T. (MCCCLXIX) 1295 - Rozprawy i Studia - Wydawnictwo Naukowe Uniwersytetu Szczecińskiego

ISBN: 978-83-7972-666-0 ISBN (online): 978-83-7972-667-7 ISSN: 0860-2751 OAI DOI: 10.18276/978-83-7972-667-7

Issue archive / T. (MCCCLXIX) 1295

Year of publication:	2023
Dziedzina:	Dziedzina nauk społecznych
Dyscyplina:	ekonomia i finanse
Keywords:	behavioural economics public policy tools acceptance Poland
Authors:	Danuta Miłaszewicz Uniwersytet Szczeciński

Information

Electronic version of the publication available under CC BY-SA 4.0 license after 12 months from the date of release: February 2024

Abstract

Behavioural sciences (including behavioural economics) offer broad knowledge (so-called behavioural insights), supported by numerous experiments and scientific evidence, of the reasons behind and manifestations of bounded rationality of decision makers. Research results in these sciences have influenced the traditional understanding of the decision making processes and patterns, behaviour of markets and public policy making. Researchers and public institutions across the world believe that better understanding of human behaviours can contribute to improvement in every stage of public policy making and implementa- tion. Policy makers refer to research studies within behavioural sciences in their attempts to understand why people behave in a certain way and use these behavioural insights to design, test and implement behavioural solutions to political issues. This knowledge has allowed development and tests of new instruments which are employed by the so-called behavioural public policy, with the nudge, the foundation of the choice architecture, being one of them. The nudge is regarded as a simple and cheap instrument offering freedom of choice, and is used globally by public bodies to mitigate various problems where the tradi- tional policy instruments seem to fail. The book presents the essence of the nudge, placing this instrument in the broader context of the origins and development of behavioural public policy and its strategies. Since it is always the response and reactions of the society members that determine the effectiveness of public policy, the empirical part of the book presents a description and analysis of the results of the author’s own research studies carried out in Poland and focusing on the citizens’ support for these instruments of behavioural public policy. The study was carried out on a representative sample, with the following predictors of support for the nudge: socio-demographic and geographic attributes of individuals and their households, political preferences and views among the Poles and their perception of objectives of individual nudges as well as measures to achieve them. The book can be used for many purposes, not only educational. The results can also prove helpful for public policy makers and experts of the choice architecture supporting them. The latter group provides the decision makers who consider using the nudge in their polit- ical toolkit with relevant information on the popularity of these tools among the Poles, which may influence both a wider use and limitation of employment of these instruments in the practice of policy making in Poland.

