1. | Ameriks, K. (1977). Husserl’s Realism. The Philosophical Review, 86(4), 498–519. https://doi.org/10.2307/2184565 |
2. | Haefliger, G. (1990). Ingarden und Husserls Transzendentaler Idealismus. Husserl Studies, 7(2), 103–121. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00157156 |
3. | Hall, H. (1982). Was Husserl a Realist or an Idealist? In H. L. Dreyfus & H. Hall (Eds.), Husserl, Intentionality and Cognitive Science (pp. 169–190). MIT Press. |
4. | Holmes, R. H. (1975). Is Transcendental Phenomenology Committed to Idealism. The Monist, 59(1), 98–114. https://doi.org/10.5840/monist19755912 |
5. | Husserl, E. (1979). Aufsätze und Vorträge (1890-1910). Kluwer. |
6. | ––––––. (1982). Ideas Pertaining to a Pure Phenomenology and to a Phenomenological Philosophy: Vol. First Book (F. Kersten, Trans.). Nijhoff. |
7. | ––––––. (1994). Briefwechsel. Band I. Die Brentanoschule. Kluwer. |
8. | Ingarden, R. (1921). Über die Gefahr einer Petitio principii in der Erkenntnistheorie. Jahrbuch Für Philosophie Und Phänomenologische Forschung, 4, 545–568. |
9. | ––––––. (1973). The Literary Work of Art (G. G. Grabowicz, Trans.). Northwestern University Press. |
10. | ––––––. (1975). On the Motives which Led Husserl to Transcendental Idealism (A. Hannibalsson, Trans.). Martinus Nijhoff. |
11. | ––––––. (1976). The Letter to Husserl about the VI [Logical] Investigation and “Idealism.” In A.-T. Tymieniecka (Ed.), Ingardeniana (pp. 419–438). Reidel. |
12. | ––––––. (1992). Einführung in die Phänomenologie Edmund Husserls – “Osloer”-Vorlesungen (1967) (G. Haefliger, Ed.; Vol. 4). Max Niemeyer Verlag. |
13. | ––––––. (2013). Controversy over the Existence of the World: Vol. I (A. Szylewicz, Trans.). Peter Lang GmbH. |
14. | ––––––. (2016). Controversy over the Existence of the World: Vol. II (A. Szylewicz, Trans.). Peter Lang GmbH. |
15. | Jansen, J. (2005). On the development of Husserl’s transcendental phenomenology of imagination and its use for interdisciplinary research. Phenomenology and the Cognitive Sciences, 4(2), 121–132. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11097-005-0135-9 |
16. | ––––––. (2016). Husserl. In A. Kind (Ed.), The Routledge Handbook of Philosophy of Imagination (pp. 69–81). Routledge. |
17. | Küng, G. (1972). The World as Noema and as Referent. Journal of the British Society for Phenomenology, 3(1), 15–26. https://doi.org/10.1080/00071773.1972.11006220 |
18. | ––––––. (1973). Husserl on Pictures and Intentional Objects. The Review of Metaphysics, 26(4), 670–680. |
19. | ––––––. (1975). Zum Lebenswerk von Roman Ingarden. Ontologie, Erkenntnistheorie und Metaphysik. In H. Kuhn, E. Avé-Lallemant, & R. Gladiator (Eds.), Die Münchener Phänomenologie (pp. 158–173). Nijhoff. |
20. | ––––––. (1993). Welterkennen und Textinterpretation Bei Roman Ingarden und Nelson Goodman. Grazer Philosophische Studien, 44(1), 69–90. https://doi.org/10.1163/18756735-90000520 |
21. | Makota, J. (1995). Roman Ingarden’s Controversy with Edmund Husserl. In A. Węgrzecki (Ed.), Roman Ingarden a Filozofia Naszego Czasu (pp. 283–295). Polskie Towarzystwo Filozoficzne. |
22. | Mitscherling, J. (1997). Roman Ingarden’s Ontology and Aesthetics. University of Ottawa Press. |
23. | Sartre, J.-P. (1991). The Psychology of Imagination. Carol Publishing Group. |
24. | Sokolowski, R. (1977). On the Motives Which Led Husserl to Transcendental Idealism. The Journal of Philosophy, 74(3), 176–180. https://doi.org/10.2307/2025608 |
25. | Thomasson, A. L. (1999). Fiction and Metaphysics. Cambridge University Press. |
26. | Tymieniecka, A.-T. (1976). Beyond Ingarden’s Idealism/Realism Controversy with Husserl: The New Contextual Phase of Phenomenology. In A.-T. Tymieniecka (Ed.), Ingardeniana: A Spectrum of Specialised Studies Establishing a Field of Research: Vol. Analecta Husserliana IV (pp. 241–418). Reidel. |
27. | Wallner, I. M. (1987). In Defense of Husserl’s Transcendental Idealism: Roman Ingarden’s Critique Re-Examined. Husserl Studies, 4(1), 3–43. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00375881 |
28. | Wolterstorff, N. (1980). Works and Worlds of Art. Clarendon Press |