Acta Biologica

Previously: Zeszyty Naukowe Uniwersytetu Szczecińskiego. Acta Biologica


ISSN: 2450-8330     eISSN: 2353-3013    OAI    DOI: 10.18276/ab.2016.23-10
CC BY-SA   Open Access   DOAJ

Issue archive / No. 23
The use of molecular techniques in the taxonomy of water mites (Hydrachnidia, Acari)

Authors: Robert Stryjecki
Department of Zoology, Animal Ecology and Wildlife Management, University of Life Sciences in Lublin, Akademicka 13, 20-950 Lublin, Poland

Aleksandra Bańkowska
Department of Invertebrate Zoology and Limnology, Institute for Research on Biodiversity, Faculty of Biology, University of Szczecin, Wąska 13, 71-415 Szczecin, Poland

Magdalena Gryzińska
Department of Biological Basis of Animal Production, University of Life Sciences in Lublin, Akademicka 13, 20-950 Lublin, Poland

Ewa Sarnacka
Department of Invertebrate Zoology and Limnology, Institute for Research on Biodiversity, Faculty of Biology, University of Szczecin, Wąska 13, 71-415 Szczecin, Poland;

Magdalena Rutkowska
Department of Biochemistry, Faculty of Biology, University of Szczecin, Felczaka 3a, 71-412 Szczecin, Poland.

Andrzej Zawal
Department of Invertebrate Zoology and Limnology, Institute for Research on Biodiversity, Faculty of Biology, University of Szczecin, Wąska 13, 71-415 Szczecin, Poland;
Keywords: Molecular analysis DNA barcoding systematic revisions taxonomic identification
Whole issue publication date:2016
Page range:10 (117-126)
Cited-by (Crossref) ?:

Abstract

The Hydrachnidia (water mites) are a robust component of aquatic communities in terms of both abundance and species richness. They have colonized all types of freshwater habitats and are highly diversified in both lotic and lentic habitats. Over 6,000 species of Hydrachnidia have been described worldwide, representing eight superfamilies, 57 families, 81 subfamilies and more than 420 genera. Water mite systematics is continually subject to change and various modifications. Performing systematic revisions can lead to numerous misunderstandings and difficulties in comparing research results, as the same species can have different systematic names in different publications. The development of molecular biology techniques has popularized the use of genomic traits in taxonomic identification. Among various markers used to identify species, the most important is the gene encoding cytochrome c oxidase I (COI). Species identification based on this gene is known as ‘DNA barcoding’. The use of DNA barcoding was a breakthrough in molecular methods of species identification and has dominated research on invertebrates. It has become possible to identify not only new species, but also species that are difficult to distinguish using traditional methods. Water mites are organisms on which molecular analysis is still rarely performed, as compared to other groups of invertebrates. Fortunately, recent years have seen increasing use of molecular techniques to clarify the intricacies of Hydrachnidia taxonomy. Using DNA markers in the taxonomy of water mites enables definitive resolution of ambiguities in the case of numerous questionable taxa, which is of great importance in all other types of research on these organisms.
Download file

