Skip to content
Analiza i Egzystencja
76 (2026)
OpenAlex

For the whole journal, according to OpenAlex.

Citations
215
Publications
300
H-index
6
I10-index
2
Mean citedness (2 years)
0.14
Citations received by year
Journal citation chart. Exact values are available in the table below. 2017: 1 2018: 12 2019: 6 2020: 14 2021: 25 2022: 23 2023: 19 2024: 39 2025: 40 2026: 34 2017 2026
Show data table
Citations received by year
YearPublicationsCitations
2017251
20182312
2019236
20202014
20212125
20222623
20232519
20242639
20252540
20262034

Data retrieved:

What do these numbers mean?

Publications and citations cover records linked to this journal in OpenAlex. H-index is the largest number h of publications with at least h citations each. I10-index counts publications cited at least 10 times. The chart shows citations received in each year; the current year is incomplete. Coverage may differ from WNUS and other services.

The 2-year mean is an OpenAlex metric. It is not the Clarivate Journal Impact Factor.

View in OpenAlex (new tab)
Google Scholar
Find in Google Scholar (new tab)

Realism, imagination and ontology: Human development and the post-liberal turn in contemporary political philosophy

DOI: 10.18276/aie.2026.76-05
Cite

The full text is available

ISSN:1734-9923
eISSN:2300-7621
Authors: Mariusz Turowski ORCID
Uniwersytet Wrocławski
Keywords: liberalism human development political realism C. B. Macpherson democratic theory
Issue / book publication date:2026
Page range:27 (89-115)
OAI-PMH:Metadata
CC BY-SA Open Access DOAJ ERIH PLUS Scopus Diamond Discovery Hub
QR code

Abstract

This article expounds upon a salient theme of the contemporary post-/anti-liberal transformation, which is broadly conceived as an opposition to the agenda of social (human) development. The primary objective of this paper is to present an alternative theorization of the social (human) development approach proposed by C. B. Macpherson, as a response to the current crisis of liberalism (and the late-liberal democracy) and liberal political philosophy. The argument is articulated through the following four stages. The introduction maps out the problem and some aspects of the broader undertaking to which the current study belongs. The first main section of the text presents a map of positions and processes involved in invalidating the “meta-empire of late liberalism.” The second main part delineates Macpherson’s interpretation of the liberal political ontology as having the potential to reaffirm the concept of social (human) development and circumvent the repercussions (or alternatively reorient them) of the neorealist/anti-idealist wave of criticism currently confronting liberalism as a political system and the discipline of liberal political philosophy. The conclusion of the study discusses the anticipated consequences of Macpherson’s defense of developmental liberalism, especially in relation to a possible integration of two theoretical contexts: progressive/critical social philosophy and the tradition of positive-freedom liberalism.

