Analiza i Egzystencja

ISSN: 1734-9923     eISSN: 2300-7621    OAI    DOI: 10.18276/aie.2024.68-06
CC BY-SA   Open Access   DOAJ  ERIH PLUS  DOAJ

Issue archive / 68 (2024)
O nowych trendach w filozofii analitycznej na przykładzie metaetyki, etyki i filozofii polityki oraz o filozofowaniu w dobie sztucznej inteligencji
(About new trends in analytical philosophy in metaethics, ethics, and political philosophy, and about philosophizing in the era of artificial intelligence)

Authors: Artur Szutta ORCID
Uniwersytet Gdański
Keywords: analytical philosophy metaethics ethics political philosophy metaethical realism intuitionism virtue ethics artificial intelligence democracy meritocracy.
Whole issue publication date:2024
Page range:20 (81-100)
Cited-by (Crossref) ?:

Abstract

The article is devoted to selected new trends in metaethics, ethics, political philosophy, and the practice of philosophy with the use of artificial intelligence. It consists of five parts. In the first part, I analyze the meaning of the question about new trends in analytical philosophy. In the second part, I present the latest trends in metaethics. In the third part, I briefly characterize the ethics of artificial intelligence. The fourth part, devoted to political philosophy, includes a presentation of the latest publications on meritocracy. The article concludes with considerations about practising philosophy in the age of artificial intelligence
Download file

