Skip to content
Analiza i Egzystencja
62 (2023)
OpenAlex

For the whole journal, according to OpenAlex.

Citations
196
Publications
300
H-index
6
I10-index
2
Mean citedness (2 years)
0.14
Citations received by year
Journal citation chart. Exact values are available in the table below. 2017: 0 2018: 12 2019: 6 2020: 13 2021: 25 2022: 23 2023: 16 2024: 33 2025: 36 2026: 30 2017 2026
Show data table
Citations received by year
YearPublicationsCitations
2017250
20182312
2019236
20202013
20212125
20222623
20232516
20242633
20252536
20262030

Data retrieved:

What do these numbers mean?

Publications and citations cover records linked to this journal in OpenAlex. H-index is the largest number h of publications with at least h citations each. I10-index counts publications cited at least 10 times. The chart shows citations received in each year; the current year is incomplete. Coverage may differ from WNUS and other services.

The 2-year mean is an OpenAlex metric. It is not the Clarivate Journal Impact Factor.

View in OpenAlex (new tab)
Google Scholar
Find in Google Scholar (new tab)

Imago Dei in St. Thomas Aquinas: a philosophical and anthropological analysis of man created in the Image of God

DOI: 10.18276/aie.2023.62-03
Cite

The full text is available

ISSN:1734-9923
eISSN:2300-7621
Authors: Wojciech Kilan ORCID
Uniwersytet Wrocławski, Instytut Filozofii
Keywords: image imago Dei human Thomas Aquinas
Issue / book publication date:2023
Page range:18 (65-82)
OAI-PMH:Metadata
CC BY-SA Open Access DOAJ ERIH PLUS Scopus Diamond Discovery Hub
QR code

Abstract

Image as a philosophical concept has a long and complex history that begins as early as antiquity. Christian scholars included it in their philosophical studies in the form of imago Dei. In this paper, the author analysed the works of St. Thomas Aquinas to determine the anthropological consequences that follow from the idea of human creation in the image of God. It was first established that man as a being created in the image of God participates through his intellect in God’s nature. Moreover, three stages of human participation in God were presented. Subsequently, the author defended the classical theory of Aquinas against contemporary reinterpretation of his thought. It was argued that Aquinas rightly claims that only the intellectual part of the human soul is, strictly speaking, created in God’s Image, while the human body (and other irrational creatures) resembles God in the likeness of a trace.