PDF

Download PDF
Preview PDF

Open PDF

Bibliography (154)
  1. Alkire, S. (2016). The capability approach and well-being measurement for public policy. In M.D. Adler, M. Fleurbaey (Eds.), The Oxford handbook of wellbeing and public policy (pp. 615–644). Oxford University Press. https://doi. org/10.1093/oxfordhb/9780199325818.013.18.
  2. Altman, A., Wellman, C.H. (2009). A liberal theory of international justice. Oxford University Press.
  3. Anderson, E. (2010). The Imperative of Integration. Princeton University Press.
  4. Anghie, A. (2004). Imperialism, Sovereignty, and the Making of International Law. Cambridge University Press.
  5. Anghie, A. (2015). Legal Aspects of the New International Economic Order. Humanity: An International Journal of Human Rights, Humanitarianism, and Development, 6(1), 145–158. https://dx.doi.org/10.1353/hum.2015.0016.
  6. Arnold, J. (2020). Across the Great Divide: Between Analytic and Continental Political Theory. Stanford University Press.
  7. Ascione, G. (2021). Knowledge in an age of transition: Wallerstein and the future. Socio, 15, 105–125. https://doi.org/10.4000/socio.11074.
  8. Ascione, G. (2024). Concept formation in global studies: Post-Western Approaches to Critical Human Knowledge. Rowman & Littlefield.
  9. Auda, J. (2008). Maqasid Al-Sharia’h as Philosophy of Islamic Law. International Institute of Islamic Thought.
  10. Auda, J. (2017). Reclaiming the Mosque: The Role of Women in Islam’s House of Worship. Claritas Books.
  11. Ballingall, R. (2010, June 1–3). A Defence of Human Nature in Aristotelian Practical Science: The Unlikely Example of C.B. Macpherson [Paper presentation]. Canadian Political Science Association Annual Conference, Concordia University, Montreal. https://cpsa-acsp.ca/papers-2010/Ballingall.pdf.
  12. Bevir, M. (2011a). Histories of analytic political philosophy. History of European Ideas, 37(3), 243–248. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.histeuroideas.2010.10.003.
  13. Bevir, M. (2011b). The Contextual Approach. In G. Klosko (Ed.), The Oxford handbook of the history of political philosophy (pp. 11–23). Oxford University Press.
  14. Bevir, M., Adcock, R., Stimson, S.C. (Eds.). (2007). Modern Political Science: Anglo-American Exchanges Since 1880. Princeton University Press.
  15. Bhambra, G.K. (2014). Connected Sociologies. Bloomsbury.
  16. Bhambra, G.K., Holmwood, J. (2021). Colonialism and Modern Social Theory. Cambridge: Polity.
  17. Bhambra, G.K. (2024). Postcolonial and Decolonial Reconstructions. In P. Gopinath, L. Brueck (Eds.), The Routledge Companion to Postcolonial and Decolonial Literature (pp. 71–83). Routledge.
  18. Bjørkdahl, K. (Ed.). (2024). The Problematic Public: Lippmann, Dewey, and Democracy in the Twenty-First Century. The Pennsylvania State University Press.
  19. Bell, D. (2026). What is Utopia? History, Theory, Tradition. In D. Bell, D. Mao, Utopia (pp. 5–27). Oxford University Press. https://doi.org/10.1093/9780198 922919.003.0002.
  20. Bray, M. (2019). Powers of the Mind: Mental and Manual Labor in the Contemporary Political crisis. Transcript Verlag. https://doi.org/10.14361/9783839441473.
  21. Braybrooke, D. (2006). Analytical Political Philosophy: From Discourse, Edification. University of Toronto Press.
  22. Browning, G. (2016). A History of Modern Political Thought: The Question of Interpretation. Oxford University Press.
  23. Burawoy, M. (2021). Going public with Polanyi in the era of Trump. In L. Hossfeld, E.B. Kelly, C. Hossfeld (Eds.), The Routledge International Handbook of Public Sociology (pp. 10–21). Routledge.
  24. Buzan, B., Lawson, G. (2014). Capitalism and the Emergent World Order. International Affairs, 90(1), 71–91. https://doi.org/10.1111/1468-2346.12096.
  25. Caney, S. (2005). Justice Beyond Borders: A Global Political Theory. Oxford University Press.
  26. Carens, J. (Ed.). (1993). Democracy and Possessive Individualism: The Intellectual Legacy of C. B. Macpherson. State University of New York Press.
