Skip to content
Analiza i Egzystencja
53 (2021)
OpenAlex

For the whole journal, according to OpenAlex.

Citations
237
Publications
481
H-index
6
I10-index
2
Mean citedness (2 years)
0.17
Citations received by year
Journal citation chart. Exact values are available in the table below. 2017: 4 2018: 13 2019: 12 2020: 17 2021: 27 2022: 31 2023: 31 2024: 33 2025: 36 2026: 19 2017 2026
Show data table
Citations received by year
YearPublicationsCitations
2017254
20182313
20192312
20202017
20212127
20222631
20232531
20242633
20252536
20262019

Data retrieved:

What do these numbers mean?

Publications and citations cover records linked to this journal in OpenAlex. H-index is the largest number h of publications with at least h citations each. I10-index counts publications cited at least 10 times. The chart shows citations received in each year; the current year is incomplete. Coverage may differ from WNUS and other services.

The 2-year mean is an OpenAlex metric. It is not the Clarivate Journal Impact Factor.

View in OpenAlex (new tab)
Google Scholar

Policzalność i niepoliczalność sprawiedliwości dystrybucyjnej w kontekście medycznym i pandemicznym


(Calculability and incalculability of distributive justice in the medical and pandemic context)
DOI: 10.18276/aie.2021.53-05
Cite

The full text is available

Abstract

This text first deals with the concept of distributive justice in general, and in the last section we devote more attention to the problem of equitable distribution of medical services, especially the distribution of Covid-19 vaccines in the current pandemic context. The presented position is neither deontological, nor utilitarian, nor rationalist, nor intuitionist, nor liberal, nor communitarian, and it probably does not fall under any “ism” at all. It arises from reflection on what in the distribution system of any goods, in particular medical services, including vaccines, can and should be countable and calculated, and what cannot. It generally refers to various positions in contemporary ethics and moral debates, but is inspired primarily by the thoughts of authors not obvious in this context, such as Levinas and Ricoeur, and especially Derrida, the quotation from which is the motto of all the considerations contained here.
Preview PDF

Open PDF

Bibliography (14)
  1. Derrida J. (1994), Force de loi. Le fondement „mystique” de l'autorité, Galilée, Paris.
  2. Derrida J. et alters (1985), La faculté de juger, Edition de Minuit, Paris.
  3. Flanagan O. i Jackson K. (1987), „Justice, Care, and Gender: The Kohlberg-Gilligan
  4. Debate Revisited”, Ethics 97 (1987), no. 3 (April).
  5. Gilligan C. (1982), Psychological Theory and Women's Development, Harvard University Press (Innym głosem. Teoria psychologiczna a rozwój kobiet, przeł. B. Szelewa, Wydawnictwo Krytyki Politycznej, Warszawa 2015).
  6. Levinas E. (1998), Całość i nieskończoność. Esej o zewnętrzności, przeł. M. Kowalska, PWN, Warszawa.
  7. Levinas E. (2000), Inaczej niż być lub ponad istotą, przeł. P. Mrówczyński, Fundacja Aletheia, Warszawa.
  8. Levinas E. (1994), O Bogu, który nawiedza myśl, przeł. M. Kowalska, Wydawnictwo Znak, Kraków.
  9. Noddings N. (1984), Caring: A Feminine Approach to Ethics and Moral Education. Berkeley: University of California Press.
  10. Rawls J. (2010), Teoria sprawiedliwości, przeł. M. Panufnik, J. Pasek, A. Romaniuk, PWN, Warszawa.
  11. Ricoeur P. (2005), O sobie samym jako innym, przeł. B. Chełstowski, PWN, Warszawa.
  12. Ricoeur P. (1995), Le juste, Editions Esprit, Paris.
  13. Ricoeur, P. (2010), Miłość i sprawiedliwość, przeł. M. Drwięga, Universitas, Kraków.
  14. Narodowy Program Szczepień, https://www.gov.pl/web/szczepimysie/narodowy-program-szczepien-przeciw-covid-19.