Skip to content
Analiza i Egzystencja
64 (2023)
OpenAlex

Data describes this article or chapter.

Record found in the database

Citations
0
References
26

Data retrieved:

View source (new tab)

For the whole journal, according to OpenAlex.

Citations
215
Publications
300
H-index
6
I10-index
2
Mean citedness (2 years)
0.14
Citations received by year
Journal citation chart. Exact values are available in the table below. 2017: 1 2018: 12 2019: 6 2020: 14 2021: 25 2022: 23 2023: 19 2024: 39 2025: 40 2026: 34 2017 2026
Show data table
Citations received by year
YearPublicationsCitations
2017251
20182312
2019236
20202014
20212125
20222623
20232519
20242639
20252540
20262034

Data retrieved:

What do these numbers mean?

Publications and citations cover records linked to this journal in OpenAlex. H-index is the largest number h of publications with at least h citations each. I10-index counts publications cited at least 10 times. The chart shows citations received in each year; the current year is incomplete. Coverage may differ from WNUS and other services.

The 2-year mean is an OpenAlex metric. It is not the Clarivate Journal Impact Factor.

View in OpenAlex (new tab)
OpenCitations

Data describes this article or chapter.

Citations
0

Data retrieved:

View source (new tab)
DOAJ

Data describes this article or chapter.

Record found in the database

Data retrieved:

View source (new tab)
Google Scholar

Emocje epistemiczne – czym są i czy przysługują wyłącznie ludziom?


(Epistemic emotions - what are they and are they exclusive to humans?)
DOI: 10.18276/aie.2023.64-01
Cite

The full text is available

Abstract

In general, epistemic emotions can be characterized as emotions that concern the subject's own states and mental processes and are associated with cognition and knowledge acquisition. They are the result of a cognitive inconsistency that may appear as a consequence of unexpected information that contradicts previous knowledge. They have a significant impact on the exploration and generation of knowledge about oneself and the world, as well as on conceptual changes and cognitive efficiency. There is no interspecies comparative perspective in experimental studies on epistemic emotions. At first glance, this situation is not controversial, because the category of epistemic emotions has been defined in such a way that it seems to belong only to people. Inconsistencies arise when comparative research in the field of cognitive ethology, primatology or comparative psychology is analyzed. Researchers point to a number of behaviors of nonhuman animals that prove that they have a wide range of emotions - including those that stand out in the catalog of epistemic emotions, i.e. surprise, curiosity or uncertainty. The presented article is an attempt to answer the questions posed in the title and an introduction to research on an adequate model of epistemic emotions, taking into account the results of research in the above-mentioned areas.
Preview PDF

