Skip to content
Analiza i Egzystencja
39 (2017)
OpenAlex

Data describes this article or chapter.

Record found in the database

Citations
1
References
15
Citations by year
YearCitations
20211

Data retrieved:

View source (new tab)

For the whole journal, according to OpenAlex.

Citations
195
Publications
300
H-index
6
I10-index
2
Mean citedness (2 years)
0.14
Citations received by year
Journal citation chart. Exact values are available in the table below. 2017: 0 2018: 12 2019: 6 2020: 13 2021: 25 2022: 23 2023: 16 2024: 33 2025: 36 2026: 29 2017 2026
Show data table
Citations received by year
YearPublicationsCitations
2017250
20182312
2019236
20202013
20212125
20222623
20232516
20242633
20252536
20262029

Data retrieved:

What do these numbers mean?

Publications and citations cover records linked to this journal in OpenAlex. H-index is the largest number h of publications with at least h citations each. I10-index counts publications cited at least 10 times. The chart shows citations received in each year; the current year is incomplete. Coverage may differ from WNUS and other services.

The 2-year mean is an OpenAlex metric. It is not the Clarivate Journal Impact Factor.

View in OpenAlex (new tab)
OpenCitations

Data describes this article or chapter.

Citations
0

Data retrieved:

View source (new tab)
DOAJ

Data describes this article or chapter.

Record found in the database

Data retrieved:

View source (new tab)
Google Scholar

Granice autonomii etyki. O potrzebie uwzględniania wyników nauk empirycznych w etyce (The limits of ethics autonomy. Ethics takes into account the empirycal data)


(The limits of ethics autonomy. Ethics takes into account the empirycal data)
DOI: 10.18276/aie.2017.39-04
Cite

The full text is available

Abstract

This paper focuses on the psychological realism requirement which should be met by any ethical theory. Even if one should not make normative conclusions out of descriptive presumptions, there are still some limitations resulting from our nature about which one should remember when formulating moral ideals. One should not impose moral ideals which may require of people more than they would ever be able to bear. The paper’s aim is to emphasize how important it is to ethics to pay attention to the empirical research carried out within psychology which show that a large part of our thought and volitional processes is automatic or semi-automatic. This means that ethicists cannot exclusively concentrate on regulating reflective processes which underlie consciously made decisions. If ethics is to avoid marginalization, ethicists must also focus on those automatic processes which control human thinking and action, especially in the circumstances of a total “ego-depletion”, e.g. when we are tired, hungry, or under a strong influence of unstable emotions. The paper shows that virtue ethics is this kind of ethical approach which meets the psychological realism condition most successfully.
Preview PDF

