ISSN: 1734-9923
eISSN: 2300-7621
OAI
DOI: 10.18276/aie.2025.72-01
Issue archive /
72 (2025)
Illocutionary Competence in Irony Comprehension: Insights from Empirical Studies on ASD
| Authors: |
Marta
Wąsik
Uniwersytet Szczeciński, Instytut Filozofii i Kognitywistyki Maciej Witek
Uniwersytet Szczeciński, Instytut Filozofii i Kognitywistyki |
| Keywords: | irony comprehension illocutionary competence compliments; criticisms illocutionary negation |
| Whole issue publication date: | 2025 |
| Page range: | 33 (5-37) |
| Klasyfikacja JEL: | Z13 |
Abstract
In this paper, we offer a pragmatic analysis of utterances used in empirical studies on irony comprehension in individuals with Autism Spectrum Disorder (ASD). Specifically, we focus on three studies that examine the understanding of ironic compliments and criticisms. Our central argument is that interpreting these utterances requires substantial illocutionary competence, alongside mindreading abilities, both of which are essential for social cognition and interaction. After exploring how different types of compliments and criticisms are performed and comprehended, we argue that irony functions as an illocutionary negation, transforming the literal force of an utterance (it would have, if taken literally) into its opposite. Our key conclusion underscores the importance of interpreting empirical findings on irony comprehension through the lens of potential differences in illocutionary competence among participants and the ability to interpret the echoic and meta-illocutionary functions of irony.
Download file
Article file
Bibliography
| 1. | Ackerman, B.P. (1983). Form and function in children’s understanding of ironic utterances. Journal of Experimental Child Psychology, 35(3), 487–508. https:// doi.org/10.1016/0022-0965(83)90023-1 |
| 2. | Alfonzetti, G. (2013). 18. Compliments. In M. Sbisà & K. Turner (Eds.), Pragmatics of Speech Actions (pp. 555–586). De Gruyter Mouton. https://doi.org/ 10.1515/9783110214383.555 |
| 3. | Amante, D.J. (1981). The theory of ironic speech acts. Poetics Today, 2(2), 77–96. https://doi.org/10.2307/1772191 |
| 4. | Attardo, S. (2000). Irony as relevant inappropriateness. Journal of Pragmatics, 32, 793–826. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0378-2166(99)00070-3 |
| 5. | Austin, J.L. (1975). How to do things with words. The Clarendon Press. https://doi.org/ 10.1093/acprof:oso/9780198245537.001.0001 |
| 6. | Bach, K., & Harnish, R.M. (1979). Linguistic communication and speech acts. MIT Press. |
| 7. | Bachman, L.F. (1990). Fundamental considerations in language testing. Oxford University Press. |
| 8. | Bertolet, R. (1994). Are there indirect speech acts? In S. Tsohatzidis (Ed.), Foundations of speech act theory: Philosophical and linguistic perspectives (pp. 335– 349). Routledge. |
| 9. | Clark, H.H., & Gerrig, R.J. (1984). On the pretence theory of irony. Journal of Experimental Psychology, 113(1), 121–126. |
| 10. | Dews, S., & Winner, E. (1997). Attributing meaning to deliberately false utterances: The case of irony. In C. Mandell & A. McCabe (Eds.), The problem of meaning: Behavioral and cognitive perspectives (pp. 377–414). Elsevier. |
| 11. | Filippova, E., & Astington, J.W. (2010). Children’s understanding of social-cognitive and social-communicative aspects of discourse irony. Child Development, 81(3), 913–928. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-8624.2010.01442.x |
| 12. | Fuchs, J. (2023). 40 years of research into children’s irony comprehension. Pragmatics & Cognition, 30(1), 1–30. https://doi.org/10.1075/pc.22015.fuc Garmendia, J. (2018). Irony. Cambridge University Press. https://doi.org/10.1017/ 9781316136218 |
