Skip to content

Studia Językoznawcze

Studia Językoznawcze

synchroniczne i diachroniczne aspekty badań polszczyzny

Previously: Studia Językoznawcze : synchroniczne i diachroniczne aspekty badań polszczyzny

t. 12, 2013
OpenAlex

For the whole journal, according to OpenAlex.

Citations
205
Publications
247
H-index
5
I10-index
3
Mean citedness (2 years)
0.03
Citations received by year
Journal citation chart. Exact values are available in the table below. 2017: 2 2018: 4 2019: 8 2020: 11 2021: 9 2022: 17 2023: 30 2024: 85 2025: 20 2026: 8 2017 2026
Show data table
Citations received by year
YearPublicationsCitations
2017192
2018254
2019188
20202311
2021199
20221117
2023830
20241485
20252520
2026268

Data retrieved:

What do these numbers mean?

Publications and citations cover records linked to this journal in OpenAlex. H-index is the largest number h of publications with at least h citations each. I10-index counts publications cited at least 10 times. The chart shows citations received in each year; the current year is incomplete. Coverage may differ from WNUS and other services.

The 2-year mean is an OpenAlex metric. It is not the Clarivate Journal Impact Factor.

View in OpenAlex (new tab)
Google Scholar

Obce nazwy winorośli występujące w poradniku Piotra Krescencjusza (1571)


(Foreign names of grapevine from Piotr Crescentius’ Guide (1571))
Cite

The full text is available

Abstract

The subject of the article are foreign names of grapevine from the second edition of the Polish version of Crescentius’ guide (1571) which were adopted by the Polish language. The material analyzed embraces 41 names, none of which appears in other texts. The aim of the work is to examine the appearance of foreign words in the Polish language and their possible incorporation into Polish. More than half of the words (58,5%) were taken from the Latin text with no alterations; the remaining words were submitted to adaptation, which was not always consistent. Only two words underwent the phonetic and infl ectional assimilation (labruszki, arbusta), but only labruszki became common in this meaning in the 16th century Polish language. In the Old Polish language and in later periods there appeared the word muszkatela, which was submitted to communization. The names analyzed here are not common in Polish, which is probably due to their originality and their highly specifi c narrow meaning.
Preview PDF

Open PDF