Article file

Bibliography

1.Alberti G. 2006. On some fundamental characteristics in acarine morphology. Atti della Accademia Nazionale Italiana di Entomologia. Rendiconti, 53: 315–360.
2.Besseling A.J. 1942. Nederlandsche Hydrachnidae. Genus Hygrobates. Entomol. Ber., 11 (243): 2–6.
3.Biesiadka E. 1977. Sur la position systématique de Piona coccinea (Koch, 1836) et Piona stjördalensis (Thor, 1897). Bull. Acad. Sci. Pol., Ser. Sci Biol. Cl. II, 24: 735–740.
4.Biesiadka E. 2008. Water Mites (Hydrachnidia). In: Fauna of Poland – characteristics and check-list of species, W. Bogdanowicz, E. Chudzicka, I. Pilipiuk, E. Skibińska (eds). Muzeum i Instytut Zoologii PAN, Warszawa, pp. 149–219.
5.Böttger K., Ullrich F. 1974. Wassermilben (Hydrachnellae, Acari) der Eider, Faunistische und biologischökologische Angaben. Faun.-ökol. Mitt., 4: 419–436.
6.Cook D.R. 1974. Water mite genera and subgenera. Mem. Am. Entomol. Inst., 21: 1–860.
7.Dabert J., Ehrnsberger R., Dabert M. 2008. Glaucalges tytonis sp. n. (Analgoidea, Xolalgidae) from the barn owl Tyto alba (Strigiformes, Tytonidae): compiling morphology with DNA barcode data for taxon descriptions in mites (Acari). Zootaxa, 1719: 41–52.
8.Dabert M., Proctor H., Dabert J. 2016. Higher-level molecular phylogeny of the water mites (Acariformes: Prostigmata: Parasitengonina: Hydrachnidiae). Molecular Phylogenetics and Evolution, 101: 75–90.
9.Dabert M., Witaliński W., Kazmierski A., Olszanowski Z., Dabert J. 2010. Molecular phylogeny of acariform mites (Acari, Arachnida): Strong conflict between phylogenetic signal and long-branch attraction artifacts. Mol. Phylogen. Evol., 56: 222–241.
10.Davids C., Di Sabatino A., Gerecke R., Gledhill T., Smit H., Van der Hammen H. 2007. Acari: Hydrachnidia I. In: Süßwasserfauna von Mitteleuropa, R. Gerecke (ed.), Elsevier GmbN, Spektrum Akademischer Verlag, München, pp. 241–376.
11.Davids C., Kouwets F.A.C. 1987. The characteristics of some water mite species of the genus Piona (Acari, Hydrachnellae) with three new larval descriptions. Arch. Hydrobiol., 110 (1): 1–18.
12.Di Sabatino A., Gerecke R., Martin P. 2000. The biology and ecology of lotic water mites (Hydrachnidia). Freshwat. Biol., 44: 47–62.
13.Di Sabatino A., Smit H., Gerecke R., Goldschmidt T., Matsumoto N., Cicolani B. 2008. Global diversity of water mites (Acari, Hydrachnidia; Arachnida) in freshwater. Hydrobiologia, 595: 303–315.
14.Edwards D.D., Deatherage D.E., Ernsting B.R. 2004. Random amplified polymorphic DNA analysis of kinship within host-associated populations of the symbiotic water mite Unionicola foili (Acari: Unionicolidae). Exp. Appl. Acarol., 34: 67–77.
15.Gerecke R. 2003. Water mites of the genus Atractides Koch, 1837 (Acari: Parasitengona: Hygrobatidae) in the western Palaearctic region: a revision. Zool. J. Lin. Soc-Lon, 138 (2–3): 141–378.
16.Gerecke R. 2009. Revisional studies on the European species of the water mite genus Lebertia Neumann, 1880 (Acari: Hydrachnidia, Lebertiidae). Abh. Senckengberh Ges. Naturforsch., 566: 1–144.
17.Gerecke R. 2011. Fauna Europaea: Pionidae, Unionicolidae. In: Fauna Europaea: Acari, W. Magowski (ed), Fauna Europaea version 2.4. Available at: http://www.faunaeur.org/.
18.Gerecke R., Gledhill T., Pešić V., Smit H. 2016. Chelicerata: Acari III. In: Süßwasserfauna von Mitteleuropa, R. Gerecke (ed.), Bd. 7/2–3, pp. 1–429.
19.Goldschmidt T. 2002. The biodiversity of Neotropical water mites. In: Acarid Phylogeny and Evolution. Adaptations in mites and ticks, F. Bernini, R. Nannelli, G. Nuzzaci, F. de Lillo (eds.), Springer Science+ Busines Media, Dordrecht, pp. 91–99.
20.Harvey M.S. 1998. The Australian Water Mites. A Guide to Families and Genera. Monographs on Invertebrate Taxonomy, 5: 1–150.
21.Hebert P.D.N., Cywinska A., Ball S.L, deWaard J.R. 2003. Biological identifications through DNA barcodes. Proc. R. Soc. Lond. B, 270: 313–321.
22.Lundblad O. 1962. Die Hydracarinen Schwedens II. Arkiv för Zoologi, 14: 1–635.
23.Mahdieh A., Hinomoto N., Saboori A, Javan-Nikkhah M. 2012. Genetic diversity in mitochondrial cytochrome coxidase subunit I sequences of the water mite Hygrobates fluviatilis (Acari: Hydrachnidia: Hygrobatidae). Int. J. Acarol., 38 (2): 96–100.
