1. | Anscombe, G. E. M. (1965). An Introduction to Wittgenstein’s ‘Tractatus’ (II). New York: Harper & Row. |
2. | Bizarro, S. (2011). A Hertzian Interpretation of Wittgenstein’s Tractatus. Eidos: Revista de Filosofía de La Universidad Del Norte, 13, 150–165. |
3. | Brockhaus, R. R. (1991). Pulling Up the Ladder: The Metaphysical Roots of Wittgenstein’s Tractatus Logico-Philosophicus. La Salle, Illinois: Open Court Publishing Company. |
4. | Conant, J. (2000). Elucidation and Nonsense in Frege and Early Wittgenstein. In A. Crary & R. J. Read (Eds.), The New Wittgenstein (pp. 174–217). London: Routledge. |
5. | Diamond, C. (2000). Ethics, Imagination and the Method of Wittgenstein’s Tractatus. In A. Crary & R. J. Read (Eds.), The New Wittgenstein (pp. 149–173). London: Routledge. |
6. | Diamond, C. (2013). Peter Winch on the Tractatus and the unity of Wittgenstein’s philosophy. In A. Pichler & S. Säätelä (Eds.), Wittgenstein: The Philosopher and his Works (Vol. 2, pp. 141–171). Frankfurt am Main: Ontos Verlag. |
7. | Eisenthal, J. (unpublished). Models and Multiplicities. |
8. | Frascolla, P. (1994). Wittgenstein’s Philosophy of Mathematics. London: Routledge. |
9. | Frege, G. (1984). Collected Papers on Mathematics, Logic, and Philosophy. (B. McGuinness, Ed., M. Black, V. H. Dudman, P. Geach, H. Kaal, E.-H. W. Kluge, B. McGuinness, & R. H. Stoothoff, Trans.). Oxford, New York: Basil Blackwell. |
10. | Gomułka, J. (2019). The Other Wittgenstein: The Philosophical Implications of Denkbewegungen and their Relation to the Development of Wittgenstein’s ‘Official’ Philosophy. In I. Somavilla, C. Humphries and B. Sieradzka-Baziur (Eds.), Wittgensteins Denkbewegungen (Tagebücher 1930–1932/1936–1937) aus interdisziplinärer Sicht / Wittgenstein’s Denkbewegungen (Diaries 1930–1932/1936–1937): Interdisciplinary Perspectives. Innsbruck: StudienVerlag. |
11. | Graßhoff, G. (1997). Hertzian Objects in Wittgenstein’s Tractatus. British Journal for the History of Philosophy, 5(1), 87 – 120. |
12. | Griffin, J. (1964). Wittgenstein’s Logical Atomism (Vol. 16). Oxford: Clarendon Press. |
13. | Hacker, P. M. S. (1999). Naming, Thinking and Meaning in the Tractatus. Philosophical Investigations, 22(2), 119–135. |
14. | Hintikka, J. (1958). On Wittgenstein’s ‘Solipsism’. Mind, 67(265), 88–91. |
15. | Hintikka, J. (2011). The Crash of the Philosophy of the Tractatus: The Testimony of Wittgenstein’s Notebooks in October 1929. In E. D. Pellegrin (Ed.), Interactive Wittgenstein (pp. 153–169). Dordrecht: Springer. |
16. | Hintikka, M., & Hintikka, J. (1986). Investigating Wittgenstein. Oxford: Basil Blackwell. |
17. | Kremer, M. (1997). Contextualism and Holism in the Early Wittgenstein: From Prototractatus to Tractatus. Philosophical Topics, 25(2), 87–120. |
18. | Malcolm, N. (1977). Memory and Mind (Vol. 28). Ithaca: Cornell University Press. |
19. | Marion, M. (2003). Wittgenstein and Brouwer. Synthese, 137(1–2), 103–127. |
20. | Markewitz Markewitz, S. (2019). Wittgensteins Kritik des a priori in den Denkbewegungen. In I. Somavilla, C. Humphries and B. Sieradzka-Baziur (Eds.), Wittgensteins Denkbewegungen (Tagebücher 1930–1932/1936–1937) aus interdisziplinärer Sicht / Wittgenstein’s Denkbewegungen (Diaries 1930–1932/1936–1937): Interdisciplinary Perspectives (pp. 55–81). Innsbruck: StudienVerlag. |