PDF

Download PDF
Preview PDF

Open PDF

Bibliography (37)
  1. Aguas, J. J. S. (2009). The notions of the human person and human dignity in Aquinas and Wojtyla. Kritike: An Online Journal of Philosophy, 3(1), 40–60. https://doi.org/10.25138/3.1.a.4.
  2. Aquinas, T. S. (1895). Summa theologiae. Textum Leoninum.
  3. Aquinas, T. S. (1933). Scriptum super Sententiis Magistri Petri Lombardi. Vol. III. (R. P. Maria Fabianus Moos, Ed.). P. Lethielleux.
  4. Aquinas, T. S. (1970). Quaestiones disputatae de veritate. (R. Busa, Trans.) (Leonine, Vol. 22). The Aquinas Institute.
  5. Aquinas, T. S. (1971). In duodecim libros metaphysicorum Aristotelis expositio (M. R. Cathala, & R.M. Spiazzi., Eds.). Marietti.
  6. Aquinas, T. S. (1992). Expositio libri Boetii de Ebdomadibus. The Aquinas Institute.
  7. Aquinas, T. S. (2012). Summa theologiae. The Aquinas Institute.
  8. Augustinus, S. (1887). On the Trinity (A. W. Haddan, Trans.). In Philip Schaff (Ed.), Nicene and post-Nicene fathers (Vol. 3, pp. 1–228). The Christian Literature Company.
  9. Augustinus, S. (1975). De diversis quaestionibus octoginta tribus (Almut Mutzenbecher, Ed.). Brepols.
  10. Augustinus, S. (1982). Eighty-three different questions (D. L. Mosher, Trans.). Catholic Univ. of America Press.
  11. Augustinus, S. (1996). O Trójcy Świętej (M. Stokowska, Trans.). Znak.
  12. Boyd, C. A. (2007). Participation metaphysics, the imago Dei, and the natural law in Aquinas’s ethics. New Blackfriars, 88, 274–287. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1741- 2005.2007.00149.x.
  13. Bray, G. (1991). The significance of God’s image in Man. Tyndale Bulletin, 44(2), 195–225. https://doi.org/10.53751/001c.30514.
  14. Brown, M. (2014). Imago Dei in Thomas Aquinas. The Saint Anselm Journal, 10(1), 1–11.
  15. Bujak, J. (2010). Imago Dei jako źródło godności człowieka i wartości jego cielesności. Studia Koszalińsko-Kołobrzeskie, 15, 35–45.
  16. Clines, D. J. A. (1968). The image of God in Man. Tyndale Bulletin, 19(1), 53–103. https://doi.org/10.53751/001c.30671.
  17. Dziewulski, G. (2010). Epifanijny charakter tożsamości człowieka i jego znaczenie dla obecności Kościoła w społeczeństwie (po)nowoczesnym. Rocznik Teologii Katolickiej, 10, 48–66.
  18. Eitenmiller, M. (2017). Grace as participation according to St. Thomas Aquinas. New Blackfriars, 98, 689–708. https://doi.org/10.1111/nbfr.12154.
  19. Fabro, C., & Bonansea, B. M. (1974). The intensive hermeneutics of Thomistic philosophy: The notion of participation. The Review of Metaphysics, 27(3), 449–491. http://www.jstor.org/stable/20126484.
  20. Irenaeus, S. (1857). Adversus haereses: Libri quinque. Cambridge University Press.
  21. Jiang, L. (2018). Person and freedom in Thomas Aquinas’s philosophy. Divus Thomas, 121(3), 359–364. https://www.jstor.org/stable/48515188.
  22. Kupczak, J. (2015). Trynitarny wymiar teologii Imago Dei. Różne możliwości interpretacji. In A. Baron, J. Kupczak, & J. D. Szczurek (Eds.), Rozwój dogmatu trynitarnego. Perspektywa historioznawcza (pp. 269–299). Wydawnictwo Naukowe Uniwersytetu Papieskiego Jana Pawła II.
  23. McFarland, I. A. (2001). When time is of the essence: Aquinas and the “imago Dei.” New Blackfriars, 82, 208– 223. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1741-2005.2001. tb06476.x.
  24. O’Neill, S. J. (2018). Why the imago Dei is in the intellect alone: A criticism of a phenomenology of sensible experience for attaining an image of God. The Saint Anselm Journal, 13(2), 19–41.
  25. Peterson, R. S. (2016). The imago Dei as human identity: A theological interpretation. Eisenbrauns.
  26. Plato. (1921). Sophist (H. N. Fowler, Trans.). In E. Capps, T. E. Page, & W. H. Rouse (Eds.), Plato II (pp. 259–459). The Loeb Classical Library: William Heinemann.
  27. Plato. (1888). Tτίμαιος-Timaeus (R. D. Archer-Hind, Trans & Ed.). Macmillan & Co.
  28. Plotinus. (1980). Enneads (A. H. Armstrong, Trans.). Harvard University Press.
  29. Schoot, H. J. M. (2020). Thomas Aquinas on human beings as image of God. European Journal for the Study of Thomas Aquinas, 38, 33–46. https://doi. org/10.2478/ejsta-2020-0003.
  30. Spencer, M. K. (2018). Perceiving the image of God in the whole human person. The Saint Anselm Journal, 13(2), 1–18.
  31. Tertullian. (1894). De baptismo liber. Aemilii Kroymann.
  32. Waldron, J. (2012). The Image of God: rights, reason, and order. In J. Witte Jr, & F. S. Alexander (Eds.), Christianity and human rights: An introduction (pp. 216–235). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
  33. Vainio, O.-P. (2019). Imago Dei and Human Rationality. Zygon 49, 121–134. https:// doi.org/10.1111/zygo.12065.
  34. Van Nieuwenhove, R. (2001). In the image of God: The Trinitarian anthropology of St Bonaventure, St Thomas Aquinas, and the blessed Jan Van Ruusbroec. Irish Theological Quarterly, 66, 109–123. https://doi.org/10.1177/002114000106600203.
  35. The New American Bible: IntraText. (n.d.). https://www.vatican.va/archive/ ENG0839/__P3.HTM.
  36. John Paul II, S. (1979). Man becomes the image of God by communion of persons. Papal address to general audience. Retrieved April 15, 2022, from https://www. ewtn.com/catholicism/library/man-becomes-the-image-of-god-by-communionof- persons-8554.
  37. International Theological Commission. (2004). Communion, and stewardship: Human persons created in the image of God. Retrieved April 15, 2022, from https://www.vatican.va/roman_curia/congregations/cfaith/cti_documents/ rc_con_cfaith_doc_20040723_communion-stewardship_en.html.