Studia Administracyjne

Previously: Zeszyty Naukowe Uniwersytetu Szczecińskiego. Studia Administracyjne

ISSN: 2080-5209     eISSN: 2353-284X    OAI    DOI: 10.18276/sa.2022.16-05
CC BY-SA   Open Access   ERIH PLUS

Issue archive / 2(16)|2022
Glosa aprobująca do wyroku Wojewódzkiego Sądu Administracyjnego w Szczecinie z 27 stycznia 2022 roku, sygn. akt II Sa/Sz 1182/21
(Approbatory commentary to the Judgement of the Provincial Administrative Court in Szczecin dated 27 January 2022, ref. no. II SA/Sz 1182/21)

Authors: Filip Zieliński-Andrysiak
Uniwersytet Warszawski
Keywords: social security care benefit administrative proceedings
Data publikacji całości:2022-12-30
Page range:8 (59-66)
Klasyfikacja JEL: K23
Cited-by (Crossref) ?:
Downloads ?: 327

Abstract

The presented commentary concerns the judgment of the Provincial Administrative Court in Szczecin dated 27 January 2022, ref. no. II SA/Sz 1182/21, which is interesting both from the perspective of substantive administrative law and procedural administrative law. A party who applied for a care benefit due to resignation from employment or other remunerative work was not granted the benefit in administrative proceedings, so she appealed to the Provincial Administrative Court. The Court overturned the decision. It relied on a different interpretation of the negative premise (that is the applicant's right to an old age pension) than what the authorities and the applicant invoked. This ruling is important for administrative law. The court gave a pro-constitutional interpretation, departing from the literal wording of the provisions. Invoking the principle of equality before the law and social justice, it applied the negative premise in such a way that persons in a similar situation would not be financially disadvantaged, thus broadening the group of persons eligible for the benefit. Moreover, the principles of information and trust in public authority were applied in a practical and very beneficial way for the party. The author approves of the judgment under review, at the same time polemicising with the judical decisions in the presented issue.
Download file

Article file

Bibliography

1.Borkowski J., Glosa do wyroku NSA z dnia 15 października 1992 r., SA/Ka 766/92, OSP 1994, nr 5.
2.Duniewska Z., Stahl M., Krakała A. (red.), Zasady w prawie administracyjnym. Teoria, praktyka, orzecznictwo, Wolters Kluwer, Warszawa 2018.
3.Hauser R., Wierzbowski M. (red.), Kodeks postępowania administracyjnego. Komentarz, C.H. Beck, Warszawa 2017.
4.Kluszczyńska Z., Emerytury i renty z Funduszu Ubezpieczeń Społecznych, (w:) System ubezpieczeń społecznych. Zagadnienia podstawowe (red.), G. Szpor, Warszawa, LexisNexis, 2013, s. 125−161.
5.Safjan M., Bosek L. (red.), Konstytucja. Komentarz, t. 1, C.H. Beck, Warszawa 2016.
6.Szczechowicz A., Prawo do emerytury a świadczenie pielęgnacyjne – spory i kontrowersje, Ruch Prawniczy, Ekonomiczny i Socjologiczny 2021, nr 83(1), s. 157–170.