21. | McGinn, M. (2006). Elucidating the Tractatus: Wittgenstein’s Early Philosophy of Logic and Language. Oxford: Oxford University Press. |
22. | McGinn, M. (2013). Wittgenstein’s Early Philosophy of Language and the Idea of ‘the Single Great Problem’. In A. Pichler & S. Säätelä (Eds.), Wittgenstein: The Philosopher and his Works (Vol. 2, pp. 107–140). Frankfurt am Main: Ontos Verlag. |
23. | Monk, R. (1990). Ludwig Wittgenstein: the Duty of Genius. London: Penguin Books. |
24. | Monk, R. (2014). The Temptations of Phenomenology: Wittgenstein, the Synthetic a Priori and the ‘Analytic a Posteriori’. British Journal for the History of Philosophy, 22(3), 312–340. |
25. | Park, B.-C. (1998). Phenomenological Aspects of Wittgenstein’s philosophy. Dordrecht and London: Kluwer Academic. |
26. | Potter, M. (2008). Wittgenstein’s Notes on Logic. Oxford: Oxford University Press. |
27. | Proops, I. (2000). Logic and Language in Wittgenstein’s ‘Tractatus’. New York and London: Garland. |
28. | Rhees, R. (1970). Discussions of Wittgenstein. London: Routledge & Kegan Paul. |
29. | Rotter, K. (2006). Gramatyka filozoficzna w dobie sporu o podstawy matematyki. Eseje o drugiej filozofii Wittgensteina. Opole: Wydawnictwo Uniwersytetu Opolskiego. |
30. | Russell, B. (1905). On Denoting. Mind, 14(56), 479–493. |
31. | Sluga, H. (1996). “Whose house is that?” Wittgenstein on the self. In H. D. Sluga & D. G. Stern (Eds.), The Cambridge Companion to Wittgenstein (pp. 320–353). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. |
32. | Stern, D. G. (1995). Wittgenstein on Mind and Language (Vol. 105). Oxford: Oxford University Press. |
33. | Vrahimis, A. (2014). Wittgenstein and the Phenomenological Movement: Reply to Monk. International Journal of Philosophical Studies, 22(3), 341–348. |
34. | Winch, P. G. (1995). Discussion of Malcolm’s Essay. In N. Malcolm & P. G. Winch, Wittgenstein: A Religious Point of View? (pp. 95–135). Ithaca: Cornell University Press. |
35. | Wittgenstein, L. (1929). Some Remarks on Logical Form. Proceedings of the Aristotelian Society, Supplementary Volumes, 9, 162–171. |
36. | Wittgenstein, L. (1980). Wittgenstein’s Lectures, Cambridge 1930-1932. From the Notes of John King and Desmond Lee. (D. Lee, Ed.). Oxford: Blackwell. |
37. | Wittgenstein, L. (2001). Tractatus Logico-Philosophicus. (D. F. Pears & B. F. McGuinness, Trans.). London and New York: Routledge. |
38. | Wittgenstein, L. (2008). Wittgenstein in Cambridge: Letters and Documents 1911-1951. (B. McGuinness, Ed.). Oxford: Blackwell. |
39. | Wittgenstein, L. (2016). Wittgenstein Nachlass. The Wittgenstein Archives at the University of Bergen. Retrieved from http://wab.uib.no |
40. | Wittgenstein, L., 1889-1951. (2009). Philosophical Investigations (Rev. 4th ed. by P.M.S. Hacker and Joachim Schulte). Chichester: Wiley-Blackwell. |
41. | Zahavi, D., & Overgaard, S. (2008). Understanding (Other) Minds: Wittgenstein’s Phenomenological Contribution. In D. K. Levy and E. Zamuner (Eds.), Wittgenstein’s Enduring Arguments. London: Routledge. |