  27. Chiappero-Martinetti, E., Osmani, S., Qizilbash, M. (Eds.). (2020). The Cambridge Handbook of the Capability Approach. Cambridge University Press.
  28. Chin, C. (2016). Beyond analytic and continental in contemporary political thought: Pragmatic methodological pluralism and the situated turn. European Journal of Political Theory, 15(2), 205–222. https://doi.org/10.1177/1474885115582076.
  29. Chin, C., Thomassen, L. (2016). Introduction: Analytic, Continental and the question of a bridge. European Journal of Political Theory, 15(2), 133–137. https:// doi.org/10.1177/1474885115582078.
  30. Christiano, T. (2008). The Constitution of Equality: Democratic Authority and Its Limits. Oxford University Press.
  31. Christov, T. (2024). Liberalism and international political thought. In D. Ivison (Ed.), Research handbook on liberalism (pp. 79–96). Edward Elgar. https://doi.org/ 10.4337/9781839109034.00011.
  32. Comim, F., Nussbaum, M. (Eds.). (2014). Capabilities, gender, equality: Towards fundamental entitlements. Cambridge University Press. https://doi.org/10.1017/ CBO9781139059138.
  33. Comim, F., Fennell, S., Anand, P.B. (Eds.). (2018). New frontiers of the capability approach. Cambridge University Press. https://doi.org/10.1017/9781108559881.
  34. Comim, F., Anand, P.B., Fennell, S. (Eds.). (2024). Social Choice, Agency, Inclusiveness and Capabilities. Cambridge University Press.
  35. Crespo, R.F. (2022). The Nature of the Economy: Aristotelian Essays on the Philosophy and Epistemology of Economics. Palgrave Macmillan.
  36. Critchley, S. (1998). Introduction: What Is Continental Philosophy? In S. Critchley, W.R. Schroeder (Eds.), A Companion to Continental Philosophy (pp. 5–13). Blackwell Publishers.
  37. Critchley, S. (2001). Continental Philosophy: A Very Short Introduction. Oxford University Press.
  38. Cunningham, F. (2019). The Political Thought of C.B. Macpherson: Contemporary Applications. Palgrave Macmillan.
  39. Curtis, W.M. (2020). Democracy Versus Neoliberalism: The Second Dewey- Lippmann Debate. American Political Thought, 9(2), 285–316. https://doi.org/ 10.1086/708391.
  40. Deneen, P. (2018). Why Liberalism Failed. Yale University Press.
  41. Deneulin, S., Shahani, L. (Eds.). (2009). An Introduction to the Human Development and Capability Approach: Freedom and Agency. Earthscan.
  42. Dewey, J. (1939). Freedom and Culture. G.P. Putnam’s Sons.
  43. Duderija, A. (2014). Maqasid al-Shari’a, Gender Non-patriarchal Qur’an-Sunna Hermeneutics, and the Reformation of Muslim Family Law. In A. Duderija (Ed.), Maqasid al-Shari’a and Contemporary Reformist Muslim Thought (pp. 193–218). Palgrave Macmillan.
  44. Düwell, M., Braarvig, J., Brownsword, R., Mieth, D. (Eds.). (2014). The Cambridge Handbook of Human Dignity: Interdisciplinary Perspectives. Cambridge University Press.
  45. Erman, E., Möller, N. (2015). Practices and principles: On the methodological turn in political theory. Philosophy Compass, 10(8), 533–546. https://doi.org/10.1111/ phc3.12245.
  46. Fabre, C. (2012). Cosmopolitan War. Oxford University Press.
  47. Fèvre, R. (2022). Wilhelm Röpke: The Social Crisis of Our Time. In T. Biebricher, W. Bonefeld, P. Nedergaard (Eds.), The Oxford Handbook of Ordoliberalism (pp. 121–135). Oxford University Press. https://doi.org/10.1093/ oxfordhb/9780198861201.013.8.
  48. Finlayson, L. (2015). The Political Is Political: Conformity and The Illusion of Dissent in Contemporary Political Philosophy. Rowman and Littlefield International.
  49. Finlayson, L. (2016). An Introduction to Feminism. Cambridge University Press.
  50. Forrester, K. (2011). Hope and Memory in the Thought of Judith Shklar. Modern Intellectual History, 8(3), 591–620. https://doi.org/10.1017/S1479244311000369.
  51. Forrester, K. (2019). In the Shadow of Justice: Postwar Liberalism and the Remaking of Political Philosophy. Princeton University Press.
  52. Forrester, K. (2024). Capitalism and the Organization of Displacement: Selma James’s Internationalism of the Unwaged. Political Theory, 52(4), 659–692. https://doi.org/10.1177/00905917231213663.