Bibliography

1.	Aczel A.D., Sounderpandian J. (2018). Statystyka w zarzadzaniu. Warszawa: Wydaw- nictwo Naukowe PWN.
2.	Afif Z., Wade W., Calvo-Gonzalez O., Dalton A.G. (2019). Behavioral science around the world. Profiles of 10 countries. Washington: World Bank Group. Pobrane z: http://documents.worldbank.org/curated/en/710771543609067500/pdf/132610-REVI- SED-00-COUNTRY-PROFILES-dig.pdf (dostęp: 8.12.2022).
3.	Allcott H., Sunstein C.R. (2015). Regulating internalities. Journal of Policy Analysis and Management, 34(3), 698–705. DOI: 10.1002/pam.21843.
4.	Almqvist G. (2020). The good place. Essays on nudging. Gothenburg: Brand Factory. Pobrane z: https://www.hhs.se/contentassets/a6f8c612f38b47de8c49ac8a5a8b9614/ sse-phd-diss_2020_kappa_gustav-almqvist_the-good-place.pdf (dostęp: 4.02.2023).
5.	Almqvist G., Andersson P. (2021). Low support for nudging among Swedes in apopula- tion-representative sample. Behavioural Public Policy, 1–13. DOI: 10.1017/bpp.2021.4.
6.	Altman M. (ed.) (2006). Handbook of contemporary behavioral economics. Foundations and developments. New York: Armonk.
7.	Angner E. (2019). We’re all behavioral economists now. Journal of Economic Methodo- logy, 26(3), 195–207. DOI: 10.1080/1350178X.2019.1625210.
8.	Angner E., Loewenstein G. (2012). Behavioral economics. W: U. Mäki (ed.), Handbook of philosophy of science. Philosophy of economic(s. 641–690). Amsterdam: Elsevier. DOI: 10.1016/B978-0-444-51676-3.50022-1.
9.	Arnsparger C., Varoufakis Y. (2008). What is neoclassical economics? The three axioms responsible for its theoretical oeuvre, practical irrelevance and, thus, discursive power. Panoeconomicus, 1, 5–18. DOI: 10.2298/PAN0601005A.
10.	Aronson E. (1997). Człowiek – istota społeczna. Warszawa: Wydawnictwo Naukowe PWN.
11.	Arrow K.J. (1994). Methodological individualism and social knowledge. The American Economic Review, 84(2), 1–9. Pobrane z: https://pages.ucsd.edu/~aronatas/project/ academic/Arrow%20on%20meth.%20indiv.pdf (dostęp: 10.11.2022)
12.	Ayton P., Fischer I. (2004). The hot hand fallacy and the gambler’s fallacy. Two faces of subjective randomness? Memory & Cognition, 32(8), 1369–1378.
13.	Backhouse R.E., Medema S.G. (2009). Defining economics. The long road to accep- tance of the Robbins definition. Economica, 76, 805–820. DOI: 10.1111/j.1468-0335.2009.00789.x.
14.	Baggio M., Ciriolo E., Marandola G., van Bavel R. (2021). The evolution of behaviourally informed policy-making in the EU. Journal of European Public Policy, 28(5), 658–676. DOI: 10.1080/13501763.2021.1912145.
15.	Banerjee S. (2021). Rethinking the origin of the behavioural policy cube with nudge plus. W: M. Viorel (ed.), Behavioral-based interventions for improving public policies (s. 1–16). Hershey: IGI Global. DOI: 10.4018/978-1-7998-2731-3.ch001.
16.	Banerjee S., John P. (2021). Nudge plus. Incorporating reflection into behavioral public policy. W: A. Oliver, G.A. Akerlof, C.R. Sunstein (eds.), Behavioural public policy (s. 1–16). Cambridge University Press: Cambridge. DOI: 10.1017/bpp.2021.6.
17.	Banerjee S., John P. (2022). To nudge plus or nudge+ a dilemma. Pobrane z: https:// bppblog.com/2022/02/18/to-nudge-plus-or-nudge-a-dilemma/ (dostęp: 10.03.2023).
18.	Barbu A., Isaic-Maniu A. (2011). Data collection in Romanian market research. Acompa- rison between prices of PAPI, CATI and CAWI. Management & Marketing Challenges for the Knowledge Society, 6(3), 349–364.
19.	Barros G. (2010). Herbert A. Simon and the concept of rationality. Boundaries and procedures. Brazilian Journal of Political Economy, 30(3), 455–472. DOI: 10.1590/ S0101-31572010000300006.
20.	Barton A., Grüne-Yanoff T. (2015). From libertarian paternalism to nudging – and beyond. Review of Philosophy and Psychology, 6(3), 341–359. DOI: 10.1007/s13164-015-0268-x.
21.	Benartzi S., Beshears J., Milkman K.L., Sunstein C.R., Thaler R.H., Shankar M., Tuc- ker-Ray W., Congdon W.J., Galing S. (2017). Should governments invest more in nudging? Psychological Science, 28(8), 1041–1055. https://doi.org/10.1177/0956797617702501
22.	Benson B. (2022). Cognitive bias cheat sheet. An organized list of cognitive biases because thinking is hard. Pobrane z: https://betterhumans.pub/cognitive-bias-cheat- -sheet-55a472476b18 (dostęp: 28.02.2023).
23.	Bergeron S., Doyon M., Saulais L., Labrecque J. (2019). Using insights from beha- vioral economics to nudge individuals towards healthier choices when eating out. A restaurant experiment. Food Quality and Preference, 73, 56–64. DOI: 10.1016 /j.foodqual.2018.12.001.
24.	Berthet V., Ouvrard B. (2019). Nudge. Towards a consensus view? Psychology and Cognitive Sciences Open Journal, 5(1), 1–5. DOI: 10.17140/PCSOJ-5-143.
25.	Beshears J., Gino F. (2015). Leaders as decision architects. Structure your organiza- tion’s work to encourage wise choices. Harvard Business Review, 93(5), 52–62. DOI: 10.1109/EMR.2016.7559057.
26.	Beshears J., Kosowsky H. (2020). Nudging. Progress to date and future directions. Organisational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 161, 3–19. DOI: 10.1016/ j.obhdp.2020.09.001.
27.	Bicchieri C. (2023). Norm nudging and twisting preferences. Behavioural Public Policy, 1–10. DOI: 10.1017/bpp.2023.5.
28.	Bicchieri C., Muldoon R., Sontuoso A. (2018). Social norms. W: E.N. Zalta (ed.), TheStan- ford encyclopedia of philosophy. Pobrane z: https://plato.stanford.edu/archives/win2018/ entries/social-norms/ (dostęp: 20.11.2022).
29.	Bickley S.J., Torgler B. (2021). Behavioural economics, what have we missed? Explo- ring “classical” behavioural economics roots in AI, cognitive psychology, and com- plexity theory. CREMA Working Paper, 21. Pobrane z: https://www.econstor.eu/ bitstream/10419/234636/1/2021-21.pdf (dostęp: 21.11.2022).
30.	Bircher J., Kuruvilla S. (2014). Defining health by addressing individual, social, and environmental determinants. New opportunities for health care and public health. Journal of Public Health Policy, 35(3), 363–386. DOI: 10.1057/jphp.2014.19.
31.	Blaug M. (1995). Metodologia ekonomii. Warszawa: Wydawnictwo Naukowe PWN.
32.	Bossaerts P., Murawski C. (2015). From behavioural economics to neuroeconomics to decision neuroscience. The ascent of biology in research on human decision making. Current Opinion in Behavioral Sciences, 5, 37–42.
33.	Bovens L. (2009). The ethics of nudge. W: T. Grüne-Yanoff, S.O. Hansson (eds.), Prefe- rences change. Approaches from philosophy, economics and psychology (s. 207–219). Berlin: Springer.
34.	BPI (2020). Polski internet we wrześniu 2020. Pobrane z: https://pbi.org.pl/badanie-ge- mius-pbi/polski-internet-we-wrzesniu-2020/ (dostęp: 22.11.2022).
35.	Brandon A., List J.A., Metcalfe R.D., Price M.K., Rundhammer F. (2019). Testing for crowd out in social nudges. Evidence from a natural field experiment in the market for elec- tricity. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences USA, 116(12), 5293–5298. DOI: 10.1073/pnas.1802874115.
36.	Brosch T. (2020). Behavioral insights for climate action. Pobrane z: https://gspi.ch/acti- vities/behavioral-insights-for-climate-action/ (dostęp: 25.01.2023).
37.	Brzezicka J., Wiśniewski R., Napiórkowska-Baryła A. (2016). Libertarian paternalism and self-government housing policy in Poland. Olsztyn Economic Journal, 11(2), 103–118. DOI: 10.31648/oej.2911.
38.	Bunge M. (1998). Social science under debate. A philosophical perspective. Toronto: University of Toronto Press.
39.	Callaway F., Hardy M., Griffiths T.L. (2022). Optimal nudging for cognitively boun- ded agents. A framework for modeling, predicting, and controlling the effects of choice architectures. PsyArXiv Preprints. Pobrane z: https://psyarxiv.com/7ahdc. DOI: 10.31234/osf.io/7ahdc (dostęp: 12.03.2023)
40.	Camerer C., Loewenstein G. (2004). Behavioral economics. Past, present, future. W: C.F. Camerer, G. Loewenstein, M. Rabin (eds.), Advances in behavioral economics (s. 3–51). New York–Princeton: Russell Sage Foundation–Princeton University Press.
41.	Camerer C., Issacharoff S., Loewenstein G., O’Donoghue T., Rabin M. (2003). Regulation for Conservatives. Behavioral economics and the case for asymmetric paternalism. University of Pennsylvania Law Review, 151, 1211–1254. DOI: 10.2307/3312889.
42.	Carlsson F., Gravert C.A., Kurz V., Johansson-Stenman O. (2021). The use of green nud- ging as an environmental policy instrument. Review of Environmental Economics and Policy, 15(2), 216–237. DOI: 10.1086/715524.
43.	Carpenter C.J. (2010). A meta-analysis of the effectiveness of health belief model varia- bles in predicting behavior. Health Communication, 25(8), 661–669. DOI: 10.1080/ 10410236.2010.521906.
44.	Cartwright E. (2011). Behavioral economics. London: Routledge.
45.	Cesarini D., Johannesson M., Magnusson P., Wallace B. (2012). The behavioral genetics of behavioral anomalies. Management Science, 58(1), 21–34.
46.	CESCP (2019). Nudge plus. A theory of behaviour change incorporating reflection. Pobrane z: https://www.sciencespo.fr/centre-etudes-europeennes/sites/sciencespo. fr.centre-etudes-europeennes/files/Sem%20191126%20SGCEE%20invit.pdf (dostęp: 10.03.2023).
47.	Chetty R. (2015). Behavioral economics and public policy. A pragmatic perspective. American Economic Review, 105(5), 1–33. DOI: 10.1257/aer.p20151108.
48.	Cialdini R.B., Martin S.J., Goldstein N.J. (2015). Small behavioral science-informed changes can produce large policy-relevant effects. Behavioral Science & Policy, 1(1), 21–27. DOI: 10.1353/BSP.2015.0008.
49.	Congiu L., Moscati I. (2022). A review of nudges. Definitions, justifications, effectiveness. Journal of Economic Surveys, 36, 188–213. DOI: 10.1111/joes.12453.
50.	Congleton R. (2022). Behavioral economics and the Virginia school of political eco- nomy. Overlaps and complementarities. Public Choice, 191, 387–404. DOI: 10.1007/ s11127-019-00679-3.
51.	Costa E., Halpern D. (2019). The behavioural science of online harm and manipulation, and what to do about it. Pobrane z: https://www.bi.team/wp-content/uploads/2019/04/ BIT_The-behavioural-science-of-online-harm-and-manipulation-and-what-to-do-a- bout-it_Single.pdf (dostęp: 11.12.2022).
52.	Dangubic M., Voorpostel M. (2017). Computer-Assisted Web Interviewing (CAWI) in the Swiss Household Panel. Demographics, participation and data quality. Swiss Household Panel Working Paper, 1(17).
53.	Daniati N., Widjaja G., Olalla G.M., Chaudhary P., Nader S.M., Chupradit S., Fakri M.Y. (2021). The health belief model’s application in the development of health behaviors. Health Education and Health Promotion, 9, 521–527
54.	Davidai S., Gilovich T., Ross L.D. (2012). The meaning of default options for potential organ donors. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 109(38), 15201–15205. DOI: 10.1073/pnas.1211695109.
55.	Dawnay E., Shah H. (2011). Behavioural economics. Seven key principles for environ- mental policy. W: S. Dietz, J. Michie, C. Oughton (eds.), The political economy of the environment (s. 74–97). London: Routledge.
56.	Dewies M., Denktaş S., Giel L., Noordzij G., Merkelbach I. (2022). Applying behavio- ural insights to public policy. An example from Rotterdam. Global Implementation Research and Applications, 2, 53–66. DOI: 10.1007/s43477-022-00036-5.
57.	Diacon P.E., Donici G.A., Maha L.G. (2013). Perspectives of economics – behavioural economics. Theoretical and Applied Economics, 20(7), 27–32.
58.	Diederich J., Goeschl T., Waichman I. (2022). Self-nudging vs. social nudging in social dilemmas. An experiment. AWI Discussion Paper, 710. Pobrane z: https://archiv.ub.uni- -heidelberg.de/volltextserver/31339/7/Diederich_Goeschl_Waichman_2022_dp710. pdf (dostęp: 22.02.2023).
