Skip to content
Colloquia Theologica Ottoniana
1/2013
OpenAlex

For the whole journal, according to OpenAlex.

Citations
131
Publications
297
H-index
4
I10-index
1
Mean citedness (2 years)
0.17
Citations received by year
Journal citation chart. Exact values are available in the table below. 2017: 7 2018: 1 2019: 7 2020: 9 2021: 6 2022: 19 2023: 14 2024: 20 2025: 12 2026: 8 2017 2026
Show data table
Citations received by year
YearPublicationsCitations
2017287
2018301
2019207
2020169
2021176
20221119
20231114
20241220
20251212
202608

Data retrieved:

What do these numbers mean?

Publications and citations cover records linked to this journal in OpenAlex. H-index is the largest number h of publications with at least h citations each. I10-index counts publications cited at least 10 times. The chart shows citations received in each year; the current year is incomplete. Coverage may differ from WNUS and other services.

The 2-year mean is an OpenAlex metric. It is not the Clarivate Journal Impact Factor.

View in OpenAlex (new tab)
Google Scholar

Czy św. Ambroży był słabym teologiem? Nowatorskie aspekty nauki o Trójcy Świętej w dziele De fide


(Was st. Ambrose weak theologian? Innovative aspects of the doctorine of the st. Trinity in the De Fide work)
Cite

The full text is available

Abstract

This article is about the Trinitarian theology of St. Ambrose of Milan concluded in De fi de, the most important and most complex bishop’s work of dogmatic. It focuses in particular on the innovative and original aspects of the theological thought of the Father of the Church. The fi rst point is given status quaestionis of Ambrosian theology. In the past, used to be attributed to Ambrose opinion good “politics” church, but poor theologian. More recent studies show one-sidedness of this opinion. In the second section are therefore discussed the aspects of Trinitarian theology Doctor of the Church, which show the specifi city and originality of his theological refl ection. They include: a new understanding of the role of the Emperor in matters of religion; relationship between faith and ecclesial interpretation of Scripture, the new interpretation of the term homoousios used by the Council of Nice, a development theme of unity of the Trinity by reference to the unity of the nature and operation of divine Persons, and not only in based on the idea arché, deepening the understanding of the mystery of the Incarnation; Christ as the center of Ambrosian spirituality, and fi nally, the relationship between faith in the Holy Trinity and the unity of the Church. In light of these issues emerges own and original theological “personality” of Bishop of Milan, and in this way it becomes possible to more comprehensive assessment of and appreciation for his contribution to the refl ection of the Trinity.
Preview PDF

Open PDF