  53. Fukuda-Parr, S., Shiva, K. (Eds.). (2009). Handbook of Human Development: Concepts, Measures and Policies. Oxford University Press.
  54. Fukuyama, F. (2022). Liberalism and Its Discontents. Farrar, Straus and Giroux.
  55. Gadomski, M. (2025). Making Sense of Political Normativity. Journal of Ethics and Social Philosophy, 30(6), 856–889. https://doi.org/10.26556/jesp.v30i6.3480.
  56. Geuss, R. (2008). Philosophy and Real Politics. Princeton University Press.
  57. Goldman, L. (2002). Science, Reform, and Politics in Victorian Britain: The Social Science Association 1857–1886. Cambridge University Press.
  58. Goldman, L. (2011). Conservative political thought from the revolutions of 1848 until the fin de siècle. In G. Stedman Jones, G. Claeys (Eds.), The Cambridge History of Nineteenth-Century Political Thought (pp. 691–719). Cambridge University Press.
  59. Gould, C.C. (1989). Rethinking Democracy: Freedom and Social Co-operation in Politics, Economy, and Society. Cambridge University Press.
  60. Gould, C.C. (2004). Globalizing Democracy and Human Rights. Cambridge University Press.
  61. Gould, C.C. (2020). Socializing the means of free development. Philosophical Topics, 48(2), 81–103. https://doi.org/10.5840/philtopics202048216.
  62. Gowan, P. (2010). A Calculus of Power: Grand Strategy in the Twenty-First Century. Verso.
  63. Guilhot, N. (Ed.). (2011). The Invention of International Relations Theory: Realism, the Rockefeller Foundation, and the 1954 Conference on Theory. Columbia University Press.
  64. Hagemann, H. (2022). Economic crisis policy. In T. Biebricher, W. Bonefeld, P. Nedergaard (Eds.), The Oxford handbook of Ordoliberalism (pp. 427–435). Oxford University Press. https://doi.org/10.1093/oxfordhb/9780198861201.013.29.
  65. Hall, E. (2024). Ideological Self-Consciousness: Judith Shklar on Legalism, Liberalism, and the Purposes of Political Theory. Social Philosophy and Policy, 41(1), 105–125. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0265052524000347.
  66. Hansen, P. (2015). Reconsidering C.B. Macpherson: From Possessive Individualism to Democratic Theory and Beyond. University of Toronto Press.
  67. Hansen, P., Caterino, B. (2019). Critical Theory, Democracy, and the Challenge of Neo- Liberalism. University of Toronto Press.
  68. Held, D. (2006). Models of Democracy (3rd ed.). Polity Press.
  69. Huta, V. (2020). How Distinct Are Eudaimonia and Hedonia? It Depends on How They Are Measured. Journal of Well-Being Assessment, 4(3), 511–537. https:// doi.org/10.1007/s41543-021-00046-4/.
  70. Hutchings, K. (2019). Cosmopolitan Just War and Coloniality. In D. Bell (Ed.), Empire, Race and Global Justice (pp. 211–227). Cambridge University Press.
  71. Ignatieff, M. (2017). The Ordinary Virtues: Moral Order in a Divided World. Harvard University Press.
  72. Ivison, D. (2024a). Introduction: The vicissitudes of liberalism. In D. Ivison (Ed.), Research Handbook on Liberalism (pp. 1–28). Edward Elgar. https://doi.org/ 10.4337/9781839109034.00006.
  73. Ivison, D. (2024b). Histories of liberalisms. In D. Ivison (Ed.), Research handbook on liberalism (pp. 62–78). Edward Elgar. https://doi.org/10.4337/978183910 9034.00010.
  74. Ivison, D. (2024c). A taxonomy of injustice. In C. Kirkby, W. Sadurski, K. Walton (Eds.), Law, Politics, and Responding to Injustice (pp. 30–50). Routledge. https://dx.doi.org/10.4324/9781032676159-3.
  75. Kelly, P. (2022a). From Professionalisation and Normalisation to Genealogy and Realism: The Challenge of Liberalism in Contemporary Political Theory. Society, 59(2), 110–118. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12115-022-00702-2.
  76. Kelly, P. (2022b). Conflict, War and Revolution: The Problem of Politics in International Political Thought. London School of Economics Press.
  77. Kelly, P. (2024). The Post-Liberal Movement. In D. Ivison (Ed.), Research Handbook on Liberalism (pp. 276–291). Edward Elgar. https://doi.org/10.4337/97 81839109034.00024.
