Moonitz, M. (1962). A Tentative Set of Broad Accounting Principles for Business Enterprises. Association of International Certified Professional Accountants.
175.Staszkiewicz, P. (2020). Instrumenty finansowe – czy taki diabeł straszny? Cz. 2. https://www. rsmpoland.pl/pl/blog/audyt-i-ksiegowosc/instrumenty-finansowe-czy-taki-diabelstraszny- cz-2.
176.Sterling, R.R. (1970). Theory of the Measurement of Enterprise Income. University Press of Kansas.
177.Storey, R.K. (1981). Conditions Necessary for Developing a Conceptual Framework. Financial Analysts Journal, 37(3), 51–58.
178.Sysiak, A. (2020). Instrumenty finansowe – czy taki diabeł straszny? Cz. 3. https://www.rsm poland.pl/pl/blog/audyt-i-ksiegowosc/instrumenty-finansowe-czy-taki-diabel-strasznycz- 3.
179.Szablewski, A. (red.) (2000). Strategie wzrostu wartości firmy. Poltext.
180.Szablewski, A., & Tuzimek, R. (red.) (2004). Wycena i zarządzanie wartością firmy. Poltext.
181.Szychta, A. (2010). Pomiar i prezentowanie wyniku całościowego spółki kapitałowej w sprawozdaniu finansowym. Zeszyty Teoretyczne Rachunkowości, 59(115), 117–142.
182.Szychta, A. (2011). Wynik całościowy w sprawozdaniach finansowych spółek publicznych. W: I. Sobańska & M. Turzyński (red.), Rachunkowość, audyt i kontrola w zarządzaniu. Wydawnictwo Uniwersytetu Łódzkiego.
183.Tkocz-Wolny, K. (2016). Wycena bilansowa środków trwałych i jej wpływ na wynik finansowy. Studia Ekonomiczne / Uniwersytet Ekonomiczny w Katowicach, 253, 129–139. Tuovila, A. (2022). Economic Profit (or Loss): Definition, Formula, and Example. https:// www.investopedia.com/terms/e/economicprofit.asp.
184.Turyna, J. (2005). Rachunkowość finansowa. C.H. Beck.
185.van Cauwenberge, P., & de Beelde, I. (2007). Critical Note on Empirical Comprehensive Income Research. https://www.researchgate.net/publication/24125966_A_Critical_Note_ on_Empirical_Comprehensive_Income_Research.
186.von Böhm-Bawerk, E. (1924a). Kapitał i zysk z kapitału (cz. I). Biblioteka Wyższej Szkoły Handlowej.
187.von Böhm-Bawerk, E. (1924b). Kapitał i zysk z kapitału (cz. II). Biblioteka Wyższej Szkoły Handlowej.
188.von Wilmowski, B. (1895). Die Abschreibung für Abnutzung von Gebäuden, Maschinen, Betriebsgerätschaften u.s.w. (The Depreciation for the Usage of Buildings, Machines, Implements, etc.). Verwaltungsarchiv – Zeitschrift für Verwaltungsrecht und Verwaltungsgerichtsbarkeit, 3.
189.von Wilmowski, B. (1896). Das Preußische Einkommensteuergesetz. T.U. Rern’s Verlag.
190.Walińska, E. (2012). Wynik całościowy w sprawozdaniu finansowym: jak go zrozumieć? Przegląd Organizacji, 12, 38–42.
191.Whittington, G. (2008). What the ‘Old Guys’ Can Tell Us: Edwards and Bell’s “The Theory and Measurement of Business Income”. Accounting, Finance, & Governance Review, 15(1), 73–84.
192.Wójtowicz, P. (2010). Wiarygodność sprawozdań finansowych wobec aktywnego kształtowania wyniku finansowego. Wydawnictwo Uniwersytetu Ekonomicznego w Krakowie.
193.Yen, A.C., Hirst, D.E., & Hopkins, P.E. (2007). A Content Analysis of the Comprehensive Income Exposure Draft Comment Letters. Research in Accounting Regulation, 19(C), 53–79. https://doi.org/10.1016/S1052-0457(06)19003-7.
194.Zagóra-Jonszta, U. (2015). Teoria rozwoju gospodarczego i „twórczej destrukcji” Schumpetera oraz jej aktualność. Optimum. Studia Ekonomiczne, 3(75), 20–31. https://doi. org/10.15290/ose.2015.03.75.02.
195.Zaratiegui, J.M. (2002). What Does Profit Mean for Alfred Marshall? International Journal of Applied Economics and Econometrics, 10(3), 381–402.
196.Zarzecki, D. (1999). Metody wyceny przedsiębiorstw. Fundacja Rozwoju Rachunkowości w Polsce.
197.Zeff, S. (1999). Evolution of the Conceptual Framework for Business Enterprises in the United States. Accounting Historians Journal, 26(2), 89–131.
198.Zeff, S. (2000). John B. Canning: A View of His Academic Career. Abacus, 36(1), 4–39.
199.Zweig, P.L., & Foust, D. (1997). Corporate America Is Fed Up With FASB. Bloomberg Businessweek, 108–110.