59.	Dolan P. (2013). Influencing the financial behaviour of individuals. The mindspace way. W: A. Oliver (ed.), Behavioural public policy (s. 191–208). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
60.	Dolan P., Hallsworth M., Halpern D., King D., Metcalfe R., Vlaev I. (2012). Influencing behaviour. The MINDSPACE way. Journal of Economic Psychology, 33(1), 264–277.
61.	Dolan P., Hallsworth M., Halpern D., King D., Vlaev I. (2010). MINDSPACE. Influencing behaviour through public policy. London: Institute for Government. Pobrane z: https:// www.instituteforgovernment.org.uk/sites/default/files/publications/MINDSPACE- -Practical-guide-final-Web_1.pdf (dostęp: 25.11.2022).
62.	Dold M. (2022). Methodological individualism in behavioral economics. W: N. Bulle, F. Di Iorio (ed s.), Palgrave handbook of methodological individualism. Pobrane z: https://www.researchgate.net/publication/364608968_Methodological_Individu- alism_in_Behavioral_Economics (dostęp: 9.12.2022).
63.	Dowding K., Oprea A. (2021). Reconsidering nudges and manipulation. Pobrane z: https://www.researchgate.net/publication/357227067_Reconsidering_Nudges_and_ Manipulation (dostęp: 14.12.2023).
64.	Dursun I., Kabadayi E.T., Tuger A.T. (2017). Application of value-belief-norm theory to responsible post consumption behaviour. Recycling and reuse.International Congress of the New Approaches and Technologies for Sustainable Development, 21–24 Sep- tember, 21–24. Pobrane z: https://www.researchgate.net/publication/320087119_Appli- cation_of_Value-Belief-Norm_Theory_to_Responsible_Post_Consumption_Beha- viors_Recycling_and_Reuse (dostęp: 10.10.2022).
65.	Earl P.E. (2016). The evolution of behavioural economics. W: R. Frantz, S.H. Chen, K. Dopfer, F. Heukelom, S. Mousavi (eds.), Routledge handbook of behavioral eco- nomics (s. 5–17). New York: Routledge.
66.	Ebeling F., Lotz S. (2015). Domestic uptake of green energy promoted by opt-out tariffs. Nature Climate Change, 5(9), 868–871. DOI: 10.1038/nclimate2681.
67.	EC (2017). Better regulation guidelines. SWD(2017)350, European Commission 7 July. Luxembourg: Publications Office of the EU.
68.	Egan M. (2017). An analysis of Richard H. Thaler and Cass R.Sunstein’s nudge improving decisions about health, wealth, and happiness. London: Routledge.
69.	Engelen B. (2019). Nudging and rationality. What is there to worry? Rationality and Society, 31(2), 204–232. DOI: 10.1177/1043463119846743.
70.	Engelen B., Schmidt A. (2020). The ethics of nudging. An overview. Philosophy Compass, 15. DOI: 10.1111/phc3.12658.
71.	Esmark A. (2019). Communicative governance at work. How choice architects nudge citizens towards health, wealth and happiness in the information age. Public Mana- gement Review, 21(1), 138–158. DOI: 10.1080/14719037.2018.1473476.
72.	Eurostat 1 (2023). Individuals who used the internet, frequency of use and activities. Pobrane z: https://ec.europa.eu/eurostat/databrowser/view/ISOC_R_IUSE_I__ custom_4358695/default/table?lang=en (dostęp: 3.01.2023).
73.	Eurostat 2 (2023). Individuals’ level of digital skills (from 2021 onwards). Pobrane z: https://ec.europa.eu/eurostat/databrowser/view/isoc_sk_dskl_i21/default/table?lan- g=en (dostęp: 3.01.2023).
74.	Eurostat 3 (2023). Individuals’ level of digital skills (until 2019). Pobrane z: https://ec.europa. eu/eurostat/databrowser/view/isoc_sk_dskl_i/default/table?lang=en (dostęp: 3.01.2023).
75.	Evans J.S., Stanovich K.E. (2013). Dual-process theories of higher cognition advancing the debate. Perspectives on Psychological Science, 8(3), 223–241. DOI: 10.1177/ 1745691612460.
76.	Ewert B. (2020). Moving beyond the obsession with nudging individual behaviour. Towards a broader understanding of behavioural public policy. Public Policy and Administration, 35(3), 337–360. DOI: 10.1177/0952076719889090.
77.	Ewert B., Loer K. (2021). Advancing behavioural public policies. In pursuit of a more comprehensive concept. Policy & Politics, 49(1), 25–47.
78.	Ewert B., Loer K., Thomann E. (2021). Beyond nudge. Advancing the state-of-the-art of behavioural public policy and administration. Policy & Politics, 49(1), 3–23.
79.	Fabbro G.D. (2021). Nudging and COVID-19. Behavioural insights as policy tools in the fight against the virus. BioLaw Journal, 1, 191–219. DOI: 10.15168/2284-4503-741. Fehr E., Hoff K. (2011). Introduction. Tastes, castes and culture. Theinfluence of society on preferences. The Economic Journal, 121(556), 396–412.
80.	Feitsma J.N. (2018). The behavioural state. Critical observations on technocracy and psychocracy. Policy Science, 51, 387–410. DOI: 10.1007/s11077-018-9325-5.
81.	Feitsma J.N. (2019). Inside the behavioural state. Hague: Eleven International Publishing. Feitsma J.N. (2020). Rationalized incrementalism. How behavior experts in gover- nment negotiate institutional logics. Critical Policy Studies, 14(2), 156–173. DOI: 10.1080/19460171.2018.1557067.
82.	Felsen G., Castelo N., Reiner P.B. (2013). Decisional enhancement and autonomy. Public attitudes towards overt and covert nudges. Judgment and Decision Making, 8, 202–213. DOI: 10.1017/S1930297500005933.
83.	Finucane M.L., Alhakami A., Slovic P., Johnson S.M. (2000). The affect heuristic in judgments of risks and benefits. Journal of Behavioral Decision Making, 13, 1–17.https://doi.org/10.1002/(SICI)1099-0771(200001/03)13:1<1::AID-BDM333>3.0.CO;2-S
84.	Forwood S.E., Ahern A.L., Marteau T.M., Jebb S.A. (2015). Offering within-category food swaps to reduce energy density of food purchases. A study using an experimen- tal online supermarket. International Journal of Behavioral Nutrition and Physical Activity, 12(1), 1–10. DOI: 10.1186/s12966-015-0241-1.
85.	Frankish K., Evans J.S. (2009). The duality of mind. An historical perspective. W: J.S. Evans, K. Frankish (eds.), In two minds. Dual processes and beyond (s. 1–29). Oxford: Oxford University Press.
86.	Frantz R. (2013). Frederick Hayek’s behavioral economics in historical context. W: R. Frantz, R. Leeson (eds.), Behavioral economics and Hayek (s. 1–34). New York: Palgrave Macmillan.
87.	Frederick S. (2002). Automated choice heuristics. W: T. Gilovich, D. Griffin, D. Kahne- man (eds.), Heuristics and biases. The psychology of intuitive judgment (s. 548–58). New York: Cambridge University Press. DOI: 10.1017/CBO9780511808098.032.
88.	Freire W.B., Waters W.F., Rivas-Mariño G. (2017). Nutritional traffic light system for processed foods. Qualitative study of awareness, understanding, attitudes, and prac- tices in Ecuador. Revista Peruana de Medicina Experimental y Salud Pública, 34(1), 11–18. DOI: 10.17843/rpmesp.2017.341.2762.
89.	Freire W.B., Waters W.F., Rivas-Mariño G., Nguyen T., Rivas P. (2017). A qualitative study of consumer perceptions and use of traffic light food labelling in Ecuador. Public Health Nutrition, 20(5), 805–813. DOI: 10.1017/S1368980016002457.
90.	Ghesla C., Grieder M., Schmitz J. (2019). Nudge for good? Choice defaults and spillover effects. Frontiers in Psychology, 10, 178. DOI: 10.3389/fpsyg.2019.00178.
91.	Gigerenzer G. (2015a). Simply rational. Decision making in the real world. New York: Oxford University Press.
92.	Gigerenzer G. (2015b). On the supposed evidence for libertarian paternalism. Review of Philosophy and Psychology, 6(3), 361–383. DOI: 10.1007/s13164-015-0248-1.
93.	Gigerenzer G. (2018). The bias bias in behavioral economics. Review of Behavioral Economics, 5(3–4), 303–336. DOI: 10.1561/105.00000092.
94.	Gigerenzer G. (2021a). Axiomatic rationality and ecological rationality. Synthese, 198, 3547–3564. DOI: 10.1007/s11229-019-02296-5.
95.	Gigerenzer G. (2021b). Embodied heuristics. Frontiers Psychology, 12, 711289. DOI: 10.3389/fpsyg.2021.711289.
96.	Gigerenzer G., Brighton H. (2009). Homo Heuristicus. Why biased minds make better inferences. Topics in Cognitive Science, 1(1), 107–143. DOI: 10.1111/j.1756-8765.2008.01006.x.
97.	Gigerenzer G., Todd P.M. (1999). Simple heuristics that make us smart. New York: Oxford University Press.
98.	Gill D. (2018). When ‘nudging’ is forever. The case of Sweden. Pobrane z: http://review.chi- cagobooth.edu/behavioral-science/2018/article/when-nudging-forever-case-sweden (dostęp: 12.03.2023).
99.	Gocko J. (2020). Moralno-społeczne aspekty troski o zdrowie w kontekście epidemii COVID-19. Roczniki Teologiczne, 67(3), 121–135. DOI: 10.18290/rt.20673-7.
100.	Golberg E. (2018). Better regulation. European Union Style. M-RCBG Associate Working Paper Series, 98.
101.	Gopalan M., Pirog M.A. (2017). Applying behavioral insights in policy analysis. Recent trends in the United States. The Policy Studies Journal, 45(S1), 82–114. DOI: 10.1111/psj.12202.
102.	Gordon W. (2011). Behavioural economics and qualitative research. A marriage made in heaven? International Journal of Market Research, 53(2), 171–185. DOI: 10.2501/IJMR-53-2-171-186.
103.	Goździalska A., Jaśkiewicz J. (2015). Wstęp. W: A.Goździalska, J. Jaśkiewicz (red.), Tro- ska o zdrowie w aspekcie społecznym (s. 7–8). Kraków: Oficyna Wydawnicza AFM.
104.	Grayot J.D. (2019). From selves to systems. On the intrapersonal and intraneural dynamics of decision making. Journal of Economic Methodology, 26(3), 208–227. DOI: 10.1080/1350178X.2019.1625213
105.	Grayot J.D. (2020). Dual process theories in behavioral economics and neuroeconomics. A critical review. Review of Philosophy and Psychology, 11, 105–136. DOI: 10.1007/ s13164-019-00446-9
106.	Green E., Murphy E., Gryboski K. (2020). Health belief model. W: The Wiley encyclopedia of health psychology (s. 211–214). DOI: 10.1002/9781119057840.ch68
107.	Grüne-Yanoff T., Hertwig R. (2016). Nudge versus boost. How coherent are policy and theory? Minds and Machines, 26(1–2), 149–183. DOI: 10.100711023-015-9367-9
108.	Guala F. (2008). Experimentation in economics. W: U. Mäki (ed.), Handbook of the philo- sophy of science (s. 597–640). Amsterdam: Elsevier. Pobrane z: http://users.unimi.it/ guala/Handbook%20Elsevier3.pdf (dostęp: 12.12.2022).
109.	GUS (2020). Mały rocznik statystyczny 2020. Pobrane z: www.stat.gov.pl (dostęp: 16.12.2022)
110.	GUS (2021). Komunikat Prezesa Głównego Urzędu Statystycznego z dnia 9 lutego 2021 r. w sprawie przeciętnego wynagrodzenia w gospodarce narodowej w 2020 r. Pobrane z: https://stat.gov.pl/sygnalne/komunikaty-i-obwieszczenia/lista-komunikatow-i-ob- wieszczen/komunikat-w-sprawie-przecietnego-wynagrodzenia-w-gospodarce-naro- dowej-w-2020-roku,273,8.html (dostęp: 19.11.2022).
111.	Hacking I. (1987). The inverse gambler’s fallacy – the argument from design. The anthro- pic principle applied to Wheeler Universes. Mind, 96, 331–340.
112.	Hagman W., Andersson D., Västfjäll D., Tinghög G. (2015). Public views on policies involving nudges. Review of Philosophy and Psychology, 6, 439–453. DOI: 10.1007/ s13164-015-0263-2
113.	Hallsworth M. (2023). A manifesto for applying behavioural science. Nature Human Behaviour, 7, 310–322. DOI: 10.1038/s41562-023-01555-3
114.	Hallsworth M., Egan M., Rutter J., McCrae J. (2018). Behavioural government. Using behavioural science to improve how governments make decisions. Pobrane z: https://www.instituteforgovernment.org.uk/sites/default/files/publications/BIT% (dostęp: 18.01.2023).
115.	Hallsworth M., Kirkman E. (2020). Behavioral insights. Cambridge: MIT Press.
116.	Halpern D. (2015). Inside the nudge unit. How small changes can make a big difference. London: WH Allen.
117.	Halpern D., Gallagher R. (2015). Can ‘nudging’ change behaviour? Using ‘behavio- ural insights’ to improve program redesign. W: J. Wanna, H.A. Lee, S. Yates (eds.), Managing under austerity, delivering under pressure. Performance and produc- tivity in public service (s. 165–121). Canberra: The Australian National Univer- sity Press.
