Skip to content
Central European Journal of Sport Sciences and Medicine
Vol. 15, No. 3/2016
OpenAlex

Data describes this article or chapter.

Record found in the database

Citations
11
References
14
Citations by year
YearCitations
20162
20174
20201
20212
20221
20251

Data retrieved:

Showing the last available data. An update is pending or has failed.

View source (new tab)

For the whole journal, according to OpenAlex.

Citations
1 179
Publications
402
H-index
14
I10-index
29
Mean citedness (2 years)
0.71
Citations received by year
Journal citation chart. Exact values are available in the table below. 2017: 27 2018: 44 2019: 49 2020: 108 2021: 100 2022: 150 2023: 159 2024: 193 2025: 199 2026: 118 2017 2026
Show data table
Citations received by year
YearPublicationsCitations
20174227
20183344
20193549
202038108
202138100
202231150
202330159
202429193
202530199
202616118

Data retrieved:

What do these numbers mean?

Publications and citations cover records linked to this journal in OpenAlex. H-index is the largest number h of publications with at least h citations each. I10-index counts publications cited at least 10 times. The chart shows citations received in each year; the current year is incomplete. Coverage may differ from WNUS and other services.

The 2-year mean is an OpenAlex metric. It is not the Clarivate Journal Impact Factor.

View in OpenAlex (new tab)
Crossref

Data describes this article or chapter.

Record found in the database

Citations
6

Data retrieved:

Showing the last available data. An update is pending or has failed.

View source (new tab)
OpenCitations

Data describes this article or chapter.

Citations
8

Data retrieved:

Showing the last available data. An update is pending or has failed.

Citing publications
  1. 10.5114/jhk/196719 (2025)
  2. 10.26773/mjssm.210902 (2021)
  3. 10.3389/fspor.2022.1052909 (2022)
  4. 10.1063/1.5012462 (2017)
  5. 10.1063/1.5012463 (2017)
  6. 10.1063/1.5012461 (2017)
  7. 10.1063/1.5012460 (2017)

The list may include only some citations. Check the source for full coverage.

View source (new tab)
DOAJ

Data describes this article or chapter.

Record found in the database

Data retrieved:

View source (new tab)
Google Scholar

Time Analysis of Muscle Activation during Basketball Free Throws

DOI: 10.18276/cej.2016.3-07
Cite

The full text is available

Abstract

Objective of the study: The study assessed and compared the duration of the muscle activation in a basketball free throw, by players representing a preliminary and specialist stage of training. There was also analysed the accuracy of throws according to the stage of training, and whether individual changes in duration of activation have impact on the accuracy of free throws. Material and methods: Players from national basketball teams second and third league of the AZS Academic Sports Club of Opole University performed twenty free throws shooting to the basket during the research study. During tests, players were equipped with EMG apparatus, which registered the time of muscle activation, when subsequent free throws were performed. Arm muscle (biceps and triceps) activation time was measured from the beginning of muscle activation to the time of completion of their work, and from muscle activation to the time of reaching the rim.Results: Players of specialist stage of training, have 0,30 sec shorter average arm muscle time activation, counted from the beginning of activation to obtain the minimum value, from players of the preliminary stage of training. They also gained average 2 points better result in throw accuracy. Variability coefficient of throws duration was higher by 19.56% at players of the specialist stage of training. In the case of unforced extend duration of muscle activation, 80% of specialists and 40% players of preliminary group, don’t score the basket.Conclusions: It was observed that the basketball players of higher training experience, have lower average time of arm muscle activation. It was demonstrated that in players of the specialist stage of training, missed free throws were mostly caused by longer duration from the beginning of muscle activity to the rim, with players of the preliminary stage it was reverse.
Preview PDF

Open PDF

Bibliography (20)
  1. Abe, S., Nozawa T., Kondo T.A. (2009). Proposal of EMG – based training support system for basketball dribbling. Symposium on human interface 2009, held as part of HCI International. Lecture Notes in Computer Science, 5617, 459–465.
  2. Argaj, G. (2005). Analýza Tréningového A Herného Zaťaženia Vo Vybraných Športových Hrách. Zborník Vedeckých Prác Katedry Hier, 65–68.
  3. Button, C.H., MacLeod, M., Sanders, R., Coleman, S. (2003). Examining movement variability in the basketball freethrow action at different skill levels. Research Quarterly for Exercise and Sport, 74 (3), 257–269.
  4. Gablonsky, J.M., Lang, A. (2005). Modeling basketball free throw. SIAM Review, 47 (4), 775–798.
  5. Higgins, J.R., Spaeth, R.K. (1972). Relationship between consistency of movement and environmental condition. Quest, 17, 61–69.
  6. Konrad, P. (2007). ABC of EMG. Practical introduction to kinesiological electromyography (pp. 40–46). Gliwice: Technomex.
  7. Kornecki, S., Lenart, I. (1997). Analiza kinematyczna rzutu piłki do kosza z wyskoku. Wychowanie Fizyczne i Sport, 3, 79–99.
  8. Kubaszczyk, A. (2001). Poziom koordynacyjnych zdolności motorycznych i umiejętności technicznych koszykarzy. Wychowanie Fizyczne i Sport, 4, 480–498.
  9. Liu, S., Burton, A. (1999). Changes in basketball shooting patterns as a function of distance. Perceptual and Motor Skills, 89, 831–845.
  10. Mack, M.G. (2001). Effects of time and movements of the preshot routine on free throw shooting. Perceptual and Motor Skills, 93, 567–573.
  11. Mačura, P. (2007). Trestné hody a víťazstvo v basketbale žien. Zborník Vedeckých Prác Katedry Hier FTVŠ UK, 8, 56–61.
  12. Mačura, P., Potocký, F. (2009). Vplyv herných činností jednotlivca na víťazstvo v basketbalovom zápase. Zborník Vedeckých Prác Katedry Hier FTVŠ UK, 14, 7–13.
  13. Miller, S. (2001). Variability in basketball shooting: practical implications. In: Y. Hong (ed.), In International Research in Sports Biomechanics (pp. 27–34). London: Routledge.
  14. Miller, S. (1999). Electromyographic considerations of inaccuracy in basketball shooting (pp. 209–212). In Scientific Proceedings of the XVII ISBS Symposium.
  15. Tománek, Ľ., Vencúrik, T. (2008). Individualizácia hodnotenia tréningového a zápa-sového zaťaženia v basketbale (pp. 151–156). Na podporu projektov VEGA.
  16. Wissel, H. (1994). Basketball: Steps to Success. Champaign: Human Kinetics.
  17. Zatoń, M., Zatoń, K., Zygadło, A. (2008). Zmiany w zdolności kinestetycznego zróżnicowania w procesie uczenia się jazdy na nartach. Antropomotoryka, 44, 37–47.
  18. Zuzik, P. (2011). Free Throw Shooting Effectiveness in Basketball Matches of Men and Women. Sport Science Review, 20 (3–4), 149–160.
  19. Zwierko, T., Osiński, W. (2001). Indywidualne zróżnicowanie oraz czynniki determinujące skuteczność uczenia się w koszykówce kobiet studiujących wychowanie fizyczne. Antropomotoryka, 11 (22), 47–63.
  20. Vickers, J.N. (1996). Visual control when aiming at a far target. Journal of Experimental Psychology, Human Perception and Performance, 22 (2), 342–354.