  78. Keohane, R.O. (2012). Twenty Years of Institutional Liberalism. International Relations, 26(2), 125–138. https://doi.org/10.1177/0047117812438451.
  79. Koikkalainen, P. (2011). Contextualist Dilemmas: Methodology of the History of Political Theory in Two Stages. History of European Ideas, 37(3), 315–324. https:// doi.org/10.1016/j.histeuroideas.2010.10.010.
  80. Kolodny, N. (2014). Rule Over None II: Social Equality and the Justification of Democracy. Philosophy and Public Affairs, 42(4), 287–336. https://doi.org/10.1111/ papa.12037.
  81. Kukathas, C. (2003). The Liberal Archipelago: A Theory of Diversity and Freedom. Oxford University Press.
  82. Kukathas, C. (2020). Immigration and Freedom. In J. Knolle, J. Poskett (Eds.), Migration (pp. 18–49). Cambridge University Press.
  83. Larmore, C. (2018). The Truth in Political Realism. In M. Sleat (Ed.), Politics Recovered: Realist Thought in Theory and Practice (pp. 27–48). Columbia University Press.
  84. Lee, R.E. (2011). The modern world-system: Its structures, its geoculture, its crisis and transformation. In D. Palumbo-Liu, N. Tanoukhi, B. Robbins (Eds.), Immanuel Wallerstein and the Problem of the World: System, Scale, Culture (pp. 27–40). Duke University Press.
  85. Lefebvre, A. (2024a). Liberalism as a Way of Life. Princeton University Press.
  86. Lefebvre, A. (2024b). Liberal conceptions of the self. In D. Ivison (Ed.), Research Handbook on Liberalism (pp. 30–44). Edward Elgar. https://doi.org/10.4337/ 9781839109034.00008.
  87. Lehto, O. (2025). Power to the powerless: Evolutionary freedom as emancipation. In M. Novak (Ed.), Liberal Emancipation: Explorations in Political and Social Economy (pp. 79–101). Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-94406-2_4.
  88. Lessmann, O., Rauschmayer, F. (Eds.). (2014). The Capability Approach and Sustainability. Routledge.
  89. Lippincott, B.E. (1938). Victorian Critics of Democracy: Carlyle, Ruskin, Arnold, Stephen, Maine, Lecky. University of Minnesota Press.
  90. Lloyd, S.A. (2012). Power and Sexual Subordination in Hobbes’s Political Theory. In N.J. Hirschmann, J.H. Wright (Eds.), Feminist Interpretations of Thomas Hobbes (pp. 47–62). The Pennsylvania State University Press.
  91. Macpherson, C.B. (1962). The Political Theory of Possessive Individualism. Oxford University Press.
  92. Macpherson, C.B. (1966). The Real World of Democracy. Clarendon Press.
  93. Macpherson, C.B. (1973). Democratic Theory: Essays in Retrieval. Clarendon Press.
  94. Macpherson, C.B. (1977). The Life and Times of Liberal Democracy. Oxford University Press.
  95. Macpherson, C.B. (1987). Problems of Human Rights in the Late Twentieth Century. In C.B. Macpherson, The Rise and Fall of Economic Justice (pp. 21–43). Oxford University Press.
  96. Manor, A. (2025). Second-Order Political Equality and the Limits of Civic Accountability: A Reply to Giavazzi. Philosophy and Public Affairs, 54(2), 83–93. https://doi.org/10.1111/papa.70011.
  97. McCarthy, M.A., Desan, M.H. (2023). The Problem of Class Abstractionism. Sociological Theory, 41(1), 3–26. https://doi.org/10.1177/07352751231152489.
  98. McDermott, D. (2008). Analytical Political Philosophy. In D. Leopold, M. Stears (Eds.), Political Theory: Methods and Approaches (pp. 11–28). Oxford University Press.
  99. McKay, I. (2014). A Half-Century of Possessive Individualism: C.B. Macpherson and the Twenty-First-Century Prospects of Liberalism. Journal of the Canadian Historical Association / Revue de la Société historique du Canada, 25(1), 307–340. https://doi.org/10.7202/1032806ar.
  100. McKay, I. (2017). Challenging the common sense of neoliberalism: Gramsci, Macpherson, and the next left. In L. Panitch, G. Albo (Eds.), Rethinking Democracy: Socialist Register 2018 (pp. 275–297). New York University Press.
  101. McKay, I. (2019, June). The real world of democracy? C. B. Macpherson’s critique of the Cold War reification of ‘liberal democracy,’ 1965 [Paper presentation]. Canadian Political Science Association Annual Conference. https://www.cpsaacsp. ca/documents/conference/2019/51.McKay.pdf.
