Acta Iuris Stetinensis

Previously: Zeszyty Naukowe Uniwersytetu Szczecińskiego. Acta Iuris Stetinensis

ISSN: 2083-4373     eISSN: 2545-3181    OAI    DOI: 10.18276/ais.2022.38-06
CC BY-SA   Open Access   DOAJ  CEEOL  ERIH PLUS

Issue archive / 2/2022 (38)
Rola wykładni i jej wpływ na orzecznictwo na przykładzie ulgi meldunkowej
(The role of interpretation and its influence on jurisprudence – the example of residency relief)

Authors: Wiktor Gnych-Pietrzak ORCID
Uniwersytet Szczeciński
Keywords: legal interpretation residency relief tax law in dubio pro tributario
Data publikacji całości:2022
Page range:16 (93-108)
Cited-by (Crossref) ?:
Downloads ?: 216

Abstract

The main objectives of the conducted research concern the consequences for the taxpayer, which arise from the rulings of the administrative courts adopting different types of interpretation in relation to the exemption from income tax on natural persons called the residence relief. The first research objective is to verify whether, among the prerequisites required to obtain the exemption, the mere fulfilment of the material condition enables to obtain the exemption from this tax. The second research objective concerned the duties of tax authorities, relating to the general principles of tax proceedings and resolving doubts as to the factual and legal status in favour of the taxpayer, as well as control of fulfilment of the material condition of the residency relief by obtaining information from teleinformatic systems. The research objectives defined in this way allowed to put forward the main research thesis, which indicates that the choice of interpretation (from among linguistic, systemic, and functional) by the adjudicating panels in the scope of the residency relief affects the application of law and produces different legal effects for the taxpayer. The conducted research allowed also to identify the second (supplementary) research thesis, according to which the tax authorities should apply the principle in dubio pro tributario in cases concerning the residency relief and additionally use the available information and communication systems in order to correctly establish the facts. A dogmatic-legal, analytical, and empirical method were used to conduct the research. Relevant legal regulations and literature were analysed. Additionally, an empirical analysis of the jurisprudence of administrative courts and the Constitutional Tribunal was used. The study was concluded as follows. The descriptive layer of the legal text requires the fulfilment of a formal condition, however, for the correct decoding and application of a legal norm, also a systemic and functional interpretation should be applied due to the lack of clear rules regarding this condition. Moreover, the tax authorities, during tax proceedings, are obliged to resolve doubts in favour of the taxpayer and should cooperate with the taxpayer in order to clarify the doubts concerning fulfilment of the formal condition for the registration allowance, in particular through the use of teleinformatic systems.
Download file

Article file

Bibliography

1.Bartosiewicz A., Kubacki R., PIT. Komentarz, Warszawa 2009.
2.Chudzik M., Podatek dochodowy od osób fizycznych. Komentarz do zmian wprowadzonych ustawą z dnia 6 listopada 2008 r. o zmianie ustawy o podatku dochodowym od osób fizycznych, ustawy o podatku dochodowym od osób prawnych oraz niektórych innych ustaw, LEX/el 2009, sip.lex.pl.
3.Jędrejek G., Wykładnia przepisów prawa cywilnego, Warszawa 2020.
4.Malec A., Zarys teorii definicji prawniczej, Warszawa 2000.
5.Mariański A., Rozstrzyganie wątpliwości na korzyść podatnika (1), „Przegląd Podatkowy” 2009, nr 8.
6.Mariański A., Rozstrzyganie wątpliwości na korzyść podatnika. Zasada prawa podatkowego, Warszawa 2011.
7.Mariański A., Zasada in dubio pro tributario w orzecznictwie Trybunału Konstytucyjnego, w: Z. Ofiarski (red.), XXV lat przeobrażeń w prawie finansowym i prawie podatkowym – ocena dokonań i wnioski na przyszłość, Szczecin 2014.
8.Wróblewski J., Rozumienie prawa i jego wykładnia, Wrocław 1990.
9.Zieliński M., Bogucki O., Choduń A., Czepita S., Kanarek B., Municzewski A., Zintegrowanie polskich koncepcji wykładni prawa, „Ruch Prawniczy, Ekonomiczny i Socjologiczny” 2009, nr 4.
10.Zieliński M., Wykładnia prawa. Zasady – reguły – wskazówki, Warszawa 2017.
11.Zieliński M., Wyznaczniki reguł wykładni prawa, „Ruch Prawniczy, Ekonomiczny i Socjologiczny” 1998, nr 3–4.