118.	Halpern D., Sanders M. (2016). Nudging by government. Progress, impact and lessons learnt. Behavioral Science & Policy, 2(2), 53–65.
119.	Hamerman E.J., Rudell F., Martins C.M. (2018). Factors that predict taking restaurant leftovers. Strategies for reducing food waste. Journal of Consumer Behaviour, 17(1), 94–104. DOI: 10.1002/cb.1700
120.	Han H., Hwang J., Lee M.J. (2016). The value-belief-emotion-norm model. Investigating customers’ eco-friendly behaviour. Journal of Travel & Tourism Marketing, 34(5), 590–607. DOI: 10.1080/10548408.2016.1208790
121.	Hands D.W. (2020). Libertarian paternalism. Taking Econs seriously. International Review of Economics, 67(4), 419–441. DOI: 10.1007/s12232-020-00349-7
122.	Hands D.W. (2021). Libertarian paternalism. Making rational fools. Review of Behavioral Economics, 8, 305–326. DOI: 10.1561/105.00000144
123.	Hansen P.G. (2014), Nudge and libertarian paternalism. Does the hand fit the glove? Copenhagen: Roskilde University
124.	Hansen P.G. (2016). The definition of nudge and libertarian paternalism. Does the hand fit the glove? European Journal of Risk Regulation, 7, 155–174. DOI: 10.1017/ S1867299X00005468
125.	Hansen P.G. (2018a). The concepts of nudge and nudging in behavioural public policy. W: H. Strassheim, S. Beck (eds.), Handbook of behavioural change and public policy (s. 63–77). Cheltenham: Edward Elgar Publishing. DOI: 10.4337/9781785367854.00010
126.	Hansen P.G. (2018b). What are we forgetting? Behavioural Public Policy, 2(2), 190–197. DOI: 10.1017/bpp.2018.13
127.	Hansen P.G., Jespersen A.M. (2013). Nudge and the manipulation of choice. A framework for the responsible use of the nudge approach to behaviour change in public policy. European Journal of Risk Regulation, (4)1, 3–28. DOI: 10.1017/S1867299X00002762
128.	Hargreaves Heap S.P. (2020). Two accounts of the relation between political economy and economics (and why it matters which account is better). Social Philosophy and Policy, 37(1), 103–117. DOI: 10.1017/S0265052520000060
129.	Hauser F. (ed.) (2017). Policy-making, implementation and innovation. Luxembourg: Publications Office of the European Union.
130.	Hausman D., Welch B. (2010). To nudge or not to nudge. Journal of Political Philosophy, 18, 123–136. DOI: 10.1111/j.1467-9760.2009.00351.x
131.	Haynes L., Service O., Goldacre B., Torgerson D. (2012). Test, learn, adapt. Developing public policy with randomised controlled trials. Pobrane z: https://www.bi.team/ publications/test-learn-adapt-developing-public-policy-with-randomised-controlled- -trials/ (dostęp: 23.11.2022).
132.	Heidig W., Wentzel D., Tomczak T., Wiecek A., Faltl M. (2017). “Supersize me!” Theeffects of cognitive effort and goal frame on the persuasiveness of upsell offers. Journal of Service Management, 28(3), 541–562. DOI: 10.1108/JOSM-03-2016-0063.
133.	Hertwig R. (2017). When to consider boosting. Some rules for policy-makers. Behavioural Public Policy, 1(2), 143–161. DOI: 10.1017/bpp.2016.14
134.	Hertwig R., Grüne-Yanoff T. (2017). Nudging and boosting. Steering or empowe- ring good decisions. Perspectives on Psychological Science, 12(6), 973–986. DOI: 10.1177/1745691617702496
135.	Heukelom F. (2014). Behavioral economics. A history. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
136.	Hirshleifer D. (2008). Psychological bias as a driver of financial regulation. European Financial Management, 14(5), 856–874. DOI: 10.1111/j.1468-036X.2007.00437.x
137.	Hoff K., Stiglitz J.E. (2016). Striving for balance in economics. Towards a theory of the social determination of behavior. Journal of Economic Behavior & Organization, 126, 25–57.
138.	Hosseini H., Katona G. (2011). A founding father of old behavioral economics. The Journal of Socio-Economics, 40(6), 977–984.
139.	Howlett M. (2018a). Designing public policies. Principles and instruments. London: Routledge.
140.	Howlett M. (2018b). Matching policy tools and their targets. Beyond nudges and utility maximisation in policy design. Policy & Politics, 46(1), 101–124.
141.	Howlett M., Giest S. (2015). Policy cycle. W: J.D. Wright (ed.), International encyclopa- edia of the social & behavioral sciences (s. 288–292). Oxford: Elsevier. DOI: 10.1016/ B978-0-08-097086-8.75031-8
142.	Howlett M., Mukherjee I., Woo J. (2018). Thirty years of research on policy instruments. W: H.K. Colebatch, R. Hoppe (ed s.), Handbook on policy, process, and governing (s. 147–168). Cheltenham: Edward Elgar Publishing.
143.	Huh Y.E., Vosgerau J., Morewedge C.K. (2014). Social defaults. Observed choices become choice defaults. Journal of Consumer Research, 41(3), 746–760. DOI: 10.1086/677315
144.	Hummel D., Maedche A. (2019). How effective is nudging? A quantitative review on the effect sizes and limits of empirical nudging studies. Journal of Behavioral and Experimental Economics, 80, 47–58.
145.	Hunt R.R., Lamb C.A. (2001). What causes the isolation effect? Journal of Experimental Psychology, 27(6), 1359–1366. DOI: 10.1037/0278-7393.27.6.1359
146.	IOSCO (2018). The application of behavioural insights to financial literacy and investor education programmes and initiatives.. Pobrane z: https://www.oecd.org/finance/ The-Application-of-Behavioural-Insights-to-Financial-Literacy-and-Investor-Edu - cation-Programmes-and-Initiatives.pdf (dostęp: 11.10.2022).
147.	Jachimowicz J.M., Duncan S., Weber E.U., Johnson E.J. (2019). When and why defaults influence decisions. A metaanalysis of default effects. Behavioural Public Policy, 3(2), 159–186. DOI: 10.1017/bpp.2018.43
148.	Jackson W.A. (2013). The desocialising of economic theory. International Journal of Social Economics, 40(9), 809–825. DOI: 10.1108/IJSE-09-2012-0174
149.	Jedynak T. (2019). How to effectively encourage Poles to save for retirement? The use of achievements of behavioural economics in the construction of Employee Capital Plans. Problemy Polityki Społecznej, 45, 33–46. DOI: 10.31971/16401808.45.2.2019.2
150.	John P. (2016). Behavioral approaches. How nudges lead to more intelligent policy design. W: G.B. Peters, P. Zittoun (eds.), Contemporary approaches to public policy. Theo- ries, controverses and perspectives (s. 113–133). Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan. DOI: 10.1057/978-1-137-50494-4_7
151.	John P. (2018). How far to nudge? Assessing behavioral public policy. Northampton: Edward Elgar Publishing. DOI: 10.4337/9781786430557
152.	John P. (2023). The ethics of self-aware behavioural public policies. Any different to standard nudges? Behavioural Public Policy, 1–8. DOI: 10.1017/bpp.2023.10
153.	John P., Cotterill S., Moseley A., Smith G., Stoker G., Wales C. (2019). Nudge, nudge, think, think. Experimenting with ways to change citizen behaviour. Manchester: Manchester University Press. DOI: 10.7765/9781526153487
154.	John P., Cotterill S., Richardson L., Moseley A., Smith G., Stoker G., Wales C. (2011). Nudge, nudge, think, think. Using experiments to change civic behavior. London–New York: Bloomsbury Academic.
155.	John P., Smith G., Stoker G. (2009). Nudge nudge, think think. Two strategies for changing civic behaviour. The Political Quarterly, 80(3), 361–370. DOI: 10.1111/ j.1467-923X.2009.02001.x
156.	John P., Stoker G. (2019). Rethinking the role of experts and expertise in behavioural public policy. Policy & Politics, 47(2), 209–226.
157.	Johnson E., Goldstein D. (2003). Do defaults save lives? Science, 302, 1338–1339. https://doi.org/10.1126/science.1091721
158.	Johnson E.J., Shu S.B., Dellaert B.G., Fox C., Goldstein D.G., Häubl G., Larrick R.P., Payne J.W., Peters E., Schkade D., Wansink B., Weber E.U. (2012). Beyond nudges. Tools of a choice architecture. Marketing Letters. A Journal of Research in Marketing, 23(2), 487–504. DOI: 10.1007/s11002-012-9186-1
159.	Jolls C., Sunstein C.R., Thaler R. (1998). A behavioral approach to law and economics. Stanford Law Review, 1471–1550. DOI: 10.2307/1229304
160.	Jolly S., Bakker R., Hooghe L., Marks G., Polk J., Rovny J., Steenbergen M., Vachudova M.A. (2021). Chapel Hill Expert Survey trend file, 1999–2019. Electoral Studies, 75, 102420.
161.	Jones R., Pykett J., Whitehead M. (2013). Changing behaviours. On the rise of the psy- chological state. Cheltenham: Edward Elgar.
162.	Kahneman D. (2002). Maps of bounded rationality. A perspective on intuitive judgment and choice. Prize Lecture. Pobrane z: http://www.nobelprize.org/nobel_prizes/eco- nomics/laureates/2002/kahnemann-lecture.pdf (dostęp: 15.12.2022).
163.	Kahneman D. (2003a). Maps of bounded rationality. Psychology for behavioral economics. American Economic Review, 93(5), 1449–1475. DOI: 10.1257/000282803322655392
164.	Kahneman D. (2003b). A perspective on judgment and choice. Mapping bounded ratio- nality. American Psychologist, 58(9), 697–720. DOI: 10.1037/0003-066X.58.9.697
165.	Kahneman D. (2011). Thinking, fast and slow. London: Penguin Books.
166.	Kahneman D. (2012). Pułapki myślenia. O myśleniu szybkim i wolnym. Poznań: Media Rodzina.
167.	Kahneman D., Frederick S. (2002). Representativeness revisited. Attribute substitution in intuitive judgment. W: T. Gilovich, D. Griffin, D. Kahneman (eds.), Heuristics and biases. The psychology of intuitive judgment (s. 49–81). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. DOI: 10.1017/CBO9780511808098.004
168.	Kahneman D., Frederick S. (2005). A model of heuristic judgment. W: K.J. Holyoak, R.G. Morrison (eds.), The Cambridge handbook of thinking and reasoning (s. 267–293), Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
169.	Kahneman D., Krueger A.B., Schkade D., Schwarz N., Stone A.A. (2006). Would you be happier if you were richer? A focusing illusion. Science, 312(5782), 1908–1910. DOI: 10.1126/science.1129688
170.	Kahneman D., Slovic P., Tversky A. (1982). Preface. W: D. Kahneman, P. Slovic, A. Tversky (eds.), Judgment under uncertainty. Heuristics and biases (s. XI–XIV). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. DOI: 10.1017/CBO9780511809477.001
171.	Kahneman D., Tversky A. (1973). On the psychology of prediction. Psychological Review, 80(4), 237–251. DOI: 10.1037/h0034747
172.	Kahneman D., Tversky A. (1992). Advances in prospect theory cumulative representation of uncertainty. Journal of Risk and Uncertainty, 5, 297–323. DOI: 10.1007/BF00122574
173.	Kahneman D., Tversky A. (1996). On the reality of cognitive illusions. Psychological Review, 103(3), 582–591. DOI: 10.1037/0033-295X.103.3.582
174.	Kaiser M., Bernauer M., Sunstein C.R., Reisch L.A. (2020). The power of green defaults. The impact of regional variation of opt-out tariffs on green energy demand in Germany. Ecological Economics, 174.
175.	Kao Y.F., Velupillai K.V. (2015). Behavioural economics. Classical and modern. The European Journal of the History of Economic Thought, 22(2), 236–271. DOI: 10.1080/09672567.2013.792366
176.	Khadzhyradieva S., Hrechko T., Savkov A. (2019). Behavioral insights in public policy. Ukrainian case. Public Policy and Administration, 18(1), 85–99. DOI: 10.5755/ j01.ppaa.18.1.23130
177.	King J., Slovic P. (2014). The affect heuristic in early judgments of product innovations. Journal of Consumer Behaviour, 13, 411–428. DOI: 10.1002/cb.1491
178.	Kopaczewski T. (2013). Vernon Smith „Racjonalność w ekonomii”. Decyzje, 20, 111–118. DOI: 10.7206/DEC.1733-0092.14
179.	Krawiec J.M., Piaskowska O.M., Piesiewicz P.F., Białaszek W. (2021). Tools for public health policy. Nudges and boosts as active support of the law in special situations such as the COVID-19 pandemic. Globalization and Health, 17, 132. DOI: 10.1186/ s12992-021-00782-5
180.	Kruglanski A.W., Gigerenzer G. (2011). Intuitive and deliberate judgments are based on common principles. Psychological Review, 118(1), 97–109. DOI: 10.1037/a0020762