Open PDF

Bibliography (66)
  1. Audi, R. (2007). Intuitionism, Pluralism, and the Foundations of Ethics. W: R. Shafer-Landau (red.), Foundations of Ethics. An Anthology (s. 402–419). Malden: Balckwell.
  2. Audi, R. (2004). The Good in the Right: a Theory of Intuition and Intrinsic Value.
  3. Woodstock: Princeton University Press.
  4. Bargh, J.A. (1989). Conditional Automaticity: Varieties of Automatic Influence in
  5. Social Perception and Cognition. W: J.S. Uleman, J. Bargh (red.), Unintended
  6. Thought (s. 3–51). New York: Guilford.
  7. Bargh, J.A., Chen, M., Burrows, L. (1996). Automaticity of Social Behavior: Direct
  8. Effects of Trait Construct and Stereotype Activation on Action. Journal
  9. of Personality and Social Psychology, 2 (71), 230–244.
  10. Baumeister, R.F., Tierney, J. (2013). Siła woli. Odkryjmy na nowo to, co w człowieku
  11. najpotężniejsze. Tłum. P. Budkiewicz. Poznań: Media Rodzina.
  12. Cohen, M. (2003). 101 Ethical Dilemmas. London: Routledge.
  13. Dancy, J. (1998). Etyka obowiązków prima facie. W: P. Singer (red.), Przewodnik
  14. po etyce (s. 261–271). Tłum. P. Łuków. Warszawa: Książka i Wiedza.
  15. Davis, N.A. (1998). Deontologia współczesna. W: P. Singer (red.), Przewodnik po
  16. etyce (s. 247–260). Tłum. P. Łuków. Warszawa: Książka i Wiedza.
  17. Doris, J.M. (2002). Lack of Character: Personality and Moral Behavior. Cambridge:
  18. Cambridge University Press.
  19. Flanagan, O. (1993). Varieties of Moral Personalities. Ethics and Psychological
  20. Realism. Cambridge: Harvard University Press.
  21. Hume, D. (1963). Badania dotyczące natury ludzkiej. Tłum. C. Znamierowski. T. 2:
  22. O uczuciach. Warszawa: PWN.
  23. Humphreys, J. (2005). The Story of Virtue. Universal Lessons on How to Live.
  24. Dublin: The Liffey Press.
  25. Isen, A.M., Levin, P.F. (1972). Effect of Feeling Good on Helping: Cookies and
  26. Kindness. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 21, 384–388.
  27. Kahneman, D. (2012). Pułapki myślenia. O myśleniu szybkim i wolnym. Tłum.
  28. P. Szymczyk. Poznań: Media Rodzina.
  29. Kilpatrick, W. (1992a). Moral Character: Story-Telling and Virtues. W: R. Knowles,
  30. G.F. McLean (red.), Psychological Foundation for Moral Education
  31. and Character Development: an Integrated Theory of Moral Development,
  32. The Council for Research in Values and Philosophy (s. 169–182). Washington.
  33. Kilpatrick, W. (1992b). Why Johnny Can’t Tell Right from Wrong: and What Can
  34. We Do About It. New York: Simon Schuster.
  35. Kinnier, R.T. (1995). A Reconceptualization of Values Clarification: Values Conflict
  36. Resolution. Journal of Counseling & Development, 74, 18–24.
  37. MacIntyre, A. (1996). Dziedzictwo cnoty. Tłum. A. Chmielewski. Warszawa: Wydawnictwo
  38. Naukowe PWN.
  39. Merritt M.W., Doris, J.M., Harman, G. (2010). Character. W: J.M. Dorris and The
  40. Moral Psychology Research Group (red.), The Moral Psychology Handbook
  41. (s. 356–392). Oxford: Oxford University Press.
  42. Nagel, Th. (1997). Traf w życiu moralnym. W: Th. Nagel, Pytania ostateczne
  43. (s. 36–53). Tłum. A. Romaniuk. Warszawa: Aletheia.
  44. Narvaez, D., Lapsey, D.K. (2005). The Psychological Foundations of Everyday
  45. Morality and Moral Expertise. W: D.K. Lapsley, C. Power (red.), Character
  46. Psychology and Character Education (s. 140–164). Notre Dame (IN): University
  47. of Notre Dame Press.
  48. Pritchard, I. (1988). Character Education: Research Prospects and Problems. American
  49. Journal of Education, 4 (96), 465–495.
  50. Saja, K. (2015). Etyka normatywna. Między konsekwencjalizmem a deontologią.
  51. Kraków: Universitas.
  52. Szutta, N. (2017). Czy istnieje coś, co zwiemy moralnym charakterem i cnotą?
  53. Lublin: Academicon.
  54. Szutta, N. (2015a). Edukacja moralna z perspektywy etyki cnót. Diametros, 46,
  55. 111–133.
  56. Szutta, N. (2010). Jedność cnót jako warunek normatywności cnoty. W obronie
  57. doktryny jedności cnót. Ethos, 23, 78–93.
  58. Szutta, N. (2015b). Wprowadzenie, czyli o co chodzi w dyskusji nad moralnym
  59. charakterem. W: N. Szutta, A. Szutta, W poszukiwaniu moralnego charakteru
  60. (s. 9–30). Lublin: Academicon.
  61. Szutta, N. (2007). Współczesna etyka cnót. Projekt nowej etyki? Gdańsk: Wydawnictwo
  62. Uniwersytetu Gdańskiego.
  63. Williams, B. (1999). Traf moralny. W: B. Williams, Ile wolności powinna mieć wola
  64. (s. 215–234). Tłum. T. Baszniak, T. Duliński, M. Szczubiałka. Warszawa:
  65. Aletheia.
  66. Wolf, S. (1982). Moral Saints. The Journal of Philosophy, 8 (79), 419–439.