| 13. | Giora, R. (1995). On irony and negation. Discourse Processes, 19(2), 239–264. https://doi.org/10.1080/01638539509544916 |
| 14. | Glenwright, M., & Agbayewa, A.S. (2012). Older children and adolescents with high-functioning autism spectrum disorders can comprehend verbal irony in computer-mediated communication. Research in Autism Spectrum Disorders, 6(2), 628–638. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rasd.2011.09.013 |
| 15. | Green, M.S. (2017). Irony as expression (of a sense of the absurd). Baltic International Yearbook of Cognition, Logic and Communication, 12, 1–24. https://doi. org/10.4148/1944-3676.1116 |
| 16. | Grice, H.P. (1989). Studies in the way of words. Harvard University Press. |
| 17. | Hancock, J.T., Dunham, P.J., & Purdy, K. (2000). Children’s comprehension of critical and complimentary forms of verbal irony. Journal of Cognition and Development, 1(2), 227–248. https://doi.org/10.1207/S15327647JCD010204 |
| 18. | Happé, F.G.E. (1993). Communicative competence and theory of mind in autism: A test of relevance theory. Cognition, 48(2), 101–119. https://doi.org/10.1016/ 0010-0277(93)90026-R |
| 19. | Happé, F. (2013). Attributions (first order/second order). In F. R. Volkmar (Ed.), Encyclopedia of Autism Spectrum Disorders (pp. 297–298). Springer. https://doi.org/ 10.1007/978-1-4419-1698-3_1719 |
| 20. | Hoogenhout, M., & Malcolm-Smith, S. (2014). Theory of mind in autism spectrum disorder: Does DSM classification predict development? Research in Autism Spectrum Disorders, 8(6), 587–607. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rasd.2014.02.005 |
| 21. | Huang, S.-F., Oi, M., & Taguchi, A. (2015). Comprehension of figurative language in Taiwanese children with autism: The role of theory of mind and receptive vocabulary. Clinical Linguistics and Phonetics, 29(8–10), 764–775. https://doi.org/ 10.3109/02699206.2015.1027833 |
| 22. | Komorowska, E., & Ohrimovich, A. (2018). The compliment as a speech act in Russian: A lexical-pragmatic study. Beyond Philology, 15(1), 49–67. https:// doi.org/10.26881/bp.2018.1.03 |
| 23. | Krawczak, K. & Glynn, D. (2015). Operationalizing mirativity: A usage-based quantitative study of constructional construal in English. Review of Cognitive Linguistics 13(2), 353–382. https://doi.org/10.1075/rcl.13.2.04kra |
| 24. | Kreuz, R.J., & Link, K.E. (2002). Asymmetries in the use of verbal irony. Journal of Language and Social Psychology, 21(2), 127–143. |
| 25. | Lewandowska-Tomaszczyk, B. (1989). Praising and complimenting. In W. Oleksy (Ed.), Contrastive Pragmatics (pp. 73–100). Benjamins. https://doi.org/10.1075/ pbns.3.08lew?locatt=mode:legacy |
| 26. | Levinson, S.C. (1983). Pragmatics. Cambridge University Press. https://doi.org/ 10.1017/CBO9780511813313 |
| 27. | Nilsen, E.S., Glenwright, M., & Huyder, V. (2011). Children and adults understand that verbal irony interpretation depends on listener knowledge. Journal of Cognition and Development, 12(3), 374–409. https://doi.org/10.1080/15248372.2010.544693 |
| 28. | Panzeri, F., Mazzaggio, G., Giustolisi, B., Silleresi, S., & Surian, L. (2022). The atypical pattern of irony comprehension in autistic children. Applied Psycholinguistics, 43(4), 757–784. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0142716422000091 |
| 29. | Perner, J., & Wimmer, H. (1985). “John thinks that Mary thinks that...”: Attribution of second-order beliefs by 5- to 10-year-old children. Journal of Experimental Child Psychology, 39(3), 437–471. https://doi.org/10.1016/0022-0965(85)90051-7 |