24.Martin P., Davids C. 2002. Life history strategies of Hygrobates nigromaculatus, a widespread Palaearctic water mite (Acari, Hydrachnidia, Hygrobatidae). In: Acarid Phylogeny and Evolution. Adaptations in mites and ticks. F. Bernini, R. Nannelli, G. Nuzzaci, F. de Lillo (eds.). Springer Science + Busines Media, Dordrecht, pp. 101–110.
25.Martin P., Dabert M., Dabert J. 2010. Molecular evidence for species separation in the water mite Hygrobates nigromaculatus Lebert, 1879 (Acari, Hydrachnidia): evolutionary consequences of the loss of larval parasitism. Aquat. Sci., 72: 347–360.
26.Martin P., Koester M., Schynawa L., Gergs R. 2015. First detection of prey DNA in Hygrobates fluviatilis (Hydrachnidia, Acari): a new approach for determining predator-prey relationships in water mites. Exp. Appl. Acarol., 67 (3): 373–80.
27.Mayr E. 1969. Principles of systematic zoology. McGraw-Hill, New York, p. 428.
28.Prasad V., Cook D.R. 1972. The Taxonomy of water mite larvae. Mem. Amer. Ent. Inst., 18: 1–326.
29.Sites J.W., Marshall J.C. 2003. Delimiting species: a renaissance issue in systematic biology. Trends Ecol. Evol., 18: 462–470.
30.Sites J.W., Marshall J.C. 2004. Operational criteria for delimiting species. Annu. Rev. Ecol. Evol. Syst., 35: 199–227.
31.Smit H. 2009. European Water Mite Research. European Water Mite Fauna (new Entries), A Checklist of the Water Mites Inhabiting European Inland Waters. Available at: http://www.watermite.org/.
32.Smit H., Van der Hammen H. 2000. Atlas van de Nederlandse watermijten. Nederlandse Faunistische Mededelingen, 13: 1–272.
33.Smit H., Gerecke R. 2010. A checklist of the water mites of France (Acari: Hydrachnidia). Acarologia, 50 (1): 21–91.
34.Smit H., Gerecke R., Pešić V., Gledhill T. 2015. On the taxonomic state of water mite taxa (Acari: Hydrachnidia) described from the Palaearctic, part 3, Hygrobatoidea and Arrenuroidea with new faunistic data. Zootaxa, 3981 (4): 542–552.
35.Smith I.M., Cook D.R., Smith B.P. 2001. Water mites (Hydrachnida) and other arachnids. In: Ecology and Classification of North American Freshwater Invertebrates (2nd ed.), J.H. Thorp, A.P. Covich (eds.). Academic Press, San Diego, California, pp. 51–659.
36.Sokolow I. 1926. Neue Hydracarien aus Russisch-Karelien. Russ. Entomol. Obozr., 3–4: 165–179.
37.Stålstedt J., Bergsten J., Ronquist F. 2013. “Forms” of water mites (Acari: Hydrachnidia): intraspecific variation or valid species? Ecol. Evol., 3 (10): 3415–3435.
38.Tuzovskij P.V. 1987. Morphology and postembryonal development of water mites. Nauka, Moscow, pp. 1–176.
39.Ullrich F. 1976. Biologisch-ökologische Studien an rheophilen Wassermilben (Hydrachnellae, Acari), unterbesonderer Berücksichrigung von Sperchon setiger (Thor 1898). PhD. thesis, Univ. of Kiel, pp. 1–241.
40.Van Hezewijk M.J., Davids C. 1985. The larvae of three water mite species of the genus Hygrobates and their development (Acari, Hydrachnellae). B Zool. Mus. Univ. Amsterdam, 10: 97–105.
41.Viets K. 1956. Die Milben des Süßwassers und des Meeres. Hydrachnellae et Halacaridae (Acari). II, III. Teil: Katalog und Nomenklator. Gustav Fischer-Verlag, Jena, pp. 1–870.
42.Viets K.O. 1982. Die Milben des Süßwassers (Hydrachnellae und Halacaridae [part.], Acari). 1. Bibliographie. Sonderbände Des Naturwissenschaftlichen Vereins in Hamburg, 6, pp. 1–116.
43.Viets K.O. 1987. Die Milben des Süßwassers (Hydrachnellae und Halacaridae [part.], Acari). 2. Katalog. Sonderbände Des Naturwissenschaftlichen Vereins in Hamburg, 8, pp. 1–1012.
44.Wainstein, B.A. 1980. Opredelitel lichinok vodjanych kleshchei. Inst. Biol. Vnutrenn. Vod., Nauka, pp. 1–238.
45.Wheeler Q.D., Raven P.H., Wilson E.O. 2004. Taxonomy: impediment or expedient? Science, 303: 285.
46.Wheeler Q.D., Valdecasas A.G. 2007. Taxonomy: Myths and Misconceptions. Anales Jard. Bot. Madrid, 64 (2): 237–241.
47.Wilson E.O. 2004. Taxonomy as a fundamental discipline. Phil. Trans. R. Soc. Lond. B, 359, 739.
48.Witte H. 1991. The phylogenetic relationships within the Parasitengona. In: Modern Acarology 2. F. Dusbabek, V. Bukwa (eds.). Academia Prague and SPB publ. The Hague, pp. 171–182.