Open PDF

Bibliography (57)
  1. An, D. (2022), Appreciation as an Epistemic Emotion. Ethical Theory and Moral Practice, 1–16. HTTPS://DOI.ORG/10.1007/s10677-021-10265-6.
  2. Andrews, K., Beck, J. (Red.) (2017). The Routledge Handbook of Philosophy of Animal Minds. New York: Routledge.
  3. Arango-Muñoz, S., Michaelian, K. (2014). Epistemic feelings, epistemic emotions: Review and introduction to the focus section. Philosophical Inquiries, 2, 97–122.
  4. Arango-Muñoz, S. (2014). The nature of epistemic feelings. Philosophical Psychology, 27 (2), 193–211. HTTPS://DOI.ORG/10.1080/09515089.2012.732002.
  5. Barto, A., Mirolli, M., Baldassarre, G. (2013). Novelty or Surprise?, Frontiers in Psychology, 4, 907. HTTPS://DOI.ORG/10.3389/fpsyg.2013.00907.
  6. Bekoff, M. (2007). The Emotional Lives of Animals: A Leading Scientist Explores Animal Joy, Sorrow, and Empathy and Why They Matter. Novato: New World Library.
  7. Beran, M., Perdue, B., Church, B., Smith, J. D. (2016). Capuchin monkeys (Cebus apella) modulate their use of an uncertainty response depending on risk. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Animal Learning and Cognition, 42, 32–43. HTTPS://DOI.ORG/10.1037/xan0000080.
  8. Bermúdez, J. L. (2006). Animal reasoning and proto-logic. W: S. Hurley, M. Nudds (red.), „Rational Animals?”(127–138). New York: Oxford University Press.
  9. Bermúdez, J. L. (2003). Thinking Without Words. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
  10. Bermúdez, J. L. (2003/1995). Nonconceptual Content: From Perceptual Experience to Subpersonal Computational States. W: Y. H. Gunther (red.) „Essays on Nonconceptual Content” (333–369). Cambridge: MIT Press.
  11. Bermúdez, J. L. (2002). Rationality and Psychological Explanation Without Language. W: J. L. Bermúdez, A. Millar (red.) „Reason and Nature” (233–264). Oxford: Clarendon Press.
  12. Byrne, R. W. (2013). Animal Curiosity. Current Biology, 23, 469–470. HTTPS://DOI.ORG/10.1016/j.cub.2013.02.058.
  13. Candiotto, L. (2019). Epistemic Emotions: The case of Wonder. Journal of Philosophy Aurora, 31, 54, 848–863. HTTPS://DOI.ORG/10.7213/1980-5934.31.054.DS11.
  14. Carruthers, P. (2017). Are epistemic emotions metacognitive? Philosophical psychology, 3, 1-2, 58–78. HTTPS://DOI.ORG/10.1080/09515089.2016.1262536.
  15. Carruthers, P. (2005). Consciousness: Essays from a Higher-Order Perspective. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
  16. Carruthers, P. (1998). Animal Subjectivity. Psyche 4: http://journalpsyche.org/files/0xaa52.pdf.
  17. Courville, A. C., Daw, N. D., Touretzky, D. S. (2006). Bayesian theories of conditioning in a changing world. Trends in Cognitive Sciences, 10, 7, 294–300. HTTPS://DOI.ORG/10.1016/j.tics.2006.05.004.
  18. de Sousa, R. (2009). Epistemic Feelings. Mind and Matter, 7, 2, 139–161.
  19. de Waal, F. (2019). Mama's Last Hug: Animal Emotions and What They Tell Us about Ourselves. New York: W. W. Norton & Company.
  20. de Waal, F. (2017). Are We Smart Enough to Know How Smart Animals Are? New York: W. W. Norton & Company.
  21. Davidson, D. (2004/2001). What Thought Requires. W: „Problems of Rationality” (135–149). Oxford: Clarendon Press.
  22. Davidson, D. (1982). Rational Animals. Dialectica, 36, 4, 317–327.
  23. Dummett, M. (1993). The Origins of Analytical Philosophy. London: Duckworth.
  24. Dunlosky, J., Metcalfe, J. (2009). Metacognition. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
  25. Gigerenzer, G. (2015). Simply rational. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
  26. Gopnik, A. (1998). Explanation as orgasm. Minds and Machines, 8, 101–118. HTTPS://DOI.ORG/10.1023/A:1008290415597.
  27. Gut, A. (2009). O relacji między myślą a językiem. Lublin: Towarzystwo Naukowe KUL.
  28. Hookway, C. (2008). Epistemic Immediacy, Doubt and Anxiety: on the Role of Emotions in Epistemic Evaluation. W: G. Brun, U. Doğuoğlu and D. Kuenzle, Aldershot (red.), „Epistemology and Emotions” (51–66), New York: Routledge.
  29. Hookway, C. (2003). Affective States and Epistemic Immediacy. Metaphilosophy, 34, 1-2, 78–96. HTTPS://DOI.ORG/10.1111/1467-9973.00261.
  30. Hookway, C. (2002). Emotions and Epistemic Evaluation. W: P. Carruthers (red.), „The Cognitive Basis of Science” (251–262). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
  31. Hookway, C. (1998). Doubt: Affective States and the Regulation of Inquiry. Canadian Journal of Philosophy, Supplementary Volume 24, 203–226.
  32. Kouider, S., Long, B., Le Stanc, L., Charron, S., Fievet, A-C., Barbosa, L. S., Gelskov S. V. (2015). Neural dynamics of prediction and surprise in infants. Nature Communications 6,1. HTTPS://DOI.ORG/10.1038/ncomms9537.