Article file

Bibliography

1.Adams, R. M. (1979). Divine command metaethics modified again. The Journal of Religious Ethics, 66-79.
2.Adams, R. M. (2002). Finite and infinite goods: A framework for ethics. Framework for Ethics.
3.Annas, J. (2011). Intelligent virtue. Oxford University Press.
4.Audi R., (1997). Moral Knowledge and Ethical Character, New York: Oxford University Press.
5.Audi, R. (2015). Intuition and Its Place in Ethics. Journal of the American Philosophical Association, 1, 57–77
6.Autor, D. (2015). Why Are There Still So Many Jobs? The History and Future of Workplace Automation. Journal of Economic Perspectives, 29(3), 3-30.
7.Ayer, A.J. (1936). Language, Truth, and Logic, London: Gollancz 1936.
8.Bai, T. (2020). Against Political Equality: The Confucian Case, New Jersey: Princeton University Press.
9.Barry, B. (1965). Political Argument, London: Routledge.
10.Bell, Daniel A. (2015). The China Model: Political Meritocracy and the Limits of Democracy, Princeton: Princeton University Press.
11.Bender, S., Nissenbaum, H. (Eds.), (2014). Privacy, Big Data, and the Public Good: Frameworks for Engagement (pp. 44-75). Cambridge University Press
12.Bengson, J., Cuneo, T., & Shafer‐Landau, R. (2020). Trusting moral intuitions. Noûs, 54(4), 956-984.
13.Benn, S.I., Peters, R.S. (1959). Social Principles and Democratic State, London: Allen & Unwin
14.Blackburn, S. (1993). Essays in quasi-realism. Oxford University Press.
15.Bloomfield, P., & Copp, D. (Eds.). (2023). The Oxford Handbook of Moral Realism. Oxford University Press.
16.Boddington, P. (2023). AI ethics: a textbook. Springer Nature.
17.Bolender, J. (2001). A Two-Tiered Cognitive Architecture for Mental Reasoning, „Biology and Philosophy” 2001, vol. 16, s. 339–356
18.Bostrom, N. (2014). Superintelligence: Paths, Dangers, Strategies. Oxford University Press.
19.Brady, M. S. (2011). New waves in metaethics. Palgrave.
20.Bregman, R. (2017). Utopia for Realists: How We Can Build the Ideal World. Little, Brown and Company.
21.Brennan, J. (2016), Against Democracy, Princeton: Princeton University Press.
22.Brennan, J., Landemore, H. (2022). Debating Democracy. Do We Need More or Less? Oxford University Press.
23.Brink, D. O. (1989). Moral realism and the foundations of ethics. Cambridge University Press.
24.Bryson, J. J. (2010). Robots Should Be Slaves. In Y. Wilks (Ed.), Close Engagements with Artificial Companions: Key Social, Psychological, Ethical and Design Issues. John Benjamins Publishing Company, 63-74.
25.Chalmers, D. J. (2010). The Singularity: A Philosophical Analysis. Journal of Consciousness Studies, 17(9-10), 7-65.
26.Coeckelbergh, M. (2020). AI ethics. MIT Press.
27.Collier, J., Stingl, M. (2020), Evolutionary Moral Realism, Routledge.
28.Cuneo, T. (2011). The Myth of Moral Fictionalism, w: Brady, New Waves in Metaethics
29.Damasio A. (2002). Błąd Kartezjusza. Emocje, rozum i ludzki mózg,tłum. M. Karpiński, Poznań: Rebis.
30.De Caro M., Vaccarezza M. (Eds). (2021). Practical Wisdom: Philosophical and Psychological Perspectives. Routledge.
31.DePaul, M. R. (1993). Balance and Refinement: Beyond Coherence Methods of Moral Inquiry, Florence, KY: Routledge
32.DePaul, M. R., & Ramsey, W. M. (Eds.). (1998). Rethinking intuition: The psychology of intuition and its role in philosophical inquiry. Rowman & Littlefield.
33.Doris, J. M. (2002). Lack of character: Personality and moral behavior. Cambridge University Press.
34.Enoch, D. (2011). Taking morality seriously: A defense of robust realism. Oxford University Press, USA.
35.Eubanks, V. (2018). Automating Inequality: How High-Tech Tools Profile, Police, and Punish the Poor. St. Martin's Press.
36.Evans, C. S. (2013). God and moral obligation. Oxford University Press.
37.Floridi, L. (2023). The Ethics of Artificial Intelligence: Principles, Challenges, and Opportunities. Oxford University Press.
38.Floridi, L., & Sanders, J. W. (2004). On the Morality of Artificial Agents. Minds and Machines, 14(3), 349-379.
39.Ford, M. (2015). Rise of the Robots: Technology and the Threat of a Jobless Future. Basic Books.
40.Fukuyama, F. (1996). Koniec historii, tłum. T. Biedroń, Poznań: Zysk i S-ka Wydwanictwo.
41.Geach, P. T. Ascriptivism. Philosophical Review 69 (1960): 221–5.
42.Geach, P. T. Assertion. Philosophical Review 74 (1965): 449–65.
43.Gibbard, A. (1990). Wise choices, apt feelings: A theory of normative judgment. Harvard University Press.
44.Goodin, E.E., Pettit, P., red., (1998). Przewodnik po współczesnej filozofii politycznej, tłum. C. Cieśliński i M. Poręba, Książka i Wiedza.
45.Gunkel, D. J. (2018). Robot Rights. MIT Press.
46.Hare R.M. (1952). The Language of Morals. Clarendon Press.
47.Hare, J. E. (2015). God's command. Oxford University Press.
48.Harman, G. (2000, January). The nonexistence of character traits. In Proceedings of the Aristotelian Society (Vol. 100, pp. 223-226). The Aristotelian Society, Wiley.
49.Hart, L.H.A. (1961) The Concept of Law, Oxford University Press.