181.	Kuehnhanss C.R. (2019). The challenges of behavioural insights for effective policy design, Policy and Society, 38(1), 14–40. DOI: 10.1080/14494035.2018.1511188
182.	Kwasiborski P., Sobol M. (2011). Test niezależności chi-kwadrat i jego zastosowanie w interpretacji wyników badań klinicznych. Kardiochirurgia i Torakochirurgia, 4, 550–554
183.	Lades L.K. (2014). Impulsive consumption and reflexive though t. Nudging ethical consumer behavior. Journal of Economic Psychology, 41, 114–28. DOI: 10.1016/j.joep.2013.01.003
184.	Lades L.K., Delaney L. (2020). Nudge FORGOOD. Pobrane z: https://www.cambridge.org/ core/journals/behavioural-public-policy/article/abs/nudge-forgood/06BC9E90325 21954E8325798390A998 (dostęp: 16.12.2022).
185.	Lades L.K., Delaney L. (2022). Nudge FORGOOD. Behavioural Public Policy, 6, 75–94. DOI: 10.1017/bpp.2019.53
186.	Lades L., Nova F. (2022). Ethical considerations when using behavioural insights to reduce people’s meat consumption. UCD Geary Institute for Public Policy Discussion Paper Series, WP2022/09. Pobrane z: https://www.ucd.ie/geary/static/publications/ workingpapers/gearywp202209.pdf (dostęp: 17.12.2022).
187.	Laibson D., List J. (2015). Principles of (behavioral) economics. American Economic Review, 105(5), 385–390. DOI: 10.1257/aer.p20151047
188.	Landreth H., Colander D.C. (2005). Historia myśli ekonomicznej. Warszawa: Wydaw- nictwo Naukowe PWN.
189.	Lapinski M.K., Rimal R.N. (2005). An explication of social norms. Communication Theory, 15(2), 127–147.
190.	Lee C.Y., Ting C.C., Wu J.H., Lee K.T., Chen H.S., Chang Y.Y. (2018). Dental visiting behaviours among primary schoolchildren. Application of the health belief model. International Journal of Dental Hygiene, 16, e88–e95. DOI: 10.1111/idh.12319
191.	Lehner M., Mont O., Heiskanen E. (2016). Nudging – a promising tool for sustainable consumption behaviour? Journal of Cleaner Production, 134, 166–177. DOI: 10.1016/j.jclepro.2015.11.086
192.	Lenzi D. (2019). Deliberating about climate change. The case for “thinking and nud- ging”. Moral Philosophy and Politics, 6(2), 313–336. DOI: 10.1515/mopp-2018-0034
193.	Leong L.C. (2011). Foreword. W: D. Low (ed.), Behavioural economics and policy design. Examples from Singapore (s. vii–xii). Singapore: World Scientific Publishing Company. Lepenies R., Małecka M. (2019). The ethics of behavioural public policy. W: A. Lever, A. Poama (ed s.), The Routledge handbook of ethics and public policy (s. 513–525). Abingdon: Routledge.
194.	Lin Y., Osman M., Ashcroft R. (2017). Nudge. Concept, effectiveness, and ethics. Basic and Applied Social Psychology, 39(6), 293–306. DOI: 10.1080/01973533.2017.1356304
195.	Lipsey R.G. (2009). Some legacies of Robbins’ „An essay on the nature and significance of economic science”. Economica, 76, 845–856.
196.	Listorti G., Basyte-Ferrari E., Acs S., Smits P. (2020). Towards an evidence-based and integrated policy cycle in the EU. a review of the debate on the BR agenda. Journal of Common Market Studies, 58(6), 1558–1577. DOI: 10.1111/jcms.13053
197.	Lodge M., Wegrich K. (2016). The rationality paradox of nudge. Rational tools of gover- nment in a world of bounded rationality. Law & Policy, 38(3), 250–267. DOI: 10.1111/ lapo.12056
198.	Loewenstein G., Chater N. (2017). Putting nudges in perspective. Behavioral Public Policy, 1, 26–53. DOI: 10.1017/bpp.2016.7
199.	Loibl C., Sunstein C.R., Rauber J., Reisch L.A. (2018). Which Europeans like nudges? Approval and controversy in four European countries. Journal of Consumer Affairs, 52(3), 655–688. DOI: 10.1111/joca.12181
200.	Lourenço J.S., Ciriolo E., Almeida S.R., Troussard X. (2016). Behavioural insights applied to policy. European Report 2016, EUR 27726 EN. DOI: 10.2760/903938
201.	Löfgren Å., Nordblom K. (2020). A theoretical framework of decision making explaining the mechanisms of nudging. Journal of Economic Behavior & Organization, 174, 1–12. DOI: 10.1016/j.jebo.2020.03.021
202.	Luan S., Reb J., Gigerenzer G. (2019). Ecological rationality. Fast-and-frugal heuristics for managerial decision making under uncertainty. Academy of Management Journal, 62(6), 1735–1759. DOI: 10.5465/amj.2018.0172
203.	Lugtig P., Toepoel V., Emery T., Cabaco S., Bujard M., Naderi R., Schumann A., Lück D. (2022). Can we successfully move a cross-national survey online? Results from a Large Three-country experiment in the gender and generations programme survey. SorcArXiv Paper. DOI: 10.31235/osf.io/mu8jy
204.	Lunn P. (2014). Regulatory policy and behavioural economics. Paris: OECD Publishing. DOI: 10.1787/9789264207851-en
205.	Lunn P., Robertson D. (2019). Using behavioural experiments to pre-test policy. Budget Perspectives, 2. Pobrane z: www.esri.ie/publications/using-behavioural-experiment- s-to-pre-test-policy (dostęp: 3.03.2023).
206.	Mącik R. (2014). Ankiety internetowe w percepcji osób korzystających i niekorzystają- cych z nich w pracy zawodowej. Studia Ekonomiczne, Metody ilościowe w badaniach marketingowych, 195, 125–139.
207.	Maier E. (2012). Smart mobility. Encouraging sustainable mobility behaviour by designing and implementing policies with citizen involvement. eJournal of eDemocracy and Open Government, 4(1), 115–141. DOI: 10.29379/jedem.v4i1.110
208.	Mäki U. (2013). Scientific imperialism. Difficulties in definition, identification, and assessment. International Studies in the Philosophy of Science, 27(3), 325–339. DOI: 10.1080/02698595.2013.825496
209.	Makki F. (2017). Nudge units are just the tool for effective policy. Pobrane z: http:// www.thenational.ae/business/economy/nudge-units-are-just-the-tool-for-effective- -policy (dostęp: 28.11.2022)
210.	Manstead A.S. (2018). The psychology of social class. How socioeconomic status impacts thought, feeling and behaviour. British Journal of Social Psychology, 57, 267–291. DOI: 10.1111/bjso.12251
211.	Marchiori D., Adriaanse M.A., De Ridder D.T. (2017). Unresolved questions in nudging research. Putting the psychology back in nudging. Social and Personality Psychology Compass, 11, e12297. DOI: 10.1111/spc3.12297
212.	Marewski J., Gaissmaier W., Gigerenzer G. (2010). Good judgments do not require complex cognition. Cognitive Processing, 11(2), 103–121. DOI: 10.1007/s10339-009-0337-0
213.	Marteau T.M., Hollands G.J., Fletcher P.C. (2012). Changing human behavior to prevent disease. The importance of targeting automatic processes. Science, 337, 1492–1495. DOI: 10.1126/science.1226918
214.	Martens S., Herberz M., Hahnel U.J., Brosch T. (2022). The effectiveness of nudging. A meta-analysis of choice architecture interventions across behavioral domains. Pro- ceedings of The National Academy of Sciences, 119(1), e2107346118. DOI: 10.1073/ pnas.2107346118.
215.	McKenzie C.R., Liersch M.J., Finkelstein S.R. (2006). Recommendations implicit in policy defaults. Psychological Science, 17(5), 414–420. DOI: 10.1111/j.1467-9280.2006.01721.x.
216.	McShane M., Nirenburg S., Jarrell B. (2013). Modeling decision-making biases. Biolo- gically Inspired Cognitive Architectures, 3, 39–50. DOI: 10.1016/j.bica.2012.09.001.
217.	Mearman A. (2007). Teaching heterodox economics concepts. The handbook for economics lecturers, economics network. DOI: 10.53593/n229a. Pobrane z: https://www.econo- micsnetwork.ac.uk/handbook/printable/heterodox.pdf (dostęp: 11.12.2022).
218.	Mensah Y., Chen H.Y. (2013). Global clustering of countries by culture. An extension of the GLOBE Study. SSRN Electronic Journal. DOI: 10.2139/ssrn.2189904.
219.	Michaelsen P., Johansson L.O., Hedesström M. (2021). Experiencing default nudges. Autonomy, manipulation, and choice-satisfaction as judged by people themselves. Behavioural Public Policy, 1–22. DOI: 10.1017/bpp.2021.5.
220.	Michie S., Stralen M., West R. (2011). The behaviour change wheel. A new method for characterising and designing behaviour change interventions. Implementation Science, 6, 42. DOI: 10.1186/1748-5908-6-42.
221.	Mider D. (2018). Dylematy metodologiczne badań kultury politycznej w Internecie. Przegląd Politologiczny, 2, 23–34. DOI: 10.14746/pp.2013.18.2.2.
222.	Mider D., Marcinkowska A. (2013). Analiza danych ilościowych dla politologów. Prak- tyczne wprowadzenie z wykorzystaniem programu GNU PSPP. Warszawa: ACAD.
223.	Milfont T., Duckitt J. (2010). The environmental attitudes inventory. A valid and reliable measure to assess the structure of environmental attitudes. Journal of Environmental Psychology, 30, 80–94. DOI: 10.1016/j.jenvp.2009.09.001.
224.	Mills C. (2015). The heteronomy of choice architecture. Review of Philosophy and Psy- chology, 6(3), 495–509. DOI: 10.1007/s13164-015-0242-7.
225.	Mills S. (2020). Nudge/sludge symmetry. On the relationship between nudge and sludge and the resulting ontological, normative and transparency implications. Behavioural Public Policy, 7(2), 309–332. DOI: 10.1017/bpp.2020.61.
226.	Milonakis D., Fine B. (2009). From political economy to economics. Method, the social and the historical in the evolution of economic theory. New York: Routledge. Pobrane z: http://pauladaunt.com/books/From_Political_Economy_to_Freakonomics.pdf (dostęp: 18.12.2022).
227.	Miłaszewicz D. (2016). Origins of experimental economics. W: K. Nermend, M. Łatu- szyńska (eds.), Selected issues in experimental economics (s. 15–26). Cham: Springer. DOI: 10.1007/978-3-319-28419-4.
228.	Mitchell G. (2004). Libertarian paternalism is an oxymoron. Northwestern University Law Review, 99(3), DOI: 10.2307/1600573.
229.	Moczko J.A., Bręborowicz G.H., Tadeusiewicz R. (1998). Statystyka w badaniach medycznych. Warszawa: Wydawnictwo Naukowe PWN.
230.	Möllenkamp M., Zeppernick M., Schreyögg J. (2019). The effectiveness of nudges in improving the self-management of patients with chronic diseases. A systematic litera- ture review. Health Policy, 123(12), 1199–1209.
231.	Mongin P., Cozic M. (2018). Rethinking nudge. Not one but three concepts. Behavioural Public Policy, 2, 107–124. DOI: 10.1017/bpp.2016.16.
232.	Mont O., Lehner M., Heiskanen E. (2014). Nudging. A tool for sustainable behaviour? Swedish Environmental Protection Agency Report, 6643. Pobrane z: https://www.diva- -portal.org/smash/get/diva2:1610786/FULLTEXT01.pdf (dostęp: 15.12.2022).
233.	Mont O., Power K. (2013). Understanding factors that shape consumption. ETC/SCP Working Paper, 1/2013. Pobrane z: http://scp.eionet.europa.eu/publications/wp2013_1/ wp/wp2013_1 (dostęp: 4.01.2023).
234.	Morewedge C.K., Kahneman D. (2010). Associative processes in intuitive judgment. Trends in Cognitive Sciences, 14(10), 435–440. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tics.2010.07.004
235.	Mousavi S. (2016). Gerd Gigerenzer and Vernon Smith. Ecological rationality of heuri- stics in psychology and economics. W: R. Frantz, S.H. Chen, K. Dopfer, F. Heukelom, S. Mousavi (eds.), Routledge handbook of behavioral economics (s. 88–100). London: Taylor & Francis.
236.	Mugg J. (2016). The dual-process turn. How recent defenses of dual-process theo- ries of reasoning fail. Philosophical Psychology, 29(2), 300–309. DOI: 10.1080/ 09515089.2015.1078458.
237.	Münscher R., Vetter M., Scheuerle,T. (2016). A review and taxonomy of choice archi- tecture techniques. Journal of Behavioral Decision Making, 29(5), 511–524. DOI: 10.1002/bdm.1897.
238.	Murdock B.B. (1962). The serial position effect of free recall. Journal of Experimental Psychology, 64(5), 482–488
239.	Nagatsu M. (2015). Social nudges. Their mechanisms and justification. Review of Philo- sophy and Psychology, 6, 481–494. DOI: 10.1007/s13164-015-0245-4.
240.	Neck R. (2021). Methodological individualism. Still a useful methodology for the social sciences? Atlantic Economic Journal, 49(4), 349–361. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11293-022-09740-x