| 30. | Pexman, P.M., & Glenwright, M. (2007). How do typically developing children grasp the meaning of verbal irony? Journal of Neurolinguistics, 20(2), 178–196. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jneuroling.2006.06.001 |
| 31. | Pexman, P.M., Rostad, K.R., McMorris, C.A., Climie, E.A., Stowkowy, J., & Glenwright, M.R. (2011). Processing of ironic language in children with highfunctioning autism spectrum disorder. Journal of Autism and Developmental Disorders, 41(8), 1097–1112. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10803-010-1131-7 |
| 32. | Saban-Bezalel, R., Dolfin, D., Laor, N., & Mashal, N. (2019). Irony comprehension and mentalizing ability in children with and without autism spectrum disorder. Research in Autism Spectrum Disorders, 58, 30–38. https://doi.org/10.1016/ j.rasd.2018.11.006 |
| 33. | Searle, J.R. (1969). Speech acts: An essay in the philosophy of language. Cambridge University Press. https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9781139173438 |
| 34. | Searle, J.R. (1979). Expression and meaning: Studies in the theory of speech acts. Cambridge University Press. https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511609213 |
| 35. | Song, Y., Li, L., & Zhang, J. (2023). Comprehension of irony in autistic children: The role of theory of mind and executive function. Autism Research, 16(1), 89–102. https://doi.org/10/1002/aur.3051 |
| 36. | Sperber, D. (1984). Verbal irony: Pretence or echoic mention? Journal of Experimental Psychology, 113(1), 130–136. https://psycnet.apa.org/doi/10.1037/ 0096-3445.113.1.130 |
| 37. | Stalnaker, R. (2002). Common ground. Linguistics and Philosophy, 25, 701–721. https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1020867916902 |
| 38. | Sullivan, K., Winner, E., & Hopfield, N. (1995). How children tell a lie from a joke: The role of second order mental state attributions. British Journal of Developmental Psychology, 13(2), 191–204. https://doi. org/10.1111/j.2044-835X.1995.tb00673.x |
| 39. | Väyrynen, P. (2025). Thick ethical concepts. In E.N. Zalta & U. Nodelman (Eds.), The Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy (Spring 2025 ed.). https://plato. stanford.edu/archives/spr2025/entries/thick-ethical-concepts/ |
| 40. | Wang, A.T., Lee, S.S., Sigman, M., & Dapretto, M. (2006). Neural basis of irony comprehension in children with autism: The role of prosody and context. Brain: A Journal of Neurology, 129(4), 932–943. https://doi.org/10.1093/brain/awl032 |
| 41. | Wilson, D. (2013). Irony comprehension: A developmental perspective. Journal of Pragmatics, 59, 40–56. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pragma.2012.09.016 |
| 42. | Wilson, D., & Sperber, D. (2012). Meaning and relevance. Cambridge University Press. https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9781139028370 |
| 43. | Wimmer, H., & Perner, J. (1983). Beliefs about beliefs: Representation and constraining function of wrong beliefs in young children’s understanding of deception. Cognition, 13(1), 103–128. https://doi.org/10.1016/0010-0277(83)90004-5 |
| 44. | Winner, E. (1988). The point of words: Children’s understanding of metaphor and irony. Harvard University Press. |
| 45. | Witek, M. (2015). Linguistic underdeterminacy: A view from speech act theory. Journal of Pragmatics, 76, 15–29. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pragma.2014.11.003 |
| 46. | Witek, M. (2022a). An Austinian alternative to the Gricean perspective on meaning and communication. Journal of Pragmatics, 201, 60–75. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pragma.2022.09.010 |
| 47. | Witek, M. (2022b). Irony as a speech action. Journal of Pragmatics, 190, 76–90. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pragma.2022.01.010 |