Studia Językoznawcze

synchroniczne i diachroniczne aspekty badań polszczyzny


ISSN: 1730-4180     eISSN: 2353-3161    OAI    DOI: 10.18276/sj.2024.23-09
CC BY-SA   Open Access   ERIH PLUS

Issue archive / t. 23, 2024
Representations of power in the Polish press discourse (1944-1991). A social semiotic analysis

Authors: Anna Łazuka-Banach ORCID
Uniwersytet Szczeciński
Keywords: visual social semiotics power press discourse
Whole issue publication date:2024
Page range:34 (127-160)
Cited-by (Crossref) ?:

Abstract

The aim of this paper is to analyse and interpret the ways in which the au-thorities were represented on the front pages of three Polish dailies published between 1944 and 1991. The author examines the kinds of semiotic re-sources used in the representations in question. The paper also discusses the meaning potential of the identified resources alongside the possible effects such representations might have had, as well as the relationship between them and the ongoing political situation. The time period this paper takes in-terest in is that from 1944 to 1991, which marks a number of defining mo-ments in Polish history, as well as the period of communism and the break-through period of political transformation. The three daily newspapers which served as research data are Trybuna Ludu [People’s Tribune], published from 1948 to 1990, the official voice of the communist authorities, Trybuna [Tribune], created in place of Trybuna Ludu in 1990 as its ideological and institutional successor, and Gazeta Wyborcza [Electoral Newspaper], found-ed in 1989 to disseminate the views of the opposition. The analysis involved examining the images primarily in terms of representational and interactive meaning, as well as some aspects of compositional meaning as described by Kress and Van Leeuwen in their grammar of visual design. The findings suggest changes in the types of depictions, involving for example, reducing distance, changed modality and a greater social relationship established symbolically between the represented – those in power, and the viewer.
Download file

Article file

Bibliography

1.Billig Michael. ,,Stacking the cards of ideology: the history of the Sun Souvenir Royal Album”. Discourse & Society, 1(1) (1990), 17–37.
2.Billig Michael. Ideologies and Beliefs. London: Sage, 1991.
3.Blommaert Jan. Discourse. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2005.
4.Coupland Nikolas, Jaworski Adam. ,,Discourse”. W: The Routledge Companion to Se-miotics and Linguistics, red. Paul Cobley. London: Routledge, 2001, 134–48.
5.Czubiński Antoni. Historia Polski XX Wieku. Poznań: Wydawnictwo Poznańskie, 2003.
6.EastWest Institute. Available at: https://www.eastwest.ngo/info/about (accessed: 19.09.2023).
7.El Refaie Elisabeth. ,,Understanding Visual Metaphor: The Example of Newspaper Car-toons”. Visual Communication, 2(1) (2003), 75–95.
8.El Refaie Elisabeth. ,,Metaphor in Political Cartoons: Exploring Audience Responses”. W: Multimodal Metaphor, red. Charles J. Forceville, Eduardo Urios-Aparisi. Berlin: De Gruyter, 2009, 173–96.
9.Fairclough Norman. Discourse and Social Change. Cambridge: Polity Press, 1992.
10.Fowler Roger. Language in the news. Discourse and Ideology in the Press. London: Routledge, 1991.
11.Gibney Frank B. ‘Nikita Krushchev’, Encyclopaedia Britannica. Available at: https:// www.britannica.com/biography/Nikita-Sergeyevich-Khrushchev (accessed: 19.09.2023).
12.Giorgi Liana. The Post-Socialist Media: What Power the West? The Changing Media Landscape in Poland, Hungary, and the Czech Republic. Aldershot: Avebury, 1995.
13.Hodge Bob, Kress Gunther. Social Semiotics. Cambridge: Polity Press, 1988.
14.Holly Michael Ann. Past Looking: Historical Imagination and the Rhetoric of the Im-age. Ithaca, NY: Cornell University Press, 1996.
15.Holsanova Jana, Rahm Henrik, Holmqvist Kenneth. ,,Entry Points and Reading Paths on Newspaper Spreads: Comparing a Semiotic Analysis with Eye-Tracking Mesure-ments”. Visual Communication, 5(1) (2006), 65–93.
16.Jewitt Carey (red.). The Routledge Handbook of Multimodal Analysis. London: Routledge, 2009.
17.Jewitt Carey, Oyama Rumiko. ,,Visual Meaning: A Social Semiotic Approach”. W: Handbook of Visual Analysis, red. Theo Van Leeuwen, Carey Jewitt. London: Sage, 2001, 134–56.
18.Kress Gunther, Van Leeuwen Theo. Reading Images. The Grammar of Visual Design. London: Routledge, 1996.
19.Kress Gunther, Van Leeuwen Theo. ,,Front Pages: (The Critical) Analysis of Newspaper Layout”. W: Approaches to Media Discourse, red. Allan Bell, Peter Garrett. Malden, MA: Blackwell Publishing, 1998, 186-219.
20.Kress Gunther, Van Leeuwen Theo. Reading Images. The Grammar of Visual Design. London: Routledge, 2006.
21.Kruk Sergei. ,,Semiotics of Visual Iconicity in Leninist ‘Monumental’ Propaganda”. Visual Communication, 7(1) (2008), 27–56.
22.Lemke Jay L. Textual Politics. Discourse and Social Dynamics. Wyd. I. Abingdon: Taylor & Francis, 1995.
23.Lester Paul M. Visual Communication. Images with Messages. Wyd. III. Belmont, CA: Thomson Wadsworth, 2003.
24.Machin David. ,,Visual Discourses of War. Multimodal Analysis of Photographs of the Iraq Occupation”. W: Discourse, War and Terrorism, red. Adam Hodges, Chad Nilep. Amsterdam/Philadelphia: John Benjamins Publishing Company, 2007a, 123–42.
25.Machin David. Introduction to Multimodal Analysis. London: Hodder Arnold, 2007b.
26.Nickel Douglas R. ,,Impressed by nature’s hand’: photography and authorship”. W: Us-ing Visual Evidence, red. Richard Howells, Robert W. Matson. Maidenhead, Berkshire: Open University Press, 2009, 43–54.
27.Pinar Sanz Maria J. ,,Decoding Meaning in Political Cartoons”. W: From Language to Multimodality. New Developments in the Study of Ideational Meaning, red. Carys Jones, Eija Ventola. London Oakville: Equinox Publishing, 2008, 313–34.
28.Rose Gillian. Visual Methodologies: An Introduction to the Interpretation of Visual Materials. London: Sage, 2007.
29.Scollon Ron, Scollon Suzie W. Discourses in Place. London: Routledge, 2003.
30.Van Dijk Teun A. Ideology: A Multidisciplinary Approach. London: Sage, 1998.
31.Van Leeuwen Theo. ,,Semiotics and Iconography”. W: Handbook of Visual Analysis, red. Theo Van Leeuwen, Carey Jewitt. London: Sage, 2001, 92–118.
32.Van Leeuwen Theo. Introducing Social Semiotics. London: Routledge, 2005.
33.Van Leeuwen Theo. Discourse and Practice: New Tools for Critical Discourse Analysis. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2008.
34.Ventola Eija. ,,Semiotic Spanning at Conferences; Cohesion and Coherence in and across Conference Papers and Their Discussions”. W: Coherence in Spoken and Written Discourse. How to Create It and How to Transcribe It, red. Wolfram Bublitz et al. Ams-terdam/Philadelphia: John Benjamins, 1999, 101–25.