  33. Kozak, P. (2018). Emocje epistemiczne i normatywność albo o tym jak pokochać teorię znaczenia. Studia Philosophiae Christianae, 54, 1, 121–140.
  34. Le Pelley, M. E. (2012). Metacognitive monkeys or associative animals? Simple reinforcement learning explains uncertainty in nonhuman animals. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 38, 3, 686–708. HTTPS://DOI.ORG/10.1037/a0026478.
  35. Lechniak, M. (2011). Przekonania i zmiana przekonań. Lublin: Wydawnictwo KUL.
  36. McDowell, J. (1994). Mind and World. Cambridge: Harvard University Press.
  37. Meylan, A. (2014). Epistemic Emotions: a Natural Kind? Philosophical Inquiries, 2, 1, 173–190.
  38. Morton, A. (2010). Epistemic emotions. W: P. Goldie (red.) „The Oxford Handbook of Philosophy of Emotion”. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
  39. Muis, K. R. Chevrier, M., Denton, C. A., Losenno, K. M. (2021). Epistemic Emotions and Epistemic Cognition Predict Critical Thinking About Socio-Scientific Issues. Frontiers in Education, 6. HTTPS://DOI.ORG/10.3389/feduc.2021.669908.
  40. Muis, K. R. Chevrier, M., Singh, C. A. (2018). The role of epistemic emotions in personal epistemology and self-regulated learning. Educational Psychologist, 53, 3, 165–184. HTTPS://DOI.ORG/10.1080/00461520.2017.1421465.
  41. Muis, K. R., Psaradellis, C., Lajoie, S. P., Di Leo, I, Chevrier, M. (2015). The role of epistemic emotions in mathematics problem solving. Contemporary Educational Psychology, 42, 172–185. HTTPS://DOI.ORG/10.1016/j.cedpsych.2015.06.003.
  42. Nerantzaki, K., Efklides, A. (2019). Epistemic Emotions: Interrelationships And Changes During Task Processing. Hellenic Journal of Psychology, 16, 177–199
  43. Perez, J., Feigenson, L. (2022). Violations of expectation trigger infants to search for explanations. Cognition 218, 2. HTTPS://DOI.ORG/10.1016/j.cognition.2021.104942.
  44. Pisula, W. (2009). Curiosity and Information Seeking in Animal and Human Behavior. Boca Raton: Brown Walker Press.
  45. Proust, J. (2014). The Philosophy of metacognition. New York, NY: Oxford University Press.
  46. Przybysz, P., Dziarnowska, W. (2012). Emocje i dylematy moralne z perspektywy neuroetyki. Studia z Kognitywistyki i Filozofii Umysłu, 6, 1, 37–62.
  47. Rosman, T., Mayer, A. K. (2018). Epistemic beliefs as predictors of epistemic emotions: Extending a theoretical model. British Journal of Educational Psychology, 88, 410–427. HTTPS://DOI.ORG/10.1111/bjep.12191.
  48. Scarantino, A., de Sousa, R. (2018). Emotions. W: E. N. Zalta (red.) „The Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy”, URL = <https://plato.stanford.edu/archives/win2018/entries/emotion/>.
  49. Schetz, A. (2011). O tak zwanym problemie prostych umysłów. Diametros, 30, 41–60. HTTPS://DOI.ORG/10.13153/diam.30.2011.455.
  50. Sim, Z. L., Xu, F. (2018). Another Look at Looking Time: Surprise as Rational Statistical Inference. Topics in Cognitive Science 11,1, 154–163. HTTPS://DOI.ORG/10.1111/tops.12393.
  51. Smith, J. D., Redford, J. S., Beran, M. J., Washburn, D. A. (2010). Rhesus Monkeys (Macaca mulatta) Adaptively Monitor Uncertainty While Multi-Tasking, Animal Cognition, 13, 1, 93–101. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10071-009-0249-5.
  52. Smith, J. D., Washburn, D. A. (2005). Uncertainty monitoring and metacognition by animals. Current Directions in Psychological Science, 14, 1, 19–24. HTTPS://DOI.ORG/10.1111/j.0963-7214.2005.00327.x.
  53. Terpe, S. (2016). Epistemic feelings in moral experiences and moral dynamics of everyday life. Digithum, 18, 5–12. https://doi.org/10.7238/d.v0i18.2874.
  54. Tye, M. (1997). The Problem of Simple Minds: Is There Anything It Is like to Be a Honey Bee? Philosophical Studies: An International Journal for Philosophy in the Analytic Tradition, 88, 3, 289–317. https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1004267709793.
  55. Vogl, E., Pekrun, R., Murayama, K., Loderer, K., Schubert, S., (2019). Surprise, Curiosity, and Confusion Promote Knowledge Exploration: Evidence for Robust Effects of Epistemic Emotions. Frontiers in Psychology, 10, Nov. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2019.02474.
  56. Vogl, E., Pekrun, R., Murayama, K., Loderer, K. (2020). Surprised – curious – confused: Epistemic emotions and knowledge exploration. Emotion, 20,4, 625–641. https://doi.org/10.1037/emo0000578.
  57. Watanabe, S., Kuczaj, S. (Red.). (2013). Emotions of Animals and Humans. Comparative Perspectives. Tokyo: Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-4-431-54123-3.