Skip to content
Analiza i Egzystencja
50 (2020)
OpenAlex

Data describes this article or chapter.

Record found in the database

Citations
0
References
1

Data retrieved:

View source (new tab)

For the whole journal, according to OpenAlex.

Citations
215
Publications
300
H-index
6
I10-index
2
Mean citedness (2 years)
0.14
Citations received by year
Journal citation chart. Exact values are available in the table below. 2017: 1 2018: 12 2019: 6 2020: 14 2021: 25 2022: 23 2023: 19 2024: 39 2025: 40 2026: 34 2017 2026
Show data table
Citations received by year
YearPublicationsCitations
2017251
20182312
2019236
20202014
20212125
20222623
20232519
20242639
20252540
20262034

Data retrieved:

What do these numbers mean?

Publications and citations cover records linked to this journal in OpenAlex. H-index is the largest number h of publications with at least h citations each. I10-index counts publications cited at least 10 times. The chart shows citations received in each year; the current year is incomplete. Coverage may differ from WNUS and other services.

The 2-year mean is an OpenAlex metric. It is not the Clarivate Journal Impact Factor.

View in OpenAlex (new tab)
OpenCitations

Data describes this article or chapter.

Citations
0

Data retrieved:

View source (new tab)
DOAJ

Data describes this article or chapter.

Record found in the database

Data retrieved:

View source (new tab)
Google Scholar

Holobionts, Symbiosis and New Narratives for the Troubled Times of Donna Haraway’s Chthulucene

DOI: 10.18276/aie.2020.50-05
Cite

The full text is available

Abstract

The aim of the article is to discuss the basic assumptions, theses and solutions of Donna Haraway’s book “Staying with the Trouble: Making Kin in the Chthulucene”. The authoress places the considerations of an American philosopher and biologist against the background of her earlier books and conceptual proposals. She analyses her suggestion of using the category of Chthulucene instead of Anthropocene, the category of sympoietic system instead of an autopoietic one, she presents her appeal for creating new forms of kinship and extensive response-ability for each other.
Preview PDF

Open PDF

Bibliography

  1. Bińczyk, E. (2019). The most unique discussion of the 21st century? The debate on the Anthropocene pictured in seven points. The Anthropocene Review. 1-16. DOI: 10.1177/2053019619848215.
  2. Gilbert, S. F., Sapp, J., Tauber, A. (2012). A symbiotic view of life: We have never been individuals. The Quarterly Review of Biology, 87(4), 325–341.
  3. Haraway, D. (1988). Situated Knowledges: The Science Question in Feminism and the Privilege of Partial Perspective. Feminist Studies, 14 (3), 575-599.
  4. Haraway, D. (1994). A game of cat’s cradle: Science studies, feminist theory, cultural studies. Configurations, 1, 59–71.
  5. Haraway, D. (2003). The companion species manifesto: Dogs, people, and significant otherness. Chicago, IL: Prickly Paradigm Press.
  6. Haraway, D. (2016). Staying with the Trouble: Making Kin in the Chthulucene. Durham, UK: Duke University Press.
  7. Hustak, C., Myers, N. (2012). Involutionary momentum. Differences, 23(3), 74–118.
  8. Latour, B. (1993). We have never been modern. Study of symmetric anthropology. (C. Porter, transl.). Cambridge, Mass.: Harvard University Press.
  9. Stengers, I. (2010). Cosmopolitics I. (R. Bononno, transl.). Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press.