  102. McKay, I. (n.d.). A New Method of Liberty: Gramsci, C.B. MacPherson, and the Next Left.
  103. McManus, M. (2024, July 16). C.B. Macpherson on retrieving liberal radicalism. Liberal Currents. https://www.liberalcurrents.com/c-b-macpherson-onretrieving- liberal-radicalism-2/
  104. McManus, M. (2025). The political theory of liberal socialism. Routledge.
  105. Mignolo, W.D. (2007). Delinking: The rhetoric of modernity, the logic of coloniality and the grammar of de-coloniality. Cultural Studies, 21(2–3), 449–514. https:// doi.org/10.1080/09502380601162647.
  106. Mignolo, W. (2021). The politics of decolonial investigations. Durham: Duke University Press.
  107. Mignolo, W.D., Walsh, C.E. (2018). On Decoloniality: Concepts, Analytics, Praxis. Duke University Press.
  108. Mills, C.W. (2005). “Ideal Theory” as Ideology. Hypatia, 20(3), 165–183. https:// doi.org/10.1111/j.1527-2001.2005.tb00493.x.
  109. Mills, C.W. (2018). Through a Glass, Whitely: Ideal Theory as Epistemic Injustice. Proceedings and Addresses of the American Philosophical Association, 92, 43–77.
  110. Noe, K. (2020). White Habits, Anti‐Racism, and Philosophy as a Way of Life. The Southern Journal of Philosophy, 58(2), 279–301. https://doi.org/10.1111/ sjp.12365.
  111. Novak, M. (2022). Conceptions of Utopia in Modern Liberal Thought: Is There a Liberal Utopia? Utopian Studies, 33(1), 144–160. https://doi.org/10.5325/ utopianstudies.33.1.0144.
  112. Nozick, R. (1974). Anarchy, State, and Utopia. Blackwell.
  113. Nussbaum, M., Sen, A. (Eds.). (1993). The Quality of Life. Clarendon Press.
  114. Owen, D. (2016). Reasons and practices of reasoning: On the analytic/continental distinction in political philosophy. European Journal of Political Theory, 15(2), 172–188. https://doi.org/10.1177/1474885115587120.
  115. Owens, P. (2007). Between War and Politics: International Relations and the Thought of Hannah Arendt. Oxford University Press.
  116. Purdy, J. (2019, October 29). What John Rawls missed: Are his principles for a just society enough today? The New Republic. https://newrepublic.com/ article/155294/john-rawls-missed-create-just-society.
  117. Quijano, A. (2000). Coloniality of Power and Eurocentrism in Latin America. International Sociology, 15(2), 215–232. https://doi.org/10.1177/0268580900015002005.
  118. Quijano, A. (2007). Coloniality and modernity/rationality. Cultural Studies, 21(2–3), 168–178. https://doi.org/10.1080/09502380601164353.
  119. Rawls, J. (1999a). A theory of justice (Revised edition). The Belknap Press.
  120. Rawls, J. (1999b). The Law of Peoples: With “The Idea of Public Reason Revisited”. Harvard University Press.
  121. Rawls, J. (2001). Justice as Fairness: A Restatement. Harvard University Press.
  122. Reinhoudt, J., Audier, S. (2018). The Walter Lippmann Colloquium: The Birth of Neo- Liberalism. Palgrave Macmillan.
  123. Robeyns, I. (2008). Ideal Theory in Theory and Practice. Social Theory and Practice, 34(3), 341–362. https://doi.org/10.5840/soctheorpract200834321.
  124. Robeyns, I., Brighouse, H. (Eds.). (2010). Measuring Justice: Primary Goods and Capabilities. Cambridge University Press.
  125. Rose, M. (2022). A World after Liberalism: Philosophers of the Radical Right. Yale University Press.
  126. Sassen, S. (2016). At the Systemic Edge: Expulsions. European Review, 24(1), 89–104. https://doi.org/10.1017/S1062798715000472.
  127. Sassen, S. (2021). The Limits of Power and the Complexity of Powerlessness: The Case of Immigration. In G. Delanty, S. P. Turner (Eds.), Routledge International Handbook of Contemporary Social and Political Theory (2nd ed., pp. 456–465). Routledge. https://doi.org// 10.4324/9781003111399-39.
  128. Satgar, V., Ntlokotse, R. (2023). Introduction. In V. Satgar, R. Ntlokotse (Eds.), Emancipatory Feminism in the Times of COVID-19: Transformative Resistance and Social Reproduction (pp. 1–20). Wits University Press. https://doi.org/ 10.18772/22023078264.
