Analiza i Egzystencja

ISSN: 1734-9923     eISSN: 2300-7621    OAI    DOI: 10.18276/aie.2022.57-02
CC BY-SA   Open Access   DOAJ  ERIH PLUS  DOAJ

Issue archive / 57 (2022)
Czy istnieje percepcja nieuwarunkowana? Wittgenstein a Bohm
(Is there unconditional perception? Wittgenstein and Bohm)

Authors: Katarzyna Gurczyńska-Sady ORCID
Uniwersytet Pedagogiczny im. KEN w Krakowie
Keywords: Wittgenstein Bohm unconditional perception seeing as thought proprioception
Whole issue publication date:2022
Page range:24 (25-48)
Cited-by (Crossref) ?:

Abstract

Does it exist an unconditional perception? Wittgenstein and Bohm The article deals with the issue of perception. In it I present Wittgenstein’s concept of “seeing as” and Bohm’s concept of thinking as a reflex. By pointing to the similarities and differences in their views, I am trying to pose the question of what makes our perception conditioned. Having assessed this fact, I then pose a question about the possibility of unconditioned perception. Thus, I will try to answer two questions: are there reasons why we should free ourselves from this type of perception (?), and whether and how it is possible at all (?).
Download file

Article file

Bibliography

1.Bargh, John A., and Tanya L. Chartrand. (1999). „The unbearable automaticity of being” w: American Psychologist, nr 54/7, (s. 462–479).
2.Barry, D.K. (1996), Forms of Life and Following Rules. A Wittgenstein Defence of Relativism, Leiden: E.J.Brill.
3.Baz, A. (2000), „What’s the Point of Seeing Aspects” w: Philosophical Investigations 23, (s. 97-121).
4.Bohm, D. (1980), Wholeness and the Implicate Order, New York: Routledge. Wyd. pol. Ukryty porządek, Warszawa: Pusty Obłok.
5.Bohm, D., Hiley, B. J., (1993), The Undivided Universe: An Ontological Interpretation of Quantum Theory, Routledge.
6.Bohm, D., Krishnamurti, J. (1985) The Ending of Time, Londyn: Gollancz. Wyd. pol. Wolność od czasu, tłumacz nieznany, Wrocław: Thesaurus.
7.Bohm, D., (1992), Thought as a System, New York: Routledge. Hacker, P.M., (1972) Inside and Illusion, Oxford: Clarendon Press, (s.199-214).
8.Mullhall S., (1990), On Being in the World. Wittgenstein and Heidegger on Seeing Aspects, London: Routledge.
9.Northon A., Smith Ch. (2020), „Towards the Source of the Thought: Insight from David Bohm on a Sustainable Future” w: The Journal of New Paradigm Research, 76/2020, (s. 153-166).
10.Scholz W., (2010), The phenomenology of Movement: Action, Proproception and Embodied Knowledge, University of Iowa Research on line, DOI: 10.17077/etd.s22md1wn.
11.Tillmanns M. (2019), The Application of Proprioception of Thinking to Doing Philosophy with Children w: Socium i vlast , nr 4/78, (s. 62—68).
12.Wittgenstein, L., (1958), Dociekania filozoficzne, Warszawa: PWN.
13.Wittgenstein, L., (1999), Kartki, Warszawa: Wydawnictwo KR.
14.Wittgenstein L., (1980), Remarks on the Philosophy of Psychology, t. I, Oxford: Basil Blackwell.