241.	Neth H., Gigerenzer G. (2015). Heuristics. Tools for an uncertain world . W: R. Scott, S. Kosslyn (eds.), Emerging trends in the social and behavioral sciences. An inter- disciplinary, searchable, and linkable resource (s. 1–18). New York: Wiley Online Library. DOI: 10.1002/9781118900772.etrds0394.
242.	Neuhaus T. (2022). When push came to nudge. Interdisciplinary criticisms of behavio- ral (public) policy. NETSOL New Trends in Social and Liberal Sciences, 7(1), 1–19. DOI: 10.24819/netsol2022.01.
243.	Neuhaus T., Curley L.J. (2022). The emergence of global behavioral public policy – deve- lopments of and within the nudge unit. World Complexity Science Academy Journal, 3(2), 1–17. https://doi.org/10.46473/WCSAJ27240606/20-09-2022-0006//full/html
244.	Nielsen A.S., Sand H., Sørensen P., Knutsson M., Martinsson P., Persson E., Wollbrant C. (2017). Nudging and pro-environmental behaviour. Copenhagen: Nordic Council of Ministers. DOI: 10.6027/TN2016-553.
245.	Nørgaard A.S. (2018). Human behavior inside and outside bureaucracy. Lessons from psychology. Journal of Behavioral Public Administration, 1(1), 1–16. DOI: 10. 30636/ jbpa.11.13.
246.	Nova F., Lades L. (2022). Nudges and other behavioural public policy instruments to encourage environmentally friendly behaviour. Pobrane z: https://publicpolicy.ie/ environment/nudges-and-other-behavioural-public-policy-instruments-to-encoura- ge-environmentally-friendly-behaviour/ (dostęp: 12.03.2023).
247.	OECD (2015). Behavioural insights and new approaches to policy design. The views from the field. Summary of an International Seminar, 23 January, Paris. Pobrane z: www.oecd.org/gov/behavioural-insights-summary-report-2015.pdf (dostęp: 23.01.2023).
248.	OECD (2017a). Behavioural insights and public policy. Lessons from around the world. Paris: OECD Publishing:. DOI: 10.1787/9789264270480-en.
249.	OECD (2017b). Fostering innovation in the public sector. Paris: OECD Publishing. DOI: 10.1787/9789264270879-en.
250.	OECD (2017c). Government at a glance 2017. Paris: OECD Publishing. DOI: 10.1787/ gov_glance-2017-en.
251.	OECD (2018a). BASIC toolkit and ethical guidelines for policy makers – draft for con- sultation. Pobrane z: https://www.oecd.org/gov/regulatory-policy/BASIC-Toolkit- -Draft-for-Consultation.pdf (dostęp: 14.12.2022)
252.	OECD (2018b). Tools and ethics for applied behavioural insights. The BASIC brochure. Pobrane z: https://www.oecd.org/gov/regulatory-policy/BASIC-Toolkit-web.pdf (dostęp: 12.01.2023).
253.	OECD (2019a). Tools and ethics for applied behavioural insights. The BASIC toolkit. OECD Publishing: Paris. DOI: 10.1787/9ea76a8f-en.
254.	OECD (2019b). Delivering better policies through behavioural insights. New approaches. Paris: OECD Publishing. DOI: 10.1787/6c9291e2-en.
255.	OECD (2022). Good practice principles for the ethical use of behavioural science in public policy. Pobrane z: https://oecd-opsi.org/publications/bi-gpps/ (dostęp: 19.12.2022).
256.	OECD (2023). Behaviour insights units. Pobrane z: https://oecd-opsi.org/bi-units/ (dostęp: 2.02.2023).
257.	Ogólnopolski Panel Badawczy Ariadna (b. d.). Pobrane z: https://www.panelariadna.pl (dostęp: 3.12.2022).
258.	Olejniczak K., Śliwowski P. (2015). Towards behaviorally informed public interventions. Management and Business Administration. Central Europe, 3(2), 61–91. DOI: 10.7206/ mba.ce.2084-3356.142.
259.	Olejniczak K., Śliwowski P., Wojtowicz W. (2019). Projektowanie rozwiązań publicznych na ludzką miarę – behavioral insights. Samorząd Terytorialny, 10, 7–19.
260.	Olejniczak K., Śliwowski P., Leeuw F. (2020). Comparing behavioral assumptions of policy tools. Framework for policy designers. Journal of Comparative Policy Analy- sis, Research and Practice, 22(6), 498–520. DOI: 10.1080/13876988.2020.1808465.
261.	Oliver A. (2013). From nudging to budging. Using behavioural economics to inform public sector policy. Journal of Social Policy, 42(4), 685–700. DOI: 10.1017/ S0047279413000299.
262.	Oliver A. (2015). Nudging, shoving and budging. Behavioural economic-informed policy. Public Administration, 93(3), 700–714. DOI: 10.1111/padm.12165.
263.	Oliver A. (2017). The origins of behavioural public policy. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
264.	Oliver A. (2018). Nudges, shoves and budges. Behavioural economic policy frameworks. The International Journal of Health Planning and Management, 33(1), 272–275. DOI: 10.1002/hpm.2419.
265.	ONZ (2022). Practitioner’s guide to getting started with behavioural science. Pobrane z: https://www.un.org/en/content/behaviouralscience/ (dostęp: 20.12.2022).
266.	Orozco F., Ochoa D., Muquinche M., Padro M., Melby C.L. (2017). Awareness, compre- hension, and use of newly mandated nutrition labels among mestiza and indigenous Ecuadorian women in the central Andes region of Ecuador. Food and Nutrition Bulletin, 38(1), 37–48. DOI: 10.1177/0379572116684730
267.	Orrell D. (2010). Economyths. Ten ways economics gets it wrong. London: Icon Books. Osman M., Fenton, N., Pilditch, T., Lagnado, D., Neil M. (2018). Whom do we trust on social policy interventions? Basic and Applied Social Psychology, 40(5), 249–268. DOI: 10.1080/01973533.2018.1469986.
268.	Panel (b.d.). Maison & partners. Pobrane z: http://www.maison.pl/index.php/panel (dostęp: 4.12.2022).
269.	Peón D., Antelo M. (2021). The effect of behavioral biases on financial decisions. Revista Estrategia Organizacional, 10(2), 1–63. DOI: 10.22490/25392786.4963.
270.	Pham M.T., Avnet T. (2009). Contingent reliance on the affect heuristic as a function of regulatory focus. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 108(2), 267–278. DOI: 10.1016/j.obhdp.2008.10.001.
271.	Plous S. (1993). The psychology of judgment and decision making. New York: McGraw-Hill.
272.	Przewłocka J. (2009). CAWI – specyfika, wykorzystanie, perspektywy rozwoju. W: A. Haber, M. Szałaj (red.), Ewaluacja wobec wyzwań stojących przed sektorem finan- sów publicznych (s. 97–108). Warszawa: Polska Agencja Rozwoju Przedsiębiorczości. Pułaska-Turyna B. (2011). Statystyka dla ekonomistów. Warszawa: Difin.
273.	Pykett J., Howell R., Lilley R., Jones R., Whitehead M. (2017). Governing mindfully. Shaping policy makers’ emotional engagements with behaviour change. W: E. Jupp, J. Pykett, F.M. Smith (eds.), Emotional states: sites and spaces of affective governance (s. 69–84). London–New York: Routledge.
274.	Samson A. (ed.) (2016). Thebehavioral economics guide 2016.Pobrane z: http://www.beha- vioraleconomics.com (dostęp: 18.12.2022).
275.	de Quintana Medina J. (2020). The acceptability of nudges as public policy tools. Pobrane z: https://www.tdx.cat/bitstream/handle/10803/671907/jdqm1de1.pdf?sequence=5. xml (dostęp: 24.02.2023).
276.	de Quintana Medina J. (2021). What is wrong with nudges? Addressing normative objec- tions to the aims and the means of nudges. Gestión y Análisis de Políticas Públicas, 25, 23–37. DOI: 10.24965/gapp.i25.10865.
277.	Rabin M. (2002). A perspective on psychology and economics. European Economic Review, 46 (4–5), 657-685. DOI: 10.1016/S0014-2921(01)00207-0.
278.	Rawat S. (2016). Behavioral studies in economics and public policy journals. A bibliome- tric analysis. Pobrane z: https://ecpr.eu/Filestore/PaperProposal/32d7e811-8d44-48c- 4-9f8a-d02b8c8e11e4.pdf (dostęp: 12.12.2022).
279.	Reijula S., Hertwig R. (2022). Self-nudging and the citizen choice architect. Behavioural Public Policy, 6(1), 119–149. DOI: 10.1017/bpp.2020.5.
280.	Reisch L.A., Sunstein C.R. (2016). Do Europeans like nudges? Judgment and Decision Making, 11, 4, 310–325. DOI: 10.2139/ssrn.2739118.
281.	Reisch L.A., Sunstein C.R., Gwozdz W. (2017). Beyond carrots and stick s. Europeans support health nudges. Food Policy, 69(4), 1–10. DOI: 10.1016/j.foodpol.2017.01.007
282.	Reynoldsa J.P., Stautz K., Piling M., van der Linden S., Marteau T.M. (2020). Communi- cating the effectiveness and ineffectiveness of government policies and their impact on public support. A systematic review with meta-analysis. Royal Society Open Science, 7, 190522. DOI: 10.1098/rsos.190522.
283.	Riddel M., Hales D. (2018). Predicting cancer-prevention behavior. Disentangling the effects of risk aversion and risk perceptions. Risk Analysis, 38, 2161–2177. DOI: 10.1111/ risa.13111.
284.	Rimal R.N., Lapinski M.K. (2015). A re-explication of social norms, ten years later. Communication Theory, 25(4), 393–409. DOI: 10.1111/comt.12080.
285.	Ritchie D., Van den Broucke S., Van Hal G. (2021). The health belief model and theory of planned behavior applied to mammography screening. A systematic review and meta-analysis. Public Health Nursing, 38, 482–492. DOI: 10.1111/phn.12842.
286.	Robbins L.C. (1932). An essay on the nature and significance of economic science. Macmillan, London. Pobrane z: https://mises.org/system/tdf/Essay%20on%20 the%20Nature%20and%20Significance%20of%20Economic%20Science_2.pdf?fi- le=1&type=document (dostęp: 20.12.2022).
287.	Roese N.J., Vohs K.D. (2012). Hindsight bias. Perspectives on Psychological Science, 7(5), 411–426. DOI: 10.1177/1745691612454303.
288.	Roszkowska E. (2021). Decyzje wielkokryterialne i negocjacje. Wybrane aspekty teoretyczne i badania eksperymentalne. Białystok: Wydawnictwo Uniwersytetu w Białymstoku.
289.	Samson A. (ed.) (2022). Behavioral economics guide 2022. Pobrane z: https://www.beha- vioraleconomics.com/be-guide/the-behavioral-economics-guide-2022/ (dostęp: 11.12.2022).
290.	Samson A., Voyer B.G. (2012). Two minds, three ways: dual system and dual process models in consumer psychology. AMS Review, 2(2-4), 48–71. DOI: 10.1007/s13162-012-0030-9.
291.	Samson A., Voyer B.G. (2014). Emergency purchasing situations. Implications for con- sumer decision-making. Journal of Economic Psychology, 44. 21–33. DOI: 10.1016/ j.joep.2014.05.004.
292.	Samuelson W., Zeckhauser R. (1988). Status quo bias in decision making. Journal of Risk and Uncertainty, 1, 7–59. DOI: 10.1007/bf00055564.
293.	Sanders M., Snijders V., Hallsworth M. (2018). Behavioural science and policy. Where are we now and where are we going? Behavioural Public Policy, 2, 144–167. DOI: 10.1017/bpp.2018.17.
294.	Sandoval L.A., Carpio C.E., Sanchez-Plata M. (2019). The effect of “traffic-light” nutritional labelling in carbonated soft drink purchases in Ecuador. PloS ONE, 14(10), e0222866. DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0222866.
295.	Santos Silva M. (2022). Nudging and other behaviourally based policies as enablers for environmental sustainability. Laws, 11(1), 9. DOI: 10.3390/laws11010009.
296.	Scarantino A. (2009). On the role of values in economic science. Robbins and his critics. Journal of the History of Economic Thought, 31(4), 449–473. DOI: 10.1017/ S1053837209990253.
297.	Schacter D., Gilbert D., Wegner D. (2011). Psychology. New York: Worth Publishers.
298.	Schlag P. (2010). Nudge, choice architecture, and libertarian paternalism. Michigen Law Review, 108(6), 913–924. Pobrane z: https://repository.law.umich.edu/mlr/vol108/ iss6/5 (dostęp: 3.03.2023).
299.	Schmidt A.T., Engelen B. (2020). The ethics of nudging. An overview. Philosophy Com- pass, 15, e12658. DOI: 10.1111/phc3.12658.
300.	Schubert C. (2017). Green nudges. Do they work? Are they ethical? Ecological Economics, 132, 329–342. DOI: 10.1016/j.ecolecon.2016.11.009.
301.	Schweizer M. (2015). Nudging and the principle of proportionality – obliged to nudge? Pobrane z: https://www.academia.edu/37264133/Nudging_and_the_principle_of_pro- portionality_-_obliged_to_nudge (dostęp: 3.03.2023).
302.	Selinger E., Whyte K. (2011). Is there a right way to nudge? The practice and ethics of choice architecture. Sociology Compass, 5(10), 923–935. DOI: 10.1111/j.1751-9020.2011.00413.x.
