Acta Iuris Stetinensis

Previously: Zeszyty Naukowe Uniwersytetu Szczecińskiego. Acta Iuris Stetinensis

ISSN: 2083-4373     eISSN: 2545-3181    OAI    DOI: 10.18276/ais.2024.47-05
CC BY-SA   Open Access   DOAJ  ERIH PLUS

Issue archive / 1/2024 (47)
What does law have in common with a folk tale? Perspectives of application of Propp’s method in jurisprudence

Authors: Łukasz Mirocha ORCID
Pomeranian University in Słupsk
Keywords: theory of law law and literature narratology Vladimir Propp Morphology of the Folktale
Data publikacji całości:2024-03
Page range:16 (77-92)
Cited-by (Crossref) ?:
Downloads ?: 49

Abstract

This study aims to present to the readers the achievements of Russian literary scholar Vladimir Propp and to analyse the possibility of applying them in jurisprudence. Propp researched literary pieces from the magical tale genre and came to a conclusion that their plot is composed of 31 repeating functions performed by 7 types of characters. Propp showed that despite variations in the names of actions, characters and superficial attributes in various folk tales, the deep level of the text of these works allowed readers to notice some identical elements between them. Propp’s major work - Morphology of the Folktale, together with anthropologist Claud Lévi-Strauss’s thought and the findings made by Noam Chomsky became an inspiration for the development of the French school of structuralism and narratological research. The discussion presented in this article fits the research realm called law and literature, especially its narratological branch. This study presents a synthetic elaboration on the state of the art of research on legal narratology and possible application and limitations of Propp’s thought in this field. This work does not rely on the analysis of the law in force, thereby a reference to such a method or a reference to the historical development of relevant law is unnecessary here. Instead, discourse analysis plays the pivotal role in this article. This paper points out that given the differences that occur between law and literature, Propp’s achievements may primarily play the role of inspiration for jurisprudence, though there are realms in which Propp’s method may be applied directly.
Download file

Article file

Bibliography

1.Andruszkiewicz M., Interpretacja prawnicza a interpretacja literacka – kilka uwag, “Krytyka Prawa” 2014, Vol. 6.
2.Andruszkiewicz M., Prawo w literaturze (Law in Literature). O stosowalności literackiej analizy prawa w prawoznawstwie, in: D. Kondratczyk-Przybylska, A. Niewiadomski, E. Walewska (eds.), Język prawny i prawniczy: I Kongres ogólnopolski, Warsaw 2017.
3.Andruszkiewicz M., Transdyscyplinarne związki prawoznawstwa z naukami o języku. Od języków formalnych do nurtu “prawo i literatura”, in: M. Król, A. Bartczak, M. Zalewska (eds.), Integracja zewnętrzna i wewnętrzna nauk prawnych, part 2, Łódź 2014.
4.Baron J.B., Epstein J., Is Law Narrative?, “Buffalo Law Review” 1997, vol. 45.
5.Burzyńska A., Markowski M.P., Teorie literatury XX wieku. Podręcznik, Kraków 2006.
6.Conti D.B., Narrative Theory and the Lain: A Rhetorician’s Invitation to the Legal Academy, “Duquesne Law Review” 2001, Vol. 39(2).
7.Farber D.A., Sherry S., Telling Stories Out of School: An Essay on Legal Narratives, “Stanford Law Review” 1993, Vol. 45.
8.Godzich W., Od narratologii akcji do narratologii decyzji, “Teksty Drugie” 1990, No. 2.
9.Grose C., Johnson M.E., Branding the Strands of Narrative and Critical Reflection with Critical Theory and Lawyering Practice, “Clinical Law Review” 2019, Vol. 26.
10.Hardy S., Narrative Theory, Psychology and Law, “Australian Journal of Law and Society” 2000-2001, Vol. 15.
11.Johnston J., Breit R., Constructing Legal Narratives: Law, Language and the Media, ANZCA Communication, Creativity and Global Citizenship 2009.
12.Kennedy D., Critical Theory, Structuralism and Contemporary Legal Scholarship, “New England Law Review” 1986, Vol. 21.
13.Lahlou K., An Attempt at Applying Vladimir Propp’s Morphology of the Folktale on Charles Dickens’s Great Expectations, “Arab World English Journal for Translation & Literary Studies” 2017, Vol. 1(3).
14.Martinez G.A., Philosophical Considerations and the Use of Narrative in Law, “Rutgers Law Journal” 1999, Vol. 30.
15.Meister J.Ch., Narratology, 19 January 2014, The Living Handbook of Narratology, https://www-archiv.fdm.uni-hamburg.de/lhn/node/48.html.
16.Mirocha Ł., Law and literature jako niedoceniony nurt jurysprudencji, “Societas et Ius” 2013, No. 1(2).
17.Mirocha Ł., Narracja w prawie? Drogi recepcji pojęcia, in: M. Zirk-Sadowski, B. Wojciechowski, T. Bekrycht (eds.), Integracja zewnętrzna i wewnętrzna nauk prawnych, part 1, Łódź 2014.
18.Młynarska-Sobaczewska A., Narracyjność w aktach stosowania prawa, “Państwo i Prawo” 2014, No. 12.
19.Morawski L., Główne problemy współczesnej filozofii prawa. Prawo w toku przemian, Warsaw 2005.
20.Morawski L., Wstęp do prawoznawstwa, Toruń 2011.
21.Olson G., Narration and Narrative in Legal Discourse, 31 May 2014, The Living Handbook of Narratology, https://www-archiv.fdm.uni-hamburg.de/lhn/node/113.html.
22.Plutarch, Żywoty równoległe – wyjątki z żywotu Likurga, in: B. Lesiński, J. Walachowicz (eds.), Historia ustroju państwa w tekstach źródłowych, Warsaw/Poznań 1992.
23.Posner R.A., Legal Narratology, “The University of Chicago Law Review” 1997, Vol. 64.
24.Potrzeszcz J., Uniwersalna gramatyka moralności i prawa, “Forum Prawnicze” 2011, No. 4–5.
25.Propp W., Morfologia bajki, transl. W. Wojtyga-Zagórska, Warsaw 1976.
26.Skuczyński P., Narracyjność języka prawniczego w procesie tworzenia prawa, “Archiwum Filozfii Prawa i Filozofii Społecznej” 2020, No. 1.
27.Smejkalova T., Story-Telling in Judicial Discourse, “Comparative Legilinguistics” 2011, No. 5.
28.Spengler O., Zmierzch Zachodu. Zarys morfologii historii powszechnej, trans. J. Marzęcki, Warsaw 2014.
29.Stawecki T., Winczorek P., Wstęp do prawoznawstwa, Warsaw 1999.
30.Stern S., Narrative in the Legal Text: Judicial Opinions and Their Narratives, in: M. Hanne, R. Weisberg (eds.), Narrative and Metaphor in Law, Cambridge 2018.
31.Wellek R., Warren A., Teoria literatury, trans. Maciej Żurowski, Warsaw 1976.
32.West R., Jurisprudence as Narrative: An Aesthetic Analysis of Modern Legal Theory, “New York University Law Review” 1985, Vol. 60.
33.Wolny K., Teoria literatury. Zarys problematyki, Rzeszów 1995.