50.Hinton, M., & Wagemans, J. H. (2023). How persuasive is AI-generated argumentation? An analysis of the quality of an argumentative text produced by the GPT-3 AI text generator. Argument & Computation, (Preprint), 1-16.
51.Huemer, M. (2005). Ethical Intuitionism, Palgrave.
52.Hussain, N.J. (2004). The Return of Moral Fictionalism, Philosophical Perspectives 18, 149-187.
53.Jaskowska, B. (2023). Książki pisane przez sztuczną inteligencję. Perspektywy Kultury, 42(3), 39-64.
54.Joyce, J. (2001). The Myth of Morality, Cambridge University Press.
55.Joyce, J. (2017). Fictionalism in Metaethics, in: D. Plunkett & T. McPherson (eds.), Routledge Handbook of Metaethics, Routledge, 72-86.
56.Joyce, J. (2020). Fictionalism: Morality and Metaphor, in B. Armour-Garb & F. Kroon (eds.), Fictionalism in Philosophy, Oxford University Press, 103-121.
57.Kalderon, M. E. (2005). Moral fictionalism. Oxford University Press, USA.
58.Kahneman D. (2011). Pułapki myślenia. O myśleniu szybkim i wolnym, tłum. P. Szymczak, Poznań: Media Rodzina.
59.Kamtekar, R. (2004). Situationism and virtue ethics on the content of our character. Ethics, 114(3), 458-491.
60.Kaspar, D. (2012). Intuitionism. Bloomsbury.
61.Kramer, M. H. (2009). Moral realism as a moral doctrine. John Wiley & Sons.
62.Kristjánsson, K., & Fowers, B. (2023). Phronesis: Retrieving practical wisdom in psychology, philosophy, and education.
63.Krzanowski, R. (2022). GPT-3 and Philosophy. Preliminary Tests Results, hal-03640357.
64.Kulp, C. B. (2017). Knowing Moral Truth: A Theory of Metaethics and Moral Knowledge. Lexington Books.
65.Kulp, Christopher B. (2019). Moral Properties. Metaphysics of Morality, 141-188.
66.Laslett, P. (1956). Philosophy Politics and Society, Seria I, Oxford: Blackwell.
67.Liao, S. M. (Ed.). (2020). Ethics of artificial intelligence. Oxford University Press.
68.Loreggia, A., Mattei, N., Rossi, F., & Venable, K. B. (2020). Modelling and reasoning with preferences and ethical priorities in Liao (ed.), AI systems. Ethics of Artificial Intelligence, 127-150.
69.Mackie J. (1977). Ethics: Inventing Right and Wrong. Penguin Books.
70.Michaux, C. (2023). Can Chat GPT Be Considered an Author? I Met with Chat GPT and Asked Some Questions About Philosophy of Art and Philosophy of Mind. Available at SSRN 4439607.
71.Miller, A. (2013). Contemporary metaethics: an introduction. Second Edition. Polity Press.
72.Nozick, R. (1974). Anarchy, state, and utopia. Blackwell Publishing.
73.O'Neil, C. (2016). Weapons of Math Destruction: How Big Data Increases Inequality and Threatens Democracy. Crown Publishing Group.
74.Pasquale, F. (2015). The black box society: The secret algorithms that control money and information. Harvard University Press.
75.Pettit, P. (1998). Filozofia analityczna, w: Goodin, E. i Pettit, P., red. (1998).
76.Quinn, P. L. (1978). Divine Command Ethics and Moral Requirements, Clarendon Press.
77.Railton, P. (1986). Moral Realism, The Philosophical Review, vol. 95, no 2, 163-207.
78.Ranciere, J. (2017). Hatred of Democracy, trans. Steve Corcoran, London: Verso, 2017.
79.Roberts, R. (2013). Emotions in the Moral Life, Cambridge University Press.
80.Roeser, S. (2011). Moral Emotions and Intuitions, Palgrave Macmillan.
81.Russell, D. C. (2009). Practical intelligence and the virtues. Oxford University Press.
82.Russell, S. (2019). Human Compatible: Artificial Intelligence and the Problem of Control. Viking.
83.Sautoy du Marcus (2020), Kod kreatywności. Sztuka i innowacja w epoce sztucznej inteligencji, tłum. T. Chawziuk, Copernicus Center Press.
84.Sayre-McCord, G. (Ed). (1988). Essays on Moral Realism, Cornell University Press
85.Scanlon, T. (1982). Contractualism and Utilitarianism, in: Sen, A., Williams, B., Utilitarianism and Beyond. Cambridge University Press, 103-129.
86.Schroeder, M. (2008). What is the Frege‐Geach problem?. Philosophy Compass, 3(4), 703-720.
87.Schwitzgebel, E., Schwitzgebel, D., & Strasser, A. (2023). Creating a large language model of a philosopher. arXiv preprint arXiv:2302.01339.
88.Searle, John. Meaning and Speech Acts. Philosophical Review 71 (1962): 423–32.
89.Shanahan, M. (2015). The Technological Singularity. The MIT Press.
90.Stevenson C.L. (1944). Ethics and Language. Yale University Press.
91.Susskind, R., & Susskind, D. (2015). The Future of the Professions: How Technology Will Transform the Work of Human Experts. Oxford University Press.
92.Szubka, T. (2009). Filozofia analityczna. Koncepcje, metody, ograniczenia. Wydawnictwo Uniwersytetu Wrocławskiego.
93.Szutta, A. (2018). Intuicje moralne: O poznaniu dobra i zła. Wydawnictwo Academicon.
94.Szutta, N. (2017). Czy istnieje coś, co zwiemy moralnym charakterem i cnotą? Wydawnictwo Academicon.
95.Tappolet, C. (2016). Emotions, Values, and Agency. Oxford University Press.
96.Tang, Y. (2023). Is Confucian Political Meritocracy a Viable Alternative to Democracy? A Critical Engagement with Tongdong Bai. The Journal of Value Inquiry (2023) 57:625–640.
97.Wallach, W., & Allen, C. (2009). Moral Machines: Teaching Robots Right from Wrong. Oxford University Press.
98.Weldon, T.D. (1953). The Vocabulary of Politics, Harmondsworth: Penguin Books.