  129. Schefold, B. (2022). Theoretical Context: Ordoliberalism as a New Synthesis of Earlier German Economic Thought. In T. Biebricher, W. Bonefeld, P. Nedergaard (Eds.), The Oxford Handbook of Ordoliberalism (pp. 3–20). Oxford University Press. https://doi.org/10.1093/oxfordhb/9780198861201.013.1
  130. Sen, A. (1995). Inequality Reexamined. Oxford University Press.
  131. Sen, A. (2006). What Do We Want From a Theory of Justice? Journal of Philosophy, 103(5), 215–238. https://doi.org/10.5840/jphil2006103517.
  132. Sen, A. (2009). The Idea of Justice. The Belknap Press.
  133. Shklar, J. (1986). Legalism: Law, Morals, and Political Trials. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
  134. Steinmetz, G. (2005). The Politics of Method in the Human Sciences: Positivism and Its Epistemological Others. Duke University Press.
  135. Steinmetz, G. (2023). Concept-quake: From the History of Science to The Historical Sociology of Social Science. In D. Fassin, G. Steinmetz (Eds.), The Social Sciences in the Looking Glass: Studies in the Production of Knowledge (pp. 21–80). Duke University Press.
  136. Therborn, G. (2022). The World and The Left. New Left Review, 137, 23–73.
  137. Therborn, G. (2024). The Future and The Left. New Left Review, 145, 27–41.
  138. Tomer, J.F. (2011). Enduring happiness: Integrating the hedonic and eudaimonic approaches. The Journal of Socio-Economics, 40(5), 530–537. https://doi. org/10.1016/j.socec.2011.04.003.
  139. Townshend, J. (2000). C.B. Macpherson and the Problem of Liberal Democracy. Edinburgh University Press.
  140. Tuck, R. (1999). The Rights of War and Peace: Political Thought and the International Order From Grotius to Kant. Clarendon Press.
  141. Turowski, M. (2014). C.B. Macpherson: „Indywidualizm posiadaczy” a dylematy współczesnej ontologii politycznej. Wydawnictwo Uniwersytetu Wrocławskiego.
  142. Turowski, M. (2016). Inclusive Versus Exclusive Public Reason: Invitation to Comparative Political Philosophy or the Affirmation of “Liberal Hegemony”? Synthesis Philosophica, 31(1), 151–167. https://doi.org/10.21464/sp31111.
  143. Turowski, M. (2021). Islamization, Modernization, and Civiliational Analysis. Studia Philosophica Wratislaviensia, 15(4), 81–92. https://doi.org/10.19195/ 1895-8001.15.4.5.
  144. Turowski, M. (2022). Hobbes Studies Revisited: The Strauss – Macpherson Debate. Oficyna Wydawnicza ATUT.
  145. Turowski, M. (2024). Metafizyka Muzułmańska—Kryzys, Reformacja, Transformacja, Reintegralizacja? Studia Philosophica Wratislaviensia, 19(1), 7–17. https://doi.org/10.19195/1895-8001.19.1.1.
  146. Vittersø, J. (Ed.). (2016). Handbook of Eudaimonic Well-Being. Springer International Publishing. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-42445-3.
  147. Vrahimis, A. (2013). Encounters between analytic and continental philosophy. Palgrave Macmillan.
  148. Vrahimis, A. (2022). Political Philosophy, Political Theory, and the Analytic-Continental Divide. International Journal of Philosophical Studies, 30(1), 86–101. https://doi.org/10.1080/09672559.2021.2022411.
  149. Wallerstein, I. (2011). The Modern World-System IV: Centrist Liberalism Triumphant, 1789–1914. University of California Press.
  150. Whatmore, R. (2021). The History of Political Thought: A Very Short Introduction. Oxford University Press.
  151. Wilkin, P. (2023). Every Day I Write the Book: Geoculture as Dominant Ideology in the Twenty-First Century. Journal of World-Systems Research, 29(2), 377–400. https://doi.org/10.5195/jwsr.2023.1190.
  152. Williams, B. (2005). In the Beginning Was the Deed: Realism and Moralism in Political Argument (G. Hawthorn, Ed.). Princeton University Press.
  153. Winant, G. (2024). The Baby and the Bathwater: Class Analysis and Class Formation After Deindustrialisation. Historical Materialism, 32(2), 3–30. https://doi.org/ 10.1163/1569206x-20242655.
  154. Wolff, J. (2013). Analytic Political Philosophy. In M. Beaney (Ed.), The Oxford Handbook of the History of Analytic Philosophy (pp. 795–822). Oxford University Press.