303.	Seljak R., Arendt Ł. (2022). Improving data collection for the quality of life in european cities survey sampling method, interviewing methodology and structure of the question- naire. Luxembourg: Publications Office of the European Union. DOI: 10.2785/359627.
304.	Sent E.M. (2004). Behavioral economics. How psychology made its (limited) way back into economics. History of Political Economy, 36(4), 735–760. DOI: 10.1215/ 00182702-36-4-735.
305.	Sent E.M. (2005). Simplifying Herbert Simon. History of Political Economy, 37(2), 227–232. DOI: 10.1215/00182702-37-2-227.
306.	Service O., Hallsworth M., Halpern D., Algate F., Gallagher R., Nguyen S., Ruda S., Sanders M., Pelenur M., Gyani A., Harper H., Reinhard J., Kirkma E. (2014). EAST: Four simple ways to apply behavioural insights. Pobrane z: http://www.behavioura- linsights.co.uk (dostęp: 19.12.2022).
307.	Sevgin M. (2020). Public policy implications of cognitive biases and heuristics. The Jour- nal of International Social Research, 13(72), 871–878. DOI: 10.14746/pp.2021.26.4.9.
308.	Shafir E. (2013a). Introduction. W: E. Shefir (ed), The behavioral foundations of public policy (s. 1–10). Princeton: Princeton University Press.
309.	Shafir E. (ed.) (2013b). The behavioral foundations of public policy. Princeton: Princeton University Press.
310.	Shah A.K., Oppenheimer D.M. (2008). Heuristics made easy. An effort-reduction frame- work. Psychological Bulletin, 134(2), 207–222. DOI: 10.1037/0033-2909.134.2.207.
311.	Shefrin H. (2000). Beyond greed and fear. Understanding behavioral finance and the psychology of investing. Oxford: Oxford University Press
312.	Shepperd J.A., Waters E., Weinstein N.D., Klein W.M. (2015). A primer on unre- alistic optimism. Current Directions in Psychological Science, 24(3), 232–237. DOI: 10.1177/0963721414568341.
313.	Shreedhar G. (2020). Consumption and biodiversity conservation: insights from behavioral science using the MINDSPACE approach. W: W. Filho, A. Azul, L. Brandli, A. Salvia, A.T. Wall (eds.), Life on land. Encyclopedia of the UN sustainable development goals (s. 1–12). Cham: Springer. DOI: 10.1007/978-3-319-71065-5_145-1.
314.	Shweder R.A., Casagrande J.B., Fiske D.W., Greenstone J.D., Heelas P., Lancy D.F. (1977). Likeness and likelihood in everyday thought. Magical thinking in judgments about personality [and comments and reply]. Current Anthropology, 18(4), 637–658. http:// www.jstor.org/stable/2741505.
315.	Simon H.A. (1972). Theories of bounded rationality. W: C.B. McGuire, R. Radner (eds.), Decision and organization (s. 161–173). Amsterdam: Nord Holand Publishing Company.
316.	Simon H.A. (1976). From substantive to procedural rationality. W: S.J. Latsis (ed.), Methods and appraisal in economics (s. 129–148). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
317.	Simon H.A. (1978). Rational decision-making in business organizations. Nobel Memorial Lecture, 8 December. Pobrane z: http://www.nobelprize.org/nobel_prizes/economic - -sciences/laureates/1978/simon-lecture.pdf (dostęp: 12.12.2022).
318.	Simon H.A. (1987). Behavioural economics. W: J. Eatwell, M. Milgate, P. Newman (eds.), The new Palgrave. A dictionary of economics, vol. 1 (s. 221–225). New York: Stockton Press.
319.	Simon H. (1990a). Reason in human affairs. Palo Alto: Stanford University Press.
320.	Simon H.A. (1990b). Invariants of human behaviour. Annual Review of Psychology, 41, 1–19. Pobrane z: http://www.annualreviews.org/doi/pdf/10.1146/annurev.ps.41.020190.000245 (dostęp: 14.12.2022).
321.	Simon H.A. (2000). Bounded rationality in social science. Mind & Society, 1(1), 25–39.
322.	Simon H.A. (2007). Podejmowanie decyzji i zarządzanie ludźmi w biznesie i administracji. Gliwice: Wydawnictwo Helion.
323.	Sintov N.D., Schultz P.W. (2017). Adjustable green defaults can help make smart homes more sustainable. Sustainability, 9(4), 622. DOI: 10.3390/su9040622.
324.	Sloman S.A. (2002). Two systems of reasoning. W: T. Gilovich, D. Griffin, D. Kahne- man (eds.), Heuristics and biases. The psychology of intuitive judgment (s. 379–397). New York: Cambridge University Press.
325.	Slovic P., Finucane M.L., Peters E., MacGregor D.G. (2007). The affect heuristic. European Journal of Operational Research, 177, 1333–1352. DOI: 10.1016/j.ejor.2005.04.006.
326.	Słowińska M. (2019). Wykorzystanie testu chi-kwadrat w badaniach preferencji żywie- niowych konsumentów. Nauki Inżynierskie i Technologie, 1(32), 24–38. DOI: 10.15611/ nit.2019.1.02
327.	Smith V.L. (2002). Constructivist and ecological rationality in economics. W: Prize lecture 2002 (s. 502–561) Pobrane z: https://www.nobelprize.org/uploads/ 2017/05/ vernon-smith-lecture.pdf (dostęp: 25.11.2022).
328.	Smith V.L. (2005). Behavioral economics research and the foundations of economics. Journal of Socio-Economics, 34, 135–150. DOI: 10.1016/j.socec.2004.09.003.
329.	Smith V.L. (2013). Racjonalność w ekonomii. Warszawa: Oficyna a Wolters Kluwer business.
330.	Sobczyk M. (2002). Statystyka. Warszawa: Wydawnictwo Naukowe PWN.
331.	Sobieszczańska A., Sobieszczański J., Piecewicz-Szczęsna H., Słopiecka A., Zukow W., Karwat I.D. (2016). Najważniejsze czynniki modelujące stan zdrowia jed- nostki i populacji. Cz. 1. Journal of Education, Health and Sport, 6(13), 247–259. DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.290621.
332.	Soman D. (2020). Sludge. A very short introduction. Pobrane z: https://www.rotman. utoronto.ca/-/media/Files/Programs-and-Areas/BEAR/White-Papers/BEARxBIOrg- -Sludge-Introduction.pdf?la=en&hash=DCB98795CB485977A04DDB27EFD800C- 3DA40220E (dostęp: 17.12.2023).
333.	Souza-Neto V., Marques O., Mayer V.F., Lohmann G. (2022). Lowering the harm of tourist activities. A systematic literature review on nudges. Journal of Sustainable Tourism, 1–22. DOI: 10.1080/09669582.2022.2036170.
334.	Sowa P., Pędziński B., Krzyżak M., Maślach D., Wójcik S., Szpak A. (2015). The compu- ter-assisted web interview method as used in the national study of ICT use in primary healthcare in Poland – reflections on a case study. Studies in Logic, Grammar and Rhetoric, 43(1), 137–146. DOI: 10.1515/slgr-2015-0046.
335.	Stanisławski R. (2017). Triangulacja technik badawczych w naukach o zarządzaniu. Organizacja i Kierowanie, 4(178), 103–120.
336.	Stanovich K.E., Toplak M.E. (2012). Defining features versus incidental correlates of Type 1 and Type 2 processing. Mind & Society, 11(1), 3–13. DOI: 10.1007/s11299-011-0093-6.
337.	Stanovich K.E., West R.F. (2002). Individual differences in reasoning. Implications for the rationality debate. Behavioral and Brain Sciences, 23, 645‒665. DOI: 10.1017/ s0140525x00003435.
338.	Stern P.C. (2000). Toward a coherent theory of environmentally significant behavior. Journal of Social Issues, 56, 407–424. DOI: 10.1111/0022-4537.00175.
339.	Straßheim H. (2020a). De-biasing democracy. Behavioural public policy and the post- -democratic turn. Democratization, 27(3), 461–476. DOI: 10.1080/13510347.2019.1663501.
340.	Straßheim H. (2020b). The rise and spread of behavioral public policy. An opportunity for critical research and self-reflection. International Review of Public Policy, 2(1), 115–128. DOI: 10.4000/irpp.897
341.	Straßheim H., Beck S. (2019). Introduction to the handbook of behavioural change and public policy. W: H. Straßheim, S. Beck, (eds.), Handbook of behavioural change and public policy (s. 1–21). Cheltenham: Edward Elgard Publishing.
342.	Sugden R. (2009). Can economics be founded on indisputable facts of experience? Lionel Robbins and the pioneers of neoclassical economics. Economica, 76, 857–872. DOI: 10.1111/j.1468-0335.2009.00793.x
343.	Sulewski P. (2013). Modyfikacja testu niezależności. Wiadomości Statystyczne, 10, 1–19.
344.	Sulewski P. (2016). Moc testów niezależności w tablicy dwudzielczej większej niż 2x2. Przegląd Statystyczny, 63(2), 191–209.
345.	Sumita I., Toyama N., Ekuni D., Maruyama T., Yokoi A., Fukuhara D., Uchida-Fukuhara Y., Nakahara M., Morita M. (2022). The impact of oral health behaviors, health belief model, and absolute risk aversion on the willingness of Japanese University Stu- dents to undergo regular dental check-ups. A cross-sectional study. International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health, 19, 13920. DOI: 10.3390/ ijerph192113920.
346.	Sunstein C.R. (2013). Behavioral economics, consumption, and environmental protec- tion. Regulatory Policy Program Working Paper RPP-2013-19. Cambridge: Harvard University.
347.	Sunstein C.R. (2014a). Why nudge? The politics of libertarian paternalism. New Haven: Yale University Press.
348.	Sunstein C.R. (2014b). The ethics of influence. Government in the age of behavioral science. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
349.	Sunstein C.R. (2014c). Nudges v s. shoves. The benefits of preserving choice. Harvard Law Review, 127(6), 210-217. Pobrane z: https://harvardlawreview.org/wp-content/ uploads/2014/04/Sunstein-Final1.pdf (dostęp: 20.02.2023).
350.	Sunstein C.R. (2014d). Nudging. A very short guide. Journal Consumer Policy, 37, 583–588. DOI: 10.1007/s10603-014-9273-1.
351.	Sunstein C.R. (2015a). Nudges do not undermine human agency. A note. Journal of Consumer Policy, 38(3), 207–210. DOI: 10.2139/ssrn.2594758.
352.	Sunstein C.R. (2015b). Nudges, agency, navigability, and abstraction. A reply to critics. Review of Philosophy and Psychology, 6, 511–529.
353.	Sunstein C.R. (2015c). Behavioural economics, consumption and environmental pro- tection. W: L.A. Reisch, J. Thøgersen (eds.), Handbook of research on sustainable consumption (s. 313–327). Cheltenham: Edward Elgar Publishing.
354.	Sunstein C. (2015d). The ethics of nudging. Yale Journal on Regulation, 32, 413–427. DOI: 10.2139/ssrn.2526341.
355.	Sunstein C.R. (2016). Do people like nudges? Administrative Law Review, 68(2), 177–232. DOI: 10.2139/ssrn.2604084
356.	Sunstein C.R. (2017). Nudges that fail. Behavioural Public Policy, 1(1), 4–25. DOI: 10.1017/ bpp.2016.3.
357.	Sunstein C.R. (2018). Misconceptions about nudge s. Journal of Behavioral Economics for Policy, 2(1), 61–67. DOI: 10.2139/ssrn.3033101.
358.	Sunstein C.R. (2019). Nudging. A very short guide. Business Economic, 54, 127–129. DOI: 10.1057/s11369-018-00104-5.
359.	Sunstein C.R. (2021). Green defaults can combat climate change. Nature Human Behavior, 5, 548–549. DOI: 10.1038/s41562-021-01071-2.
360.	Sunstein C.S. (2022). Sludge audits. Behavioural Public Policy, 6(4), 654–673. DOI: 10.1017/ bpp.2019.32.
361.	Sunstein C.R. (2002a). Risk and reason. Safety, law, and the environment. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
362.	Sunstein C.R. (2002b). Probability neglect. Emotions, worst cases, and law. The Yale Law Journal, 112, 61–107. DOI: 10.2139/ssrn.292149.
363.	Sunstein C.R., Reisch L.A. (2013). Green by default. Kyklos, 66, 398–402. DOI: 10.1111/ kykl.12028
364.	Sunstein C.R., Reisch L.A. (2014). Automatically green. Behavioral economics and environ- mental protection. Harvard Environmental Law Review, 38, 127–158. DOI: 10.2139/ ssrn.2245657.
365.	Sunstein C.R., Reisch L.A. (2019). Trusting nudges. Toward a bill of rights for nudging. Now York: Routledge. DOI: 10.4324/9780429451645.
366.	Sunstein C.R., Reisch L.A., Kaiser M. (2019). Trusting nudges? Lessons from an inter- national survey. Journal of European Public Policy, 26(10), 1417–1443. DOI: 10.1080/ 13501763.2018.1531912.
367.	Sunstein C.R., Reisch L.A., Rauber J. (2018). A worldwide consensus on nudging? Not quite, but almost. Regulation & Governance, 12, 3–22. DOI: 10.1111/rego.12161.
368.	Sunstein C.R., Thaler R.H. (2003). Libertarian paternalism is not an oxymoron. The Uni- versity of Chicago Law Review, 70, 1159–1202. DOI: 10.2139/ssrn.405940.
