Skip to content

Studia Językoznawcze

Studia Językoznawcze

synchroniczne i diachroniczne aspekty badań polszczyzny

Previously: Studia Językoznawcze : synchroniczne i diachroniczne aspekty badań polszczyzny

t. 20, 2021
OpenAlex

For the whole journal, according to OpenAlex.

Citations
204
Publications
247
H-index
5
I10-index
3
Mean citedness (2 years)
0.03
Citations received by year
Journal citation chart. Exact values are available in the table below. 2017: 2 2018: 4 2019: 8 2020: 11 2021: 8 2022: 17 2023: 30 2024: 85 2025: 20 2026: 8 2017 2026
Show data table
Citations received by year
YearPublicationsCitations
2017192
2018254
2019188
20202311
2021198
20221117
2023830
20241485
20252520
2026268

Data retrieved:

What do these numbers mean?

Publications and citations cover records linked to this journal in OpenAlex. H-index is the largest number h of publications with at least h citations each. I10-index counts publications cited at least 10 times. The chart shows citations received in each year; the current year is incomplete. Coverage may differ from WNUS and other services.

The 2-year mean is an OpenAlex metric. It is not the Clarivate Journal Impact Factor.

View in OpenAlex (new tab)
Google Scholar

Stylistyka listów Bolesława Prusa do żony


(The language of Bolesław Prus’s letters to his wife)
DOI: 10.18276/sj.2021.20-02
Cite

The full text is available

Abstract

The linguistic shape of the letters depends on the role that the writer plays when writing them to his wife. When he writes from distant Germany, Switzerland, and France, he is a traveler who wants to bring his beloved closer to his views and impressions, hoping to visit wonderful, unknown places together. When he rests in Nałęczów, he verifies or supplements known facts, events, landscapes, talks about new acquaintances, describes the lazily passing days recording even the smallest details. The letters written from the room next door are a language joke, an exercise for a hand hitting the keys of a typewriter. The epistolographic works described above are the best illustration of Stefania Skwarczyńska’s claim that the letter “is a phenomenon in its genesis most strongly associated not only with the person of the author, but also with the person of the addressee who, through his silent participation, grows to the dignity of a co-author”.
Preview PDF

Open PDF

Bibliography

  1. Prus, Bolesław. Pisma wszystkie. Korespondencja. T. 1: Listy Bolesława Prusa. Oprac. Jacek Nowak. Wstęp Jacek Nowak. Warszawa–Lublin: Towarzystwo Literackie im. Adama Mickiewicza, Wydawnictwo Episteme, 2017.
  2. Machnicka, Violetta. „Korespondencyjne dzieje pewnej miłości, czyli środki językowe oddające uczucia i emocje w «Listach do narzeczonej i żony» Bolesława Prusa”. W: Wyrażanie emocji, red. Kazimierz Michalewski, 538–550. Łódź: Wydawnictwo Uniwersytetu Łódzkiego, 2007.
  3. Olma, Marceli. Listy emigracyjne Józefa Ignacego Kraszewskiego do Władysława Chodźkiewicza. Analiza pragmalingwistyczna. Kraków: Wydawnictwo Naukowe Akademii Pedagogicznej, 2006.
  4. Prus, Bolesław. Pisma wszystkie. Korespondencja. T. 2: Listy do Bolesława Prusa. Oprac. Jacek Nowak. Wstęp Jacek Nowak. Warszawa–Lublin: Towarzystwo Literackie im. Adama Mickiewicza, Wydawnictwo Episteme, 2017.
  5. Skwarczyńska, Stefania. Pomiędzy historią a teorią literatury. Warszawa: Instytut Wydawniczy PAX, 1975.
  6. Skwarczyńska, Stefania. Teoria listu. Na podstawie lwowskiego pierwodruku opracowali Elżbieta Feliksiak i Mariusz Leś. Białystok: Wydawnictwo Uniwersytetu w Białymstoku, 2006.
  7. Tokarzówna, Krystyna, Stanisław Fita, oprac., Zygmunt Szweykowski, red. Bolesław Prus