369.	Sztompka P. (2012). Normy społeczne i ich respektowanie. W: G. Mazurkiewicz (red.), Jakość edukacji: Różnorodne perspektywy (s. 180–184). Kraków: Wydawnictwo Uniwersytetu Jagiellońskiego.
370.	Śliwowski O., Wincewicz-Price A. (2019). Prościej, taniej i skuteczniej, czyli jak ekono- mia behawioralna wspiera polityki publiczne w Polsce. Warszawa: Polski Instytut Ekonomiczny.
371.	Thaler R.H. (2015a). Misbehaving. The making of behavioral economics. New York: W.W. Norton.
372.	Thaler R.H. (2015b). The power of nudges, for good and bad. Pobrane z: https://www.nyti- mes.com/2015/11/01/upshot/the-power-of-nudges-for-good-and-bad.html (dostęp: 20.02.2023)
373.	Thaler R.H. (2016). Behavioral economics. Past, present, and future. American Economic Review, 106(7), 1577–1600. DOI: 10.1257/aer.106.7.1577.
374.	Thaler R.H. (2018a). From cashews to nudges. The evolution of behavioral economics. American Economic Review, 108(6), 1265–1287. DOI: 10.1257/aer.108.6.1265.
375.	Thaler R.H. (2018b). Nudge, not sludge. Science, 361(6401), 431. DOI: 10.1126/science. aau9241.
376.	Thaler R.H., Sunstein C.R. (2008). Nudge. Improving decision about health, wealth and happiness. London: Penguin.
377.	Thaler R.H., Sunstein C.R. (2003). Libertarian paternalism. American Economic Review, 93(2), 175–179. DOI: 10.1257/000282803321947001.
378.	Thaler R.H., Sunstein C.R. (2021). Nudge. The Final Edition. Harmondsworth: Penguin Books an imprint of Penguin Random House LLC.
379.	Thaler R.H., Sunstein C.R. (2023). Impuls. Wydanie finalne. Warszawa: Zysk i S-ka.
380.	Thaler R.H., Sunstein C.R., Balz J. (2012). Choice architecture. W: E. Shafir (ed), The beha- vioral foundations of public policy (s. 428–439). Princeton: Princeton University Press.
381.	The Prize in Economic Sciences (2017). Scientific background. Richard H. Thaler: integrating economics with psychology. Pobrane z: http://www.nobelprize.org/nobel_ prizes/economic-sciences/laureates/2017/advanced.html (dostęp: 8.11.2022).
382.	The Sveriges Riksbank Prize in Economic Sciences in Memory of Alfred Nobel 1978. Pobrane z: http://www.nobelprize.org/nobel_prizes/economic-sciences/laureates /1978/> (dostęp: 15.11.2022).
383.	The Sveriges Riksbank Prize in Economic Sciences in Memory of Alfred Nobel 2002. (a) Pobrane z: http://www.nobelprize.org/nobel_prizes/economic-sciences/laureates/2002/ index.html (dostęp: 15.11.2022).
384.	The Severigs Riksbank Prize in Economic Sciences in Memory of Alfred Nobel 2002 (b). Pobrane z: https://www.nobelprize.org/prizes/economic-sciences/2002/kahneman/ lecture/ (dostęp: 18.12.2022).
385.	Thomas M.D. (2019). Reapplying behavioral symmetry: Public choice and choice archi- tecture. Public Choice, 180, 11–25. DOI: 10. 1007/ s11127- 018- 0537-1.
386.	Toepoel V., Lugtig P. (2015). Introduction. Online surveys are mixed-device surveys. Methods, Data and Analyses, 9(2), 155–162. DOI: 10.1016/j.trpro.2018.10.033.
387.	Tomer J.F. (2007). What is behavioral economics? Journal of Socio-Economics, 36, 463–479. DOI: 10.1016/j.socec.2006.12.007.
388.	Toplak M.E., West R.F., Stanovich K.E. (2011). The cognitive reflection test as a pre- dictor of performance on heuristics-and-biases tasks. Memory & Cognition, 39(7), 1275–1289. DOI: 10.3758/s13421-011-0104-1.
389.	Torma G., Aschemann-Witzel J., Thøgersen J. (2018). I nudge myself. Exploring ‘self-nud- ging’ strategies to drive sustainable consumption behaviour. International Journal of Consumer Studies, 42(1), 141–54. DOI: 10.1111/ijcs.12404.
390.	Troussard, X., van Bavel R. (2018). How can behavioural insights be used to improve EU policy? Intereconomics, 53, 8–12. DOI: 10.1007/s10272-018-0711-1.
391.	Trzpiot G. (2016). Rozważania o p-value. Studia Ekonomiczne. Zeszyty Naukowe Uni- wersytetu Ekonomicznego w Katowicach, 304, 58–67.
392.	Tummers L. (2019). Public policy and behavior change. Public Administration Review, 79(6), 925–930. DOI: 10.1111/puar.13109.
393.	Tversky A., Kahneman D. (1973). Availability. A heuristic for judging frequency and probability. Cognitive Psychology, 5(2), 207–232. DOI: 10.1016/0010-0285(73)90033-9.
394.	Tversky A., Kahneman D. (1974). Judgment under uncertainty. Heuristics and biases. Science, 185(4157), 1124–1131. https://doi.org/10.1126/science.185.4157.1124
395.	Tversky A., Kahneman D. (1979). Prospect theory. An analysis of decision under risk. Econometrica, 47(2), 263–291.
396.	Tversky A., Kahneman D. (1982a). Judgment under uncertainty. Heuristics and biases. W: D. Kahneman, P. Slovic, A. Tversky (eds), Judgment under uncertainty. Heuristics and biases (s. 3). New York: Cambridge University Press.
397.	Tversky A., Kahneman D. (1982b). Subjective probability: A judgment of representati- veness. W: D. Kahneman, P. Slovic, A. Tversky (eds.), Judgment under uncertainty. Heuristics and biases (s. 32–47). New York: Cambridge University Press.
398.	Tversky A., Kahneman D. (1982c). Availability. A heuristic for judging frequency and probability. W: D. Kahneman, P. Slovic, A. Tversky (eds.), Judgment under Uncer- tainty. Heuristics and biases (s. 163–178). New York: Cambridge University Press.
399.	Tversky A., Kahneman D. (1991). Loss aversion in riskless choice. A reference-dependent model. The Quarterly Journal of Economics, 106(4), 1039–1061. DOI: 10.2307/2937956.
400.	Tversky A., Kahneman D. (1992). Advances in prospect theory. Cumulative represen- tation of uncertainty. Journal of Risk and Uncertainty, 5(4), 297–323. DOI: 10.1007/ BF00122574.
401.	Tversky A., Slovic P., Kahneman D. (1982). Preface. W: D. Kahneman, P., Slovic, A. Tversky (eds.), Judgment under uncertainty. Heuristics and biases (s. xi–xii). New York: Cambridge University Press.
402.	Tversky A., Thaler R.H. (1990). Anomalies. Preference reversals. Journal of Economic Perspectives, 4(2), 201–211. DOI: 10.1257/jep.4.2.201.
403.	UKE (2021). Raport o stanie rynku telekomunikacyjnego w Polsce w 2020 r. Pobrane z: https://www.uke.gov.pl/akt/raport-o-stanie-rynku-telekomunikacyjnego-w-2020-r-,391. html (dostęp: 3.01.2023).
404.	UNICEF (2021). Ethical considerations when applying behavioural science in projects focused on children. Pobrane z: https://www.unicef-irc.org/publications/1251-ethical- -considerations-when-applying-behavioural-science-in-projects-focused-onchildren. html (dostęp: 20.12.2022).
405.	van der Linden S. (2018). The future of behavioral insights. On the importance of socially situated nudges. Behavioural Public Policy, 2(2), 207–217. DOI: 10.1017/bpp.2018.22.
406.	van Kleef E., van den Broek O., van Trijp H.C. (2015). Exploiting the spur of the moment to enhance healthy consumption. Verbal prompting to increase fruit choices in a sel- f-service restaurant. Applied Psychology: Health and Well-Being, 7(2), 149–166. DOI: 10.1111/aphw.12042.
407.	Varian H.R. (1997). Mikroekonomia. Kurs średni. Ujęcie nowoczesne. Warszawa: Wydawnictwo Naukowe PWN.
408.	Viscusi K.W., Gayer T. (2015). Behavioral public choice. The behavioral paradox of gover- nment policy. Harvard Journal of Law and Public Policy, 38(3), 973. DOI: 10.2139/ ssrn.2559408.
409.	Vlaev I., King D., Dolan P., Darzi A. (2016). The theory and practice of “Nudging”. Chan- ging health behaviors. Public Administration Review, 76(4), 550–561. DOI: 10.1111/ puar.12564.
410.	Von Neumann J., Morgenstern O. (1944). Theory of games and economic behavior. Princeton: Princeton University Press.
411.	Wang X., Song G., Wan X. (2022). Measuring “nudgeability”. Development of a scale on susceptibility to physical activity nudges among college students. Behavioral Sciences, 12, 318. DOI: 10.3390/bs12090318.
412.	Wheeler G. (2020). Bounded rationality. W: E.N. Zalta (ed), The Stanford encyclopaedia of philosophy. Pobrane z: https://plato.stanford.edu/archives/fall2020/entries/boun- ded-rationality/ (dostęp: 14.11.2022).
413.	White M.D. (2013). The manipulation of choice. Ethics and libertarian paternalism. New York: Palgrave Macmillan.
414.	Whitehead M., Jones R., Lilley R., Pykett J., Howell R. (2018). Neuroliberalism. Beha- vioural government in the twenty-first century. Londyn: Routledge. DOI: 10.4324/ 9781315684772.
415.	Whitman G. (2022). Austrian behavioral economics. Journal of Institutional Economics, 18(3), 449–466. DOI: 10.1017/S1744137421000084.
416.	WHO (2021). Climate change and health. Pobrane z: https://www.who.int/news-room/ fact-sheets/detail/climate-change-and-health?gclid=CjwKCAiA2fmdBhBpEiwA4C- cHzXGLsRV_V4FBHB_-T9iCfJUpZD1kUn3Fg-UM_-cEhWViph4_2jSc4RoCQU- oQAvD_BwE (dostęp: 11.01.2023).
417.	Wierzbicka A. (2013). Determinanty zdrowia – analiza taksonomiczna determinant stanu zdrowia starszej subpopulacji krajów europejskich. Acta Universitatis Lodziensis Folia Oeconomica, 297, 195–210.
418.	Wilkinson N. (2008). An introduction to behavioral economics. New York: Palgrave Macmillan.
419.	Williamson K., Bujold P.M., Thulin E. (2020). Behavior change interventions in practice. A synthesis of criteria, approaches, case studies & indicators. Pobrane z: https:// behavior.rare.org/wp-content/uploads/2021/02/Behavior-Change-Interventions-in- -Practice-final.pdf (dostęp: 18.11.2022).
420.	Willis L.E. (2013). When nudges fail. Slippery defaults. University of Chicago Law Review, 80(3), 1155–1230. DOI: 10.2139/ssrn.2142989.
421.	Wincewicz-Price A. (2019). Does behavioural economics equip policy-makers with acom- plete (enough) picture of the human. The case of nudging. Zarządzanie Publiczne. Public Governance, 2(48), 58–73. https://doi.org/10.15678/ZP.2019.48.2.06
422.	Włodarczyk E. (2019). Psychologia zachowań zdrowotnych apromocja zdrowia – wybrane zagadnienia. Medyczna Wokanda, 12, 61–89.
423.	Włodarczyk J. (2012). Współczesna ekonomia heterodoksyjna. Wybrane zagadnienia. W: S. Czaja, A. Becla, J. Włodarczyk, T. Poskrobko, Wyzwania współczesnej ekonomii. Wybrane problemy (s. 138–147). Warszawa: Difin.
424.	Wolff F., Schönherr N. (2011). The impact evaluation of sustainable consumption policy instruments. Journal of Consumer Policy, 34(1), 43–66. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10603-010-9152-3
425.	World Bank (2015). Mind, society, and behavior. A World Bank Group flagship report. Washington: International Bank for Reconstruction and Development, The World Bank.
426.	Woźniak M., Brukwicka I., Kopański Z., Kollár R., Kollárová M., Bajger B. (2015). Zdrowie jednostki i zbiorowości. Journal of Clinical Healthcare, 4, 1–3.
427.	Wrenn M.V. (2006). On the nature of heterodox economics. A survey study. History of Economics Review, 43, 123–145.
428.	Wu J. (2015). Helpful laymen in informational cascades. Journal of Economic Behavior & Organization, 116, 407–415. DOI: 10.1016/j.jebo.2015.05.002.
429.	Zaleśkiewicz T. (2016). Preferencje, ryzyko i afekt. Badania Paula Slovica. Decyzje, 25, 85–93. DOI: 10.7206/DEC.1733-0092.73.
430.	Zawicki M. (2016). Koncepcje teoretyczne implementacji polityki publicznej. Kraków: Wydawnictwo Uniwersytetu Ekonomicznego.
431.	Zielonka P. (2011). Giełda i psychologia. Behawioralne aspekty inwestowania na rynku papierów wartościowych. Warszawa: CeDeWu.
432.	Zielonka P. (2017). Framing, czyli efekt sformułowania. Dezyzje, 17, 41–68. DOI: 10.7206/ DEC.1733-0092.85.
433.	Zijlstra T., Wijgergangs K., Hoogendoorn-Lanser S. (2018). Traditional and mobile devices in computer assisted web-interviews. Transportation Research Procedia, 32, 184–194, DOI: 10.1016/j.trpro.2018.10.033

Nudges jako narzędzia behawioralnej polityki publicznej i ich akceptowanie w Polsce

ISBN: 978-83-7972-666-0 ISBN (online): 978-83-7972-667-7 ISSN: 0860-2751 OAI DOI: 10.18276/978-83-7972-667-7

Issue archive / T. (MCCCLXIX) 1295

Information

Abstract

Bibliography